chronic graft versus host disease
play

Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: Symptoms vary Utilizing the - PDF document

Both inflammatory and fibrotic components Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: Symptoms vary Utilizing the 50% have 3 or more involved organs NIH Consensus Guidelines Treatment is prolonged and may contribute to morbidity and


  1. • Both inflammatory and fibrotic components Chronic Graft-versus-Host Disease: – Symptoms vary Utilizing the – 50% have 3 or more involved organs NIH Consensus Guidelines • Treatment is prolonged and may contribute to morbidity and mortality Stephanie J. Lee, MD MPH – Median duration of treatment is 2-3 years Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center – 15% still require treatment after 7 years February 3, 2012 – Infections cause 60-85% of deaths Disclosures: Astellas, research grant; All therapeutics are off-label Outline Health status • Overview of chronic GVHD • Chronic GVHD Consensus conference • Organ-specific and global severity scoring • Two clinical examples • Treatment • Information resources Fraser et al. Blood 2006;108:2867-2873 Chronic GVHD Impetus for the NIH Consensus Conference • No change in first line therapy since 1980’s • Most common long-term complication of allogeneic hematopoietic cell infusion • No standard second line therapy • No FDA approved therapies – Affects 30-70% of allogeneic recipients – Median onset 4-6 months • Literature sparse, heterogeneous – 90-95% of cases diagnosed within 1 year • Difficult to interpret clinical trials – Leading cause of non-relapse mortality – Diagnosis not standardized • 25% of deaths in 2 year survivors – Severity scale dichotomous • 11% of deaths in 5 year survivors – Response measures not defined

  2. NIH Consensus Development Project on 2005 NIH Revision Criteria for Clinical Trials in Chronic GVHD (June 6, 2005) Chairs: Steve Pavletic & Georgia Vogelsang LATE ACUTE (15-48%) • Diagnosis and scoring (Filipovich et al) • Pathology (Shulman et al) CLASSIC ACUTE OVERLAP (20-48%) CLASSIC CHRONIC (9-60%) • Biomarkers (Schultz et al) • Response criteria (Pavletic et al) BBMT 2005; 11: 945 • Supportive care (Couriel et al) 2006; 12: 31 12: 126 Day 0 Day 100 Cho 2008; Vigorito 2009 • Clinical trials (Martin et al) 12: 252 Graft infused 12: 375 Jagasia 2007; Arora 2008 Pidala 2012 12: 491 Diagnosis and Scoring Diagnostic Manifestations SKIN GI • Criteria for chronic GVHD diagnosis • Poikiloderma • Esophageal web, stricture • Lichen-planus – 1 Diagnostic finding OR 1 Distinctive finding plus • Sclerosis Joints biopsy/test confirmation • Morphea • Fasciitis • Lichen sclerosis • Contractures • Categories of organ-specific severity (0-3) MOUTH Genital – Skin, Mouth, Eyes, Lung, GI tract, Liver, Joints and • Lichen-planus • Lichen planus Fascia, Genital Tract • Hyperkeratotic plaques • Stenosis • Sclerosis • Calculation of overall (global) severity Lung – Mild, Moderate, Severe • Bronchiolitis obliterans on bx Filipovich et al, BBMT 2005; 11: 945 Acute and Chronic GVHD Seattle 1980-2008 N>5050 100d DFS All allo Tx Clinical ext ACUTE CHRONIC chronic GVHD Day 0 Day 100 Graft infused Storer, unpublished data

