By By th the e end of of th this s sessio ion we w will l - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

By By th the e end of

• f th

this s sessio ion we w will l hav ave an an unders rstan andin ing of

• f th

the fol

• llo

lowin ing:

 A model

el f for tea eacher er ev evaluation based ed o

• n curren

ent res esea earch

 The

e FEAPs Ps as a framew ework for the e obser ervation proces ess

 The

he corre rrelation n of BEST ST in in the he obse servatio ion rub rubri rics

 The

he re revise ised st struc ructure of the he inst instruc uctional l appraisal s system em

Evalu

luatio ion p proc rocess re requires a a tw two-way ay dialogue betwee een o

• bserver a

and o

• bser

ervee ee

A

A tea each cher’s i impact a as a a lea eader o

• n the s

e sch chool should d extend d beyond d the classroom

Th

The p prim rimary p purpose of

• f an e

evalu aluatio ion is is to to improve ve instruction, e evi videnced b d by s stude dent achievement

 Th

The d develo lopme ment of t of th the e evalu luatio ion p proc rocess for a any ny one ne t teacher is de designed w with t h the he i inp nput

• f
• f both
• th te

teacher a and ad admi ministrati tion

 Evalu

luatio ion f for th

• r the te

teac acher is is an an on

• ngoin
• ing

re refle lecti tive p proc rocess

 It

t ta takes more more th than an on

• ne ob
• bservatio

ion to to ev eval aluate t the ef e effectiveness of a a teac eacher

 Tea

eacher ef effec ectiveness i is co correlated t to the e le level l of

• f stu

tudent t engag ageme ment t an and stu tudent t perfor

• rman

mance ce

 Fundamental

l to to all all we do

• is

is th the underly lying purpo pose: Impr provi ving stu tudent t achiev evemen ent th thro rough grow rowth th in in re refle lectio ion, colla

• llaboratio

ion, an and p prof rofessio ional p l pra ractic ice.

Al

All tea teacher ers will i increa ease th e thei eir expert rtis ise and d skill ill level l from year r to to yea ear which allow

• ws ga

gains in stu student achiev eveme ment from

• m yea

ear to to year.

PROFESS SSIONA NAL PRACT CTICES CES

30 P 30 Points: : Professional Practices 6 P Points ts: : Professional Growth Plan Development 10 P 10 Points: : Plan Implementation 4 P Points ts: : Collaboration & Mutual Accountability

50%Multi-Metric

(50 pts) INDIVIDUAL ACCOUNTABILITY BASED ON IDENTIFIED ASSESSMENTS

45 Po 45 Points: Individual Results ts 5 Po 5 Points: : Collaborative team student achievement results related to closing t the a achievement g gap of the Lowest 25% in Reading and/or Math

50%

Student Achievement

(50 pts)

 Annual Evaluation of Professional Practices 30

Pts

• reflects evidence collected during formal and

informal observations

 Professional Growth Plan Development 6 Pts  PGP Implementation 10 Pts  Collaboration and Mutual Accountability 4 Pts

BPS I Instr truct ction

• nal Performance Ap

Appraisal S Syst ystem Dimens nsions

Professional Responsibilities & Ethical Conduct Assessment Instructional Delivery & Facilitation Learning Environment Instructional Design & Lesson Planning

 Development of PGP Goal  Work Plan Strategies  Outcome Measures and Reflection

* Individual pre-conference meetings with administrator * Teachers may collaborate with others in development but no plan should be identical * PGP goal may continue into second year if student data indicates a need for continued professional growth in a particular area * Strategies and outcome indicators would be differentiated in year two

• For teachers returning to BPS, reflect on last

year’s annual evaluation and student achievement results to develop your “stretch goal.”

• Wednesday, August 27, is an early release day

designated for PGP development activity.

• You may submit a draft plan to your

administrator for review prior to scoring by August 29, 2014.

• Final due date for PGP’s: Friday, September 26

• For teachers new to BPS, reflect on your first

semester observations and midterm evaluation to develop your “stretch goal.”

• You may submit a draft plan to your

administrator for review prior to scoring by January 9, 2015.

• Final due date for PGP’s: Friday, January 23,

2015

 Working the Plan

Peer observations are required for a “Distinguished” rating

 In-Process Monitoring  Evidence to support implementation may include

training records, peer observations, student work samples, lesson plans, parent communication, other artifacts illustrating efforts to implement the strategies and use feedback from colleagues to improve instructional practice.

 Evidence not required for indicators or dimensions

• bserved by the administrator.

 Teams have two purposes: working together to

improve each other’s instructional practice, and working with at-risk students to improve their achievement and close the achievement gap.

 Groups may be by grade level, department,

cohorts, within or outside the school.

