co conti tinuous de delivery y with th co containers th
play

Co Conti tinuous De Delivery y with th Co Containers: Th The - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Co Conti tinuous De Delivery y with th Co Containers: Th The Good, the Bad, and the Ug Ugly ly Daniel Bryant @danielbryantuk Containers: Expectations versus reality DevOps 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk @danielbryantuk


  1. Co Conti tinuous De Delivery y with th Co Containers: Th The Good, the Bad, and the Ug Ugly ly Daniel Bryant @danielbryantuk

  2. Containers: Expectations versus reality “DevOps” 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  3. @danielbryantuk • Independent Technical Consultant, Product Architect at Datawire • Architecture, DevOps, Java, microservices, cloud, containers • Continuous Delivery (CI/CD) advocate • Leading change through technology and teams 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  4. Setting the scene… bit.ly/2jWDSF7 • Continuous delivery is a large topic • No business focus today (value stream etc) • PaaS and Serverless are super interesting… • But I’m assuming you’re all-in on containers • Focusing today on the process and tooling • No live coding today • Mini-book contains more details (thanks nginx!) 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  5. TL;DR – Containers and CD • Container image becomes the build pipeline ‘single binary’ • Adding metadata to containers images is vital, but challenging • Must validate container constraints on system quality attributes (NFRs) 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  6. Continuous Delivery 101 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  7. Continuous Delivery • Produce valuable and robust software in short cycles • Optimising for feedback and learning • Not (necessarily) Continuous Deployment 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  8. Velocity (with stability) is key to business success “Continuous delivery is achieved when stability and speed can satisfy business demand. Discontinuous delivery occurs when stability and speed are insufficient.” - Steve Smith (@SteveSmithCD) 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  9. Creation of a build pipeline is mandatory for continuous delivery 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  10. Feedback: - Was our initial hypothesis proven? - How can we improve business, architecture and ops? 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  11. Stability 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  12. 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  13. Speed 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  14. Feedback: - Was our initial hypothesis proven? - How can we improve business, architecture and ops? 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  15. The impact of containers on CD 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  16. Container technology (and CD) • OS-level virtualisation • cgroups, namespaces, rootfs • Share the OS kernel • Package and execute software • Container image == ‘single binary’ 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  17. 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  18. 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  19. Should I build my own container platform? Probably not (Unless you are Google, AWS or IBM) Whatever you decide… push it through a pipeline ASAP! 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  20. But what about microservices? 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  21. PATTERN Independent service deployment https://www.slideshare.net/dbryant_uk/deliveragile-2018-continuous- delivery-patterns-for-modern-architectures 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  22. Working Locally 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  23. 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  24. Make your dev environment like production • Develop locally or copy/code in container • Must build/test containers locally • Perform (at least) happy path tests • Use identical base images from production • With same configuration 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  25. Quick digression: Working remotely, locally… https://opencredo.com/working-locally-with-microservices/ https://www.telepresence.io/ 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  26. Make your dev environment like production • Develop locally or copy/code in container • Must build/test containers locally • Perform (at least) happy path tests • Use identical base images from production • With same configuration 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  27. Lesson learned: Dockerfile content is su super important • OS choice (distroless?) • Java • JDK vs JRE and Oracle vs OpenJDK? • Configuration • Golang • Statically compiled binary in scratch? • Build artifacts • Python • Exposing ports, user • Virtualenv? 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  28. Please talk to the sysadmin people: Their operational knowledge is invaluable 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  29. Different test and prod containers? • Create “test” version of container • Full OS (e.g. Ubuntu) • Test tools and data • Easy to see app/configuration drift • Use test sidecar containers instead http://blog.terranillius.com/post/docker_testing/ • ONTEST proposal by Alexi Ledenev 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  30. Docker multi-stage builds https://docs.docker.com/develop/develop-images/multistage-build/ https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/distroless 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  31. Building Artifacts 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  32. 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  33. Building images with Jenkins • My report covers this • Build as usual… • Build Docker Image • Cloudbees Docker Build and Publish Plugin • Push image to registry 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  34. Building in the Cluster? https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/kaniko https://www.infoq.com/news/2018/03/jenkins-x-kubernetes 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  35. Deployment https://blog.hasura.io/draft-vs-gitkube-vs-helm-vs-ksonnet-vs-metaparticle-vs-skaffold-f5aa9561f948 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  36. Building Artifacts: Metadata 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  37. Lesson learned: Metadata is valuable • Application metadata • Version / GIT SHA • Build metadata • Build date • Image name • Vendor • Quality metadata • QA control, signed binaries, ephemeral support • Security profiles (AppArmor), Security audited etc 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  38. Metadata – Beware of “latest” Docker Tag • Beware of the ‘latest’ Docker tag • “Latest” simply means • the last build/tag that ran without a specific tag/version specified • Ignore “latest” tag • Version your tags, every time • danielbryantuk/test:2.4.1 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  39. Metadata - Adding Labels at build time • Docker Labels • Add key/value data to image 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  40. Metadata - Adding Labels at build time • Microscaling Systems’ Makefile • Labelling automated builds on DockerHub (h/t Ross Fairbanks) • Create file ‘/hooks/build’ • label-schema.org • microbadger.com 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  41. Metadata - Adding Labels at runtime $ docker run -d -- label uk.co.danielbryant.lbname=frontdoor nginx • Can ’docker commit’, but creates new image • Not possible to update running container • Docker Proposal: Update labels #21721 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  42. External registry with metadata support 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  43. New Solution: Grafeas + Kritis https://github.com/grafeas/grafeas https://www.infoq.com/news/2018/05/grafeas-kritis-security 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  44. Grafeas Metadata “kinds” (Schema) 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  45. 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  46. Grafeas Metadata “kinds” (Schema) 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  47. 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  48. Quality Assurance 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  49. 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  50. Validating Container Structure https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/container-structure-test https://github.com/GoogleContainerTools/container-diff 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  51. Quality Assurance: Functional 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  52. Testing (in Production??) martinfowler.com/bliki/TestPyramid.html https://medium.com/@copyconstruct/testing-microservices-the-sane-way-9bb31d158c16 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  53. Component testing 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  54. Testing: Jenkins Pipeline (as code) 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  55. 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  56. Testing individual containers 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  57. Integration testing 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  58. Introducing Docker Compose 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  59. Quality Assurance: Nonfunctional 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  60. Testing NFRs in the build pipeline • Architecture • Performance and Load testing • Gatling / jmeter / Flood.io • Security testing • Findsecbugs / OWASP Dependency check • Bdd-security (OWASP ZAP) / Arachni • Gauntlt / Serverspec • Docker Bench for Security / CoreOS Clair 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  61. Architectural Visibility 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  62. Quick digression: Testing Architecture https://www.archunit.org/ 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  63. Performance/soak testing 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

  64. Mechanical sympathy: Docker and Java • Watch for JVM cgroup/taskset awareness (with JDK <= 8) • getAvailableProcessors() may incorrectly report the number of cpus in Docker (JDK-8140793) • Runtime.availableProcessors() ignores Linux taskset command (JDK-6515172) • Default fork/join thread pool sizes (and others) is based from host CPU count • Set container memory appropriately • JVM requirements = Heap size (Xmx) + Metaspace + JVM overhead • Account for native thread requirements e.g. thread stack size (Xss) • Entropy • Host entropy can soon be exhausted by crypto operations and /dev/random blocks • -Djava.security.egd=file:/dev/./urandom (notes on this) 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk 64

  65. Security Visibility: Basic Code Scanning 21/05/2018 @danielbryantuk

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend