Closing the Gap The County Infrastructure Deficit November 6, 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

closing the gap
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Closing the Gap The County Infrastructure Deficit November 6, 2019 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Closing the Gap The County Infrastructure Deficit November 6, 2019 Challenges Faced by Municipalities Aging critical infrastructure Deteriorating infrastructure condition due to environmental conditions Increased demand and


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Closing the Gap

The County Infrastructure Deficit

November 6, 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Challenges Faced by Municipalities

  • Aging critical infrastructure
  • Deteriorating infrastructure condition due to

environmental conditions

  • Increased demand and expectations for service by rate

payers

  • Tax levy supported funding falling behind the needs
  • Rising construction and operating costs
  • Low levels of growth within the County
  • Downloading costs from senior levels of government

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Council Approval – February 20, 2019

 2018 Asset Management Policy and Plan  Identified significant challenges to

sustaining its aging infrastructure assets.

Closing the Gap

$93M gap over next 10 years

Strategic direction is needed to plan for the future.

This proposed tax levy increase is not confirmed and does not close the gap. Currently

 For several years, a dedicated

infrastructure levy of 2.0% has been used.

Closing the Gap

 To close this gap several fiscal tools

can be considered.

 Reducing service, cost efficiencies,

grant funding, tax levy increases.

 Balance affordability and risk.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Needs versus Funding

5

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Available Fiscal Tools

  • Divesting
  • Revenue Base Increase
  • Spending Reduction
  • Debt Financing
  • Property Tax Levy Increase

6

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Perspective - Cost Effect on the Average Taxpayer

  • For each 1% tax levy increase this is equivalent to a $9 per

year increase to the average residential taxpayer in the County of Peterborough (75¢ per month).

  • Median assessed value of a single family residential property

in the County of Peterborough for 2019 taxation purposes is $257,750.

  • Statistics provided by Online Property Tax Analysis (OPTA) based on data

from Municipal Property Assessment Corporation (MPAC).

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Perspective – Risk Management

  • Potential risks that may be associated with County buildings include:

– danger to health and safety of occupants, – acceleration of component replacements (e.g. roofing), – catastrophic repairs & associated insurance premiums, – interruption or loss of operations, – deterioration of facilities to the point of loss of use and/or requirement for replacement.

  • Potential risks that may be associated with road and bridge

infrastructure include:

– ratepayer inconvenience, – reputational loss, – catastrophic failure of assets, – reduced public safety. – higher travel times between communities.

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Options for Dedicated Infrastructure Levy

1) Do Nothing – Infrastructure Deficit Expands 2) Reduce Infrastructure Deficit to 50% by 2028 3) Eliminate Infrastructure Deficit by 2028 4) Expedited Infrastructure Deficit Elimination by 2024

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Option 1 - Do Nothing Infrastructure Deficit Expands

  • Infrastructure deficit continues to grow

beyond $93M by 2028.

  • Service levels and infrastructure

condition deteriorates.

  • Risk increases – safety, asset, liability
  • No dedicated tax levy.
  • No direct financial effect on the

taxpayer.

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Option 2 - Reduce Infrastructure Deficit to 50% by 2028

  • Infrastructure deficit decreases to $42M

by 2028.

  • Service levels and infrastructure

condition deteriorates.

  • Risk increases – safety, asset, liability
  • Annual tax levy increase.
  • Monthly cost increase to tax payer in

2020.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Option 3 - Eliminate Infrastructure Deficit by 2028

  • 100% infrastructure deficit reduction by

2028.

  • Service levels and infrastructure

condition levels out.

  • Risk decreases – safety, asset, liability
  • Annual tax levy increase.
  • Monthly cost increase

to tax payer in 2020.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Eliminating the Infrastructure Deficit by 2028

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Option 4 - Expedited Infrastructure Deficit Elimination by 2024

14

  • 100% infrastructure deficit reduction

by 2024.

  • Service levels and infrastructure

condition improves.

  • Risk decreases – safety, asset, liability
  • Annual tax levy increase.
  • Monthly cost increase to tax payer in

2020.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Closing the Funding Gap

Option Dedicated Tax Levy Funding Gap Asset Condition Risks Do Nothing – Infrastructure Deficit Expands 0% $92.9M Declines Increase Reduce Infrastructure Deficit to 50% by 2028 2.25% $46.2M Declines Increase Eliminate Infrastructure Deficit by 2028 4.25%

  • $0.3M

Stabilize Decrease Expedited Infrastructure Deficit Elimination by 2024 5.56%

  • $0.1M

Stabilize Decrease

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Dedicated Levy and Effect

  • n Rate Payer in 2020

Option Dedicated Tax Levy % Tax Levy in 2020 Effect on Average Ratepayer Do Nothing – Infrastructure Deficit Expands 0%

  • Reduce Infrastructure Deficit to 50%

by 2028 2.25% $967,817 $20.25/year $1.69/month Eliminate Infrastructure Deficit by 2028 4.25% $1,845,099 $38.25/year $3.19/month Expedited Infrastructure Deficit Elimination by 2024 5.56% $2,413,824 $50/year $4.17/month

16

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Council Direction – November, 6 2019

 Strategy be adopted by Council to eliminate

the County’s existing $93M infrastructure funding gap by the end of 2028.

 Address significant challenges with County

infrastructure assets.

Recommendation to Close the Gap

Close $93M gap

  • ver next 10 yrs

Tax Levy increase 4.25% in each of the next 9 years

Additional $38.25 in 2020 or $3.19 per month for average County tax payer.

Proposed

 Dedicated infrastructure levy of 4.25%

starting in 2020.

 Include additional $1,845,099 funding in

2020 budget deliberations.

Closing the Gap

 Dedicated infrastructure levy of 4.25% in

each of the next 9 years.

 Balances affordability with the needs of

the community.

 Zero Gap. 17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Recommendation

  • Whereas, at the January 25, 2017, Special Council meeting on Strategic

Planning, County of Peterborough Council identified the need to implement a long term funding strategy for the purpose of addressing the significant infrastructure deficit of roads and bridges that will be experienced over the next 10-year period; and further

  • Whereas, at the February 21, 2019, Council meeting the County of

Peterborough Asset Management Plan and Policy was adopted and approved by Council, which demonstrates the scope and magnitude of the County’s $93M infrastructure deficit, and further;

  • Now therefore be it resolved that a strategy be adopted by Council to eliminate

the County’s existing infrastructure funding gap by the end of 2028, as outlined in the approved 2018 County Asset Management Plan; and further

  • That a dedicated levy increase of 4.25% be included in the 2020 budget for

County’s infrastructure capital program; and further

  • That an annual dedicated levy increase of 4.25% be adopted each and every

year to 2028, as part of County’s 10-year capital forecast, budget, and reserve fund planning horizon; and further

  • That a communication plan be developed for the dedicated infrastructure levy

as part of the 2020 budget deliberations.

18