Bankruptcy: Weapons for the Bankruptcy: Weapons for the Proactive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

bankruptcy weapons for the bankruptcy weapons for the
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Bankruptcy: Weapons for the Bankruptcy: Weapons for the Proactive - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Bankruptcy: Weapons for the Bankruptcy: Weapons for the Proactive Credit Professional Presented to the Presented to the 2009 MFSG Educational Seminar May 13 2009 Rosemont Illinois May 13, 2009 Rosemont, Illinois By: Joseph M.


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Bankruptcy: Weapons for the Bankruptcy: Weapons for the Proactive Credit Professional

Presented to the Presented to the 2009 MFSG Educational Seminar May 13 2009 – Rosemont Illinois May 13, 2009 – Rosemont, Illinois

By: Joseph M. Coleman KANE RUSSELL COLEMAN & LOGAN PC Ph 214 777 4280

1

Phone: 214-777-4280 Email: jcoleman@krcl.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

OVERVIEW:

Weapons for the Proactive Credit Professional

Section 503(b)(9) – 20 day Administrative Claims Bankruptcy Rights of Reclamation The Creditors' Committee – Fighting g g Within the System Defending Preference Litigation g g MFSG Bonus Offer – Filling out a Proof of Claim Form

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

OVERVIEW:

Weapons for the Proactive Credit Professional

Section 503(b)(9) – 20 day Administrative Claims Bankruptcy Rights of Reclamation The Creditors' Committee – Fighting g g Within the System Defending Preference Litigation g g MFSG Bonus Offer – Filling out a Proof of Claim Form

4

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Section 503(b)(9) – 20 day Administrative Claims

Suppliers can receive an administrative claim for the value of any goods received by the debtor within 20 value of any goods received by the debtor within 20 days before the bankruptcy case.

Benefits 1) Converts a prepetition claim into an allowable administrative expense 2) Administrative claim must be paid in full as a condition of 2) Administrative claim must be paid in full as a condition of confirmation of a chapter 11 plan 3) Potential for a more prompt payment of the “20 day” Administrative Claim Means Trade Suppliers = Lawyers ) p p p y y liability

5

pp y

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Section 503(b)(9) – 20 day Administrative Claims

Only for goods sold in the ordinary course of Requirements

  • Only for goods sold in the ordinary course of

business Cl i t t ti l fil th d i i t ti l i

  • Claimant must timely file the administrative claim

Recent Developments Recent Developments

  • A supplier's failure to timely file its administrative claim in

the amo nt of $1 401 053 for goods deli ered to the the amount of $1,401,053 for goods delivered to the debtors was DENIED by the court.

6 In re Dana Corporation, 2007 WL 1577763 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. May 30, 2007)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Section 503(b)(9) – 20 day Administrative Claims

When Does the Debtor Pay the y Administrative Claim?

  • Courts exercise discretion in deciding when the claim
  • Courts exercise discretion in deciding when the claim

should be paid based on: (1) prejudice to the debtor; (2) hardship to the claimant; (3) potential detriment to other creditors creditors.

  • Courts generally will not permit immediate or pre-

confirmation payment of the administrative claim. p y

7

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Section 503(b)(9) – 20 day Administrative Claims

  • Procedure / Protocol / Bar Date
  • Procedure / Protocol / Bar Date
  • Impact of pre-existing liens
  • Reconciliation process
  • Questions

8

slide-9
SLIDE 9

OVERVIEW:

Weapons for the Proactive Credit Professional

Section 503(b)(9) – 20 day Administrative Claims Bankruptcy Rights of Reclamation The Creditors' Committee – Fighting g g Within the System Defending Preference Litigation g g MFSG Bonus Offer – Filling out a Proof of Claim Form

9

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Bankruptcy Rights

  • f Reclamation

Provides unsecured suppliers of goods with a relatively short window of opportunity to regain y pp y g possession of goods, despite not possessing a security interest in inventory. Immediate action is essential! is essential!

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Reclamation Under the UCC

  • Requires reclamation demand within 10 days of

q y customer's receipt of goods (20 days in some jurisdictions). W itt i t ti f l ithi 3 th f

  • Written misrepresentation of solvency within 3 months of

delivery? No 10-day limitation.

  • Subject to rights of ordinary course buyers and secured

Subject to rights of ordinary course buyers and secured lenders.

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

E d d R l ti Ri ht U d BAPCPA

Bankruptcy Rights of Reclamation

Expanded Reclamation Rights Under BAPCPA

Old law: Creditor’s claim for return of goods must be Creditor s claim for return of goods must be made within 10 days after delivery to debtor If debtor receives goods within 10

  • debtor. If debtor receives goods within 10

days of bankruptcy filing, creditor has 20 days from delivery to debtor to make days from delivery to debtor to make reclamation demand.

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Bankruptcy Rights of Reclamation

New Law:

  • Seller has 45 days after the debtor’s receipt of the

goods in which to demand reclamation of the goods. Demand/notice is required within 20 days after the Demand/notice is required within 20 days after the commencement of the bankruptcy case.

  • Reclamation rights apply only to goods received by
  • Reclamation rights apply only to goods received by

the debtor in the 45 days prior to petition date.

  • Reclamation rights are subject to the prior rights of a
  • Reclamation rights are subject to the prior rights of a

holder of a security interest in the goods or the goods’ proceeds.

13

g p

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Bankruptcy Rights of Reclamation Rights of reclamation claimant in bankruptcy include:

  • Return of goods only.

M t k t f l ti i ht b d

  • Must seek to enforce reclamation right by adversary

proceeding/TRO to recover goods.

P bl R l ti dit ’ i ht bj t t Problem: Reclamation creditor’s rights are subject to:

  • Sales in ordinary course of business, and
  • Secured lender’s prior liens in the goods. Under-secured

l d l ti l i i lik l l l lender means reclamation claim is likely valueless.

14

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Bankruptcy Rights of Reclamation

Impact of the Changes

  • If supplier fails to timely file reclamation claim, it

can still file administrative claim for the 20-day period period.

  • Because the new administrative claim has

“automatic priority ” reclamation is now important automatic priority, reclamation is now important primarily on goods delivered in the 21 to 45 days prior to the bankruptcy filing. p p y g

In re Tucker, 329 B.R. 291 (Bankr. D. Ariz. 2005). I D C 367 B R 409 (B k S D N Y 2007) 16 In re Dana Corp., 367 B.R. 409 (Bankr. S.D.N.Y. 2007).

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

slide-19
SLIDE 19

OVERVIEW:

Weapons for the Proactive Credit Professional

Section 503(b)(9) – 20 day Administrative Claims Bankruptcy Rights of Reclamation The Creditors' Committee – Fighting g g Within the System Defending Preference Litigation g g MFSG Bonus Offer – Filling out a Proof of Claim Form

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

The Creditor's Committee – Fighting within the System

Hit ‘em Hard Right Out of the Box Hit em Hard Right Out of the Box

a) Object to Financing/Cash Collateral b) Object to Debtor’s professionals c) Object to critical vendors if disproportionate d) Retain forensic accountants e) Demand documents – including copy of Directors & Officers policy

20

slide-21
SLIDE 21

The Creditor's Committee – Fighting within the System

Keep Hitting ‘em Hard Keep Hitting em Hard

a) Discovery: Bankruptcy Rule 2004 examinations examinations b) “Take over” debtors’ lawsuits c) Attack bank’s liens and prepetition conduct c) Attack bank s liens and prepetition conduct d) Force sales process ) D l ti l f i ti e) Develop competing plan of reorganization

21

slide-22
SLIDE 22

The Creditor's Committee – Fighting within the System

Perspective

  • Equity is out of the money
  • This is your company, your

case your opportunity case, your opportunity

22

slide-23
SLIDE 23

The Creditor's Committee – Fighting within the System

  • Congress intended unsecured creditors to have a

i t i i i ti voice – a very strong voice – in reorganization cases.

  • Congress gave the unsecured Creditors' an

invitation to the party – the Committee must not p y

  • nly RSVP – but must become the life of the party.
  • “White Hat” – One Bankruptcy Judge's view

23

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

slide-25
SLIDE 25

The Committee's Role: Section 1103(c)

  • Consult with the trustee or debtor-in-possession

concerning administration of the case concerning administration of the case

  • Investigate the acts, conduct, assets, liabilities, and

g , , , , financial condition of the debtor, including the

  • peration of the debtor's business and desirability of

the continuance of such business the continuance of such business

  • Request the appointment of a trustee or examiner
  • Request the appointment of a trustee or examiner

under § 1104 of the bankruptcy code

25

  • So much more – it's your case!
slide-26
SLIDE 26

The Committee's Weapons

  • Intelligence: Committee often possesses

i d t i f ti th t b h l f l t industry information that may be very helpful to the reorganization process

  • Financial Muscle: Committees may also be able

to provide post-petition financial support to provide post-petition financial support

  • Radar: Committees may be able to locate

Radar: Committees may be able to locate industry buyers

26

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Other Weapons in Your Arsenal

  • First Question: tell me about your D&O

First Question: tell me about your D&O coverage

  • Replace or significantly change
  • Replace or significantly change

management

a) Clear majorit of 30+ Committees a) Clear majority of 30+ Committees b) Mutually agreeable crisis or turnaround management management c) Mutually agreeable professional to run sale

27

process

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Other Weapons: Appoint a Trustee (§ 1104(a))

Strong presumption debtor should be permitted to remain in possession

f

  • Appoint Trustee – best interests of creditors
  • If current management committed

a) Fraud a) Fraud b) Dishonesty c) Incompetence d) Gross mismanagement d) Gross mismanagement e) Other (Examples: failure to keep accurate records, questionable transactions)

B t i t t f dit it it h ld d

  • Best interest of creditors, equity security holders, and
  • ther interests of estate
  • As an alternative to dismissal or conversion if in best

28

interest of creditors

slide-29
SLIDE 29

Other Weapons: Force a Sale Process (§ 363)

  • Attempt to capture going concern value
  • Management/shareholder preservation of

g equity, jobs, and control versus Committee's desire to maximize distribution E l

  • Examples

(a) Forcing sale process (b) Competitive dynamic (b) Competitive dynamic

  • Creating a competitive dynamic before it is too

late (a) Opportunity for buyer (b) Opportunity for creditors to maximize

29

value

slide-30
SLIDE 30

Other Weapons: Director & Officer Lawsuits

  • Very underutilized weapon
  • Upon becoming insolvent directors owe a

Upon becoming insolvent, directors owe a fiduciary duty to creditors (a) states differ upon the precise duty ( ) p p y (b) creditors v. shareholders

  • California example

( ) f d l h h i l (a) forced sale through involuntary bankruptcy (b) D&O (b) D&O (c) Reverse Merger

  • Important to use throughout case in

30

Important to use throughout case in negotiations

slide-31
SLIDE 31

R b C itt M b O Remember Committee Members Owe a Fiduciary Duty to ALL Unsecured Creditors

  • Act in best interest of all unsecured

creditors creditors

  • Competing Interests: Committee versus

p g your own company

  • Duty of diligence, loyalty, candor

31

  • When in doubt, fully disclose and abstain
slide-32
SLIDE 32

How do I Become a Become a Committee Member? Member?

32

slide-33
SLIDE 33

Getting on the Committee

  • 1. Top 10 to 15 creditors will receive a notice

from the Office of the U.S. Trustee

  • Address on Top 20
  • Contact U.S. Trustee
  • 2. Fill out request to serve on Committee

33

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

slide-37
SLIDE 37

Getting on the Committee

3. Attend formation meeting

– In person In person – Via telephone – Written proxy

4. Once selected

– Select Committee chairperson Select Committee chairperson – Select counsel – Agree to bylaws ATTACK! – ATTACK!

5. Committee member time commitment

37

slide-38
SLIDE 38

Committee Impact

  • Hereford Biofuels, LP

– 180 million out of the money 180 million out of the money – Objected to cash collateral, financial advisor, bidding procedures 2004 E i ti f th b k d th d bt – 2004 Examinations of the bank and the debtor – Emergency Hearings – Deal Deal

  • R&S Strauss

– Deal – Size up case – Pick fights carefully Get deal done

38

– Get deal done

slide-39
SLIDE 39

Committee Impact

  • Arrow Speed

– Attack first days Attack first days – Attack cash collateral – Attack sale – Attack insiders

Fi tPl Fi i l I

  • FirstPlus Financial, Inc.

– 300 boxes of documents 25 2004 Examinations in 75 days – 25 2004 Examinations in 75 days – Reach deal – Obtain court approval of deal

39

Obtain court approval of deal

slide-40
SLIDE 40

The Creditor's Committee – Fighting within the System

CONCLUSION CONCLUSION

  • Your case – Create an immediate

presence presence

  • Find leverage – Look under every rock
  • Pick your battles – Get a deal approved
  • Be a good fiduciary

g y

40

slide-41
SLIDE 41

OVERVIEW:

Weapons for the Proactive Credit Professional

Section 503(b)(9) – 20 day Administrative Claims Bankruptcy Rights of Reclamation The Creditors' Committee – Fighting g g Within the System Defending Preference Litigation g g MFSG Bonus Offer – Filling out a Proof of Claim Form

41

slide-42
SLIDE 42

Preferential Transfers:

(Why Credit Professionals Hate Them)

  • An account debtor owes you money.

y y

  • You do your job well, and your company gets

paid.

  • You collect a due and owing debt in a legal
  • You collect a due and owing debt in a legal

manner.

  • Guess what? The account debtor files

bankruptcy, and your company may have to return the money!

  • Why did Congress allow this to happen??? Isn't
  • Why did Congress allow this to happen??? Isn t

the government here to help you??? (Answer: No, you're not G.M.)

42

slide-43
SLIDE 43

Rationale Behind Bankruptcy Code Section 547 “The purpose of the preference section is twofold. p p p First, by permitting the trustee to avoid prebankruptcy transfers that occur within a short i d b f b k t dit di d period before bankruptcy, creditors are discouraged from racing to the courthouse to dismember the debtor during the debtor's slide into bankruptcy debtor during the debtor s slide into bankruptcy. The protection thus afforded the debtor often enables the debtor to work its way out of a difficult y financial situation through cooperation with all of his

  • creditors. . .

43

slide-44
SLIDE 44

Rationale Behind Bankruptcy Code Section 547

Second, and more important, the preference provisions facilitate the prime bankruptcy policy of p p p y p y equality of distribution among creditors of the

  • debtor. Any creditor that received a greater

payment than others of his class is required to disgorge so that all may share equally. The ti f th f ti t d t 'th

  • peration of the preference section to deter 'the

race of diligent' of creditors to dismember the debtor before bankruptcy furthers the second goal debtor before bankruptcy furthers the second goal

  • f the preference section, that of equality of

distribution.”

44

distribution.

slide-45
SLIDE 45

C S Rationale Behind Bankruptcy Code Section 547

  • “Ideally” encourages creditors to continue

dealing with troubled companies in the di f b i

  • rdinary course of business.
  • Prevents debtor from selectively paying

favored customers favored customers.

  • Prevents secret liens.
  • Prevents debtors from paying insiders and
  • Prevents debtors from paying insiders and

related entities.

45

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Mechanics of a Preference Lawsuit

TRUSTEE'S JOB: Gather Assets For Distribution Gather Assets For Distribution To Creditors

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

Assets include preference lawsuits. Mechanics of a Preference Lawsuit Trustee Assets include preference lawsuits. ASSETS ASSETS TRUSTEE (Debtor-in-Possession) HAS THE FIDUCIARY DUTY TO GATHER ASSETS UNDER BANKRUPTCY

47

UMBRELLA

slide-48
SLIDE 48

Mechanics of a Preference Lawsuit

Chapter 7: Trustee Pursues Recovery Chapter 7: Trustee Pursues Recovery Chapter 11: Debtor in possession Chapter 11: Debtor-in-possession, Creditors' Committee or Post Confirmation Entity Post-Confirmation Entity (such as Creditors' Trust) Pursues Recovery Pursues Recovery

48

slide-49
SLIDE 49

Creditor Debtor 90 d

within

BANKRUPTCY BANKRUPTCY

90 days

preference

49

preference lawsuit

Creditor Trustee

slide-50
SLIDE 50

Mechanics of a Preference Lawsuit

The Demand Letter

50

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

slide-52
SLIDE 52

Mechanics of a Preference Lawsuit

The Summons

52

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

slide-54
SLIDE 54

Mechanics of a Preference Lawsuit

The Complaint

54

slide-55
SLIDE 55

55

slide-56
SLIDE 56

Mechanics of a Preference Lawsuit

Burden of Proof

Plaintiff: Has burden of proving that a given p g g transfer(s) is avoidable, according to the standard set forth in Bankruptcy p y Code Section 547(b). Defendant: Has burden of proving the non- avoidability of a transfer under one

  • r more of the exceptions set forth

in Bankruptcy Code Section 547(c).

56

slide-57
SLIDE 57

Mechanics of a Preference Lawsuit

Parties Liable. Parties liable for preferences include not only p y the initial transferee, but also the parties for whose benefit the transfer was made and the immediate or mediate transferees of the initial immediate or mediate transferees of the initial transferee.

57

slide-58
SLIDE 58

Elements of Proof in a P f L it Preference Lawsuit

1. Transfer by the debtor; 1. Transfer by the debtor; 2. Of an interest of the debtor’s property; 3 To or for the benefit of a creditor; 3. To or for the benefit of a creditor; 4. On account of an antecedent debt; 5 Made while the debtor is insolvent; 5. Made while the debtor is insolvent; 6. Made within 90 days before bankruptcy; and 7 Enables creditor to receive more than in 7. Enables creditor to receive more than in Chapter 7.

58

slide-59
SLIDE 59

Elements of Proof in a Preference Lawsuit (Trustee’s Burden)

1. Any transfer;

  • broadly defined “every mode direct or

( )

  • broadly defined every mode, direct or

indirect, absolute or conditional, voluntary or involuntary, disposing of or parting with y, p g p g property or an interest in property . . .”

In other words, any action that removes property or an , y p p y interest in property from the debtor and delivers it to another party is a “transfer.” If the property given to the creditor does not come from the debtor then it is the creditor does not come from the debtor, then it is not a “transfer” for preference purposes.

59

slide-60
SLIDE 60

Elements of Proof in a Preference Lawsuit (Trustee’s Burden)

2. Of an interest of the Debtor in property; "property that would have been part of the

( )

property that would have been part of the estate had it not been transferred before the commencement of the bankruptcy [case]".

Payments; Granting liens; Executions on judgments; Giving up options; Anything that diminishes or depletes the d bt ' t t debtor's estate. Examples include security interests, assignments, distribution rights, tax benefits, options, and numerous g p

  • ther items that might not ordinarily come into mind as

being a debtor's "property." Virtually any kind of advantage that a creditor obtains from a debtor during the period is l bl t tt k

60

vulnerable to attack.

Compare letter of credit

slide-61
SLIDE 61

Elements of Proof in a Preference Lawsuit (Trustee’s Burden)

3. To or for the benefit of a creditor;

  • Creditor: Anyone with a “claim.” Broadly defined:

( ) y y contingent, disputed, not matured. . .

4. For or on account of an antecedent debt

  • wed by the debtor before such transfer
  • wed by the debtor before such transfer

was made;

  • i.e. for invoices that are due or past due.

p

  • Payment on any outstanding invoices, whether

they are due or not, is a payment on account of an antecedent debt an antecedent debt.

  • Note that a payment for goods that is made prior

to shipping or receiving those goods is not a payment of an antecedent debt

61

payment of an antecedent debt.

slide-62
SLIDE 62

Elements of Proof in a Preference Lawsuit (Trustee’s Burden)

5. Made while the debtor was insolvent;

( )

  • financial condition such that the sum of the

debtor's debts is greater than all of the debtor's property at a fair valuation property, at a fair valuation

  • Solvency is presumed

S l ti b “b t”

  • Solvency presumption can be “burst”
  • Significantly alters the negotiation dynamics

6. Made within 90 days before bankruptcy is filed (one year for insiders); and

62

slide-63
SLIDE 63

Elements of Proof in a Preference Lawsuit (Trustee’s Burden)

7. That enables such creditor to receive more than such creditor would receive if –

( )

a. the case were a case under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code; b the transfer had not been made; b. the transfer had not been made; and c. such creditor received payment of c. such creditor received payment of such debt to the extent provided by the provisions of the Bankruptcy C d Code.

  • Hypothetical Chapter 7 test.

63

slide-64
SLIDE 64

Preference Defenses

64

slide-65
SLIDE 65

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit (Creditor’s Burden)

  • 1. Contemporaneous Exchange – Section

547(c)(1)

( )

547(c)(1)

  • 2. Ordinary Course of Business – Section

547(c)(2) 547(c)(2)

  • 3. Enabling Loan Defense – Section

547(c)(3) 547(c)(3)

  • 4. Transfer of Subsequent New Value –

Section 547(c)(4) Section 547(c)(4)

  • 5. Security Interests in Inventory or

Receivables – Section 547(c)(5)

65

Receivables Section 547(c)(5)

slide-66
SLIDE 66

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit (Creditor’s Burden)

Contemporaneous Exchange a Intent for contemporaneo s e change

( )

  • a. Intent for contemporaneous exchange

by both debtor and creditor;

  • b. A contemporaneous exchange

actually occurs; and

  • c. Creditor provides “real” new value.

(Examples: COD/cash in advance) ( p )

66

slide-67
SLIDE 67

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Ordinary Course of Business Defenses

Ordinary course of business test requires that a transfer be in payment of a debt incurred by the debtor in the ordinary course of business the debtor in the ordinary course of business

  • r financial affairs of the debtor and the

transferee, and either:

1) Made in the ordinary course of business or financial affairs of the debtor and the transferee (the so- called “subjective” ordinary course test); or called subjective ordinary course test); or 2) Made according to ordinary business terms (the so- called “objective” ordinary course test).

67

slide-68
SLIDE 68

N O di C f B i D f New Ordinary Course of Business Defense

Ordinary course defense is essentially a new statute post- y y p

  • BAPCPA. This substantial change was accomplished by

changing an 'and' to an 'or'.

What does this mean for creditors?

Two disjunctive, alternative defenses:

  • 1. Preferential payment was made in the ordinary course
  • f the debtor's and the creditor's/defendant's business,
  • OR-
  • 2. Payment made in accordance with ordinary business

68

y y terms.

slide-69
SLIDE 69

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Ordinary Course of Business Defenses

Ordinary course of business test requires that a transfer be in payment of a debt incurred by the debtor in the ordinary course of business the debtor in the ordinary course of business

  • r financial affairs of the debtor and the

transferee, and either:

1) Made in the ordinary course of business or financial affairs of the debtor and the transferee (the so- called “subjective” ordinary course test); or called subjective ordinary course test); or 2) Made according to ordinary business terms (the so- called “objective” ordinary course test).

69

slide-70
SLIDE 70

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Determination of “Ordinary Course of Business” entails: Business entails:

  • a. Consideration of quantifiable factors

(Mathematical comparison of payment (Mathematical comparison of payment history before and during the preference period); and p );

  • b. Consideration of non-quantifiable factors

(i.e., timing, amount, manner, collection efforts, and circumstances of transfers).

70

slide-71
SLIDE 71

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit Ex: Debtor files bankruptcy on May 11, 2009 Preference Period Pre-preference “Historical” Period

Beginning of

90 days

Beginning of Vendor relationship 02/10/09 05/11/09 (Petition Date)

71

slide-72
SLIDE 72

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Learn the facts using: 1 P f D f Q ti i Learn the facts, using:

  • 1. Preference Defense Questionnaire
  • 2. Ordinary Course of Business Worksheet
  • 3. New Value Worksheet

72

slide-73
SLIDE 73

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

PREFERENCE DEFENSE QUESTIONNAIRE

To properly evaluate your company's defenses to the alleged preferential transfers at issue it to the alleged preferential transfers at issue, it is essential that we understand the business relationship between your company and the p y p y bankrupt debtor. Accordingly, we ask that you provide us with a brief, but complete, written response to the following questions:

73

slide-74
SLIDE 74

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

  • 1. How long has your company done business with the

debtor?

74

slide-75
SLIDE 75

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit 2 Wh t i th f th tit t hi h th t

  • 2. What is the name of the entity to which the payments

were made? Is that the same as the entity being sued?

75

slide-76
SLIDE 76

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

  • 3. What is the name of the entity from which you

received the payments? Is that the name of the debtor seeking avoidance of the transfers?

76

slide-77
SLIDE 77

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit 4 What credit terms did you offer the debtor before the

  • 4. What credit terms did you offer the debtor before the

bankruptcy? (Beginning 15 months prior to the debtor's petition date and continuing to the petition date itself ) What grace period if any do you allow date itself.) What grace period, if any, do you allow for payment? Are special terms ever given for limited periods of time for promotional/seasonal reasons?

77

slide-78
SLIDE 78

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

  • 5. Are there seasonal factors associated with the
  • 5. Are there seasonal factors associated with the

products you sell, such that you sell more product (or the debtor pays earlier or later) depending on the time

  • f year?
  • f year?

78

slide-79
SLIDE 79

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

  • 6. Are the credit terms you offer the debtor comparable

to those you offered to similarly situated customers? Are your credit terms for this debtor comparable to Are your credit terms for this debtor comparable to those provided by your competitors?

79

slide-80
SLIDE 80

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit 7 Do you have any reason to believe the debtor was

  • 7. Do you have any reason to believe the debtor was

paying you in a more favorable manner than it paid

  • ther creditors?

80

slide-81
SLIDE 81

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

  • 8. Was there a change in credit terms during the
  • 8. Was there a change in credit terms during the

preference period or in the year prior to the preference period? Explain. Is there any documentation (memos letters e-mails etc ) of the change? How (memos, letters, e mails, etc.) of the change? How was the change communicated to the debtor?

81

slide-82
SLIDE 82

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

  • 9. Did your company engage in any unusual collection
  • 9. Did your company engage in any unusual collection

activity during, or immediately prior to, the preference period? Cessation of shipments? Threatening collection phone calls or Threatening collection phone calls or correspondence? Describe in detail, and be prepared to provide copies of all related correspondence.

82

slide-83
SLIDE 83

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

  • 10. How are credit memos handled with this debtor,

including timing of returns and credits and payment

  • f advertising co-op payments, if any? Is this typical
  • f advertising co op payments, if any? Is this typical
  • f the procedure your company uses with other

customers?

83

slide-84
SLIDE 84

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit 11 What is the timing between the date an invoice is 11.What is the timing between the date an invoice is prepared and the date related product is shipped?

84

slide-85
SLIDE 85

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit 12.Did the debtor pay for goods shipped/services provided during the preference period? Be prepared provided during the preference period? Be prepared to identify by (i) invoice number, date and amount and (ii) check number, check amount and deposit date.

85

slide-86
SLIDE 86

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit 13.Has a proof of claim been filed? If not, why not? Be prepared to provide us with a copy of all proofs of prepared to provide us with a copy of all proofs of claim, including any exhibits or attachments to the proof of claim.

86

slide-87
SLIDE 87

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit 14.Did you receive financial statements from the debtor in the six months prior to the bankruptcy filing or did in the six months prior to the bankruptcy filing, or did you receive any other information or assurances from the debtor during that time indicating that the debtor was financially sound? was financially sound?

87

slide-88
SLIDE 88

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit 15.Are there other facts that might indicate that your preference period transactions with the debtor took place in the ordinary course of business? Explain.

88

slide-89
SLIDE 89

Preference Defenses

89

slide-90
SLIDE 90

Creditor Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

O di C f B i Ordinary Course of Business Worksheet Worksheet

90

slide-91
SLIDE 91

Ordinary Course of Business Worksheet

Invoice Number Invoice Date Invoice Amount Check/Wire No. Check/Wire Date Payment Amount Payment Due Date Payment Receipt Date Invoice Date to Payment Receipt Date (Days)

HISTORICAL DATA

15 Month History Before Petition Date

1001 03/01/08 $10,000.00 536 03/07/08 $10,000.00 03/31/08 03/11/08 10 1002 04/01/08 $15,000.00 604 04/13/08 $15,000.00 05/01/08 04/17/08 16 1003 05/01/08 $25,000.00 642 06/05/08 $25,000.00 05/31/08 06/09/08 39 1004 06/01/08 $62,000.00 699 07/17/08 $62,000.00 07/01/08 07/21/08 50 1005 07/01/08 $40,000.00 713 07/16/08 $40,000.00 07/31/08 07/20/08 19 1006 08/01/08 $70,000.00 722 09/05/08 $70,000.00 08/31/08 09/09/08 39 $ $ HISTORICAL DATA 1007 09/01/08 $45,000.00 754 10/15/08 $45,000.00 10/01/08 10/19/08 48 1008 10/01/08 $30,000.00 789 11/23/08 $30,000.00 10/31/08 11/27/08 57 1009 11/01/08 $22,000.00 839 12/15/08 $22,000.00 12/01/08 12/19/08 48 1010 12/01/08 $13,000.00 862 01/16/09 $13,000.00 12/31/08 01/20/09 50 1011 01/01/09 $18,000.00 899 02/12/09 $18,000.00 01/31/09 02/16/09 46 1012 02/01/09 $20,000.00 908 03/17/09 $20,000.00 03/03/09 03/21/09 48 PREFERENCE PERIOD DATA 1013 03/01/09 $21,000.00 912 04/16/09 $21,000.00 03/31/09 04/20/09 50 1014 04/01/09 $40,000.00 950 06/20/09 $40,000.00 05/01/09 06/24/09 84 1015 05/01/09 $62,000.00 951 06/09/09 $62,000.00 05/31/09 06/13/09 43

91

slide-92
SLIDE 92

Ordinary Course of Business Worksheet

Invoice Number Invoice Date Invoice Amount Check/Wire No. Check/Wire Date Payment Amount Payment Due Date Payment Receipt Date Invoice Date to Payment Receipt Date (Days) HISTORICAL DATA

12 Month History Before Petition Date

1001 03/01/08 $10,000.00 536 03/07/08 $10,000.00 03/31/08 03/11/08 10 1002 04/01/08 $15,000.00 604 04/13/08 $15,000.00 05/01/08 04/17/08 16 1003 05/01/08 $25,000.00 642 06/05/08 $25,000.00 05/31/08 06/09/08 39 1004 06/01/08 $62,000.00 699 07/17/08 $62,000.00 07/01/08 07/21/08 50 1005 07/01/08 $40,000.00 713 07/16/08 $40,000.00 07/31/08 07/20/08 19 1006 08/01/08 $70,000.00 722 09/05/08 $70,000.00 08/31/08 09/09/08 39 $ $

HISTORICAL DATA

1007 09/01/08 $45,000.00 754 10/15/08 $45,000.00 10/01/08 10/19/08 48 1008 10/01/08 $30,000.00 789 11/23/08 $30,000.00 10/31/08 11/27/08 57 1009 11/01/08 $22,000.00 839 12/15/08 $22,000.00 12/01/08 12/19/08 48 1010 12/01/08 $13,000.00 862 01/16/09 $13,000.00 12/31/08 01/20/09 50 1011 01/01/09 $18,000.00 899 02/12/09 $18,000.00 01/31/09 02/16/09 46 1012 02/01/09 $20,000.00 908 03/17/09 $20,000.00 03/03/09 03/21/09 48 Mean 39 Median 47 Mode 48

  • Std. Dev.

