CEREBRAL PALSY AN OVERVIEW BY: RISHAN JEYAKUMAR MS-4 CARIBBEAN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cerebral palsy
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CEREBRAL PALSY AN OVERVIEW BY: RISHAN JEYAKUMAR MS-4 CARIBBEAN - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CEREBRAL PALSY AN OVERVIEW BY: RISHAN JEYAKUMAR MS-4 CARIBBEAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SOM 09/2020 CEREBRAL PALSY (CP) Most common physical disability of childhood. It is a group of permanent disorders of the development of movement and posture


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CEREBRAL PALSY

AN OVERVIEW

BY: RISHAN JEYAKUMAR MS-4 CARIBBEAN MEDICAL UNIVERSITY SOM 09/2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CEREBRAL PALSY (CP)

Most common physical disability of childhood. It is a group of permanent disorders of the development of movement and posture attributed to non-progressive injury to the fetal or infant brain. It is clinically diagnosed usually between 12 and 24 months. The incidence as of 2020 1.5-3.0 per 1000 live births.

slide-3
SLIDE 3

TYPES OF CEREBRAL PALSY (SCPE CLASSIFICATION)

Spastic 89% Dyskinetic 6% Ataxic 5%

Distribution Type will emerge and change over the first 2 years of life.

slide-4
SLIDE 4

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

The type they present as is dependant upon the location of the injury. In addition to motor disabilities, disturbances can be seen in:

  • Cognition
  • Perception
  • Communication
  • Behaviour

Comorbid Conditions:

  • Epilepsy
  • Secondary musculoskeletal problems
slide-5
SLIDE 5

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Spastic Cerebral Palsy:

  • Spasticity is defined as velocity dependant

resistance to stretch.

  • Limb involvement can be hemiplegia,

diplegia, or quadriplegia.

  • Affected limbs will have hyperactive DTRs,

hypertonicity, tremors, weakness.

  • There is a characteristic “scissor gait” with

toe walking.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d0Lm aJnAxfY&ab_channel=prohealthsys

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Dyskinetic Cerebral Palsy

  • Abnormally slow writhing movements of the hands,

feet, or legs.

  • Exacerbated during periods of stress.
  • Absent during sleep.
  • Dystonic CP: Irregular posture + enhanced muscle

tension

  • “hypertonic-hypokinetic”
  • Athetoid CP: Quick, uncontrolled, fragmented

movements overlapped with dynamic twisting movement + predominantly diminished muscle tension

  • “hypotonic-hyperkinetic”
slide-7
SLIDE 7

CLINICAL PRESENTATION

Ataxic Cerebral Palsy:

  • Impaired balance and

coordination.

  • Wide-based gait.
  • Intention tremors that impair

fine motor function.

  • Predominantly lowered muscle

tension.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

ETIOLOGIES

Historically CP was thought to be due to hypoxia during labour, delivery, and perinatal periods; however, treatment measures targeted in these areas did not change the incidence. Risk factors for developing cerebral palsy are now divided as: Preconception, Prenatal, Perinatal, and Neonatal/infant period.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

DIAGNOSIS

Warning signs for Cerebral Palsy

  • Delayed development (largely

motor)

  • Abnormal muscle tone
  • Unusual posture
  • Persistent infantile reflexes
  • Hand preference before the age of 1
slide-10
SLIDE 10

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS

slide-11
SLIDE 11

DIAGNOSTICS

  • Based on clinical presentation and history.
  • Precise interview concerned with pregnancy, labour, neonatal and infant

period. Imaging Tools:

  • Brain ultrasonography in infants.
  • CT of the brain in older children.
  • MRI of the brain; Can be conducted on foetuses.
  • Abnormalities demonstrated in more than 80% of CP patients.
  • MRI can reveal anatomic abnormalities characteristic of particular CP

types Additional tests: Psychological tests, vision evaluation, audiometric tests and Video EEG

slide-12
SLIDE 12

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM (MRICS)

5 Main Groups:

A. Maldevelopments B. Predominant white matter injury C. Predominant grey matter injury D. Miscellaneous E. Normal Mixed lesions may also present

slide-13
SLIDE 13

MRICS: A – MALDEVELOPMENTS

A1: disorder of cortical formation A2: other maldevelopments

slide-14
SLIDE 14

MRICS: B – PREDOMINANT WHITE MATTER INJURY

B1: periventricular leukomalacia (PVL) B2: sequelae of Intraventricular hemorrhage (IVH) or periventricular hemorrhagic infarction B3: combination of PVL and IHV sequelae

slide-15
SLIDE 15

MRICS: C – PREDOMINANT GREY MATTER INJURY

C1: basal ganglia/thalamus lesion C2: cortico-subcortical lesion C3: arterial infarction

slide-16
SLIDE 16

MRICS: D – MISCELLANEOUS

D: miscellaneous

slide-17
SLIDE 17

MRICS: E – NORMAL

E: normal imaging

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ASSESSMENT

slide-19
SLIDE 19

GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Children walk at home, school, outdoors and in the community. They can climb stairs without the use of a railing. Children perform gross motor skills such as running and jumping, but speed, balance and coordination are limited.

GMFCS I

slide-20
SLIDE 20

GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Children walk in most settings and climb stairs holding onto a railing. They may experience difficulty walking long distances and balancing on uneven terrain, inclines, in crowded areas or confined spaces. Children may walk with physical assistance, a handheld mobility device or used wheeled mobility over long distances. Children have

  • nly minimal ability to perform gross motor skills such as running and jumping.

GMFCS II

slide-21
SLIDE 21

GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Children walk using a hand-held mobility device in most indoor settings. They may climb stairs holding onto a railing with supervision or assistance. Children use wheeled mobility when traveling long distances and may self- propel for shorter distances.

GMFCS III

slide-22
SLIDE 22

GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Children use methods of mobility that require physical assistance or powered mobility in most settings. They may walk for short distances at home with physical assistance or use powered mobility or a body support walker when

  • positioned. At school, outdoors and in the community children are transported in

a manual wheelchair or use powered mobility.

GMFCS IV

slide-23
SLIDE 23

GROSS MOTOR FUNCTION CLASSIFICATION SYSTEM

Children are transported in a manual wheelchair in all settings. Children are limited in their ability to maintain antigravity head and trunk postures and control leg and arm movements.

GMFCS V

slide-24
SLIDE 24

MANAGEMENT

Goal: Increase functionality, improve capabilities, sustain health

  • Physical and Occupational Therapy
  • Speech and Language Therapy
  • Assistive Technologies
  • Medications
  • Botulinum toxin type A
  • Baclofen
  • Benzodiazepine
  • Surgery
  • Selective dorsal rhizotomy
  • Selective peripheral neurotomy
  • Supportive surgical procedures
slide-25
SLIDE 25

MANAGEMENT OF EPILEPSY IN CEREBRAL PALSY

  • Antiepileptic drugs have a lower

efficacy and patients are often drug resistance.

  • Drug resistant epilepsy occurs more
  • ften in spastic quadriplegia type CP.
  • Risk factors:
  • Neonatal convulsions
  • Intense neuropathological changes

in cerebrum

  • Mental retardation.
  • Consider non-pharmacological

methods of treatment for drug resistant epilepsy

  • Surgeries (Causal vs. Supportive)
  • Neuromodulation
  • Ketogenic diet
slide-26
SLIDE 26

ADDITIONAL MANAGEMENT AND PROGNOSIS

  • Oral-motor function is commonly impaired.
  • May require long-term nasogastric tube feeding or gastrostomy.
  • Associated with decreased survival.
  • Marked reduction in bone mass in non-ambulatory patients.
  • Mental health can be affected by chronic pain, social isolation, and loss
  • f functionality/independence.
  • Patients are also have higher mortality for ischemic heart disease,

cerebrovascular disease, and digestive disorders.

