coding
play

coding Xin Sheng Zhou Problem for Wireless Networks Traffic demand - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Cooperative networks and coding Xin Sheng Zhou Problem for Wireless Networks Traffic demand Main problem: Shared medium = Interference What we have done? Wireless throughput had doubled every 30 months over a period of 104 years,


  1. Cooperative networks and coding Xin Sheng Zhou

  2. Problem for Wireless Networks • Traffic demand • Main problem: Shared medium = Interference

  3. What we have done? • Wireless throughput had doubled every 30 months over a period of 104 years, or a million-fold increase since 1957 – 25-fold from wider spectrum – 1600-fold from reduced cell size – 5-fold from dividing the spectrum into smaller slices – 5-fold from better modulation scheme

  4. Why reduced cell size? • Assume received SNR unchanged at the edge of the cell • Reduced cell size means reduced transmitting power • SINR does not change = Capacity unchanged for single user • Network capacity increased because more users can be served • When power is reduced compared to the noise level, the capacity   for single user also reduced P    log 1    I N 5W 5W 40W 40W 5W 5W 5W 5W 5W 5W

  5. How can we deal with interference? • Do not care about other users and consider them as interference/noise – When we do not need that information, e.g. mobile user receives signals from other cells • Try to understand/decode other users message and cancel the interference – When we need both of them. E.g. Uplink at the base station from multiple users • If we do not need the interfering information, would it be benefit if we decode the interference first? Especially in cooperative networks

  6. Interference effect • Total rate • Average rate per sender

  7. FDMA

  8. TDMA • Naïve TDMA • Modification – If user uses half time, it can uses double power and still maintain the average power – Same capacity region as FDMA

  9. Successive decoding • Decode user 2 and consider user 1 as noise • Subtract signal from user 2 and decode user 1

  10. CDMA

  11. CDMA (2)

  12. Heterogeneous networks • To improve network capacity – Existing solution: Cell splitting – New approach: Heterogeneous networks • Low power nodes are overlaid within a macro network with the same frequency

  13. Heterogeneous networks • Heterogeneous networks – Interference management • Power control • Time-frequency resource partitioning and allocation – DL: OFDM, UL: SC-FDMA – Cell range expansion • Cell handover biasing for load balancing • Adaptive resource partitioning among different node power classes – Interference cancellation receiver

  14. Base station Relay f D f U Relay node • Relay node f D f U – In-band: backhaul link Mobile user and access link use the same frequency R R (UL and DL still use different frequency) – Half duplex: time DL division on backhaul link and access link M – Full duplex: Spatial B M B separation, or R R interference cancellation UL M B M B

  15. Half-duplex 2-phase 2-way RC n 3 n 2 n 1 R R 1 2 t • Two source nodes communicate with each other with the help of the relay node • No direct link between two source nodes • Example: Satellite communications • Modeled as two phases

  16. Half-duplex 2-phase 2-way RC Achievable rate region DMC AWGN          P P min{ ( ; | ), ( , )}   R I X Y X I X Y       1 3  min , R C C     1 1 3 2 3 2 1      N N     3 2 min{ ( ; | ), ( , )} R I X Y X I X Y 2 2 3 1 3 1       P P            2 3  ( , ; ) min , R R I X X Y R C   C   2 1 2 1 2 3      N N  3 1    P P      1 2 R R C   1 2   N 3 T. Oechtering, C. Schnurr, I. Bjelakovic, and H. Boche, “Achievable rate region of a two phase bidirectional relay channel," in Proc. 41st Annu. Conf. Information Sciences Systems, Mar. 2007, pp. 408-413.

  17. LDPC codes factor graph for MAC • Multiple access channels    Y X X Z 3 1 2

  18. Half-duplex 3-phase 2-way RC n 3 n 2 n 1 R R 1 2 t • Direct link between two sources • Example: Cellular networks • Modeled as three phases

  19. Half-duplex 3-phase 2-way RC Achievable rate region DMC AWGN         P P P                 min{ ( ; ), ( ; ) ( ; )} R I X Y I X Y I X Y  1 3 1  min , R C C C       1 1 3 3 2 1 2 1        N N N       3 2 2 min{ ( ; ), ( ; ) ( ; )} R I X Y I X Y I X Y 2 2 3 3 1 2 1         P P P             3  2 2 min , R C C C       2        N N N  3 1 1

  20. Joint encoding for 2-way RC • Joint encoding at the relay node • Generate additional check bits Generated by node 3 Received from node 1 Received from node 2

  21. Joint decoding for 3-phase 2-way RC • Decoding based on three parts – Signal received from the source node – Signal received from the relay node – Its own message as side Joint decoding at node 1 information Message 1 Message 2 Additional check bits

  22. Simulation results for 3-phase 2-way RC • (1920,640) LDPC codes • Signal-to-noise ratios are the same in two receiving phases • E b : Energy per bit from the source node

  23. Thank you! Any questions and comments are welcome!

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend