SLIDE 15 Beyond the Bubble: Using Performance Assessments for Learning & Accountability Presented at the 2018 VASSP Conference Hot Springs, VA Christopher R. Gareis, Ed.D. (2018) crgare@wm.edu 15
Not Evident (0) Developing (1) Proficient (2) On Target (3) Determine the relevance of a source
Irrelevant response or no response provided Does not recognize the gap in time and instead takes the painting at face value Evaluates reliability of source but does not fully explain the problems caused by the gap in time Explains why the time gap limits the reliability
- f the source as evidence
- f what happened at the
first Thanksgiving
Formulate a claim
Irrelevant response or no response provided Makes a claim, but it is implausible Makes a claim, but it is not explicitly related to the context of the source Makes a plausible claim about a possible motivation for the depiction of the event based on the historical context of the painter
Apply historical content
Irrelevant or no content provided Provides inaccurate or contradictory historical information Provides generalized historical information to support claim Provides specific, accurate historical information
Convey historical reasoning in writing
No response Grammatical errors and/or awkward wording that inhibit understanding Some grammatical errors and/or instances of awkward wording that detract from effectively conveying ideas Clearly written and easy to read; few, if any, grammatical or mechanical errors
OVERALL RATING Revise & Resubmit
0 – 5 marks
Pass
6 – 9 marks (with none @ “Not Evident”)
Pass Advanced
10 – 12 marks (with none @“Basic” or “Not Evident”)
Gradations Criteria Grading Scheme
Implications for Leaders
- 1. If we are serious about the 5C’s and about College & Career
readiness, then we need performance assessments.
- 2. Performance assessments can be used for accountability.
- 3. Performance assessments are dependent upon excellent teachers
and teaching.