CASE 6 G. Petur Nielsen, M.D. Department of Pathology - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

case 6
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CASE 6 G. Petur Nielsen, M.D. Department of Pathology - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CASE 6 G. Petur Nielsen, M.D. Department of Pathology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA Professor of Pathology Harvard Medical School gnielsen@partners.org CASE 6 43 year old presented with pain in the right upper thigh that had


slide-1
SLIDE 1

CASE 6

  • G. Petur Nielsen, M.D.

Department of Pathology Massachusetts General Hospital Boston, MA Professor of Pathology Harvard Medical School gnielsen@partners.org

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CASE 6

  • 43 year old presented with pain in the right

upper thigh that had recently increased. There was a history of minor trauma and injury in the remote past

slide-3
SLIDE 3
slide-4
SLIDE 4
slide-5
SLIDE 5
slide-6
SLIDE 6
slide-7
SLIDE 7
slide-8
SLIDE 8
slide-9
SLIDE 9
slide-10
SLIDE 10

Diagnosis

Bizarre parosteal

  • steochondromatous proliferation

(BPOP)

slide-11
SLIDE 11

BPOP

  • First described by Nora et al.
  • 35 patients
  • 14‐74 years old
  • 0.4‐3 cm
  • Proximal phalanges / metatarsals / metacarpals
  • 18 local recurrence – 8 locally recurred twice
  • Nora et al. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferations of the hands and feet.

Am J Surg Pathol 1983; 7:245‐250

slide-12
SLIDE 12

BPOP

  • 65 patients
  • 8‐73 years old
  • 72% involved the small bones
  • 27% involved long bones
  • 14 with one local recurrence – 5 with two – 3 with

three

  • Menses et al. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferations of bone (Nora’s

lesion). Am J Surg Pathol 1993; 17:691‐697

slide-13
SLIDE 13
slide-14
SLIDE 14
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Fibrous tissue Cartilage Bone

slide-16
SLIDE 16

BPOP

  • Initially thought to be a non‐neoplastic, reactive

process

  • t(1;17(q32;q21) has been identified supporting a

neoplastic process

  • Four cases with inversion of chromosome 7 have

been described

  • Nilsson et al et al. Molecular cytogenetic characterization of recurrent translocation breakpoints in bizarre parosteal
  • steochondromatous proliferation (Nora’s lesion). Human Pathology 2004;35:1063‐1069
  • Endo et al. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation with a t(1;17) translocation. Virchows Archiv 2005;447:99‐102
  • Broehm et al. Bizarre parosteal osteochondromatous proliferation: a new cytogenetic subgroup characterized by inversion of

chromosome 7. Cancer Genetics 2013;206:402‐405

slide-17
SLIDE 17

BPOP – Differential Diagnosis

  • Small bones
  • Subungual exostosis
  • Florid reactive periostitis
slide-18
SLIDE 18

Subungual Exostosis

  • Arises in a subungual

location

  • t(X;6)(q24‐26;q15‐21)

77% 10% 13% Location of Subungual Exostosis Based on 244 Cases Great Toe Other Toes Fingers

  • DaCambra et al. Subungual Exostosis of the Toes: A Systematic Review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 2014;472:1251‐1259
  • Mertens et al. The t(X;6) in subungual exostosis results in transcriptional deregulation of the gene for insulin receptor substrate 4. Int. J. Cancer

2011;128:487‐491

slide-19
SLIDE 19
slide-20
SLIDE 20
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Florid Reactive Periostitis

  • Surface lesion of small bones of hands and

feet (parosteal fasciitis – unusual myositis

  • ssificans)
  • Probably reactive / traumatic process – no

genetic abnormality has been identified

  • Spjut et al. Florid reactive periostitis of the tubular bones of the hands and feet. A benign lesion which may simulate osteosarcoma. Am J Surg Pathol

1981;5:423‐433

slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24

BPOP – Differential Diagnosis

  • Long bones
  • Parosteal osteosarcoma
  • Periosteal osteosarcoma
  • Osteochondroma
slide-25
SLIDE 25

Parosteal Osteosarcoma

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Parosteal Osteosarcoma

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Parosteal Osteosarcoma

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Periosteal Osteosarcoma

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Periosteal Osteosarcoma

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Osteochondroma

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Osteochondroma

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Osteochondroma

slide-33
SLIDE 33

CASE 6

  • Treated with resection
  • No recurrence 11 years later
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Thank You