clarification regarding presentation released to the asx
play

CLARIFICATION REGARDING PRESENTATION RELEASED TO THE ASX ON 1 OCTOBER - PDF document

ASX RELEASE 2 October 2015 CLARIFICATION REGARDING PRESENTATION RELEASED TO THE ASX ON 1 OCTOBER 2015 At the request of the ASX, Toro Energy Limited (ASX:TOE) wishes to advise that it has updated the Presentation to Sydney Mining Club


  1. ASX RELEASE 2 October 2015 CLARIFICATION REGARDING PRESENTATION RELEASED TO THE ASX ON 1 OCTOBER 2015 At the request of the ASX, Toro Energy Limited (ASX:TOE) wishes to advise that it has updated the “Presentation to Sydney Mining Club” announcement to include the statement required in respect of the Theseus resource estimate being prepared under JORC 2004 and competent persons statement. Todd Alder Company Secretary TORO ENERGY LTD: ABN 48 117 127 590 Address: 2/35 Ventnor Ave West Perth WA 6005 Tel: +61 8 9214 2100

  2. Uranium: critical to a Sydney Mining Club clean energy future Vanessa Guthrie 1 October 2015

  3. Why talk about uranium? 2 2

  4. How safe is uranium and nuclear? Can Fukushima happen again? Can Australian uranium be diverted to weapons? What is the answer to waste disposal? How is nuclear part of the world energy mix? 3

  5. Uranium and Radiation Uranium and Radiation • Heaviest naturally occurring metal • Mildly radioactive in natural form 3 isotopic forms – 238 U 235 U 234 U • • Uranium ore = 238 U = 99.3% • • 235 U = 0.7% (fissile) • To convert U ore to nuclear fuel requires multiple processing steps • 1 kg U 3 O 8 = 20,000 t black coal • Sufficient energy to power an average household for 25 years 4 4

  6. Uranium as a source of energy 1 kg uranium = Household for 25 years 5

  7. Where does radiation come from? Total annual per capita dose = 3.2 mSv 6

  8. Sources of Radiation Exposure What most people don’t know about radiation…. 7

  9. Nuclear Fuel Cycle 8

  10. Lessons from Incidents Three Mile Island • Operator training • “Human” factors Fukushima • Plant design • Risk Protection Chernobyl • Early warning systems • Useful life • Plant design • Planned maintenance • “Human” factors 9

  11. Deaths from Nuclear related events 75,000 1979 4000? 3 Mile Island 2011 990 Fukushima 64 105 0 2014 2014 1986 WA roads Commercial airlines Chernobyl Source: WA Police, UNSCEAR, IAEA, CNN 10

  12. Events since Fukushima • Japan systematically closed reactor fleet over 2 year period • Loss of 30% power generating capacity – replaced by oil, coal and gas • Japan committed to 22% nuclear energy as part of future energy mix • 2 reactors allowed to re-start – Ohi 1 and Ohi 2 then closed after one year operation • 25 reactors re-start applications in place • Sendai 1 reactor re-started 10 August, Sendai 2 reactor now ready • Japanese nuclear operators investing ¥3 trillion in safety measures • China suspended approvals for reactor new builds, now recommenced Gen IV design 11

  13. New Reactor Design Fukushima China, India Chernobyl new build program 12

  14. Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty • NPT commenced in 1968, now 191 countries have signed • 5 recognised nuclear states: US, Russia, UK, France and China • 5 non-signatories: India, Pakistan, South Sudan, Israel and North Korea • Nuclear weapons declared in Pakistan, India, known in Israel, North Korea • 235 U is required at 3-5% for nuclear power; >95% for weapons • “Megatons to Megawatts” US-Russia program • 20 years, US$1.3 billion • 500 tonnes weapons grade HEU removed • 7 trillion KWH or 10% US electricity generation • Australia-India Nuclear Civil Cooperation Agreement 2014 • Yet to be ratified by Australian Parliament • Will need to meet Australian Safeguards Act • Reflects IAEA requirements 13

  15. Nuclear Fuel and Waste Nuclear Fuel and Waste Percent by Percent by radioactive volume content Low level waste Hospitals/medical; Industrial, tailings 1 90 Intermediate level waste Resins, cladding, industrial, 4 7 construction High level waste Spent fuel, reprocessed waste 95 3 The hockey puck test: High level spent fuel from one person’s lifetime 14 Source: WNA 14

  16. Nuclear Fuel and Waste The waste dilemma • Technology solutions available today • Multiple barrier systems • Geological repositories • Total waste over 60 years = 30,000m 3 • Equivalent to 10 Olympic swimming pools By 2040 = 60,000 m 3 • 1GWe reactor = 3m 3 (27t) per year of waste • • 1000 years to decay to original radioactivity levels • 5% total cost of electricity production 15 Source: WNA 15