 All teacher teams must have at least 8 students

and specify learning targets and measures.

 Deadline to identify teacher teams, students,

achievement measures, and targeted outcomes:

 October 3, 2014

 Formative  Time frame provided to teacher  Pre-conference required  Full lesson segment  Use classroom observation instrument (COI)

• Post-conference with scored feedback within 10

days

• Scored feedback = evidence for evaluations

 Formative  Minimum of two for all teachers by

administrator

 Scored feedback provided within 5 days

electronically or face to face

 Scored feedback = evidence for evaluations

 Teachers new to Brevard

• Probationary for one year
• Minimum of two informal observations by administrator
• Two formal observations, midterm evaluation, and

annual evaluation conducted by administrator

• Two additional informal observations by administrator,

mentor teacher, or other qualified persons

• Tea

eache hers no not m meet eeting ef effective e standa dard rds o

• f instruc

ructio iona nal p l practic ice

 Inter erim im e evaluat aluation

• Writ

Written PDAP for r dim imensio ions sco corin ring g 2. 2.9 9

• r

r lo lower

 Spec ecific ific s strat rateg egies ies, s sug ugges estio ions ns, improv

• vements

ts

• Spec

ecific ific & & reas asonab nable le timel melin ine t e to correc rect defic ficie ient a areas eas

 Admin inistra trator tors m may condu duct a t additi tion

• nal

l forma rmal l

• r informa
• rmal o

l observ rvati tion

• ns and m

may v vide deota

• tape

pe instr truction tional p practic tice.  If evid idence f from rom a an obs

• bservation or
• r vide

ideo will be ill be used in the e evalu luation tion, w writte ten f feedba back k must t be be pro provid ided to th to the te teacher prior prior to th to the evalu luation tion m meetin ing. g.  Admi dminis istrators rs ma may als lso c

• con
• nduct walk

lk-thr hroug ughs hs

• r
• r in

instructio ional rou

• rounds. These e

events a are re f for

• r

dat ata co a collec ection an and ar are e not u used ed in a a teach eacher er’s evalu luation tion.  Teach Teachers ar are e en enco couraged ed t to observe one e anot

• ther a

and pro d provide feedb dback to on to one a anoth

• ther.

 Th Thes ese o e observations ar are n e not u used ed i in a a teach eacher’s evalu luation tion b but may be prov

• vide

ided t d to admin inis istra trator tor as PGP i imple leme menta tation tion evide dence.

 PS

PSC T C Tea eacher er who rec ecei eives es a a sec econd “unsa unsatis isfactory ry” ra rating ing o

• r

r thre hree ne needs s im impro rovement nt ra rating ings in s in a thre hree y year r perio riod sha shall ll be e placed ed on probation for 90 calendar days

• Four f

r formal rmal o

• bser

servat atio ions will ll be c conducted ed

• Admi

minis istrat rator w r will a ill assess ssess p perfo rform rman ance a e again ain no m more t re than 1 an 14 days s after t er the e e end of the 90 90-day ay p probat atio iona nary ry p perio riod a and submit a recomme mmendation r regard rding ing f future empl ployment s status s to the S Supe perintende dent

 Summat

ative e eval aluat ation, P , Par art I

 50 points  Formal evaluation of professional practices from formal and informal observations (30 points)  PGP Development (6 points)  PGP Implementation (10 points)  Collaborative/Mutual Accountability Score (4 points)  Signed in the spring by teacher and administrator  Use results to guide reflection for next year’s PGP goal

 Summa

mmativ ive E Evaluatio ion Part I II

• Totals 100 points
• Includes Summative Part I and Student Achievement

Scores

• Signed by Teacher and Administrator in the fall

Sc Scores a s added together fr from Summative P Part rt I I and S Summative P Part II II det etermine fi final rating: Highl ghly Effe Effective, Effe Effective, Need Needs s to Im Improve

• r
• r Unsat

atisfact actory P Performan ance ce

Sum Summative P Part rt I

• 50

50-42 42– High ghly Ef Effec ecti tive ve

• 41

41-30 30– Effective

• 29

29-15 15– Need eeds Im Improvemen ent

• 14

14-0 0 – Unsatisfac actor tory

• Pr

Proficien ent s scores es = = Effec ective Per e Performance e (used ed to det eter ermine s e score r ranges es)

Su Summat mative Part II

• 88

88-100 100 – High Highly ly Ef Effect ctive

• 69

69-87 87 – Ef Effect ctiv ive

• 68

68-46 46 – Needs s Improvem vement ent

• 45

45-0– Unsati tisfact ctory ry

Ser erving g ev ever ery stu student with th ex excel ellen ence e as s th the e sta standard.