ccNSO PDP(s) on retirement of ccTLDs and Review mechanism Staging - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

▶

Apr 06, 2023 350 likes •446 views

ccNSO PDP(s) on retirement of ccTLDs and Review mechanism Staging a Policy Development Process Stage 1 (Launch) Starts with ccNSO Council decision Description of issues, assessment of timeline, assessment whether in scope of

SLIDE 1

ccNSO PDP(s)

n retirement of ccTLDs

and Review mechanism

SLIDE 2

Staging a Policy Development Process

Stage 1 (Launch)

– Starts with ccNSO Council decision – Description of issues, assessment of timeline, assessment whether in scope of ccNSO policy development process – Decision to initiate ccNSO PDP

Stage 2 (Development of Policy)

– Starts with interim Report – Public input/comments – Ends with Final Report

Stage 3

– Starts with Final Report – ccNSO Council adoption – ccNSO members vote – Ends with submission of Board Report

SLIDE 3

Characteristics PDP

Duration PDP determined by stage 2

– Includes at a minimum 2 rounds (40 days) public comment – Analyses of issues – Development of recommendations – Minimal duration 6 months

Stage 3 includes members vote on set of

recommendations

– possible two rounds ( quorum rule: at least 80 members need to vote), – minimal duration 2 months

SLIDE 4

Method (1) Single PDP

Charter two working groups
Working Group 1: Review Mechanism
Working Group 2: Retirement of ccTLDs and update Review

Mechanisms if necessary

Total package (output WG 1 and 2) subject to members vote

SLIDE 5

Method (2) two PDPs

Inititiate 2 PDPs
PDP 1 Review Mechanism
Members vote at end of PDP 1
PDP 2 on retirement of ccTLDs
Members vote at the end of PDP 2

SLIDE 6

Outcome Marrakesh session

Review mechanism on decisions delegation,

revocation, transfer highest priority

Preference one (1) PDP
Do as much parallel as possible

SLIDE 7

Launch of PDP Helsinki Council decisions

Request for an Issue Report by Hyderabad

– Includes question to initiate one or twoPDPs

In preparing Issue Report be guided by:

– DRD WG Final report on retirement of ccTLDs, 07 march 2011 – ccNSO Framework of Interpretation – RFC 1591 – ISO 3166 Standard – CWG-Stewardship Final Report, Annex O (Survey)

Appointment Issue manager
Appointment Oversight Committee (6 Councillors)

SLIDE 8

Concern Council

Availability of community members/

Workload for the community.

– If as much as parallel as possible will become issue

When is Review Mechanism needed?

– If one PDP, date of availability determined by date

f members vote at the end of process