Carbon Cap and Trade What will it do to Ag and forest Bruce A. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

carbon cap and trade what will it do to ag and forest
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Carbon Cap and Trade What will it do to Ag and forest Bruce A. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Carbon Cap and Trade What will it do to Ag and forest Bruce A. McCarl Distinguished Professor of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M University Presented at Research Perspectives on Carbon and Climate Change Issues Farm Foundation Forum,


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Carbon Cap and Trade What will it do to Ag and forest

Bruce A. McCarl

Distinguished Professor of Agricultural Economics Texas A&M University Presented at

Research Perspectives on Carbon and Climate Change Issues Farm Foundation Forum, Washington, D.C. November 10, 2009

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Why Care About GHGs

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Greenhouse Gasses

Source http://ssca.usask.ca/2002conference/Bennett.htm

Carbon Dioxide highly associated with climate change Policy around world working to limit emissions

Source : U.S. National Assessment

Where we are

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Where we could go Size of Potential Emissions

Coal 5,000 to 8,000 PgC

Biomass ~500 PgC

Soils ~1,500 PgC

Atmosphere 800 PgC (2004)

Oil ~270 PgC

  • N. Gas

~260 PgC

Unconventional Fossil Fuels 15,000 to 40,000 PgC

Source Jae Edmonds, Joint Global Change Research Institute at the University of Maryland

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Why Adapt - Inevitability

500 600 700 800

Stabilization level (ppm CO2-eq) Global mean temp. increase at equilibrium (ºC) Year CO2 needs to peak Year CO2 emissions back at 2000 level Reduction in 2050 CO2 emissions compared to 2000

445 – 490 2.0 – 2.4 2000 - 2015 2000- 2030

  • 85 to -50

490 – 535 2.4 – 2.8 2000 - 2020 2000- 2040

  • 60 to -30

535 – 590 2.8 – 3.2 2010 - 2030 2020- 2060

  • 30 to +5

590 – 710 3.2 – 4.0 2020 - 2060 2050- 2100 +10 to +60 710 – 855 4.0 – 4.9 2050 - 2080 +25 to +85 855 – 1130 4.9 – 6.1 2060 - 2090 +90 to +140

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Why Agriculture and Forestry

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Greenhouse Gas Emissions Sources

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Historical Emissions Estimates

Source: Apparently this was drawn from W. F. Ruddiman, 2001. Earth's Climate: Past and Future. W. H. Freeman and Sons, New York

Sequestration may have the potential to alleviate somewhere in the neighborhood of 25% of the historical atmospheric greenhouse gas accumulation.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Source: IEA WEO 2007 and Socolow presentation at Americas Climate Choices

Per-capita fossil-fuel CO2 emissions, 2005

1- World emissions: 27 billion tons CO2 STABILIZATION AVERAGE TODAY

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Cap and Trade Effects and Responses

slide-11
SLIDE 11

AG and FOREST MITIGATION OPTIONS AG and FOREST MITIGATION OPTIONS

Strategy Basic Nature CO2 CH4 N2O Crop Mix Alteration Emis, Seq X X Crop Fertilization Alteration Emis, Seq X X **Crop Input Alteration Emission X X Crop Tillage Alteration Emission X X Grassland Conversion Sequestration X Irrigated /Dry land Mix Emission X X Biofuel Production Offset X X X Stocker/Feedlot mix Emission X Enteric fermentation Emission X Livestock Herd Size Emission X X Livestock System Change Emission X X Manure Management Emission X X Rice Acreage Emission X X X Afforestation (not today) Sequestration X Existing timberland Management Sequestration X Deforestation Emission X

slide-12
SLIDE 12

“The Effects of Low-Carbon Policies on Net Farm Income”

Duke/TAMU et al Modeling Effort WORKING PAPER*

Justin S. Baker Bruce A. McCarl Brian C. Murray Steven K. Rose Ralph J. Alig Darius Adams Greg Latta Robert Beach Adam Daigneault

*Results under review, please do not cite at this time. *Some results shared today are not included in this working paper

slide-13
SLIDE 13

FROM EPA (2005) GREENHOUSE GAS MITIGATION POTENTIAL IN U.S. FORESTRY AND AGRICULTURE

500 1,000 1,500 2,000 2,500 MMT CO2 reductions relative to baseline $1 $5 $15 $30 $50 $/t CO2

National Mitigation Cost Curve for Agriculture, Forestry, and Biofuel Offsets

Agricultural soil carbon sequestration Forest management Fossil fuel mitigation from crop production Agricultural CH4 and N2O mitigation Afforestation Biofuel offsets

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Biodiesel Cell Ethanol Grain/Sug Ethanol

Liquid Portfolio Composition Ag Only

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Dissecting Welfare Gains Further (Full Eligibility Scenario)

Preliminary results. Subject to change.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Direct and Indirect Revenue Flows (Full Eligibility Scenario)

  • Energy Input Cost Increases:
  • 1.4%, 2.30%, and 4.10% per acre
slide-17
SLIDE 17

Will RFS make Land Use Change Happen

Prices in $2004 dollars Base shows diminishing prices as yield growth exceeds demand RFS2 Holds prices up until it hits max Q then overtaken by Yield growth Climate Bill holds up prices

Corn Prices with Different Policies

0.00 0.50 1.00 1.50 2.00 2.50 3.00 3.50 4.00 2000 2010 2020 2030 2040 2050 Year Corn Price base with rfs2 with rfs2 and clim bill

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Food Competition

Figure 1: Ethanol Production and Capacity plus new construction 2001-2008

2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000 16000 1 9 9 9 2 2 1 2 2 2 3 2 4 2 5 2 6 2 7 2 8 Year Million gallons Production Capacity+Construction

Figure 4 US Average Corn Price in $ per Bushel

Corn Price $/Bushel 1 2 3 4 5 6 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008

Similarly soybean oil prices have changed

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Effects of Policies on the Table

Ordinarily Red items regarded as carbon sequestration reducing Blue items regarded as carbon sequestration increasing Colors for numbers are relative to NO RFS2

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Findings

GHG mitigation competitive with Current Production Price implications are substantial Ag and forest income will increase Consumers will pay Big opportunities Afforestation, Bio electricity, Ag soil management, Forest management, Fossil fuel use Leakage/indirect land use is a factor need global accounting and more than what lifecycle does GHG prices move us away from current ethanols