Call for Abstracts closing 8 July 2019 The Review of Pharmacy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

call for abstracts closing 8 july 2019 the review of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Call for Abstracts closing 8 July 2019 The Review of Pharmacy - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Call for Abstracts closing 8 July 2019 The Review of Pharmacy Remuneration and Regulation 2 July, 2019 What will we cover? Scope Background History Analysis Recommendations Lessons and Questions The pharmacy review 3 Scope Scope


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Call for Abstracts – closing 8 July 2019

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Review of Pharmacy Remuneration and Regulation

2 July, 2019

slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

What will we cover? Scope Background History Analysis Recommendations Lessons and Questions

The pharmacy review

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Scope

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Scope

Scope

The Panel was asked to consider:

  • pharmacy remuneration for

dispensing;

  • regulation;
  • wholesaling, logistics and

distribution arrangements;

  • accountability and regulation; and
  • consumer experience.
slide-6
SLIDE 6

Background on community pharmacy

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

The PBS supply chain

Background on Community Pharmacy

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Pharmacy ownership and ‘groups’

Background on Community Pharmacy

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Community pharmacy - What is a dispense

Background on Community Pharmacy

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Pharmacy remuneration –

Background on Community Pharmacy

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Pharmacy remuneration – 40mg Atorvastatin (May 2017)

Background on Community Pharmacy

slide-12
SLIDE 12

A brief history on remuneration for dispensing

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

A brief history on remuneration for dispensing

History

  • The 1980s – a time of free entry and

government set remuneration (and state

  • wnership rules)
  • 5609 pharmacies (we have about 5500 today)
  • One pharmacy for every 3000 people (about

1:4300 today)

  • Increasing government cost largely driven by

two-part remuneration

  • The 1988 Inquiry
  • Need to reform remuneration
  • Too many inefficient pharmacies so need

amalgamations/closures

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

A brief history on remuneration for dispensing

History

  • The 1990s
  • First CPA with Pharmacy Guild to get

agreement on remuneration and agreement

  • n closures and amalgamation
  • Location rules necessarily followed – any

new pharmacy had to be at least 5km away from an existing pharmacy

  • CPA covers dispensing, programs and

wholesaling

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

A brief history on remuneration for dispensing

History

  • The 2000s
  • Location rules ‘whack a mole’ starts
  • Rules to move an existing pharmacy and

rules for medical centres and shopping centres

  • Rural pharmacy subsidy starts
  • At end of decade – price disclosure rules
slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Price disclosure savings ($m)

History

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

A brief history on remuneration for dispensing

History

  • The 2010s
  • Location rules ‘whack a mole’ continues
  • Can move pharmacy up to 1km
  • Set up new pharmacy if ‘demonstrable

need’.

  • Significant jump in remuneration per script
  • Price disclosure bites
slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

Average Pharmacy remuneration per script

History

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Analysis

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

The money

Analysis

What is appropriate remuneration for dispensing?

  • $11.50 per script but not based on any

economic analysis of costs

  • The government does not have the data to

determine the cost of efficient dispensing

  • But huge differences in pharmacies
  • The 70:30 rule except where it is 30:70
  • Price disclosure will kill some pharmacies

(but always a buyer for the license!)

  • Best information to the panel suggests that an

efficient pharmacy needs $8-$10 per script on a conservative basis.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Fiscal savings from flat $10 dispensing fee (based on 2016 data)

Analysis

Year Fiscal cost saving 2015-16 $277,693,429 2016-17 $290,328480 2017-18 $296,564,010 2018-19 $303,674,132 2019-20 $310,954,719 Total $1,479,214,770

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

The customer

Analysis

Is the customer getting what the government pays for?

  • Service highly variable and customers ‘voting with

feet’

  • What you can get differs between pharmacies
  • No ‘modern’ interface between GP – community

pharmacy – hospital

  • Huge price variation
  • Where you live matters.
  • Community pharmacy is “a shop”.
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Notes: Top 10 medicines ranked by script volume. Only community pharmacies included. Excludes any price differences due to special patient contributions, therapeutic group premiums and brand premiums. Excludes chemotherapy medicines.

