CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas James R. Thompson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cds as insurance leaky lifeboats in stormy seas
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas James R. Thompson - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas James R. Thompson Presented at: CES, Munich September 05, 2012 James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas

James R. Thompson

Presented at: CES, Munich September 05, 2012

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 1 / 32

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

What are CDS?

  • Roughly half of buyers use them purely for speculation, rest

use for risk management/hedging.

  • Fitch Rating Agency 2009, 2010.
  • China and Germany propose bans on trading without owning

underlying.

  • Bloomberg Sept 13, 2010, June 14, 2010
  • New York State trying to regulate CDS sellers as Insurers
  • New York State Insurance Department, Circular Letter No. 19 (2008)
  • AMBAC,MBIA,ACA,AIG, many hedge funds did not provide

true insurance.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 2 / 32

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

What are CDS?

  • Roughly half of buyers use them purely for speculation, rest

use for risk management/hedging.

  • Fitch Rating Agency 2009, 2010.
  • China and Germany propose bans on trading without owning

underlying.

  • Bloomberg Sept 13, 2010, June 14, 2010
  • New York State trying to regulate CDS sellers as Insurers
  • New York State Insurance Department, Circular Letter No. 19 (2008)
  • AMBAC,MBIA,ACA,AIG, many hedge funds did not provide

true insurance.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 2 / 32

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

What are CDS?

  • Roughly half of buyers use them purely for speculation, rest

use for risk management/hedging.

  • Fitch Rating Agency 2009, 2010.
  • China and Germany propose bans on trading without owning

underlying.

  • Bloomberg Sept 13, 2010, June 14, 2010
  • New York State trying to regulate CDS sellers as Insurers
  • New York State Insurance Department, Circular Letter No. 19 (2008)
  • AMBAC,MBIA,ACA,AIG, many hedge funds did not provide

true insurance.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 2 / 32

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

What are CDS?

  • Roughly half of buyers use them purely for speculation, rest

use for risk management/hedging.

  • Fitch Rating Agency 2009, 2010.
  • China and Germany propose bans on trading without owning

underlying.

  • Bloomberg Sept 13, 2010, June 14, 2010
  • New York State trying to regulate CDS sellers as Insurers
  • New York State Insurance Department, Circular Letter No. 19 (2008)
  • AMBAC,MBIA,ACA,AIG, many hedge funds did not provide

true insurance.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 2 / 32

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

What we do

  • Ask: What features of CDS create/increase counterparty

risk in the market?

  • Update the insurance economics framework to handle

CDS.

  • Contrast results with ordinary insurance contracts.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 3 / 32

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

What we do

  • Ask: What features of CDS create/increase counterparty

risk in the market?

  • Update the insurance economics framework to handle

CDS.

  • Contrast results with ordinary insurance contracts.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 3 / 32

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

What we do

  • Ask: What features of CDS create/increase counterparty

risk in the market?

  • Update the insurance economics framework to handle

CDS.

  • Contrast results with ordinary insurance contracts.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 3 / 32

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Unique to CDS

  • UPDATE 1: Risk of insurer insolvency private information
  • UPDATE 2: Buyers (banks) can have differing

motivations to purchase

  • UPDATE 3: Contracts cleared through Central

Counterparty (CCP)

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 4 / 32

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Unique to CDS

  • UPDATE 1: Risk of insurer insolvency private information
  • UPDATE 2: Buyers (banks) can have differing

motivations to purchase

  • UPDATE 3: Contracts cleared through Central

Counterparty (CCP)

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 4 / 32

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Unique to CDS

  • UPDATE 1: Risk of insurer insolvency private information
  • UPDATE 2: Buyers (banks) can have differing

motivations to purchase

  • UPDATE 3: Contracts cleared through Central

Counterparty (CCP)

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 4 / 32

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Main Results

  • Counterparty risk (usually) higher with opaque insurers.

Stable insurers become less stable. Increased competition among insurers can increase counterparty risk.

  • CDS market characterized by lower quality insurers than

traditional insurance due to speculators. Removing speculators may actually increase counterparty risk.

  • With a CCP, stable insurers can lose competitive advantage

and drop out: problem of the commons type result.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 5 / 32

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Main Results

  • Counterparty risk (usually) higher with opaque insurers.

Stable insurers become less stable. Increased competition among insurers can increase counterparty risk.

  • CDS market characterized by lower quality insurers than

traditional insurance due to speculators. Removing speculators may actually increase counterparty risk.

  • With a CCP, stable insurers can lose competitive advantage

and drop out: problem of the commons type result.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 5 / 32

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Main Results

  • Counterparty risk (usually) higher with opaque insurers.

Stable insurers become less stable. Increased competition among insurers can increase counterparty risk.

  • CDS market characterized by lower quality insurers than

traditional insurance due to speculators. Removing speculators may actually increase counterparty risk.

  • With a CCP, stable insurers can lose competitive advantage

and drop out: problem of the commons type result.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 5 / 32

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Players

  • Insured Party (Bank)

◮ Endowed with loan that can default.

  • Two Insurers

◮ Either ’good’ or ’bad’ ◮ Both endowed with random portfolio ◮ Both make investment decision. Good invests liquid, bad

invests illiquid.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 6 / 32

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Bank

  • Return from an asset (e.g., loan) of RB with probability p,

nothing otherwise

  • It insures loan of size 1. As in Thompson (2010), suffers cost

Z if no protection.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 7 / 32

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Insurers

  • Portfolio (realized at interim period)

θ

0 θdF(θ) + θ 0dF(θ)

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 8 / 32

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Good Insurer

  • Receives premium PG.
  • Invests premium in liquid (storage) asset available at t = 1,

return: 1.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 9 / 32

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Bad Insurer

  • Bad insurer receives premium PB.
  • Invests premium in illiquid asset available only at t = 2,

return: r > 1.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 10 / 32

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Timing

t = 0 t = 1 t = 2 If needed, each insurer either pays the claim or defaults. Illiquid asset pays off for insurer Bank endowed with loan and insures proportion γ Portfolio draw and liquid invest- ment for insurer realized. Insur- ance claim can be made. James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 11 / 32

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Insurers

πG = p θ

−PG

(θ + PG) dF(θ)

  • +(1 − p)

θ

(1−PG )

(θ − (1 − PG)) dF(θ)

  • James R. Thompson

School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 12 / 32

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Insurers

πG = p θ

−PG

(θ + PG) dF(θ)

  • +(1 − p)

θ

(1−PG )

(θ − (1 − PG)) dF(θ)

  • πB

= p θ (θ + rPB) dF(θ)

  • +(1 − p)

θ

1

(θ − 1 + rPB) dF(θ)

  • James R. Thompson

School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 12 / 32

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Insurers

Lemma

There exists a return r∗, such that for all r > r∗, P0

G > P0 B, where

P0

G and P0 B are the zero profit premia.

  • Define:

◮ qG ≡ 1 − F(1 − PG) ◮ qB ≡ 1 − F(1) James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 13 / 32

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Equilibrium

  • Let j ∈ {B, G}

Π(j) = pRB + (1 − p)qj − (1 − p)(1 − qj)Z − Pj

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 14 / 32

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Equilibrium

Lemma

  • 1. The good insurer provides insurance when

(1 − p)(1 + Z)(qG − qB) ≥ P0

G − P0 B,

where P∗

G ≥ P0 G such that above holds with equality.

  • 2. The bad insurer provides insurance when

(1 − p)(1 + Z)(qG − qB) < P0

G − P0 B,

where P∗

B ≥ P0 B such that above holds with equality.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 15 / 32

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Competition

  • Add new insurer ”(M)iddle” such that qG > qM > qB

πM = p θ

− 1

2 PM

  • θ + 1

2PM(1 + r)

  • dF(θ)
  • + (1 − p)

θ

(1− 1

2 PM)

  • θ − 1 + 1

2PM(1 + r)

  • dF(θ)
  • Focus on case where good insurer dominates bad: When we

add insurer types counterparty risk increases

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 16 / 32

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Unknown Insurer

  • Need PBNE or Sequential Equilibrium with off-equilibrium

path beliefs.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 17 / 32

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Unknown Insurer

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 18 / 32

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Unknown Insurer

  • Assume the following: Any premium above P0

G, the bank

learns nothing.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 19 / 32

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Unknown Insurer

  • market-wide counterparty risk is sum over counterparty risk of

insurers in market.

Proposition

  • When the good insurer dominates under perfect information,

the good insurer becomes riskier and market counterparty risk unambiguously increases when insurer type is unknown.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 20 / 32

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Why buy protection?

Fitch 2009 Credit Derivatives survey of global banks...

Credit Policy

Global Credit Derivatives Survey: Surprises, Challenges and the Future August 2009

17

Global Banks Motivations

41% 38% 14% 24% 50% 24% 43% 27% 33% 9% 76% 19% 59% 43% 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% Hedging/credit risk management Regulatory capital Trading Alternative asset class Intermediary/market‐maker (%) Dominant Active Minimal to not relevant Source: Fitch

In line with past trends, there were some notable swings in the net bought and sold positions within the banks surveyed, both in Europe and the US. While some banks shifted from being net protection sellers to net protection buyers, there were an equal number that shifted from being net buyers to net sellers of protection. This is partly a reflection of the positions taken and the varying views of banks. Clearly, the progress made by banks in reconciling the backlog in trade confirmations and strengthening their back office systems has helped them cope with the unprecedented stress and the chain of credit events to which the CDS market was exposed. Although progress has been achieved, it is clear that continued improvement is necessary if the CDS market is to deal with the increasing number of challenges it is facing.

Insurance Companies

Fitch excluded the insurance industry from this year’s survey due to their having relative lower exposure to CDx than the banks. Previous survey’s received limited responses and the collapse of AIG removed the largest single transactor of CDx in the insurance space. Although AIG is generally viewed as an insurance organisation, its CDx activities were conducted outside of regulated insurance operations. Berkshire Hathaway’s and Swiss Re’s CDx activities are more limited and also

  • utside of insurance operations. Insurance companies have exposures to CDOs,

many of which have experienced sharp declines in value negatively impacting US GAAP reported capital in 2008. Insurance companies are active derivatives players, using interest rate, currency and equity derivatives to hedge economic exposures of very long dated liabilities. Hedge strategies and target levels are extremely varied due to differences in regulatory credit and accounting effectiveness. Insurance companies have not been active users of single name or index‐based

  • derivatives. It remains to be seen if the development of a CCP will increase the

likelihood of active credit management. A few insurance companies suffered losses from the collapse of Lehman Brothers due to counterparty risk. Counterparty risk management is relatively unsophisticated with insurance companies relying on traditional limits of exposure through credit limits and collateral management.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 21 / 32

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Why buy protection?

Fitch 2010 Credit Derivatives survey of global banks...

57 52 41 21 13 33 30 42 43 10 17 32 27 38 43

10 20 30 40 50 60 Regulat ory Capit al Alt ernat ive Asset Class Int ermediary/ Market - maker Hedging/ Credit Risk Management Trading

Minimal to not Relevant Active Dominant Source: Fitch. (% )

Global Banks' Motivations James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 22 / 32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Why buy protection?

  • size of most outstanding single name CDSs are multiples of

total bonds outstanding.

  • Data is sketchy, but majority do not own the underlying.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 23 / 32

slide-34
SLIDE 34

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Speculation versus hedging

  • Risk aversion: Keynes (1930) and Hicks (1946)
  • Risk aversion + beliefs: Hirshleifer (1975, 1977), Spiegel and

Subrahmanyam (1992)

  • Lemma

There exists a ˆ Z such that a bank for which Z < ˆ Z insures with bad insurer, and Z ≥ ˆ Z insures with good insurer.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 24 / 32

slide-35
SLIDE 35

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Speculation versus hedging

  • Risk aversion: Keynes (1930) and Hicks (1946)
  • Risk aversion + beliefs: Hirshleifer (1975, 1977), Spiegel and

Subrahmanyam (1992)

  • Lemma

There exists a ˆ Z such that a bank for which Z < ˆ Z insures with bad insurer, and Z ≥ ˆ Z insures with good insurer.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 24 / 32

slide-36
SLIDE 36

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Speculation versus hedging

  • Risk aversion: Keynes (1930) and Hicks (1946)
  • Risk aversion + beliefs: Hirshleifer (1975, 1977), Spiegel and

Subrahmanyam (1992)

  • Lemma

There exists a ˆ Z such that a bank for which Z < ˆ Z insures with bad insurer, and Z ≥ ˆ Z insures with good insurer.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 24 / 32

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

  • ZL is speculator, ZH is hedger. ZL = 0 is risk neutral ZH > 0

is risk averse (the normal case of insurance)

  • Simplest setting: 2 banks (ZH > ˆ

Z, ZL < ˆ Z), 2 insurers (G, B)

◮ Assume each bank insured with it’s own insurer.

