Climate change adaptation and wildfire protection in Harrop - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

climate change adaptation and wildfire protection in
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Climate change adaptation and wildfire protection in Harrop - - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Climate change adaptation and wildfire protection in Harrop - Procter Public Meeting Harrop Hall June 26, 2019 Erik Leslie Forest Manager Harrop-Procter Community Co-op Climate models: simplified summary Over the next 30 to 50 years:


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Climate change adaptation and wildfire protection in Harrop - Procter

Public Meeting Harrop Hall June 26, 2019

Erik Leslie Forest Manager Harrop-Procter Community Co-op

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Climate models: simplified summary

Over the next 30 to 50 years:

 Fall/ winter/ spring 2 - 5 warmer and 10 - 25% wetter  Summers 3 - 7 warmer and up to 30% drier  ~5 to 10+ times more average annual area burned  Increased frequency and magnitude of extreme

precipitation events

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Harrop-Procter community priorities

Relatively consistent community values for 20 years

 Protect domestic water  Maintain/ enhance biodiversity  Create local jobs  Community wildfire protection (new priority since

2003)

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Overview of project workplan

1. Risk assessment 2. Operations strategy 3. Management Plan and AAC

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

etc

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Risk Assessment

Probability of:

 Fire  Drought

Consequence to:

 Homes  Water  Biodiversity  Timber

6

Objective: Prioritize areas for adaptive actions

  • Focus on next 20 to 40 years

RISK = Probability X Consequence

High Moderate Low Very_low High Moderate Low Very Low High Moderate Low

Fire Consequence Fire Probability

Fire Risk

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Fire probability

Fire probability = likelihood of high severity fire

7

High probability Moderate probability Low probability High fuel loads (from LiDAR) Moderate fuel loads Low fuel loads Dry site (per aSMR) Moderate site (per aSMR) Moist site (per aSMR) High percentage dead pine Slopes >50% Slopes 30 – 50% Slopes <30%

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Fuel density

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Absolute Soil Moisture

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15
slide-16
SLIDE 16
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Consequence mapping

Homes Water Biodiversity Timber

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Risk

High Moderate Low Very_low High Moderate Low Very Low High Moderate Low

Fire Consequence Fire Probability

Fire Risk

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Fire risk to water—coming

slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Add climate change

25

Average CMD ensemble all decades and scenarios ID2 Scenario Average of CMD ICH xw rcp45 433 ICH xw rcp85 462 ICH dw 1 rcp45 302 ICH dw 1 rcp85 330 ICH mw 4 rcp45 169 ICH mw 4 rcp85 196 ESSFwh 3 rcp45 113 ESSFwh 3 rcp85 136 ESSFwm 4 rcp45 75 ESSFwm 4 rcp85 92 ESSFwm 3 rcp45 69 ESSFwm 3 rcp85 88 ESSFwmw rcp45 50 ESSFwmw rcp85 67 ESSFwmp rcp45 36 ESSFwmp rcp85 51

50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 rcp45 rcp85 rcp45 rcp85 rcp45 rcp85 rcp45 rcp85 rcp45 rcp85 rcp45 rcp85 ICH xw ICH dw 1 ICH mw 4 ESSFwh 3 ESSFwm 4 ESSFwm 3

Average CMD ensemble by subzone

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

2080’s drought probability

27

slide-28
SLIDE 28

2080’s fire probability

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29

2080’s fire risk to homes?

29

slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31

Risk assessment conclusions

Top priority areas for adaption actions: Homes: Entire WUI (that is not wet or thinned) Timber: All accessible stands on submesic sites Water: Headwaters areas with high fuel loads Biodiversity: Older forests on submesic (mesic) sites Examples of target areas:

 dense submesic ICH stands, especially with cedar  Any feasible landscape-level fuel break

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Operations strategy—based on risks

 Reserve design  Landscape fire breaks  WUI fuel reduction  Prescribed fire  Residual stand structure  Stocking standards  Stand tending  Species and provenances  More adaptation tools?

32

Manage for resilience

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

60 - 70% of landbase in reserves

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Fire/ fuel hazard reduction

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36
slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

slide-39
SLIDE 39
slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

Interface areas

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

46

Resilience

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

Plant Ponderosa pine and deciduous species

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Management Plan and AAC: Community decisions

56

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Next steps 2019

 Document operations strategy, develop AAC scenarios  Project newsletter #2 summer— send to stakeholders  Draft Handbook and Workshop— circulate to advisory

committee

 Advisory committee meeting #4: ~October/ November  Public meeting in Harrop ~November  Practitioners’ workshop ~December

57

slide-58
SLIDE 58

End of presentation

58