certification of inequalities involving transcendental

play

Certification of Inequalities involving Transcendental Functions: - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

May 24, 2023 •225 likes •807 views

Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization Certification of Inequalities involving Transcendental Functions: combining SDP and Max-plus Approximation Joint Work withX.

Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization Certification of Inequalities involving Transcendental Functions: combining SDP and Max-plus Approximation Joint Work withX. Allamigeon, S. Gaubert and B. Werner Third year PhD Victor MAGRON LIX/CMAP INRIA, ´ Ecole Polytechnique ECC 2013 Thursday July 18 th Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization The Kepler Conjecture Kepler Conjecture (1611): π √ The maximal density of sphere packings in 3D-space is 18 It corresponds to the way people would intuitively stack oranges, as a pyramid shape The proof of T. Hales (1998) consists of thousands of non-linear inequalities Many recent efforts have been done to give a formal proof of these inequalities: Flyspeck Project Motivation: get positivity certificates and check them with Proof assistants like Coq Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization Contents Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization 1 Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS 2 Max-Plus Estimators 3 Certified Global Optimization 4 Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization The Kepler Conjecture Inequalities issued from Flyspeck non-linear part involve: Multivariate Polynomials: 1 x 1 x 4 ( − x 1 + x 2 + x 3 − x 4 + x 5 + x 6 )+ x 2 x 5 ( x 1 − x 2 + x 3 + x 4 − x 5 + x 6 )+ x 3 x 6 ( x 1 + x 2 − x 3 + x 4 + x 5 − x 6 ) − x 2 ( x 3 x 4 + x 1 x 6 ) − x 5 ( x 1 x 3 + x 4 x 6 ) Semi-Algebraic functions algebra A : composition of 2 polynomials with | · | , √ , + , − , × , /, sup , inf , · · · Transcendental functions T : composition of semi-algebraic 3 functions with arctan , exp , sin , + , − , × , · · · Lemma from Flyspeck (inequality ID 6096597438 ) ∀ x ∈ [3 , 64] , 2 π − 2 x arcsin(cos(0 . 797) sin( π/x ))+0 . 0331 x − 2 . 097 ≥ 0 Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization The Kepler Conjecture Inequalities issued from Flyspeck non-linear part involve: Multivariate Polynomials: 1 x 1 x 4 ( − x 1 + x 2 + x 3 − x 4 + x 5 + x 6 )+ x 2 x 5 ( x 1 − x 2 + x 3 + x 4 − x 5 + x 6 )+ x 3 x 6 ( x 1 + x 2 − x 3 + x 4 + x 5 − x 6 ) − x 2 ( x 3 x 4 + x 1 x 6 ) − x 5 ( x 1 x 3 + x 4 x 6 ) Semi-Algebraic functions algebra A : composition of 2 polynomials with | · | , √ , + , − , × , /, sup , inf , · · · Transcendental functions T : composition of semi-algebraic 3 functions with arctan , exp , sin , + , − , × , · · · Lemma from Flyspeck (inequality ID 6096597438 ) ∀ x ∈ [3 , 64] , 2 π − 2 x arcsin(cos(0 . 797) sin( π/x ))+0 . 0331 x − 2 . 097 ≥ 0 Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization The Kepler Conjecture Inequalities issued from Flyspeck non-linear part involve: Multivariate Polynomials: 1 x 1 x 4 ( − x 1 + x 2 + x 3 − x 4 + x 5 + x 6 )+ x 2 x 5 ( x 1 − x 2 + x 3 + x 4 − x 5 + x 6 )+ x 3 x 6 ( x 1 + x 2 − x 3 + x 4 + x 5 − x 6 ) − x 2 ( x 3 x 4 + x 1 x 6 ) − x 5 ( x 1 x 3 + x 4 x 6 ) Semi-Algebraic functions algebra A : composition of 2 polynomials with | · | , √ , + , − , × , /, sup , inf , · · · Transcendental functions T : composition of semi-algebraic 3 functions with arctan , exp , sin , + , − , × , · · · Lemma from Flyspeck (inequality ID 6096597438 ) ∀ x ∈ [3 , 64] , 2 π − 2 x arcsin(cos(0 . 797) sin( π/x ))+0 . 0331 x − 2 . 097 ≥ 0 Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization The Kepler Conjecture Inequalities issued from Flyspeck non-linear part involve: Multivariate Polynomials: 1 x 1 x 4 ( − x 1 + x 2 + x 3 − x 4 + x 5 + x 6 )+ x 2 x 5 ( x 1 − x 2 + x 3 + x 4 − x 5 + x 6 )+ x 3 x 6 ( x 1 + x 2 − x 3 + x 4 + x 5 − x 6 ) − x 2 ( x 3 x 4 + x 1 x 6 ) − x 5 ( x 1 x 3 + x 4 x 6 ) Semi-Algebraic functions algebra A : composition of 2 polynomials with | · | , √ , + , − , × , /, sup , inf , · · · Transcendental functions T : composition of semi-algebraic 3 functions with arctan , exp , sin , + , − , × , · · · Lemma from Flyspeck (inequality ID 6096597438 ) ∀ x ∈ [3 , 64] , 2 π − 2 x arcsin(cos(0 . 797) sin( π/x ))+0 . 0331 x − 2 . 097 ≥ 0 Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization Global Optimization Problems: Examples from the Literature   4 3 � � a ij ( x j − p ij ) 2 H3 : x ∈ [0 , 1] 3 − min c i exp  −  i =1 j =1 sin( x 1 + x 2 ) + ( x 1 − x 2 ) 2 − 0 . 5 x 2 + 2 . 5 x 1 + 1 min MC : x 1 ∈ [ − 3 , 3] x 2 ∈ [ − 1 . 5 , 4] 5 n � � � � SBT : min j cos(( j + 1) x i + j ) x ∈ [ − 10 , 10] n i =1 j =1 n ( x i + ǫx i +1 ) sin( √ x i ) � x ∈ [1 , 500] n − min ( ǫ ∈ { 0 , 1 } ) SWF : i =1 Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization Global Optimization Problems: a Framework Given K a compact set, and f a transcendental function, minor f ∗ = inf x ∈ K f ( x ) and prove f ∗ ≥ 0 f is underestimated by a semialgebraic function f sa 1 We reduce the problem f ∗ sa := inf x ∈ K f sa ( x ) to a polynomial 2 optimization problem in a lifted space K pop (with lifting variables z ) We solve the POP problem f ∗ pop := inf f pop ( x , z ) using 3 ( x , z ) ∈ K pop a hierarchy of SDP relaxations by Lasserre If the relaxations are accurate enough, f ∗ ≥ f ∗ sa ≥ f ∗ pop ≥ 0 . Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization Global Optimization Problems: a Framework Given K a compact set, and f a transcendental function, minor f ∗ = inf x ∈ K f ( x ) and prove f ∗ ≥ 0 f is underestimated by a semialgebraic function f sa 1 We reduce the problem f ∗ sa := inf x ∈ K f sa ( x ) to a polynomial 2 optimization problem in a lifted space K pop (with lifting variables z ) We solve the POP problem f ∗ pop := inf f pop ( x , z ) using 3 ( x , z ) ∈ K pop a hierarchy of SDP relaxations by Lasserre If the relaxations are accurate enough, f ∗ ≥ f ∗ sa ≥ f ∗ pop ≥ 0 . Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization Global Optimization Problems: a Framework Given K a compact set, and f a transcendental function, minor f ∗ = inf x ∈ K f ( x ) and prove f ∗ ≥ 0 f is underestimated by a semialgebraic function f sa 1 We reduce the problem f ∗ sa := inf x ∈ K f sa ( x ) to a polynomial 2 optimization problem in a lifted space K pop (with lifting variables z ) We solve the POP problem f ∗ pop := inf f pop ( x , z ) using 3 ( x , z ) ∈ K pop a hierarchy of SDP relaxations by Lasserre If the relaxations are accurate enough, f ∗ ≥ f ∗ sa ≥ f ∗ pop ≥ 0 . Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization Global Optimization Problems: a Framework Given K a compact set, and f a transcendental function, minor f ∗ = inf x ∈ K f ( x ) and prove f ∗ ≥ 0 f is underestimated by a semialgebraic function f sa 1 We reduce the problem f ∗ sa := inf x ∈ K f sa ( x ) to a polynomial 2 optimization problem in a lifted space K pop (with lifting variables z ) We solve the POP problem f ∗ pop := inf f pop ( x , z ) using 3 ( x , z ) ∈ K pop a hierarchy of SDP relaxations by Lasserre If the relaxations are accurate enough, f ∗ ≥ f ∗ sa ≥ f ∗ pop ≥ 0 . Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization Global Optimization Problems: a Framework Given K a compact set, and f a transcendental function, minor f ∗ = inf x ∈ K f ( x ) and prove f ∗ ≥ 0 f is underestimated by a semialgebraic function f sa 1 We reduce the problem f ∗ sa := inf x ∈ K f sa ( x ) to a polynomial 2 optimization problem in a lifted space K pop (with lifting variables z ) We solve the POP problem f ∗ pop := inf f pop ( x , z ) using 3 ( x , z ) ∈ K pop a hierarchy of SDP relaxations by Lasserre If the relaxations are accurate enough, f ∗ ≥ f ∗ sa ≥ f ∗ pop ≥ 0 . Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS
Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS Max-Plus Estimators Certified Global Optimization Contents Flyspeck-Like Global Optimization 1 Classical Approach: Taylor + SOS 2 Max-Plus Estimators 3 Certified Global Optimization 4 Third year PhD Victor MAGRON Maxplus SOS

Download Presentation

Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend

More recommend