  • Increased risk of breast and brain cancer.
  • Increased risk from preventable deaths (drowning, motor vehicles

crashes)

  • Prognosis is based on disease severity and functionality.
slide-27
SLIDE 27

REFERENCES

Krigger KW. Cerebral palsy: an overview. Am Fam Physician. 2006;73(1):91-100. Sadowska M, Sarecka-Hujar B, Kopyta I. Cerebral Palsy: Current Opinions on Definition, Epidemiology, Risk Factors, Classification and Treatment Options. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020;16:1505-1518. Published 2020 Jun 12. doi:10.2147/NDT.S235165 Novak I, Morgan C, Adde L, et al. Early, Accurate Diagnosis and Early Intervention in Cerebral Palsy: Advances in Diagnosis and Treatment [published correction appears in JAMA Pediatr. 2017 Sep 1;171(9):919]. JAMA Pediatr. 2017;171(9):897-

  • 907. doi:10.1001/jamapediatrics.2017.1689

Mathewson MA, Lieber RL. Pathophysiology of muscle contractures in cerebral

  • palsy. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am. 2015;26(1):57-67.

doi:10.1016/j.pmr.2014.09.005 Yin R, Reddihough D, Ditchfield M, Collins K. Magnetic resonance imaging findings in cerebral palsy. J Paediatr Child Health. 2000;36(2):139-144. doi:10.1046/j.1440- 1754.2000.00484.x

slide-28
SLIDE 28

REFERENCES

MacLennan AH, Lewis S, Moreno-De-Luca A, et al. Genetic or Other Causation Should Not Change the Clinical Diagnosis of Cerebral Palsy. J Child Neurol. 2019;34(8):472-476. doi:10.1177/0883073819840449 GMFCS descriptors: Palisano et al. (1997) Dev Med Child Neurol 39:214–23 “Types of CP.” CEREBRAL PALSY PROJECT, www.cerebralpalsyproject.org/types-

  • f-cp.html.

Cans C, Dolk H, Platt MJ, Colver A, Prasauskiene A, Krageloh-Mann I; SCPE Collaborative group. Recommendations from the SCPE collaborative group for defining and classifying cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol Supp. 2007;109:35–

  • 38. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2007.tb12626.x

Mlodawski J, Mlodawska M, Pazera G, et al. Cerebral palsy and obstetric- neonatological interventions. Ginekol Pol. 2019;90(12):722-727. doi:10.5603/GP.2019.0124 Weyant, Curtis. “Cerebral Palsy Symptoms.” ConsumerSafety.org, ConsumerSafety.org, 20 Aug. 2020, www.consumersafety.org/news/how-does- cerebral-palsy-affect-development/.

slide-29
SLIDE 29

REFERENCES

Nicolini-Panisson RD, Tedesco AP, Folle MR, Donadio MVF. SELECTIVE DORSAL RHIZOTOMY IN CEREBRAL PALSY: SELECTION CRITERIA AND POSTOPERATIVE PHYSICAL THERAPY PROTOCOLS. RIZOTOMIA DORSAL SELETIVA NA PARALISIA CEREBRAL: CRITÉRIOS DE INDICAÇÃO E PROTOCOLOS DE REABILITAÇÃO FISIOTERAPÊUTICA PÓS-OPERATÓRIA. Rev Paul Pediatr. 2018;36(1):9. Published 2018 Jan 15. doi:10.1590/1984- 0462/;2018;36;1;00005 Gorter JW, Ketelaar M, Rosenbaum P, Helders PJ, Palisano R. Use of the GMFCS in infants with CP: the need for reclassification at age 2 years or older. Dev Med Child

  • Neurol. 2009;51(1):46-52. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8749.2008.03117.x

McPhee PG, Wong-Pack M, Obeid J, MacDonald MJ, Timmons BW, Gorter JW. Differences in cardiovascular health in ambulatory persons with cerebral palsy. J Rehabil

  • Med. 2018;50(10):892-897. doi:10.2340/16501977-2491

Bailes AF, Gannotti M, Bellows DM, Shusterman M, Lyman J, Horn SD. Caregiver knowledge and preferences for gross motor function information in cerebral palsy. Dev Med Child Neurol. 2018;60(12):1264-1270. doi:10.1111/dmcn.13994 Sinno D., Charafeddine L., Mikati M. (2012) Enhancing Childhood Development in Children with Cerebral Palsy and Other Disorders. In: Enhancing Early Child

  • Development. Springer, New York, NY. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-4827-3_3