challenges and opportunities for financing development in
play

Challenges and opportunities for financing development in Cambodia as - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Challenges and opportunities for financing development in Cambodia as a least developed country Phnom Penh, Cambodia 5 November 2018 Oliver Paddison Chief Countries with Special Needs Macroeconomic Policy and Financing for Development Division


  1. Challenges and opportunities for financing development in Cambodia as a least developed country Phnom Penh, Cambodia 5 November 2018 Oliver Paddison Chief Countries with Special Needs Macroeconomic Policy and Financing for Development Division ESCAP

  2. Least Developed Countries • Category created in 1971 • Defined as “ low ‐ income countries confronting severe structural impediments to sustainable development ” • Have exclusive access to certain international support measures, in particular in the areas of development assistance and trade. • Istanbul Programme of Action aims to enable half of LDCs to become eligible for graduation by 2020. • 12 LDCs in the Asia ‐ Pacific region; 47 LDCs globally

  3. LDC graduation • The Committee for Development Policy (CPD) reviews the list of LDCs every three years • The graduation thresholds must to be met for any two of the three criteria in two consecutive triennial reviews (or income ‐ only) Gross National Economic Human Assets Index Income per capita Vulnerability Index $1,230 or above Income ‐ only: 66 or above 32 or below $2,460 or above • Only 5 countries have graduated from the LDC category: Botswana (1994), Cabo Verde (2007), Maldives (2011), Samoa (2014) and Equatorial Guinea (2017) • Vanuatu (2020) and Angola (2021) are due to graduate.

  4. Structural impediments to sustainable development: Low Human AssetsAaA

  5. Structural impediments to sustainable development: Low Human AssetsAaA

  6. Structural impediments to sustainable development: Economic Vulnerability

  7. Structural impediments to sustainable development: Economic Vulnerability

  8. Of the region’s 12 LDCs, 10 met the thresholds for graduation as of 2018 Year in which the Year in which the Committee Committee Human Human Economic Economic Have the Have the recommended recommended GNI per capita GNI per capita assets assets vulnerability vulnerability criteria criteria country for country for Country Country (average: 2014-16) (average: 2014-16) index index index index been met? been met? graduation graduation Afghanistan Afghanistan $ 633 $ 633 48.4 48.4 39.3 39.3 Bangladesh Bangladesh   $ 1274 $ 1274 73.2 73.2 25.2 25.2 Bhutan Bhutan 36.3 36.3   2018 2018 $ 2 401 $ 2 401 72.9 72.9 Cambodia Cambodia $ 1075 $ 1075 34.8 34.8 68.9 68.9 Kiribati Kiribati 73.7 73.7   2018 2018 $ 2 986 $ 2 986 84 84 Lao PDR Lao PDR 33.7 33.7   $ 1 996 $ 1 996 72.8 72.8 Myanmar Myanmar   $ 1 255 $ 1 255 68.5 68.5 31.7 31.7 Nepal Nepal $ 745 $ 745   71.2 71.2 25.1 25.1 Solomon Islands Solomon Islands 51.9 51.9   2018 2018 $ 1 763 $ 1 763 74.8 74.8 Timor-Leste Timor-Leste 66.6 66.6 56.8 56.8   $ 2656 $ 2656 Tuvalu Tuvalu 56 56   2012 2012 $ 5 388 $ 5 388 90.1 90.1 Vanuatu Vanuatu 47 47   2015 2015 $ 2 997 $ 2 997 78.5 78.5 Graduation Graduation ≥ $ 1 242 ≥ $ 1 242 ≥ 66 ≥ 66 ≤ 32 ≤ 32 thresholds thresholds Source : UN DESA

  9. Indicator trends: Cambodia’s comparative performance (GNI/Capita) 2500 2000 1500 1000 500 0 Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan Cambodia Kiribati Laos PDR Myanmar Nepal Solomon Timor ‐ Leste Tuvalu Vanuatu Islands 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 Threshold

  10. Indicator trends: Cambodia’s comparative performance (HAI) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan Cambodia Kiribati Laos PDR Myanmar Nepal Solomon Timor ‐ Leste Tuvalu Vanuatu Islands 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 Threshold

  11. Indicator trends: Cambodia’s comparative performance (EVI) 100 90 80 70 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 Afghanistan Bangladesh Bhutan Cambodia Kiribati Laos PDR Myanmar Nepal Solomon Timor ‐ Leste Tuvalu Vanuatu Islands 2000 2003 2006 2009 2012 2015 2018 Threshold

  12. Cambodia Economic vulnerability index - LDC since 1991 - If Cambodia meets pre-eligibility criteria by the next triannual review Cambodia in 2021, the country may graduate from the LDC category as early as LDC average 2027. GNI per capita World average 2,500 'Income ‐ only' threshold Human assets index 2,000 World average 1,500 Graduation threshold Cambodia 1,000 500 Cambodia LDC average 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

  13. International support measures (ISMs)  Trade-related ISM : preferential market access; special and differential treatment (SDT) provisions; trade-related technical assistance; accession to WTO  Finance-related ISM : ODA volume and modalities; climate finance  Technology-related ISM : Aid for science, technology and innovation; agreement on Trade-related aspects of intellectual property rights (TRIPS); climate change-related technology transfer; Technology Bank  Technical assistance ; Enhanced Integrated Framework (EIF); Aid for Trade  Other general ISM : contribution to international organizations; travel and research https://www.un.org/ldcportal/

  14. Trade-related ISM Average tariffs levied by developed countries in 2015 on products exported by LDCs and developing countries (%) LDCs Developing countries 8 7.7 6.5 5 3.2 1.0 0.9 0.3 Agriculture Textiles Clothing Other industrial products Source: WTO Secretariat

  15. Trade-related ISM Cambodia’s export (2016) Source: The Observatory of Economic Complexity, MIT

  16. Structural transformation

  17. Structural transformation

  18. Higher output in association with diversification 11 y = -0.0137x 2 + 1.1691x - 12.168 R² = 0.7814 Number of categories of products, logarithm 10 Cambodia Nepal 9 Armenia Kazakhstan Kyrgyzsta 8 Bangladesh n Azerbaijan Fiji Uzbekistan Afghanistan 7 Lao Maldive PDR Papua New Mongolia s Samo Guinea Turkmenista Vanuatu a Tajikistan 6 n Timor- Marshall Leste Bhutan Islands Tonga Solomon Kiribati 5 Tuval Islands Micronesia, Fed. Sts. Palau 4 16 18 20 22 24 26 28 30 32 GDP ($ billion), logarithm

  19. Finance-related ISM Priority 7 of Istanbul Programme of Action: Mobilizing financial resources for development and capacity-building ▪ Domestic resource mobilization ▪ Official development assistance ▪ External debt ▪ Foreign direct investment ▪ Remittances

  20. Finance-related ISM Net ODA as share of GNI 20 18 16 14 12 10 8 6 4 2 0 Botswana (1994) Cabo Verde Maldives (2011) Samoa (2014) (2007) Pre ‐ graduation Post ‐ graduation Source: UNCTAD (2016) Note: Ten-year, or less, averages prior to and after graduation

  21. Performance of graduated countries FDI as share of GDP 14 12 LDC indicator values (2015) 10 GNI per EVI HAI 8 capita Threshold > $1,242 <32 >66 6 Botswana 7,410 43.4 75.9 4 Cabo Verde 3,595 38.8 88.6 2 Maldives 6,645 49.5 91.3 0 Samoa 3,319 43.9 94.4 Botswana Cabo Verde Maldives (2011) Samoa (2014) (1994) (2007) Pre ‐ graduation Post ‐ graduation Source: CDP (2015) Source: UNCTAD (2016) Note: Ten-year, or less, averages prior to and after graduation

  22. Pre- and post-graduation: Sectoral composition of gross value added and export concentration Sectoral composition of gross value added 100% Export concentration index 90% 80% 0.8 70% 0.7 60% 0.6 Services 50% 0.5 40% Industry 0.4 30% Agriculture 0.3 20% 0.2 10% 0.1 0% 0 Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Pre Post Botswana Cabo Verde Maldives Samoa Pre ‐ graduation Post ‐ graduation Botswana Cabo Verde Maldives Samoa Source: UNCTAD (2016) Note: Ten-year, or less, averages prior to and after graduation

  23. Conclusion • Move from graduation strategies focus on meeting the criteria for graduation towards post-graduation strategies to ensure a smooth and sustainable transition as graduation approaches (still time for Cambodia) • No sharp reductions in availability of development finance after graduation. But, possible reduction in concessionally and loss of access to climate finance. • Loss of preferential market access may entail substantial costs . • Maintaining access to some ISMs depends on the graduating country's negotiation capacities . • A better understanding of likely impacts of graduation , with sufficient data and analysis, good preparation, and proactive engagement with development partners are critical.

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend