{ Brandon Buskey, Deputy Director, Criminal Law Reform Project, ACLU - - PDF document

brandon buskey deputy director criminal law reform
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

{ Brandon Buskey, Deputy Director, Criminal Law Reform Project, ACLU - - PDF document

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides The Need and the Path For Reform { Brandon Buskey, Deputy Director, Criminal Law Reform Project, ACLU 1 Overview Why do we need bail reform? How can


slide-1
SLIDE 1

{

The Need and the Path For Reform

Brandon Buskey, Deputy Director, Criminal Law Reform Project, ACLU

Why do we need bail reform? How can we achieve pretrial reform? What role should risk assessments play, if

any?

Overview

1 2

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-2
SLIDE 2

{

State v. Gregory

What can we learn from Washington’s experience with the death penalty?

The Connections

 Death Penalty

 Tries to identify

“worst of the worst”

 Most serious

consequence after conviction

 Pretrial Detention

 Predicts “worst of the

worst” risks of danger

 Most serious decision

prior to conviction

3 4

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-3
SLIDE 3

 1972: Supreme Court strikes down death

penalty as

 Racist & Arbitrary  1974: Supreme Court reinstates,  Today, fewer people on death row, but

still

 Racist & Abitrary  See Gregory

History of Capital Punishment

 Trying to replace a system that is  Arbitrary: majority of felony

defendants detained because of bail

 Discriminatory: African Americans  Receive higher bail  More likely to be detained on bail

Are we at similar cross roads in bail?

5 6

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Can Washington avoid Gregory in its bail system? Why reform: human costs

7 8

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Harms of Pretrial Detention

48 hours in jail can lead to lose of: Employment, Housing, Child custody

 Causal effect on case outcomes  4X’s more likely to be sentenced to jail  3X’s more likely to receive prison  3X’s longer jail sentence  2X’s longer prison sentence  25% more likely to plead guilty

Harms of Pretrial Detention

9 10

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-6
SLIDE 6

{

Increases recidivism

 More likely to be arrested

following release

Increases failure to appear

 Less likely to return to court

Pretrial Detention Causes What We Want to Prevent

 Nationally:  1 of 5 people incarcerated are pretrial  2 of 3 people in a local jail are pretrial  Washington  7‐8 of 10 people in jail are pretrial  Places like King, Pierce, and

Spokane counties

The Link to Mass Incarceration

11 12

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Only 1.9% of Felony Defendants re‐

arrested for new violent offense

 Baughman and McIntyre, Predicting Violence, Tex.

  • L. Rev.

We can safely increase release

And…The Law Requires More Pretrial Release

13 14

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-8
SLIDE 8

{

United States v. Salerno

“In our society, liberty is the norm, and detention prior to trial or without trial is the carefully limited exception.”

{

The Presumption of Innocence

“It is better that ten guilty persons escape than that one innocent suffer.” Blackstone 15 16

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Risk Tolerance and the Right to Pretrial Release

Flight Stack v. Boyle Dangerousness US v. Salerno

What Risks Matter?

17 18

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-10
SLIDE 10

{ {

False Negatives

 Mislabeling

someone as “not risky”

False Positives

 Mislabeling

someone as “risky”

What Errors Matter?

(Presumption of Innocence) +

(Right to Pretrial Release) = Greater Concern for False Positives?

The Law and Risk Tolerance

19 20

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-11
SLIDE 11

{ {

Standard for Guilt

 Issue: What you did  Proof Beyond a

Reasonable Doubt

 Err on the side of

acquittal Standard for Release

 Issue: What you

might do

 Detention only if

“necessary”

 Err on the side of

release

Back to the Presumption

{

The Challenge

Judges Worry More About False Negatives 21 22

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Always Know a False (‐)

“Deadly shooting of Dallas officer reignites bail reform debate”

Never Know a False (+)

23 24

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-13
SLIDE 13

{

Pretrial feedback is biased toward detention; Over time, detention will naturally increase

The Ratchet Effect

“People of color in the United States, particularly young black men, are often assumed to be guilty and dangerous…. As a consequence of this country’s failure to address effectively its legacy

  • f racial inequality, this presumption of guilt and

the history that created it have significantly shaped every institution in American society, especially our criminal justice system.”

 ‐ Bryan Stevenson

Roots in the Legacy

25 26

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-14
SLIDE 14

{ How do we avoid reproducing this legacy pretrial?

History and Risk Tolerance

{ The way to equitable reform

Cultivating a Culture of Release

27 28

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Limit Detention to

 Those charged with serious offenses  Whose risk cannot be managed

Everyone Else Goes Home,

 Pretrial supports; or  Release conditions

The Salerno Roadmap

How to do it

 Personal

recognizance

 Court reminders  Voluntary treatment

referrals

 Unsecured bond  Capable defense

counsel

29 30

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-16
SLIDE 16

How Not to do it

 “Overconditioning”

 Increases failure

 Conditions that are not

evidence‐based

 Drug testing  GPS monitoring  Secured money bail

 Unsecured and other alternatives are

more effective

 Denies or delays release  Ability to pay is inadequate:  People overestimate ability to pay  “Second look” is rare and too late

Seriously, avoid secured money bail

31 32

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-17
SLIDE 17

{ The Rundown

Let’s Talk Risk Assessments

{

In a Culture of Release, do you need them?

3 Critical Issues

33 34

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Be clear about your goals

 Increase release?  Reduce bias?

Be sure you can do it “right”

 Necessary data and capacity  Public input

Be sure you’re meeting goals

 No “Zombie Predictions”: Evaluate

pre‐ and post‐implementation data

 Feedback from stakeholders

At a minimum

ACLU and over 100 civil rights groups oppose RAI’s

35 36

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-19
SLIDE 19

 Flight and Violence are rare; rare events

are inherently hard to measure

 RAI’s don’t measure flight or violence,

but:

 Risk of single failure to appear  Risk of a single new arrest

Can’t inform a detention decision.

What is the failure rate for PSA

violence flag?

Answer: 8.9%

Is “High Risk” Really High?

37 38

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-20
SLIDE 20

 High risk doesn’t mean strict conditions

 E.g., High FTA risk better addressed by:  Court reminders?  Transportation?  Treatment?

Can’t inform proper release conditions

{

What can they do?

What can they not do? 39 40

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Measure GROUP Risk

Not individual risk! Think: Profile

Ex: Person A looks like Group 2

May help with sorting decisions

E.g., release w/o hearing

Risk Assessments Are Not “Evidence Based”

41 42

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Evidence‐based: robust studies

showing something works

 Being based on data is not “evidence based”

We don’t yet know if risk

assessments “work”

 More accurate than judges?  Less biased than judges?  Improve judicial decision‐making?

Assessing Risk Assessment

Megan Stevenson

{

Race and Risk Assessments

Another struggle with the Legacy 43 44

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-23
SLIDE 23

“There is no such thing

as a race neutral risk assessment.”

 Prof. Sandra Mayson

Here’s the thing….

{

  • Assume the past

will carry into the future

  • But what do we

make of the past?

Risk Assessments Reflect

45 46

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-24
SLIDE 24

{

Thought Experiment

What would a risk assessment tell you?

Alabama, 1865

47 48

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Ferguson, 2014

{

Back to Risk Tolerance

The Pro Publica Debate 49 50

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Algorithmic Fairness

 Compass  ProPublica  Predictive Parity (True

Positive & Negative)

 Same Score = Same % Re‐

arrest

 E.g., High risk = 20% re‐arrest

(violence)

 Industry standard

 False Positive & Positive

Parity

 AA’s not re‐arrested 2X more

likely mis‐labeled high risk

 Whites rearrested 2X more

likely mislabled “low” risk

The Base Rate Problem

 The ProPublica disparities are unavoidable

 Confirmed by Center for Court Innovation

 Why?

 AA’s more likely to be arrested  Tools more likely to predict AA’s arrests  Higher proportion of mistaken predictions

 No tool can satisfy ProPublica and Compass

51 52

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-27
SLIDE 27

An Illustration (Mayson)

 All stem from The Legacy

 Disparate police behavior (e.g., marijuana

arrests, “stop‐and‐frisk”)

 Structural racism and socioeconomic inequality

What Causes Base Rate Disparities?

53 54

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020

slide-28
SLIDE 28

 Limit use to those:

Charged with serious offenses

Identified in the highest risk category???

Center for Court Innovation

 Disaggregate risk  Regular validation with new data

No “zombie predictions”

 Test predictive accuracy and false positive rates  Drop “High Risk” classifications

Best Practices:

Proceed with Care

 Bias in, Bias out  Assessing Risk Assessment  Predicting Violence  Center for Court Innovation

References

55 56

Defender Initiative 10th Annual Conference Session 3 - MJC Bail REform Pannel BB slides February 28, 2020