Challenging The Way We Work
Health Information Technology (HIT) Working for Us Dunedin Dialysis Laboratory Summary System
Donkin B. Dunedin Hospital, Southern District Health Board, Private Bag 1921, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
Challenging The Way We Work Health Information Technology (HIT) - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Challenging The Way We Work Health Information Technology (HIT) Working for Us Dunedin Dialysis Laboratory Summary System Donkin B. Dunedin Hospital, Southern District Health Board, Private Bag 1921, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand Challenging The
Donkin B. Dunedin Hospital, Southern District Health Board, Private Bag 1921, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
– ID prob. –
– Concept sol’n tool design testing training transition implementation
– Outcomes / Comment lit
– Nsg care & P/O – Pt safety / QofC
(Waneka & Spetz, 2010)
– Biochem mtg
– Each patient – Each test group – Drill down results
– RN time (RTC; NPJ)
Questions:
“..how…be done better?” “..how automate process - existing electronic systems?” “.. system orientated, less person dependant?”
population.”
quality health services.”
– Spec details
– Improved pt demographics
– Customise display period
– May - Jun 2 syst run side by side (final quality check) – Audit of all trial test results (test database)
– Customised
– Reports – Database
– Secure
– Previously 1/3 staff gen. rpt
– Transcribing – Manual calculations – Adj Ca++ / URR
– Meeting delays – timely decisions
Implementation of decisions sep process!
– ICU
– doc qual – doc time – error – nsg satis – pt care (?)
(Waneka & Spetz, 2010)
100% Y
100% Y
100% Y
Ext well Well Could've been better Not so well Really poor
Responses Need for Change
Absolutely Good Just ok Could have been better No w ay
Responses Training
my mediocre computer skills…”
it…had to be reminded …have ok since .”
– Accessing results – Adding results – Report display +editing – Add / remove pts
Really easy Easy A little tricky Very tricky Impossible
Responses Ease of Use
easy to use.”
available…”
– no change … lack of familiarity with system – “…still look up i-Soft…”
– +ve integration HIT
Invol staff plan / devel / impl: flex
Impt adeq training ($ needs asst’s)
– Staff satisfaction present
HIT perceived ease use Integrates nsg wk flow
(Waneka & Spetz, 2010)
– ? RN want in HIT
– Prod / proced new to organisation – (DU) improve exist proced, processes
(US General Accounting Office, 2005)
– Opp’ys: recognised & encouraged
(Druder, 86. Blohowiak, 92. Radka, 02 as cited in Huges, 2010)
– Nature comm’n
–sustain uptake – Audit data –?HIT imp → RTC? –Diff show HIT +ve nsg sens pt outcomes
(Waneka & Spetz, 2010)
1. Copnell, B., & Bruni, N. (2006). Breaking the silence: nurses’ understandings of change in clinical practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 55(3), 301-9. 2. Hughes, F. (2006). Nurses at the forefront of innovation. International Nursing Review, 53(2), 94-101. 3. Strategos (2003). What are the barriers to innovation? Survey of 500+
http://venture2.typepad.com/innovationnet/2004/08/what_are_the_ba.html 4. The CEO Refresher (2010). Change Management – Five colossal mistakes to
5. US General Accounting Office (2005). Principles of innovation and change. Retrieved from http://www4.uwm.edu/cuts/bench/princp.htm 6. Waneka, R., & Spetz, J. (2010). Hospital information technology systmes impact
–Self reporting –Dom voice lit
–Less r/t pt comfort –Obs lit and crit from lit
(Copnell, B., & Bruni, N. 2006)
telling
Centralised Decentralised iPM DLS Control / Power
High level: vertical Admin Tech ex
Control / Power
Low level: horizontal Among gp members; peer network
Need ID
High level “Push” down effect: change / solutions
Need ID
Local (gp, peer) “Pull” effect: change / solutions
Local adaptation
Low degree Inflexible
Local adaptation
High degree Flexible
Information and training
High degree Formal
Information and training
Low degree Informal
Uptake
Low
↑Complexity,
distance, delay: training and use
Uptake
High
↓ complex,
local, less delay