  3. NIH Skin Score NIH Lung Score 0 1 2 3 ฀ No Symptoms ฀ Mild symptoms ฀ Moderate ฀ Severe 0 1 2 3 (shortness of symptoms symptoms ฀ No ฀ < 18% ฀ 19-50% BSA ฀ >50% BSA Clinical breath after (shortness of breath (shortness of features OR involvement OR deep Symptoms BSA with climbing one flight after walking on flat breath at rest; ฀ Maculopapular rash disease with superficial sclerotic ฀ Lichen planus-like of steps) ground) requiring O 2 ) signs but sclerotic features ฀ Papulosquamous NO ฀ Ichthyosis features “not “hidebound” ฀ Hyperpigmentation sclerotic hidebound” (unable to ฀ Hypopigmentation pinch) OR features (able to pinch) ฀ Keratosis pilaris ฀ FEV1 > 80% ฀ FEV1 60-79% ฀ FEV1 40-59% OR ฀ FEV1 <39% ฀ Erythema impaired OR LFS=2 OR LFS 3-5 LFS 6-9 OR LFS 10-12 ฀ Erythroderma mobility, ฀ Poikiloderma ulceration or ฀ Sclerotic features ฀ Pruritus severe LFS = FEV1 score + DLCO score > 80% = 1 ฀ Hair involvement 70-79% = 2 pruritus ฀ Nail involvement 60-69% = 3 % BSA 50-59% = 4 involved____ 40-49% = 5 ♦ Symptoms and PFTs < 40% = 6 ♦ % BSA and degree of sclerosis NIH Eye Score Body Surface Area – Rule of 9s 0 1 2 3 ฀ No Symptoms ฀ Mild dry eye ฀ Moderate dry eye ฀ Severe dry eye symptoms not symptoms partially symptoms affecting ADL affecting ADL significantly (requiring eyedrops (requiring drops > 3 x affecting ADL < 3 x per day) OR per day or punctal (special eyeware to asymptomatic plugs) WITHOUT relieve pain) OR signs of kerato- vision impairment unable to work conjunctivitis sicca because of ocular symptoms OR loss of vision caused by kerato-conjunctivitis sicca ♦ Symptoms and interventions NIH Mouth Score Other organs • Liver 0 1 2 3 ฀ No Symptoms ฀ Mild symptoms ฀ Moderate ฀ Severe – Total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, ALT/AST with disease signs symptoms with symptoms • Gastrointestinal but not limiting disease signs with with disease oral intake partial limitation of signs on – Dysphagia, anorexia, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, significantly oral intake examination abdominal pain, weight loss with major limitation of • Joint and fascia oral intake – Tightness, contractures, range of motion, ADLs • Genital ♦ Symptoms and limitation of oral intake – Physical findings, pain

  4. NIH Eye Score Example 1 • Diane, a 36 y/o woman 0 1 2 3 ฀ No Symptoms ฀ Moderate dry eye ฀ Severe dry eye  Mild dry eye – Maculopapular rash on her face and upper chest symptoms partially symptoms symptoms not affecting ADL significantly – Food sensitivity, lichen-planus-like oral changes affecting ADL (requiring drops > 3 x affecting ADL (requiring eyedrops – Dry eyes, using eyedrops twice a day per day or punctal (special eyeware to < 3 x per day) OR plugs) WITHOUT relieve pain) OR asymptomatic vision impairment unable to work signs of kerato- because of ocular conjunctivitis sicca symptoms OR loss of vision caused by kerato-conjunctivitis Dry eyes, using eyedrops twice a day sicca ♦ Symptoms and interventions NIH Skin Score Example 2 0 1 2 3 • Mark, a 49 y/o man Clinical ฀ No  < 18% ฀ 19-50% BSA ฀ >50% BSA – Sclerosis involving his arms features OR involvement OR deep Symptoms BSA with  Maculopapular rash with superficial sclerotic disease – Oral ulcers, unable to eat spicy foods ฀ Lichen planus-like sclerotic features ฀ Papulosquamous signs but features “not “hidebound” ฀ Ichthyosis – No other organs involved NO ฀ Hyperpigmentation hidebound” (unable to sclerotic ฀ Hypopigmentation pinch) OR (able to pinch) ฀ Keratosis pilaris features ฀ Erythema impaired ฀ Erythroderma mobility, ฀ Poikiloderma ulceration or ฀ Sclerotic features ฀ Pruritus severe ฀ Hair involvement pruritus ฀ Nail involvement % BSA Maculopapular rash on her face and upper chest (10%) involved 10% ♦ % BSA and degree of sclerosis NIH Mouth Score NIH Skin Score 0 1 2 3 0 1 2 3 Clinical ฀ No ฀ < 18% ฀ 19-50% BSA  >50% BSA ฀ No Symptoms ฀ Moderate ฀ Severe  Mild symptoms features OR involvement Symptoms BSA with OR deep symptoms with symptoms with disease signs ฀ Maculopapular rash disease with superficial sclerotic disease signs with with disease ฀ Lichen planus-like but not limiting signs but sclerotic ฀ Papulosquamous features partial limitation of signs on NO oral intake features “not ฀ Ichthyosis “hidebound” oral intake examination ฀ Hyperpigmentation significantly sclerotic hidebound” (unable to with major ฀ Hypopigmentation features (able to pinch) ฀ Keratosis pilaris pinch) OR limitation of ฀ Erythema impaired oral intake Food sensitivity, lichen-planus-like oral changes ฀ Erythroderma ฀ Poikiloderma mobility,  Sclerotic features ulceration or ฀ Pruritus severe ฀ Hair involvement ♦ Symptoms and limitation of oral intake Sclerosis involving his arms (BSA 18%) ฀ Nail involvement pruritus % BSA involved 18% ♦ % BSA and degree of sclerosis

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend