Bounds on the number of tessellations in graphs Alexandre S. Abreu 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bounds on the number of tessellations in graphs
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Bounds on the number of tessellations in graphs Alexandre S. Abreu 1 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Tessellations Results Bounds on the number of tessellations in graphs Alexandre S. Abreu 1 , Lu s Felipe I. Cunha 1 Franklin L. Marquezino 1 and Luis Antonio B. Kowada 2 1 PESC/COPPE-UFRJ 2 IC-UFF November 11, 2016 A.S. Abreu et al.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Tessellations Results

Bounds on the number of tessellations in graphs

Alexandre S. Abreu1, Lu´ ıs Felipe I. Cunha1 Franklin L. Marquezino1 and Luis Antonio B. Kowada2

1 PESC/COPPE-UFRJ 2 IC-UFF

November 11, 2016

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 1 / 21

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tessellations Results

Outline

1 Tessellations in Graphs 2 Bounds on the number of tessellations

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 2 / 21

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Tessellations Results

Section 1 Tessellations in Graphs

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 3 / 21

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Tessellations Results

Definition

Let Ti = {c1, c2, · · · , cn} be a family of cliques of a graph G; Ti is a tessellation in G if and only if:

All cliques of Ti are disjoint, and; The union of the cliques of Ti covers all vertices of G.

Each clique in Ti is called a cluster (Portugal, 16).

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 4 / 21

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Tessellations Results

Example

Figure 1: Tessellations of G. Each tessellation covers all vertices.

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 5 / 21

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Tessellations Results

Number of Tessellations of a Graph

A graph G is T-tessellable if T is the smallest number of tessellations such that the union of these tessellations covers all edges of G.

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 6 / 21

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Tessellations Results

Number of Tessellations of a Graph

A graph G is T-tessellable if T is the smallest number of tessellations such that the union of these tessellations covers all edges of G.

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 6 / 21

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Tessellations Results

Number of Tessellations of a Graph

A graph G is T-tessellable if T is the smallest number of tessellations such that the union of these tessellations covers all edges of G.

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 6 / 21

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Tessellations Results

Number of Tessellations of a Graph

A graph G is T-tessellable if T is the smallest number of tessellations such that the union of these tessellations covers all edges of G.

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 6 / 21

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Tessellations Results

Motivation: Quantum walks

Quantum walks are the model of a particle’s tour through the vertices of a graph. In quantum walks there are quantum state representing the walker, and an evolution operator applied on the quantum state, moving the walker through the graph’s vertices. Staggered quantum walks model uses tessellations in graphs to generate the evolution operators (Portugal et al., 16)

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 7 / 21

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Tessellations Results

2-tessellable graphs

Proposition 1 ((PORTUGAL, 2016)) A graph is 2-tessellable if and only if its clique graph is 2-colorable. This proposition is not generalizable for T > 2.

The characterization of a T-tessellable graph is still an open problem.

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 8 / 21

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Tessellations Results

Section 2 Bounds on the number of tessellations

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 9 / 21

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Tessellations Results

Upper Bound

We propose an upper bound for the number of tessellations. Lemma 1 Given G and its clique graph K(G), then T(G) ≤ χ(K(G)).

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 10 / 21

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Lemma 1

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 11 / 21

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Lemma 1

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 11 / 21

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Lemma 1

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 11 / 21

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Lemma 1

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 11 / 21

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Tessellations Results

Upper bound is tight

Theorem 1 Let G be a graph s.t. there is a vertex v ∈ V (G) which is a cut vertex and all cliques of G just share v. Then, T(G) = χ(K(G)).

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 12 / 21

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Theorem 1

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 13 / 21

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Theorem 1

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 13 / 21

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Theorem 1

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 13 / 21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Theorem 1

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 13 / 21

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Theorem 1

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 13 / 21

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Theorem 1

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 13 / 21

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Tessellations Results

Lower Bound

We propose a lower bound for the number of tessellations. Lemma 2 Let G be a graph and K(G) its clique graph. Then, T(G) ≥ ⌈ χ(K(G))

2

⌉.

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 14 / 21

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Lemma 2

1 k-chromatic graph has at least k vertex with degree at least

k − 1.

2 For every graph G, T(G) ≤ χ(K(G)) ≤ ∆(K(G)) + 1.

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 15 / 21

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Lemma 2

Idea:

m = m(K(G)) =

  • i di

2

By (1) we have that m = χ(χ−1)

2

+ σ

2 , where σ is the

remaining sum, and 0 ≤ σ. T(G) ≤ χ(χ−1)

2

+ σ

2 .

So, χ2

2 − χ 2 + σ 2 − T(G) ≥ 0.

Let us divide our problem in three cases, considering φ ≥ 1:

(i)T(G) > χ

2 , i.e., T(G) = χ 2 + φ;

(ii)T(G) = χ

2 , and;

(iii)T(G) < χ

2 , i.e., T(G) = χ 2 − φ A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 16 / 21

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Tessellations Results

The proof’s Idea of Lemma 2

In each of this three cases, we have to solve an inequation. By this inequation, it comes that to get an answer in R the discriminant ∆ must be greater than or equal to zero. So:

(i)∆ = 1 − σ + 2φ ≥ 0 → σ ≤ 1 + 2φ; (ii)∆ = 1 − σ ≥ 0 → σ ≤ 1, however; (iii)∆ = 1 − σ − 2φ ≥ 0 → σ ≤ 1 − 2φ < 0, but σ ≥ 0.

Thus, we never have that T(G) < χ(K(G))

2

.

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 17 / 21

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Tessellations Results

Lower bound is tight

For a wheel graph w-wheel, s.t. w > 4, we have that T(G) = ⌈ χ

2 ⌉.

Theorem 2 Let G be a w-wheel, s.t. w > 4. Then, T(G) = ⌈ χ

2 ⌉.

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 18 / 21

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Tessellations Results

Tight Bounds

Theorem 3 Let G be a graph and K(G) its clique graph, and let K(G) is non-bipartite. We have that ⌈ χ(K(G))

2

⌉ ≤ T(G) ≤ χ(K(G)).

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 19 / 21

slide-31
SLIDE 31

Tessellations Results

Open Questions

What is the number of tessellations for other classes? What is the complexity of this problem?

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 20 / 21

slide-32
SLIDE 32

Tessellations Results

References

PORTUGAL, R. Staggered quantum walks on graphs. arXiv preprint arXiv:1603.02210, 2016. PORTUGAL, R. et al. The staggered quantum walk model. Quantum Information Processing, Springer, v. 15, n. 1, p. 85–101, 2016.

A.S. Abreu et al. November 11, 2016 21 / 21