claremont public schools fy21 budget presentation
play

CLAREMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FY21 BUDGET PRESENTATION CSB Budget - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CLAREMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FY21 BUDGET PRESENTATION CSB Budget Sub-Committee: Frank Sprague Jason Benware Mike Petrin Richard Seaman Michael Tempesta Ensure delivery of a NO Tax-Payer Increase; neutral budget! Create efficiencies


  1. CLAREMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS FY21 BUDGET PRESENTATION CSB Budget Sub-Committee: Frank Sprague Jason Benware Mike Petrin Richard Seaman Michael Tempesta

  2. • Ensure delivery of a “NO Tax-Payer Increase”; neutral budget! • Create efficiencies in programming to ensure that ALL students in Claremont have access to a quality education. Expand targeted grade level interventions! • Create robust specialized programming in a LRE that ensure that all CPS students have access to career and college options upon graduation FY21 BUDGET GOALS • Address and rectify historical gaps in programming that greatly disadvantage CPS students (CMS core classes; FY Science and Social Studies) • Mitigate enrollment trends that create inequities in staffing, content delivery and resources within the CPS Elementary Schools • Negotiate four (4) CBAs to ensure a stable, professional work-force, school environments and programs that most benefit students within Strategic Plan and Budget parameters • Create Programs that reduce CPS reliance upon costly Out-of-District Specialized Programming

  3. CLAREMONT SCHOOL DISTRICT ESTIMATED REVENUES FOR FY21

  4. CLAREMONT PUBLIC SCHOOLS ELEMENTARY SCHOOL FY21 RESTRUCTURING

  5. • Stability and control of class size and staffing assignments • Complete equity for students: All students go to each Elementary School • Stronger, consistent, targeted curriculum, assessment and interventions at each grade level • Universal, All-Day, Pre-K for students age 4 BENEFITS OF ELEMENTARY SCHOOL • Unique Programming and Experiential Curriculum Opportunities for entire grade levels RE-STRUCTURING ( Ex: Grade 4 field trip) • Reduced conflicts with age discrepancies in within buildings [ two and three year differentials vs. five years (K-5) ] • Re-allocation of teachers will focus on teacher strengths and program needs (Ex: teachers can focus on grade level content specialties vs. being generalists; content units can be “pushed in.”

  6. FY 20 ELEMENTARY CLASS SIZE CONFIGURATION FY 21 ELEMENTARY CLASS SIZE CONFIGURATION

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend