BUSINESS ETHICS 2014-2015 Fourth and fifth lessons Gianfranco - - PDF document

business ethics 2014 2015 fourth and fifth lessons
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

BUSINESS ETHICS 2014-2015 Fourth and fifth lessons Gianfranco - - PDF document

10/20/2014 BUSINESS ETHICS 2014-2015 Fourth and fifth lessons Gianfranco Rusconi ABOUT PAPER OF DONALDSON AND WEHRANE* WHAT ABOUT IDEAS AND LIMITS OF: CONSEQUENTIALISM/UTILITARIANISM, DEONTOLOGY AND VIRTUE ETHICS? BASF CASE :


slide-1
SLIDE 1

10/20/2014 1

BUSINESS ETHICS 2014-2015 Fourth and fifth lessons

Gianfranco Rusconi ABOUT PAPER OF DONALDSON AND WEHRANE*

  • WHAT ABOUT IDEAS AND LIMITS OF:
  • CONSEQUENTIALISM/UTILITARIANISM, DEONTOLOGY

AND VIRTUE ETHICS?

  • BASF CASE : BUILDING PLANT OR NOT?
  • *THESE SLIDES ARE NOT SYSTEMATICALLY REPEATING

WHAT WAS BEEN DONE IN THE LESSONS/READING OF THE PAPER AND DO NOT SUBSTITUTE THE READING AND COMPREHESION OF THE PAPERS.

slide-2
SLIDE 2

10/20/2014 2

SOME POINTS FROM DONALDSON AND WERHANE

  • CONSEQUENTIALISM:
  • A) ETHICAL EGOISM
  • B) UTILITARIANISM
  • WHAT IS UTILITY? PLEASURE.. GREATEST

HAPPYNESS FOR THE GREATEST NUMBER (JSMILL).. GOOD IS ONLY PLEASURE? OR MAXIMIZING KNOWLWDGE, MORAL MATURITY, FRIENDSHIP? SCALE OF PREFERENCES?

SOME POINTS: problems and issues

  • EACH PERSON COUNTS “ONE”
  • FUTURE GENERATIONS
  • INTENSITY OF PLEAUSURE (AND THE

CONTRARY)

  • DICTATOR OF MAJORITY INTERESTS
  • SOME PLEASURE AND HAPPYNESS ARE

QUALITATIVELY BETTER THAN OTHERS?

  • ACT AND RULE UTILITARIANISM
slide-3
SLIDE 3

10/20/2014 3

SOME POINTS

  • CRITICS:
  • NOT RESPECTING JUSTICE
  • WHAT KIND OF GOODS MAXIMIZE?
  • OFTEN WE USE UTILITARIANISM IN

ORDINARY LIFE, MA THERE IS THE PROBLEM OF GENERAL PRINCIPLES OF PERSONS

SOME POINTS

  • DEONTOLOGY:
  • A) KANTIAN
  • B) SOCIAL CONTRACT THEORY
  • “TO FOCUS ON DUTY AND UNIVERSAL RULES

TO DETERMINE RIGHTS ACTIONS”

slide-4
SLIDE 4

10/20/2014 4

SOME POINTS

  • KANTIANISM
  • DUTY SELF EVIDENT TO MORAL CONSCIENCE
  • “CATEGORICAL IMPERATIVE”: UNIVERSALITY

OF PRINCIPLES OF ACTIONS; OTHER PERSONS HAVE AN INTRINSIC VALUE IN ITSELF, NEVER TO BE TREATED AS MEANS TO ACHIEVE ONE’S END.

  • LIMITS: RISK TO HAVE MORAL RIGIDY OF

FANATICISM

SOME POINTS

  • THE CONTRACTARIAN ALTERNATIVE: a rational

person

  • JOHN LOCKE (18° century) : NATURAL RIGHTS state of

nature …CONTRACTARIAN REASONING …RIGHTS INHERENT TO A PERSON’S NATURE (example: US Declaration of Independence) and inalienable

  • JOHN RAWLS (now) : reasonable position of a person

implies a social contract done with a veil of ignorance about the future (dis)advantages for everyone (male

  • r female, rich or poor…) that is implicitly subscriber
  • f the social contract:
slide-5
SLIDE 5

10/20/2014 5

GENERAL QUESTIONS FOR DEONTOGISTS- CONTRACTARIANS (both Kant and contractarian)

  • «IN THE MORAL VALUTION OF BUSINESS, ALL

DEONTOLOGISTS – CONTRACTARIANS INCLUDED-WOULD ASK THE QUESTION SUCH AS THE FOLLOWING:

  • 1) ARE THE RULES FAIR TO EVERYONE?
  • 2) DO THE RULES HOLD UNIVERSALLY EVEN

WITH THE PASSAGE OF TIME (MY NOTE: PROBLEM OF RELATIVISM AND OBJECTIVISM)

  • 3) IS EVERY PERSON TREATED WITH EQUAL

RESPECT?

LIMITS OF CONTRACTARIAN VIEW

  • CONTRACT IS IMPLICIT;
  • CAN THE CONTENTS CHANGE AND IF NOT WHAT IS

THEIR ORIGIN? IT IS SUFFICIENT TO SPEAK ABOUT HUMAN RATIONALITY IN ORDER TO GIVE THEM SOUND FOUNDATIONS OF TRUTH?

  • CAN CUSTOMS OR OTHER BE THOUGHT AS

UNIVERSAL ETHICAL VALUE?

  • HOW COULD WE DISCOVER THESE PRINCIPLES?
  • COULD BE ACCEPTED VALID EXCEPTIONS AND HOW

IT COULD AGREE WITH THE DEONTOLOGICAL PERSPECTIVES

slide-6
SLIDE 6

10/20/2014 6

CONSEQUENTIALISM AND DEONTOLOGY

  • THE PRINCIPLES GENERATED BY SOCIAL

CONTRACT APPROACH COULD BE FITTING WITH SOME DECISIONS ON THE BASIS OF CONSEQUENTIALISM (DISCUSSION)

VIRTUE Ethics and the case of Health is First Inc.

  • SOME PHILOSOPHERS CONSIDER THE TWO

PREVIOUS APPROACHES AS «INCOMPLETE»

  • THE CASE OF MISTER JOHN
  • VIRTUE ETHICS APPROACH, ORIGINED BY

Aristotle

slide-7
SLIDE 7

10/20/2014 7

VIRTUE ETHICS

  • MORE THAN RULES: IT IS IMPORTANT THE ROLE

OF CHARACTER IN ETHICS

  • 1) HUMAN PERSON IS SOCIAL FOR NATURE
  • 2) DEVELOPING CERTAIN VIRTUES OR TRAITS OF

CHARACTER (WISDOM, GENEROSITY, SELFRESTRAINT) : TO BE A GOOD MEMBER OF THE COMMUNITY, CULTIVATION OF GOOD HABITS

  • 3) ETHICAL EXCELLENCE CONNECTED WITH

SOCIAL EXCELLENCE OF MANAGERS NOT ONLY RESPECT OF SOME RULES

CRITICS TO VIRTUE ETHICS

  • BY UTILITARIANS AND

DEONTOLOGIANS:

  • «LACKS OF CLEAR-CUT RULES AND

DECISION-MAKING PROCEDURES»

slide-8
SLIDE 8

10/20/2014 8

DEEPENING

  • THESE PAPERS COULD IMPROVE

YOUR KNOWLEDGE BUT NOT TO BE STUDIED COMPLETELY (LIKE IS MORE FOR THE PAPER OF DONALDSON AND WERHANE)