  17. Uranium – critical to a clean energy future 16

  18. 7.3 billion people.… 47% of world’s population 6 out of 10 Have nuclear power 17

  19. World Energy Outlook 2014 (1) (1) Million tonnes oil equivalent (Mtoe) 3 Source: IEA 2014 (1) Million tonnes oil equivalent (Mtoe) 18

  20. Where will the energy come from? Increase by 2040 Percent % increase Non-OPEC supplies to 2025 Oil supplies 14 mbd 15 Requires investments in Middle East 70% output from India, Indonesia, China, Coal 6,350 Mtce 0.5%pa Australia by 2040 Includes unconventional gas 31% increase Gas 5,400 bcm 50 Requires $11 trillion infrastructure investment Nuclear Includes 380 GW added, 148 GW retired 624 GW 60 Includes hydro, solar, wind, biofuels Renewables 33% global power generation by 2040 16,500 TWh 300 Requires subsidies of $205 billion in 2040 CO 2 emissions 40% of global emissions over the period 15.4 Gt 16 Source: IEA 2014 19

  21. Nuclear Power today 69 344 Under construction Operating reactors 20

  22. Nuclear Power in 2040 60%  624GW 380 GW added 148 GW retired 112,000Mt CO 2 emissions avoided 21

  23. Global Nuclear Power Growth Uranium Demand • 60% increase in nuclear power by 2040 • 624 GWe • China: – 58 GWe by 2020 – Largest nuclear fleet by 2025 • India: – 17GWe by 2024 – 25% energy mix by 2050 • Middle East: – UAE, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, Jordan – Displacing domestic gas power gen 22 22

  24. Nuclear Power and Climate Change • Source of low emissions energy • Life cycle emissions in the same range as renewables • Competitive average levelised costs per unit power output ($/MWh) • Recognition by US-China Joint Announcement on Climate Change • Nuclear power generation projected to grow by 60% by 2040 • 1GWe nuclear reactor could meet Australia’s emissions reductions commitments by displacement of fossil fuels Life cycle emissions from power generation Source: IEA, 2014; MCA 2015 23

  25. Comparable Cost of Nuclear Power 2012 $/MWhr 24

  26. Australian Uranium Facts 1 st in resources • 32 per cent of global uranium resources 2 nd largest primary energy source • 22 per cent total primary energy production in 2012/13 3 rd in global production • 11 per cent of global supply in 2013 4,200 jobs • Uranium industry employment, much in remote areas 5,710 tonnes • production of uranium in 2013-14 • Equal to >90% of domestic energy consumption $622 million • Australian uranium export earnings in 2013/14 10 • $1.1billion forecast value of Australia’s uranium exports in 2018/19 Source: OECD NEA Red book, 2014; BREE, WNA, 2014; ASNO Annual Report 2013/14 25

  27. Australian uranium… many opportunities, few choices • Free trade deals – China, South Korea and Japan • India – Australia Nuclear Civil Cooperation Agreement signed, Free Trade Agreement expected 2015 • Australia – strong production history but now only three mines in operation • Queensland assets now under uranium ban again; approvals required by 2017 for WA assets • 2018 forecast production limited to Olympic Dam, Four Mile • Near term production assets with approvals ready to go are limited – Wiluna is at the front of the queue / technical studies 26

  28. Global uranium market • Global uranium stocks are high, filling demand gap and holding back investment • Uranium prices taking longer to recover, but long term fundamentals remain strong • Forecast demand/supply shows a gap emerging in mid term • Australia is well positioned to deliver into growing Asian market • Toro continues to focus on developing Wiluna allowing value to be realized …. permitting and traditional owner agreements, resource improvement, project financing 27

  29. Toro’s vision Create a significant mid-tier uranium company 3 Driving value from Exploration 2 Asset base growth 1 Unlocking the potential of 200-300 Mlb Wiluna Province ASX TSX 28

  30. Toro’s asset portfolio (1) (1) (2) (1) Refer Resources table at slide 40 and 41 and Competent Person's statement following this presentation 29

  31. Capital structure Capital Structure Directors ASX Code TOE John Cahill (1) Acting Chairman Ordinary Shares on Issue m 2,000.8 Vanessa Guthrie Managing Director Share Price cps 5.8 NED Richard Patricio – Mega Undiluted Market A$m 116.0 NED Richard Homsany – Mega Capitalisation NED Michel Marier – Sentient Cash (31 August 2015) A$m 15.8 Board and management Loan A$m 6.0 2% of diluted issued shareholding – OTM options and capital performance rights Shareholders [VALUE] 35.3% Research Coverage 20.8% Realfin Capital Partners 18.3% 4.4% Dundee Proactive Investors OZ Minerals Mega Uranium The Sentient Group RealFin Cap (1) Fiona Harris was granted a leave of absence effective 1 July 2015. John Cahill is acting Chair during this period. 30

  32. Project Overview Wiluna Project 31

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend