Best Management Practices - A Tool Not a Rule Jay Hesse and Becky - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

best management practices a tool not a rule
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Best Management Practices - A Tool Not a Rule Jay Hesse and Becky - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Best Management Practices - A Tool Not a Rule Jay Hesse and Becky Johnson Nez Perce Tribe "Knowledge is a tool, and like all tools, its impact is in the hands of the user(s) Dan Brown, The Lost Symbol Tool versus Rule Tool


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Best Management Practices - A Tool Not a Rule

"Knowledge is a tool, and like all tools, its impact is in the hands of the user(s)“

Dan Brown, The Lost Symbol

Jay Hesse and Becky Johnson – Nez Perce Tribe

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Tool – something used in performing an

  • peration or necessary in the practice of a

vocation or profession. Rule - a regulation or bylaw governing procedure or controlling conduct.

Tool versus Rule

slide-3
SLIDE 3

“The HSRG’s recommendations are not the only possible alternatives for managing hatchery programs to meet conservation and harvest goals. As such, the managers may develop other solutions which better meet their program principles and goals. Success over time will be defined by the managers’ ability to take actions in the future to adjust hatchery programs based on good science to meet their conservation and harvest goals.”

  • - Jim Waldo, Chair Columbia River Hatchery Reform Steering Committee

Conservation Hatchery Best Management Practice Recommendations

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Snake River

slide-5
SLIDE 5
  • One extant population

–Hatchery genetics very

similar to natural-origin (endemic brood program)

–15% of historical habitat

assessable

  • Two extinct populations
  • Congressionally mandated

mitigation hatchery program

slide-6
SLIDE 6
  • Proportion Natural Influence (PNI) >0.67
  • Maximize percent natural origin in

broodstock

  • Minimize percent hatchery origin on spawning

grounds

  • 100% marked hatchery production
  • Selective harvest regimes
  • Mimic natural life histories

Conservation Hatchery Best Management Practice Recommendations

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Case History

0.00 0.25 0.50 0.75 1.00 '75 '80 '85 '90 '95 '00 '05 '10

pHOS pNOB

Proportion Natural Influence (PNI) = 0.10

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Case History

10% 37% 23% 6% 24% 0% 5% 10% 15% 20% 25% 30% 35% 40% Ad Clip Only Ad Clip Plus CWT CWT Only PIT Tag Only No Mark

  • 3 hatchery programs
  • 11 release sites
  • 5.5 million fish produced
  • 5 mark types
slide-9
SLIDE 9

Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Case History

Commercial Sport Treaty Natural spawning Broodstock

Total SR fall Chinook in 2010 Includes ocean and freshwater harvest

15% 20% 15% 5% 46%

Consumption* 50% Conservation 50%

*Non-selective fisheries

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Case History

Wild 60-70 mm in May Hatchery 90-95 mm in May

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon Case History

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Number of Assumptions

31% 35% 34%

Valid Unknown Invalid

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Management Assumption Current Status New M&E Action Proposed Anticipated 2017 Knowledge

  • 1a. Adult progeny per

parent (P:P) ratios for hatchery-produced fish significantly exceed those

  • f natural-origin fish.

Valid. Questionable accuracy and precision associated with natural production P:P ratio. 1) 1) PBT marking. 2) Retrospective analysis

  • f NOR abundance

using 2010 (subtraction) run-reconstruction methodology. 3) Assess sensitivity of P:P analyses to various levels of non-selective and selective harvest. 10 to 14 years of hatchery production vs natural production P:P ratios. Two years

  • f improved natural production P:P ratio

precision.

  • 1b. Natural spawning

success of hatchery-origin fish must be similar to that of natural-origin fish. Unknown. See “Guidance to develop alternatives for determining the relative reproductive success and effects on natural-origin fish of hatchery-origin Snake River Fall Chinook Salmon” (Peven 2010). 1) 1) PBT marking. 2) 2) RPA 64/65 RFP. Description of natural-origin population growth rate as increasing, decreasing, or

  • stable. Assessment of Relative

Reproductive Success is not readily achievable at this time and is the subject of FCRPS BiOp RPA 64 and 65 (even if implemented in 2012 first year results will not be obtained until 2021). RRS study feasibility will be determined prior to 2017.

  • 1c. Temporal and spatial

distribution of hatchery-

  • rigin spawners in nature

is similar to that of natural-origin fish. Unknown. Carcass sampling only possible in Clearwater River. Fidelity of yearlings to release site areas described in Garcia (2003). Fidelity

  • f subyearling releases unknown.

Relative spawn timing of natural and hatchery-origin fish unknown. 1) 1) Radio tag study. 2) 2) PBT marking. 3) 3) Otolith micro- chemistry study Two years of precise (10 plus years of imprecise) hatchery and natural origin spawner distribution data within the Clearwater River. Three to five years of subyearling fidelity to release site area data and LFH on-station release spawner distribution upstream of Lower Granite. Six years of natal spawning and rearing areas for natural origin fish.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

DISAGREE 14% AGREE 25% STRONGLY AGREE 61%

slide-16
SLIDE 16

 Best Management Practices Principles  Maintain Site Specific Flexibility  Maintain Adaptive Management with

Structured M&E program

 Integrate Biological, Legal and Political

Perspectives.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Changes to hatchery programs in response to scientific recommendations can be successfully implemented only with concurrent integration of associated non-technical factors and risks, including but not limited to:

(1) legally authorized and mandated mitigation

  • bligations,

(2) tribal treaty-reserved fishing rights - United States vs.

Oregon,

(3) logistical challenges and infrastructure constraints, and (4) funding and operating budgets for implementing the

changes and monitoring their effectiveness.

slide-18
SLIDE 18

3000 6000 9000 12000 15000 18000

1986 1991 1996 2001 2006 2011

Natural Natural- Origin Escapement Goal (14,360)

Fall Chinook Salmon Escapement to Snake River Basin

ICTRT minimum viability threshold = 3,000 6,342 Status

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Results

10,000 20,000 30,000 40,000 50,000 60,000 1975 1977 1979 1981 1983 1985 1987 1989 1991 1993 1995 1997 1999 2001 2003 2005 2007 2009 2011

Total Return to Lower Granite Dam Year Hatchery Natural

Management Escapement Goal = 39,110 Total Escapement 10 year geomean = 27,991 Natural-origin 10 year geomean = 6,342

slide-20
SLIDE 20