chapter 11
play

Chapter 11: Object-Oriented Software Engineering Integration and - PDF document

Chapter 11: Object-Oriented Software Engineering Integration and System Testing Using UML, Patterns, and Java Podcast Ch11-03 Title : Integration Testing Description : Strategies for Integration Testing, Bottom-up Testing, Top-down


  1. Chapter 11: Object-Oriented Software Engineering Integration and System Testing Using UML, Patterns, and Java Podcast Ch11-03 ♦ Title : Integration Testing ♦ Description : Strategies for Integration Testing, Bottom-up Testing, Top-down Testing ♦ Participants : Barry Kurtz (instructor); Brandon Winters, Sara Hyde, Cheng Vue, Dan Baehr (students) ♦ Textbook : Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns and Java by Bernd Bruegge and Allen H. Dutoit Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 2 Integration Testing Strategy ♦ The entire system is viewed as a collection of subsystems (sets of classes) determined during the system and object design. ♦ The order in which the subsystems are selected for testing and integration determines the testing strategy � Big bang integration (Nonincremental) � Bottom up integration � Top down integration � Sandwich testing � Variations of the above ♦ For the selection use the system decomposition from the System Design Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 3 Page 1

  2. Using the Bridge Pattern to enable early Integration Testing ♦ Use the bridge pattern to provide multiple implementations under the same interface. ♦ Interface to a component that is incomplete, not yet known or unavailable during testing Seat Interface VIP Seat Implementation (in Vehicle Subsystem) Simulated Real Seat Stub Code Seat (SA/RT) Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 4 Example: Three Layer Call Hierarchy A Layer I Layer II B C D G Layer III F E Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 5 Integration Testing: Big-Bang Approach Unit Test A Don’t try this! Unit Test B Unit Test C System Test Unit Test D Unit Test E Unit Test F Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 6 Page 2

  3. Bottom-up Testing Strategy ♦ The subsystem in the lowest layer of the call hierarchy are tested individually ♦ Then the next subsystems are tested that call the previously tested subsystems ♦ This is done repeatedly until all subsystems are included in the testing ♦ Special program needed to do the testing, Test Driver: � A routine that calls a subsystem and passes a test case to it Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 7 Bottom-up Integration A Layer I B C D Layer II Test E E F G Layer III Test B, E, F Test F Test Test C A, B, C, D, E, F, G Test D,G Test G Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 8 Pros and Cons of bottom up integration testing ♦ Bad for functionally decomposed systems: � Tests the most important subsystem (UI) last ♦ Useful for integrating the following systems � Object-oriented systems � real-time systems � systems with strict performance requirements Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 9 Page 3

  4. Top-down Testing Strategy ♦ Test the top layer or the controlling subsystem first ♦ Then combine all the subsystems that are called by the tested subsystems and test the resulting collection of subsystems ♦ Do this until all subsystems are incorporated into the test ♦ Special program is needed to do the testing, Test stub : � A program or a method that simulates the activity of a missing subsystem by answering to the calling sequence of the calling subsystem and returning back fake data. Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 10 A Top-down Layer I Integration Testing B C D Layer II F G E Layer III Test Test A Test A, B, C, D A, B, C, D, E, F, G Layer I Layer I + II All Layers Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 11 Pros and Cons of top-down integration testing ♦ Test cases can be defined in terms of the functionality of the system (functional requirements) ♦ Writing stubs can be difficult: Stubs must allow all possible conditions to be tested. ♦ Possibly a very large number of stubs may be required, especially if the lowest level of the system contains many methods. Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 12 Page 4

  5. Pros and Cons of top-down integration testing ♦ One solution to avoid too many stubs: Modified top-down testing strategy � Test each layer of the system decomposition individually before merging the layers � Disadvantage of modified top-down testing: Both, stubs and drivers are needed Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 13 Exercise ch11-03-01 A B C D E F G H I J ♦ Specify a test plan for the following components using a bottom-up testing strategy ♦ Specify a test plan using a bottom-up testing strategy Bernd Bruegge & Allen H. Dutoit Object-Oriented Software Engineering: Using UML, Patterns, and Java 14 Page 5

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend