categoricity of shimura varieties
play

Categoricity of Shimura Varieties Sebastian Eterovi University of - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Categoricity of Shimura Varieties Sebastian Eterovi University of Oxford PLS12, June 2019 S. Eterovi (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 1 / 10 The Language of Algebraic Varieties Let V ( C ) C n be an irreducible


  1. Categoricity of Shimura Varieties Sebastian Eterović University of Oxford PLS12, June 2019 S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 1 / 10

  2. The Language of Algebraic Varieties Let V ( C ) ⊆ C n be an irreducible algebraic variety defined over a countable field F 0 . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 2 / 10

  3. The Language of Algebraic Varieties Let V ( C ) ⊆ C n be an irreducible algebraic variety defined over a countable field F 0 . Let F be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0 with an embedding F 0 → F . This defines a structure in the language L F 0 = { + , · , F 0 } which is the extension of the language of rings by a set of constants for F 0 . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 2 / 10

  4. The Language of Algebraic Varieties Let V ( C ) ⊆ C n be an irreducible algebraic variety defined over a countable field F 0 . Let F be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0 with an embedding F 0 → F . This defines a structure in the language L F 0 = { + , · , F 0 } which is the extension of the language of rings by a set of constants for F 0 . The set V ( F ) (consisting of the F -points of V ) can be interpreted over the L F 0 -structure F . For every m ≥ 1, every subvariety of V ( F ) m definable over F 0 is definable in the language L F 0 . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 2 / 10

  5. The Language of Algebraic Varieties Let V ( C ) ⊆ C n be an irreducible algebraic variety defined over a countable field F 0 . Let F be an algebraically closed field of characteristic 0 with an embedding F 0 → F . This defines a structure in the language L F 0 = { + , · , F 0 } which is the extension of the language of rings by a set of constants for F 0 . The set V ( F ) (consisting of the F -points of V ) can be interpreted over the L F 0 -structure F . For every m ≥ 1, every subvariety of V ( F ) m definable over F 0 is definable in the language L F 0 . Let T be the complete first-order theory of V in this language. As V ( F ) is bi-interpretable with F , then T has the same model-theoretic properties as ACF 0 , in particular, it is uncountably categorical. S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 2 / 10

  6. Quotient Varieties Let U ⊆ C n be a complex domain, and suppose that there is an action of a group Γ on U such that V ( C ) = Γ \ U is an algebraic variety. S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 3 / 10

  7. Quotient Varieties Let U ⊆ C n be a complex domain, and suppose that there is an action of a group Γ on U such that V ( C ) = Γ \ U is an algebraic variety. Example Let H ⊂ C denote the upper half-plane. The group SL 2 ( Z ) acts on H through Möbius transformations. The quotient SL 2 ( Z ) \ H is an algebraic variety isomorphic to C . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 3 / 10

  8. Quotient Varieties Let U ⊆ C n be a complex domain, and suppose that there is an action of a group Γ on U such that V ( C ) = Γ \ U is an algebraic variety. Example Let H ⊂ C denote the upper half-plane. The group SL 2 ( Z ) acts on H through Möbius transformations. The quotient SL 2 ( Z ) \ H is an algebraic variety isomorphic to C . Quotient varieties can have more interesting structures than just being algebraic varieties. In order to witness this with model theory, it helps to expand the language and make it two-sorted: q : U → V ( C ) V has the language of algebraic varieties, U at least has the structure of a Γ -action, q is a function symbol invariant under Γ . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 3 / 10

  9. Shimura Varieties Let X + denote a complex domain and suppose that there is an algebraic group G defined over Q such that G ( R ) + acts on X + through biholomorphisms. Under certain axioms on this data, one can find discrete subgroups Γ < G ( Q ) + such that Γ \ X + is a variety. S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 4 / 10

  10. Shimura Varieties Let X + denote a complex domain and suppose that there is an algebraic group G defined over Q such that G ( R ) + acts on X + through biholomorphisms. Under certain axioms on this data, one can find discrete subgroups Γ < G ( Q ) + such that Γ \ X + is a variety. Choosing the axioms to be the axioms of Shimura data , the quotient S ( C ) := Γ \ X + is called a (connected) Shimura variety . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 4 / 10

  11. Shimura Varieties Let X + denote a complex domain and suppose that there is an algebraic group G defined over Q such that G ( R ) + acts on X + through biholomorphisms. Under certain axioms on this data, one can find discrete subgroups Γ < G ( Q ) + such that Γ \ X + is a variety. Choosing the axioms to be the axioms of Shimura data , the quotient S ( C ) := Γ \ X + is called a (connected) Shimura variety . By some very deep theorems, Shimura varieties are canonically defined over a corresponding number field E = E ( G , X + ) called the reflex field . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 4 / 10

  12. Special Subvarieties Suppose V ⊆ S is a subvariety such that one can find a subdomain V ⊆ X + and an algebraic subgroup H < G defined over Q , so that X + H , X + � � also satisfies the axioms of Shimura data. V S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 5 / 10

  13. Special Subvarieties Suppose V ⊆ S is a subvariety such that one can find a subdomain V ⊆ X + and an algebraic subgroup H < G defined over Q , so that X + H , X + � � also satisfies the axioms of Shimura data. V Let Γ H = Γ ∩ H ( Q ) . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 5 / 10

  14. Special Subvarieties Suppose V ⊆ S is a subvariety such that one can find a subdomain V ⊆ X + and an algebraic subgroup H < G defined over Q , so that X + H , X + � � also satisfies the axioms of Shimura data. V Let Γ H = Γ ∩ H ( Q ) . If V ( C ) = Γ H \ X + V , then we call V a special subvariety of S . We also call X + V a special domain for V . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 5 / 10

  15. Special Subvarieties Suppose V ⊆ S is a subvariety such that one can find a subdomain V ⊆ X + and an algebraic subgroup H < G defined over Q , so that X + H , X + � � also satisfies the axioms of Shimura data. V Let Γ H = Γ ∩ H ( Q ) . If V ( C ) = Γ H \ X + V , then we call V a special subvariety of S . We also call X + V a special domain for V . A 0-dimensional special subvariety of S is called a special point . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 5 / 10

  16. Some Important Special Subvarieties Let p : X + → S ( C ) be a Shimura variety. Choose g 1 , . . . , g n ∈ G ( Q ) + . Define: X + S ( C ) n p g : → x �→ ( p ( g 1 x ) , . . . , p ( g n x )) . The image of p g is a special subvariety of S n which we denote Z g . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 6 / 10

  17. Shimura Structures Let p : X + → S ( C ) be a Shimura variety. We interpret this as a Shimura structure q : D → S ( F ) using the language L consisting of: S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 7 / 10

  18. Shimura Structures Let p : X + → S ( C ) be a Shimura variety. We interpret this as a Shimura structure q : D → S ( F ) using the language L consisting of: 1 S ( F ) is interpreted as an algebraic variety over F 0 = E (Σ) , where Σ is the set of coordinates of all special points of S ( C ) . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 7 / 10

  19. Shimura Structures Let p : X + → S ( C ) be a Shimura variety. We interpret this as a Shimura structure q : D → S ( F ) using the language L consisting of: 1 S ( F ) is interpreted as an algebraic variety over F 0 = E (Σ) , where Σ is the set of coordinates of all special points of S ( C ) . 2 D is a set with an action of G ( Q ) + and also predicates D V ⊆ D m (for all m ≥ 1) interpreted as the special domains of a special subvariety V . S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 7 / 10

  20. Shimura Structures Let p : X + → S ( C ) be a Shimura variety. We interpret this as a Shimura structure q : D → S ( F ) using the language L consisting of: 1 S ( F ) is interpreted as an algebraic variety over F 0 = E (Σ) , where Σ is the set of coordinates of all special points of S ( C ) . 2 D is a set with an action of G ( Q ) + and also predicates D V ⊆ D m (for all m ≥ 1) interpreted as the special domains of a special subvariety V . 3 q is a function. S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 7 / 10

  21. Shimura Structures Let p : X + → S ( C ) be a Shimura variety. We interpret this as a Shimura structure q : D → S ( F ) using the language L consisting of: 1 S ( F ) is interpreted as an algebraic variety over F 0 = E (Σ) , where Σ is the set of coordinates of all special points of S ( C ) . 2 D is a set with an action of G ( Q ) + and also predicates D V ⊆ D m (for all m ≥ 1) interpreted as the special domains of a special subvariety V . 3 q is a function. Let Th ( p ) be the complete first-order theory of p : X + → S ( C ) in this language. S. Eterović (Oxford) Categoricity of Shimura Varieties June 2019 7 / 10

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend