CADMC 2013 CAMBRIDGE GUIDELINES FOR THE PROPOSAL OF A SYSTEM OF - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

cadmc 2013
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

CADMC 2013 CAMBRIDGE GUIDELINES FOR THE PROPOSAL OF A SYSTEM OF - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

CADMC 2013 CAMBRIDGE GUIDELINES FOR THE PROPOSAL OF A SYSTEM OF Paulo R. N. Dziobczenski DESIGN MANAGEMENT INDICATORS IN PRODUCT Maurcio M. e S. Bernardes DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES bernardes@ufrgs.br PORTO ALEGRE RIO GRANDE DO SUL CADMC


slide-1
SLIDE 1

GUIDELINES FOR THE PROPOSAL OF A SYSTEM OF DESIGN MANAGEMENT INDICATORS IN PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT COMPANIES

Paulo R. N. Dziobczenski Maurício M. e S. Bernardes bernardes@ufrgs.br

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

slide-2
SLIDE 2

PORTO ALEGRE – RIO GRANDE DO SUL

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

slide-3
SLIDE 3

UFRGS – FEDERAL UNIVERSITY OF RIO GRANDE DO SUL

First school 1895

  • Admin. staff

4,494 Undergraduates 24,567 Postgraduates 8,415 Campus 371,742 m² of constructed area Website www.ufrgs.br

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

slide-4
SLIDE 4

WHY THIS RESEARCH IS IMPORTANT TO BRAZIL?

ICD Project: Innovation, Competitiveness and Design – www.ufrgs.br/icd Guidelines to enhance the competitiveness of the Brazilian Industry through the management and development of innovative products Five large Brazilian product development companies At the end of 2015 4 Doctorate students 5 M.Sc. Students Other four Brazilian Universities joined the project 2 professors of the Institute of Design /IIT - Chicago

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

slide-5
SLIDE 5

INTRODUCTION

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

slide-6
SLIDE 6

RESEARCH METHOD

Investigation in a three companies study cases Interviews with the designers and people connected with them and also with the product development process Way of understanding the routines and environment in which the company are inserted Research protocol based on Kaplan & Norton (1997); Nixon (2002); Oliver (2002); Lockwood (2008); Andrew et al. (2009); Viladàs (2009); Borja de Mozota (2003)

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

slide-7
SLIDE 7

COMPANIES SELECTION CRITERIA

The main activity of the companies should be product development The companies should be located in the state of Rio Grande do Sul The companies should have an internal department in charge of product development, with at least one professional working as a designer

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

slide-8
SLIDE 8

RESEARCH PROTOCOL

1 – Schedule interviews with designers and/or design coordinators

  • f the companies and ask them to select the indicators from the

chart that they regard as important in their company context. 2 – After the selection of each indicator, the respondent should justify his or her choice. This reason will characterize the criterion for selection. 3 – After the selection of the indicators, each respondent should select the three indicators that he or she finds more relevant than all the others selected.

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

slide-9
SLIDE 9

RESEARCH PROTOCOL

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

INDICATORS Financial PDP Design and Innovation Customer HR

slide-10
SLIDE 10

RESEARCH PROTOCOL – EXAMPLES OF INDICATORS

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

INDICATORS Financial PDP Design and Innovation Customer HR

Profitability per product Customer retention Number of new projects per year Mean time of product development Internal customer satisfaction

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CRITERIA CHOOSEN BY COMPANY

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

Company A Company B Company C Criteria Feedback Financial return Financial return Productivity Reduction

  • f

production costs Feedback Development time Product performance Competitors Competitors Productivity Productivity

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CRITERIA FOR THE SELECTION OF INDICATORS

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

slide-13
SLIDE 13

DIFFERENT VIEW POINTS

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

Subject of concern viewpoints aspect models finance users environmental electronic service mechanical information manufacturing business

slide-14
SLIDE 14

GUIDELINES

FROM THE POINT OF VIEW THE PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT

  • 1. Alignment between indicators and the business strategy
  • 2. Balance between the results, performance and market indicators
  • 3. Establishing relationships between indicators
  • 4. Easy indicator collection
  • 5. Selection of indicators and the action plan
  • 6. Shared vision by the users of the indicators system
  • 7. Preparation for the implementation

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

slide-15
SLIDE 15

NEXT STEPS

  • 1. Focus group with experts to choose indicators

 Use of the Guidelines  Competitiveness  Innovation

  • 2. Indicators System Conception
  • 3. Implementation and Standardization
  • 4. Development of a Benchmarking web-based platform

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE

slide-16
SLIDE 16

DOUBTS

  • 1. How to define or propose indicators to measure competitiveness

in a market that the companies do not know even their marketing share?

  • 2. Considering that each company can have different strategic
  • bjectives, how to propose a standardized indicator system in
  • rder to check their competitiveness degree?

CADMC 2013

CAMBRIDGE