Charge-changing and total interaction cross section measurements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

charge changing and total interaction cross section
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Charge-changing and total interaction cross section measurements - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Charge-changing and total interaction cross section measurements Maya Takechi, Niigata University Collaborators M. Tanaka, 2 A. Homma, 1 Y. Tanaka, 2 T. Suzuki, 3 M. Fukuda, 2 D. Nishimura, 4 T. Moriguchi, 5 D. S. Ahn,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Charge-changing and total interaction cross section measurements

Maya Takechi, Niigata University

slide-2
SLIDE 2
  • M. Tanaka,∗2 A. Homma,∗1 Y. Tanaka,∗2 T. Suzuki,∗3 M. Fukuda,∗2 D. Nishimura,∗4
  • T. Moriguchi,∗5 D. S. Ahn,∗6 A. S. Aimaganbetov,∗7,∗8 M. Amano,∗5 H. Arakawa,∗3 S. Bagchi,∗9

K.-H. Behr,∗9 N. Burtebayev,∗7 K. Chikaato,∗1 H. Du,∗2 T. Fujii,∗3 N. Fukuda,∗6 H. Geissel,∗9 T. Hori,∗2

  • S. Hoshino,∗1 R. Igosawa,∗3 A. Ikeda,∗1 N. Inabe,∗6 K. Inomata,∗3 K. Itahashi,∗6 T. Izumikawa,∗10
  • D. Kamioka,∗5, N. Kanda,∗1 I. Kato,∗3 I. Kenzhina,∗11 Z. Korkulu,∗6 Ye. Kuk,∗7,∗8 K. Kusaka,∗6
  • K. Matsuta,∗2 M. Mihara,∗2 E. Miyata,∗1 D. Nagae,∗6 S. Nakamura,∗1 M. Nassurlla,∗7 K. Nishimuro,∗3
  • K. Nishizuka,∗1 S. Ohmika,∗3, K. Ohnishi,∗2 M. Ohtake,∗6 T. Ohtsubo,∗1 H. J. Ong,∗12 A. Ozawa,∗5
  • A. Prochazka,∗9 H. Sakurai,∗6, C. Scheidenberger,∗9 Y. Shimizu,∗6 T. Sugihara,∗2 T. Sumikama,∗6
  • S. Suzuki,∗5 H. Suzuki,∗6 H. Takeda,∗6 Y. K. Tanaka,∗9 T. K. Zholdybayev,∗7 T. Wada,∗1
  • K. Wakayama,∗3 , S. Yagi,∗2 T. Yamaguchi,∗3, R. Yanagihara,∗2 Y. Yanagisawa,∗6 and K. Yoshida∗3

Collaborators

. ∗1 Department of Physics, Niigata University, ∗2 Department of Physics, Osaka University, ∗3 Department of Physics, Saitama University, ∗4 Department of Physics, Tokyo University of Science, ∗5 Institute of Physics, University of Tsukuba , ∗6 RIKEN Nishina Center, ∗7 The Institute of Nuclear Physics Kazakhstan . ∗8 L. N. Gumilyov Eurasian National University ,∗9 GSI Helmholtzzentrum fu

̈r Schwerionenforschung

. ∗10 Radioactive Isotope Center, Niigata University , ∗11 Al - Farabi Kazakh National University . ∗12 Research Center for Nuclear Physics, Osaka University 


slide-3
SLIDE 3

Nuclear Size and Interaction Cross Sections

σI or σR

Nuclear Size

Glauber Calculation

σtot = σR + σel σI = σR - σinel

σ R = db

1− exp − d 2r

σNN E

( )ρz

P

i (r)ρz

Tj (r - b) i,j

& ' ( ) * + ,

  • .