23

Price differences, general consumers (Sept 2016)

Analysis

PBS item code Medicine name

  • No. of scripts

('000s) Average price paid Standard deviation 01215Y PARACETAMOL + CODEINE 86 $11.41 $4.78 01394J LEVONORGESTREL + ETHINYLOESTRADIOL 101 $16.08 $5.24 01889K AMOXYCILLIN 176 $12.01 $4.88 03119E CEPHALEXIN 158 $12.66 $4.95 08008L PANTOPRAZOLE 99 $11.81 $4.99 08215J ATORVASTATIN 74 $13.06 $5.99 08254K AMOXYCILLIN + CLAVULANIC ACID 186 $13.66 $5.45 08600P ESOMEPRAZOLE 112 $21.00 $6.30 08700X ESCITALOPRAM 74 $12.46 $5.80 09043Y ROSUVASTATIN 202 $17.22 $6.46

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Proportion of $1 discount scripts dispensed by PhARIA, 1 Jan – 30 June 2016

Analysis

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Location rules and remuneration

Analysis

There is no credible economic case for ‘excessive clustering’ of community pharmacies once appropriate remuneration is established. Other factors:

  • Supermarket co-location
  • Ability of incumbent to take new licenses
slide-26
SLIDE 26

Recommendations

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Minimum pharmacy services:

A minimum set of services that all community pharmacies must provide in return for acting as government agents and receiving (partial) government payment for those services – including dispensing PBS medicines. No pricing discretion for PBS medicines Some limits to complementary medicines in community pharmacy

Recommendations

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Minimum pharmacy services: A minimum set of services that all community pharmacies must provide in return for acting as government agents and receiving (partial) government payment for those services – including dispensing PBS medicines. No pricing discretion for PBS medicines Some limits to complementary medicines in community pharmacy

Recommendations

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Electronic prescriptions:

Participation required for all prescribers and dispensers. Linked to a universal health record and medicine record for the patient. Tied to automatic safety net calculations and electronic medicines information

Recommendations

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Electronic prescriptions: Participation required for all prescribers and dispensers. Linked to a universal health record and medicine record for the patient. Tied to automatic safety net calculations and electronic medicines information

Recommendations

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Pharmacy information:

Data to underpin remuneration: Step 1 – Framework for remuneration (*)

  • Best practice benchmark
  • Incremental cost (LRAIC)

Step 2 – What information Step 3 – Get the information Step 4 – Set (flat) level of remuneration for dispensing

Principle of the same government payment for the same service to apply across health professionals.

Recommendations

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Pharmacy information: Data to underpin remuneration: Step 1 – Framework for remuneration (*)

  • Best practice benchmark
  • Incremental cost (LRAIC)

Step 2 – What information Step 3 – Get the information Step 4 – Set (flat) level of remuneration for dispensing Principle of the same government payment for the same service to apply across health professionals.

Recommendations

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Location rules:

Gazzumped by government

  • Recommend someone else look at the rules and ensure

they are based on “equitable and affordable access to Medicines”

  • ACCC to act on local ‘monopolies’ using SLC test with

Divestiture power

Recommendations

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Location rules: Gazzumped by government

  • Recommend someone else look at the rules and ensure

they are based on “equitable and affordable access to Medicines”

  • ACCC to act on local ‘monopolies’ using SLC test with

Divestiture power

Recommendations

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Future Community Pharmacy agreements:

Just remuneration for dispensing

  • Not consider wholesaling
  • Not include ‘programs’
  • Representation by the Guild, the PSA, and the CHF

A range of recommendations on existing and new programs including DAAs, home medicine reviews, and residential aged care.

Recommendations

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

Future Community Pharmacy agreements: Just remuneration for dispensing

  • Not consider wholesaling
  • Not include ‘programs’
  • Representation by the Guild, the PSA, and the CHF

A range of recommendations on existing and new programs including DAAs, home medicine reviews, and residential aged care.

Recommendations

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

Other:

Wholesaling:

  • Further work on supply chain
  • Cap of $700-$1000 on wholesale cost to pharmacy

Support for indigenous Australians follows the individual. Indigenous health services can own and operate pharmacies Trial of machine dispensing One minimum standard and payment for chemotherapy compounding

Recommendations

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

Other: Wholesaling:

  • Further work on supply chain
  • Cap of $700-$1000 on wholesale cost to pharmacy (*)

Support for indigenous Australians follows the individual (*) Indigenous health services can own and operate pharmacies Trial of machine dispensing (-) One minimum standard and payment for chemotherapy compounding

Recommendations (*) Accepted (with caveats) (-) Rejected

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Lessons and Questions

3 July, 2019