CAR-T and Other Immunotherapies in Myeloma Ivan Borrello, M.D. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CAR-T and Other Immunotherapies in Myeloma Ivan Borrello, M.D. - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
CAR-T and Other Immunotherapies in Myeloma Ivan Borrello, M.D. bb2121: BCMA CAR T Cell Design bb2121 CAR Design CD8 MND SP Anti-BCMA scFv 4-1BB CD3z Promoter Linker Signaling Domains Tumor binding domain Autologous T cells
bb2121: BCMA CAR T Cell Design
- Autologous T cells transduced with a lentiviral vector encoding a CAR specific for human BCMA
- Optimal 4-1BB costimulatory signaling domain: associated with less acute toxicity and more
durable CAR T cell persistence than CD28 costimulatory domain1
- 1. Ali SI, et al. Blood. 2016;128(13):1688-700.
bb2121 CAR Design
SP Anti-BCMA scFv CD3z 4-1BB MND CD8
Tumor binding domain Signaling Domains Linker Promoter
CAR-T Toxicities
3
4
Parameter Escalation (N=21) Expansion (N=22) Exposed Refractory Exposed Refractory Prior therapies, n (%) Bortezomib 21 (100) 14 (67) 22 (100) 16 (73) Carfilzomib 19 (91) 12 (57) 21 (96) 14 (64) Lenalidomide 21 (100) 19 (91) 22 (100) 18 (82) Pomalidomide 19 (91) 15 (71) 22 (100) 21 (96) Daratumumab 15 (71) 10 (48) 22 (100) 19 (86) Cumulative exposure, n (%) Bort/Len 21 (100) 14 (67) 22 (100) 14 (64) Bort/Len/Car/Pom/Dara 15 (71) 6 (29) 21 (96) 7 (32) Parameter Escalation (N=21) Expansion (N=22) Median (min, max) prior regimens 7 (3, 14) 8 (3, 23) Prior autologous SCT, n (%) 21 (100) 19 (86) 3 (14) 1 15 (71) 14 (64) >1 6 (29) 5 (23)
Data cutoff: March 29, 2018. SCT, stem cell transplant.
Treatment History
Parameter Dosed Patients (N=43) Patients with a CRS event, n (%) 27 (63) Maximum CRS gradea None 1 2 3 4 16 (37) 16 (37) 9 (21) 2 (5) Median (min, max) time to onset, d 2 (1, 25) Median (min, max) duration, d 6 (1, 32) Tocilizumab use, n (%) 9 (21) Corticosteroid use, n (%) 4 (9)
Cytokine Release Syndrome Parameters
Data cutoff: March 29, 2018. aCRS uniformly graded according to Lee DW, et al. Blood. 2014;124(2):188-195. b3 patients were treated at the 50 x 106 dose level for a total of 43 patients.
Cytokine Release Syndrome By Dose Level
Dose Levelb
16,7 50,0 22,2 22,7 9,1 20 40 60 80 100 150 x 106 >150 x 106
Patients, %
3 2 1
39% 82% >150 × 106 (n=22) 150 × 106 (n=18) Maximum Toxicity Gradea
Cytokine Release Syndrome
bb2121 CAR+ T Cell Expansion
- Comparable Cmax in active dose cohorts (≥150 × 106
CAR+ T cells)
- Durable bb2121 persistence (≥6 months) in 44%
- Higher peak expansion in patients with response
Data cutoff: March 29, 2018. Cmax, maximum serum concentration; LLOQ, lower limit of quantitation.
7
Median (Q1, Q3) Vector Copies in CD3-Enriched Peripheral Blood by Dose Cohorts
Month 1 Month 3 Month 6 Month 12 At risk, n 32 26 16 10 With detectable vector, n (%) 31 (97) 22 (85) 7 (44) 2 (20)
Patients with ≥2 months of response data and 1 month of vector copy data (N=36). P value based on a 2-sided Wilcoxon rank sum test. Patients with a post-baseline vector copy value were included. One patient was dosed at 205 × 106 CAR+ T cells instead of the planned 450 × 106 and was included in the 450 × 106 dose group.
Peak bb2121 Vector Copies in Responders vs Nonresponders
P=0.005 Median Vector Copies/µg of Genomic DNA
1 07 1 06 1 05 1 04 1 03
Tumor Response: Deep MRD- negative responses observed
- All responding patients evaluated for MRD were MRD negative at 1 or more time points
- 2 nonresponders evaluated for MRD were MRD positive at month 1
Response 50 × 106 150 × 106 450 × 106 800 × 106 Total MRD- evaluable responders 4 11 1 16 MRD-nega 4 (100) 11 (100) 1 (100) 16 (100)
Data cutoff: March 29, 2018. aOf 16 MRD-negative responses: 4 at 10-6, 11 at 10-5, 1 at 10-4 sensitivity by Adaptive next-generation sequencing assay.
PFS at Inactive (50 × 106) and Active (150–800 × 106) Dose Levelsa PFS in MRD-Negative Patientsa
Data cutoff: March 29, 2018. Median and 95% CI from Kaplan-Meier estimate. NE, not estimable. aPFS in dose escalation cohort. 50 × 106 (n=3) 150–800 × 106 (n=18) Events 3 10 mPFS (95% CI), mo 2.7 (1.0–2.9) 11.8 (8.8–NE) 150–800 × 106 (n=16) mPFS (95% CI), mo 17.7 (5.8–NE)
Progression-Free Survival
- mPFS of 11.8 months at active doses (≥150 × 106 CAR+ T cells) in 18 subjects in dose escalation phase
- mPFS of 17.7 months in 16 responding subjects who are MRD-negative
mPFS = 11.8 mo mPFS = 2.7 mo mPFS = 17.7 mo
20000 40000 60000 80000 100000 120000 140000 160000 PBL aPBL MILs aMILs CPM/ 10^5 CD3
Nothing CD33 CD138
100 200 300 400 500 600 700 30 50 70 90 110 130 150 170 190 240
Days post tumor challenge Human Kappa (ng/ml)
HBSS aMIL aPBL
MILs Exhibit Significant Anti-Myeloma Specificity aMILs Effectively Kill Myeloma Cells MILs eradicate pre-established disease
Marrow Infiltrating Lymphocytes
Noonan et al Ca Res 2005; 65(5)
10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 APC day 79
100 101 102 103 104 PE M1
100 101 102 103 104 PE M1
aPBLs Human CD3+ aMILs MILs Persist in the Bone Marrow and Eradicate Myeloma
Human CD138+ Control No Stain
10 0 10 1 10 2 10 3 10 4 APC day 110
First MILs Clinical Trial
Tumor Specificity of aMILs Product
13
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40
CR PD
%CD3+/CFSElow/IFNg+
p=0.07
(Noonan et al. STM 2015; 7:288)
5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 D60 D180 D360 %CD3+/CFSElow/IFNγ+
CR PR SD PD
Tumor-specific Response in the BM Correlates with Clinical Outcomes
* *
*p<0.001
(Noonan et al. STM 2015; 7:288)
41BB Expression with Expansion
PBL MIL
CD4+/41BB+ =8.14% CD4+/41BB+ =18.21%
CD4+ CD4+
Pre-Activation
CD4+/41BB+ =2.8% CD4+/41BB+ =10.67%
Normoxia
CD4+/41BB+ =0% CD4+/41BB+ =43.4%
Hypoxia
Hypoxia Enhances Function in 4- 1BB+ T cell Subset
16
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 2139 untouched 2139 4- 1BBneg 2139 4- 1BBpos
500 1000 1500 2000 2500 3000 3500 4000
d+3 7 14 21 28 60 180
J0770 J0997 J1343 MILs J1343 No MILs
Average ABS Lymph Count
N=21 N=30
Normoxia MILs No MILS
In vivo MILs Expansion
N=5 N=2
Hypoxia MILs
Day 3 Day 5 Day 9
MILs CAR
5.7% 36.1% 0% 1.6%
PBLs CAR
7.1% 57.8%
CD3
CD138
Superior Killing by MIL-CARs Compared to PBL-CARs
N.B: 8226 cells was added on days 3 or 7 days after the primary 8226 challenge
MIL CARs: More Data Showing Superior Killing via the CAR in MIL CARs vs. PBL CARs
19
C A R M I L s C A R P B L s 5 0 1 0 0
% 8 2 2 6 C e l l K i l l i n g P = 0 . 0 0 7 7 * *
C A R M I L s C A R P B L s 5 0 1 0 0
% 8 2 2 6 C e l l K i l l i n g P = 0 . 0 2 1 *
CART:Target ratio = 1:10 Primary Challenge (48hr) Rechallenge
MIL CARs: Preserve the Endogenous TCR-mediated Killing
CD38 MIL CARs NT MILs
14.9% 4.8%
CD38 Stimulated CD38 MIL CARs
21.0% Native TCR in MIL CARS works even after the CAR has fired
Tumor Specificity Assay Testing ability of Native TCR to Recognize Tumor Ag:
Conclusions
- Tumor specificity of MILs correlates with clinical outcomes
- Memory phenotype, broad antigenic specificity are properties
unique to MILs and not found on PBLs
- T cell persistence correlates with responses
- Hypoxia augments T cell function of MILs through
– upregulation of 4-1BB – increase in anti-apoptotic proteins and survival cytokines – Enhance ex vivo and in vivo expansion
- The absence of a PFS plateau with BCMA CARs limits the long-
term efficacy of this approach in MM
- MILs appear to show better anti-tumor activity as a source of
CAR-modified T cells than PBLs
21
Acknowledgements
22
Myeloma Group Abbas Ali Carol Ann Huff Bill Matsui Amy Sidorski Satish Shanbhag Jenn Hanle Clinical Research Laura Cucci Leo Luznik Phil Imus Maria Yankouski Amanda Stevens Cell Therapy Lab Janice Davis Vic Lemas Sue Fiorino Borrello Lab Megan Heiman Valentina Hoyos Luca Biavati Danielle Dillard Ervin Griffin Amy Thomas WindMIL Kim Noonan Eric Lutz Lakshmi Rudraraju Funding NIH BMT PO1 Commonwealth Foundation