. / 1 1

R

Interaction Cross Section Reaction Cross Section

σR can be uniquely calculated by 3 quantities

Projectile Density

ρP ρT

Target Density

σNN Nucleon- Nucleon Total Cross Section Nuclear Size of unknown Nuclei → Halo features

  • ✡ ☛☞✌✍
  • ✎ ✏✑☞✌

Li Isotopes

Example

6Li 7Li 8Li 9Li

Halo Nucleus

11Li

  • M. Takechi et al.,
  • Phys. Lett. B 707 (2012) 357.
  • I. Tanihata et al.,
  • Phys. Lett. B 206 (1988) 592.

11Li 11Be 31Ne 37Mg

Stable Nuclei Follows A1/3 Curve calculated from known radii Halo, and Deformation have been discussed extensively with the comparison to Theories

Next : Neutron Skin Thickness of Nuclei A>40

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Neutron Skin and Nuclear Matter EOS

Droplet Model

How to know L?

When the density of nuclear matter is around nuclear surface density

Symmetry term aA ⋍ symmetry term of EOS

Measurement of δ dependence of ΔR L

~0.1 fm-3

Neutron skin thickness ΔR ~ L × δ + correction term

  • M. Centelles et al., PRL 102, 122502 (2009)

One Simple correlation between L and Neutron Skin

w n, d

Q V c w 0 + 18n 0

2

K 0 n - n 0

Q V

2 + d 2 S 0 + 3n 0

L n - n 0

Q V

" %

EOS around N⋍Z δ = (N - Z)/A, A > 40

L : gradient

  • K. Oyamatsu and K. Iida

PRC 81, 054302 (2010)

w n, d

Q V c w 0 + 18n 0

2

K 0 n - n 0

Q V

2 + d 2 S 0 + 3n 0

L n - n 0

Q V

" %

First Key Parameter : L

n0 : saturation density, w0 : saturation energy K0 : incompressibility, S0 : symmetry energy at n = n0

δ = (N - Z)/A

L : Density derivative coefficient

  • f symmetry energy
slide-5
SLIDE 5

Neutron skin thickness ΔR ~ L × δ + correction term

Existing data for Neutron Skin Thickness

Neutron Skin thickness ΔR (fm)

Prediction from NL3 interaction

Neutron Star R1.4M⊙ 15km Mmax = 2.8 M⊙

FSUGold interaction

Neutron Star R1.4M⊙ 13km Mmax = 1.7 M⊙

Li-Gang Cao, H. Sagawa, G. Col’o Nuclear Structure in China 2012 (2012) 33

L 25 ~ 115 MeV Various Results

δ = (N-Z) / A

  • M. Centelles et al.,

Analysis of L using Antiprotonic Atom Data from A = 40 ~ 238

Anti Protonic Atom : A. Trzcinska et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 082501 (2001). GDR : A. Krasznahorkay et al., Nucl. Phys. A 567 521 (1994). SDR : A. Krasznahorkay et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3216 (1999). SDR : A. Krasznahorkay et al., Nucl. Phys. A 731 224 (2004). ES : S. Terashima et al., Phys. Rev. C 77 024317 (2008). ES : J. Zenihiro et al., Phys. Rev. C 82 044611 (2010).

Skin thickness for Neutron-rich Nuclei

slide-6
SLIDE 6

To know Neutron Skin Thickness, Rp is necessary! Stable Nuclei : Electron Scattering Experiment X-ray Measurements Muonic Atom Unstable Nuclei : Isotope shift Measurements Proton Radii

Sensitive to the Coulomb Potential of Protons

How to determine Neutron Skin Thickness for Exotic Nuclei?

σI

Rm

σ R = db

1− exp − d 2r

σNN E

( )ρz

P

i (r)ρz

Tj (r - b) i,j

& ' ( ) * + ,

  • .

. / 1 1

R

σI (Interaction cross section ) →Matter Radius Neutron Skin ΔR = Neutron Radius Rn - Proton Radius Rp

New Method : Charge Changing Cross Section

σCC

Rp

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Proton Distribution Radius Rp and σCC

Strong Correlation between Protin Radii and σCC Rp ( Electron Scattering Data) vs σCC

σCC →Proton Radius ?

vcc = db 1 - exp - vpp tproton

Projectile tproton T arg et

#

+ vnp t proton

Projectile t neutron T arg et

#

S X

F I

" %

#

Glauber Calculation for σCC

σCC calculation using charge distribution of nucleus

σCC

Rp

?