  • Markets with more ZH types will have more good (stable)
  • insurance. Traditional insurance versus CDS.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 25 / 32

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

  • ZL is speculator, ZH is hedger. ZL = 0 is risk neutral ZH > 0

is risk averse (the normal case of insurance)

  • Simplest setting: 2 banks (ZH > ˆ

Z, ZL < ˆ Z), 2 insurers (G, B)

◮ Assume each bank insured with it’s own insurer.

  • Markets with more ZH types will have more good (stable)
  • insurance. Traditional insurance versus CDS.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 25 / 32

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

  • ZL is speculator, ZH is hedger. ZL = 0 is risk neutral ZH > 0

is risk averse (the normal case of insurance)

  • Simplest setting: 2 banks (ZH > ˆ

Z, ZL < ˆ Z), 2 insurers (G, B)

◮ Assume each bank insured with it’s own insurer.

  • Markets with more ZH types will have more good (stable)
  • insurance. Traditional insurance versus CDS.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 25 / 32

slide-40
SLIDE 40

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

On the minds of regulators/governments

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 26 / 32

slide-41
SLIDE 41

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

On the minds of regulators/governments

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 27 / 32

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Even average investors of modest wealth...

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 28 / 32

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

  • Consider the policy of removing speculators
  • Two cases: Bertrand competition within each insurer type, No

Bertrand competition within insurer type

Proposition

In case 1, a policy that removes ZL banks will decrease market counterparty risk. In case 2, this policy will make the good insurer riskier and consequently may increase or decrease market counterparty risk.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 29 / 32

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

  • Consider the policy of removing speculators
  • Two cases: Bertrand competition within each insurer type, No

Bertrand competition within insurer type

Proposition

In case 1, a policy that removes ZL banks will decrease market counterparty risk. In case 2, this policy will make the good insurer riskier and consequently may increase or decrease market counterparty risk.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 29 / 32

slide-45
SLIDE 45

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Central Clearing Counterparties

  • The CCP becomes the buyer to every seller, and the seller to

every buyer.

  • CCP pools counterparty risk. Pirrong (2009) reports that RM

for CCP is mainly on underlying asset, and not counterparty risk.

◮ Therefore, differential pricing not strong based on insurer

quality.

  • Assume that there are lots of insurers of both types and lots
  • f banks insuring currently with both insurer types.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 30 / 32

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Central Clearing Counterparties

  • The CCP becomes the buyer to every seller, and the seller to

every buyer.

  • CCP pools counterparty risk. Pirrong (2009) reports that RM

for CCP is mainly on underlying asset, and not counterparty risk.

◮ Therefore, differential pricing not strong based on insurer

quality.

  • Assume that there are lots of insurers of both types and lots
  • f banks insuring currently with both insurer types.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 30 / 32

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Central Clearing Counterparties

  • The CCP becomes the buyer to every seller, and the seller to

every buyer.

  • CCP pools counterparty risk. Pirrong (2009) reports that RM

for CCP is mainly on underlying asset, and not counterparty risk.

◮ Therefore, differential pricing not strong based on insurer

quality.

  • Assume that there are lots of insurers of both types and lots
  • f banks insuring currently with both insurer types.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 30 / 32

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Central Clearing Counterparties

Proposition

In the presence of a CCP, the bad insures will dominate the market and push the good insurers out.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 31 / 32

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Conclusion

  • We demonstrated the pervasiveness of counterparty risk in

these markets by updating the traditional insurance economics literature.

  • A policy to remove speculators can cause market counterparty

risk to increase.

  • CCPs can cause players to choose lower quality counterparties.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 32 / 32

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Conclusion

  • We demonstrated the pervasiveness of counterparty risk in

these markets by updating the traditional insurance economics literature.

  • A policy to remove speculators can cause market counterparty

risk to increase.

  • CCPs can cause players to choose lower quality counterparties.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 32 / 32

slide-51
SLIDE 51

Model Setup Known Insurer Unknown Insurer Incentives to Insure CCP

Conclusion

  • We demonstrated the pervasiveness of counterparty risk in

these markets by updating the traditional insurance economics literature.

  • A policy to remove speculators can cause market counterparty

risk to increase.

  • CCPs can cause players to choose lower quality counterparties.

James R. Thompson School of Accounting and Finance, University of Waterloo CDS as Insurance: Leaky Lifeboats in Stormy Seas 32 / 32