* Bryan R. Garner; Stephen J. Tueller, Michael Bradshaw, Steve - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bryan r garner stephen j tueller michael bradshaw steve
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

* Bryan R. Garner; Stephen J. Tueller, Michael Bradshaw, Steve - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

The I mplementation & Sustainment Facilitation (I SF) Strategy: Effectiveness results from a 39-site cluster randomized trial * Bryan R. Garner; Stephen J. Tueller, Michael Bradshaw, Steve Martino, Kate Speck, Denna Vandersloot, Heather J.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

The I mplementation & Sustainment Facilitation (I SF) Strategy: Effectiveness results from a 39-site cluster randomized trial

*Bryan R. Garner; Stephen J. Tueller, Michael Bradshaw,

Steve Martino, Kate Speck, Denna Vandersloot, Heather J. Gotham, Michael Chaple, Liz Ball, Alyssa Wolfe, Mat Roosa, and Jay Ford

Funding provided by the National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA; R01-DA038146; PI: Garner)

*Presented by: Bryan R. Garner, PhD Senior Implementation Research Scientist RTI International 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 Phone: (919) 597-5159 Email: bgarner@rti.org

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Substance Abuse Treatment to HI V Care (SAT2HI V) Project (R01-DA038146)

slide-3
SLIDE 3

The Substance Abuse Treatment to HI V Care (SAT2HI V) Project (R01-DA038146)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

The Substance Abuse Treatment to HI V Care (SAT2HI V) Project (R01-DA038146)

Focus of this presentation

slide-5
SLIDE 5

I mplementation Effectiveness

(Klein & Sorra, 1996; Klein, Conn, & Sorra, 2001)

“Implementation effectiveness refers to the consistency and quality of targeted organizational members’ use of a specific innovation.”

Klein & Sorra, 1996

slide-6
SLIDE 6

I mplementation Effectiveness

(Klein, Conn, & Sorra, 2001, p. 812)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Participant Flow Chart

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Participant Flow Chart

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Participant Flow Chart

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Naming, Defining, and Specifying the I mplementation Strategies

  • 1. Name it
  • 2. Define it
  • 3. Specify it

a) The Actor b) The Action c) Action Target d) Temporality e) Dose f) Implementation Outcome g) Justification

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC) implementation strategy

  • A. Centralized technical

assistance

  • B. Develop educational

materials

  • C. Develop and organize

quality monitoring systems

  • D. Develop tools for

quality monitoring

  • E. Distribute educational

materials

  • F. Conduct educational

meetings

  • G. Make training

dynamic

  • H. Audit & Provide

feedback

  • I. Provide ongoing

consultation

  • J. Create a learning

collaborative

slide-12
SLIDE 12

I mplementation & Sustainment Facilitation (I SF) strategy

  • K. Use an improvement and

implementation advisor

  • L. Develop tools for quality

improvement

  • M. Organize implementation

team meetings

  • N. Identify and prepare

champions

  • O. Assess for readiness and

identify barriers

  • P. Conduct local consensus

discussions

  • Q. Conduct cyclical small tests
  • f change
slide-13
SLIDE 13

Addiction Technology Transfer Center (ATTC) implementation strategy

slide-14
SLIDE 14

I mplementation & Sustainment Facilitation (I SF) strategy

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Strategy dose during preparation phase

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Strategy dose during implementation phase

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Strategy dose during sustainment phase

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Participant Flow Chart

slide-19
SLIDE 19

The Substance Abuse Treatment to HI V Care (SAT2HI V) Project (R01-DA038146)

Focus of this presentation

?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Methods

Sample

  • 78 staff from 39 AIDS Service Organizations (ASOs; 2 staff per ASO).
  • 38 staff and 19 ASOs randomized to ATTC condition.
  • 40 staff from 20 ASOs randomized to ATTC+ISF condition.

Outcome

  • Implementation Effectiveness – A continuous staff measure representing

the sum of the standardized cumulative number of MIBIs delivered by BI staff (i.e., consistency) and the cumulative fidelity score of their delivery of the MIBI (i.e., quality).

Analysis

  • Mplus was used to conduct an adjusted multilevel regression analysis

focused on the relationship between condition assignment (ATTC = 0; ATTC+ISF = 1) and implementation effectiveness.

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Hypothesized Model

Assigned to ATTC+ISF condition (relative to ATTC) Implementation Effectiveness Staff-level covariates

1. Age 2. Gender 3. Race 4. Ethnicity 5. Education level 6. Years of experience 7. Average hours worked per week 8. MI Experience 9. Innovation-values fit

+

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Results

Assigned to ATTC+ISF condition (relative to ATTC)

β = .43, p = .002

Implementation Effectiveness Staff-level covariates

1. Age 2. Gender 3. Race 4. Ethnicity 5. Education level 6. Years of experience 7. Average hours worked per week 8. MI Experience 9. Innovation-values fit

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Conclusions

  • As part of the SAT2HIV Project, our team was able to

advance 39 ASOs across the EPIS continuum.

  • Results of this cluster-randomized trial support the

effectiveness of the Implementation & Sustainment Facilitation (ISF) intervention as an adjunct to the ATTC strategy, at least for implementation effectiveness.

  • Future research will need to examine the extent to which

the current findings can be replicated, improved upon, and generalized to other contexts and EBPs.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Thank you!

Bryan R. Garner, PhD Senior Implementation Research Scientist RTI International 3040 E. Cornwallis Rd. Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-2194 Phone: (919) 597-5159 Email: bgarner@rti.org