5.0 4.5 4.0 3.5 3.0 2.5 2.0 1.5

Rc (fm)

2000 1500 1000 500

CCCS (mb)

58Ni 10Be 28Si

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Determination of skin thickness Charge radii from CC cross sections

vcc = db 1 - exp - vpp tproton

Projectile tproton T arg et

#

+ vnp t proton

Projectile t neutron T arg et

#

S X

F I

" %

# Glauber Calculation for σCC

σCC calculation using charge distribution of nucleus σCC from Be to Ni

σCC Expt.

σCC Calc.

58Ni 28Si 40Ca

σCC(Expt..) / σCC(Calc.) ~ Constant

N/Z ~ 1 Nuclei

Determination of charge radius for 16C from σCC (HIMAC)

Calibration of σCC(Expt..) / σCC(Calc.) for light nuclei in wide range of Z/N (Charge Radii known)

Be to O

9Be 11Be 16O 18O 10B

9Be, 10B, Borromeans

  • T. Yamaguchi et al., PRL. 107, 032502 (2011)

Determination of charge radius for 12 - 19C from σCC (GSI) ~1 GeV/u

  • R. Kanungo et al., PRL 117, (2016) 102501

How about unstable, heavier nuclei A>40 ?

slide-9
SLIDE 9

σCC Measurements

Charge Radii are known (Isotope-shift Measurements)

Study of σCC(Expt..) / σCC(Calc.) for A>40 nuclei in wide Z/N range

σI and σCC Measurements for 58-78Ni

And

σCC Measurements for 40-48, 50Ca, 58-64Ni, 38-47K, 62-80Cu

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Neutron skin thickness ΔR ~ L × δ + correction term

Existing data for Neutron Skin Thickness

Neutron Skin thickness ΔR (fm)

Prediction from NL3 interaction

Neutron Star R1.4M⊙ 15km Mmax = 2.8 M⊙

FSUGold interaction

Neutron Star R1.4M⊙ 13km Mmax = 1.7 M⊙

Li-Gang Cao, H. Sagawa, G. Col’o Nuclear Structure in China 2012 (2012) 33

L 25 ~ 115 MeV Various Results

δ = (N-Z) / A

  • M. Centelles et al.,

Analysis of L using Antiprotonic Atom Data from A = 40 ~ 238

Anti Protonic Atom : A. Trzcinska et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 082501 (2001). GDR : A. Krasznahorkay et al., Nucl. Phys. A 567 521 (1994). SDR : A. Krasznahorkay et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 82, 3216 (1999). SDR : A. Krasznahorkay et al., Nucl. Phys. A 731 224 (2004). ES : S. Terashima et al., Phys. Rev. C 77 024317 (2008). ES : J. Zenihiro et al., Phys. Rev. C 82 044611 (2010).

Skin thickness for Neutron-rich Nuclei

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Experiment at RIBF

RIBF ZDS F11, two MUSICs from GSI

slide-12
SLIDE 12

238U Beam

345 MeV/u 30 pnA

Abrasion Fission

  • n Be Target

238U Beam

Target Fissile Nucleus Fission Fragments

BigRIPS ZDS

Experiment at RIBF

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Produced Beam around Ni Region

58-78Ni 84Ge 81-83Ga 68-82Zn 62-80Cu 61-76Co 56-65Fe 54-57Mn 55-56Cr

82Zn 83Ga 84Ge

238U on Be Abrasion Fission

Produced Beam around Ca Region

40-50Ca 41-48K 39-46Sc etc. …

slide-14
SLIDE 14

σI and σCC Measurements for 58-78Ni and nuclides nearby

σ R = −1 t ln N 2 N1 $ % & ' ( )

  • ✡☛☞

✌ ✍ ✡☛☞ ✌

σI or CC N1 : Incident particle N2 : Without changing Z and A σI σCC N2 : Without changing Z

Measurements : Transmission Method

Charge Radii are known (Isotope-shift Measurements)

σCC Measurements for 40-48, 50Ca, 58-64Ni, 38-47K, 62-80Cu

slide-15
SLIDE 15

F8 F10 F11 F12

BigRIPS

F9 F9

Experimental Setup

BigRIPS F3 BigRIPS F0 (第0焦点面)

Be Prod. Target

BigRIPS F5

BigRIPS

F5 Wedge-Shape

C Reaction Target

F11 C Reaction Target

ZDS

σI and σCC Measurements at 260 MeV/u σCC Measurements at 170 MeV/u σCC at two different energies and σI measured simultaneously

slide-16
SLIDE 16

N1 : Incident particle

F3PL PPAC x 2

BigRIPS F3 BigRIPS F0 (第0焦点面)

PPAC PPAC Slit

BigRIPS F0 - F5

Time of Flight of F3 - F5:F3PL, F5PL Identification : ΔE - Bρ - TOF Method Energy Loss:Ion Chamber at F3 (F3IC) Magnetic Rigidity (Bρ) :F5 PPAC

IC IC Reaction Target

BigRIPS F5

F0 - F5 : Counting N1 F5 Target Measurement

Be Prod. Target

F8 F10 F11 F12

BigRIPS

F9 F9

σ R = −1 t ln N 2 N1 $ % & ' ( )

σI or CC

F5PL

F0 - F5 : Counting N1

σI and σCC Measurements at 260 MeV/u

slide-17
SLIDE 17

F8 F10 F11 F12

BigRIPS

F9 F9

ZDS

BigRIPS F0 (第0焦点面)

PPAC PPAC Slit

BigRIPS F5

Reaction Target IC IC

BigRIPS F7

F7PL PPAC PPAC

Time of Flight of F5 - F7:F5PL, F7PL Identification : ΔE - Bρ - TOF Method Energy Loss:Ion Chamber at F5 and F7 (F5IC, F7IC) Magnetic Rigidity (Bρ) :F5 PPAC

BigRIPS F0 - F5

F0 - F5 : Counting N1 F5 - F7 : Counting N2

Be Prod. Target

σ R = −1 t ln N 2 N1 $ % & ' ( )

σI or CC

σI N2 : Without changing Z and A

BigRIPS F5 - F7

σCC N2 : Without changing Z

F5 Target Measurement

F5PL

σI and σCC Measurements at 260 MeV/u

slide-18
SLIDE 18

N2 : Without changing Z

σ R = −1 t ln N 2 N1 $ % & ' ( )

CC

N1 : Incident particle

F11 Target Measurement

PPAC F7PL PPAC

F8 F10 F11 F12

BigRIPS

F9 F9

BigRIPS F3 BigRIPS F0 (第0焦点面) BigRIPS F5

IC

BigRIPS F7

F3PL PPAC x 2 IC PPAC PPAC Slit F5 Target IC Be Prod. Target

σCC Measurements at 170 MeV/u

slide-19
SLIDE 19

N2 : Without changing Z

F8 F10 F11 F12

BigRIPS

F9 F9

σCC Measurements at 170 MeV/u

PPAC x 2

ZDS F9

PPAC PPAC F11PL

ZDS F11

MUSIC 1 MUSIC 2

F11

Reaction Target Long PL

TOF F7PL, F11PL Identification : ΔE - Bρ - TOF Method ΔE : MUSIC 1 Bρ:F9 PPAC

F7 - F11 : Counting N1 σ R = −1 t ln N 2 N1 $ % & ' ( )

CC

MUSIC2 : Counting N2

N1 : Incident particle

MUSIC1 MUSIC2 Target

F11 Target Measurement

slide-20
SLIDE 20

61Ni 62Ni 63Ni

64Cu

Particle Identification Incident Beam on F5 Target

A/Q Z Incident Particle N1

slide-21
SLIDE 21

62Ni

63Ni 61Ni

Co

Fe

Particle Identification after the Reaction Target

A/Q Z