15 Minimum 10 Maximum 57

92

slide-93
SLIDE 93

Ordinary Course of Business Worksheet

Invoice Number Invoice Date Invoice Amount Check/Wire No. Check/Wire Date Payment Amount Payment Due Date Payment Receipt Date Invoice Date to Payment Receipt Date (Days)

Preference Period

1013 03/01/09 $21,000.00 912 04/16/09 $21,000.00 03/31/09 04/20/09 50 1014 04/01/09 $40,000.00 950 06/20/09 $40,000.00 05/01/09 06/24/09 84 1015 05/01/09 $62,000.00 951 06/09/09 $62,000.00 05/31/09 06/13/09 43 Mean 59 Median 50 M d N/A PREFERENCE PERIOD DATA Mode N/A Minimum 43 Maximum 84

93

slide-94
SLIDE 94

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Ordinary Course of Business Worksheet Focus is on average number of days between invoice date and date check is received (or between due date and check receipt date) and check receipt date).

94

slide-95
SLIDE 95

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Average time to pay during Preference Period: A ti t hi t i ll 59 days 39 d Average time to pay historically: 39 days Which data set works best for you? A. 12 month historical average: _________ 39 days y B. 9 month historical average: _________ C. 6 month historical average: _________ y 45 days 50 days

95

slide-96
SLIDE 96

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

What is within “Ordinary Course?”

  • A. 10 days of average? 15 days?
  • B. Consistent with prior practices?

C I id th hi t i l ?

  • C. Inside the historical range?
  • D. Well established payment practices?
  • E. Look at actual payment history, not contract terms.

96

slide-97
SLIDE 97

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Analysis of Ordinary Course of Business

Get creative: Get creative:

  • Remove/include extraneous data points that

skew averages g

  • Different historical analysis: 9 months; 18

months; 24 months

  • Median, mode
  • Standard deviation

F l i

  • Frequency analysis
  • Seasonality charting

S i l ti ff t

97

  • Special promotions effects
slide-98
SLIDE 98

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Factors most frequently considered by the courts when evaluating whether a the courts when evaluating whether a transfer took place in the “ordinary course of business” include: course of business include:

  • timing of the transfer
  • amount of the transfer
  • manner of the transfer
  • circumstances of the transfer

98

slide-99
SLIDE 99

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Timing of the transfer

Did th t f Did the transfer occur:

  • on the eve of bankruptcy?
  • later than usual?
  • earlier than usual?

earlier than usual?

  • on a non-standard basis?

99

slide-100
SLIDE 100

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Amount of the transfer

W th t f Was the transfer:

  • larger than usual?
  • in an other than ordinary payment

amount? amount?

100

slide-101
SLIDE 101

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Manner of the transfer

Was the transfer: i d th th b h k?

  • wired, rather than by check?
  • cashier's check, rather than a regular

check? check?

  • overnighted or hand-delivered rather than

mailed?

  • any non-standard method or form of

payment?

101

slide-102
SLIDE 102

Circumstances of the Transfer

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Circumstances of the Transfer (Creditor)

  • Did the creditor initiate “a calculated response

to the debtor's deteriorating financial to the debtor s deteriorating financial condition,” or otherwise use economic pressure so as to take the payments out of p p y the ordinary course of business exception?

  • Shorter credit terms?
  • Reduced credit limits?
  • Unusual or harassing demands for payment?

O h i di ?

102

  • Other, more strict credit terms?
slide-103
SLIDE 103

Ci t f th T f

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Circumstances of the Transfer (Debtor) ( )

  • Was the debtor's deteriorating financial

condition a factor in the circumstances condition a factor in the circumstances

  • f the debtor's payments?

/ f ?

  • Paying only key/preferred vendors?
  • Holding checks?
  • Slow pays?
  • Paying only “squeaky wheels?”

103

  • Paying only squeaky wheels?
slide-104
SLIDE 104

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Ordinary Course of Business Defenses

Ordinary course of business test requires that a transfer be in payment of a debt incurred by the debtor in the ordinary course of business the debtor in the ordinary course of business

  • r financial affairs of the debtor and the

transferee, and either:

1) Made in the ordinary course of business or financial affairs of the debtor and the transferee (the so- called “subjective” ordinary course test); or called subjective ordinary course test); or 2) Made according to ordinary business terms (the so- called “objective” ordinary course test).

104

slide-105
SLIDE 105

PREFERENCES

New Ordinary Course of Business Defense: Ordinary Business Terms

PREFERENCES

Ordinary Business Terms How courts have interpreted this change:

  • “Ordinary business terms” is now a separate defense
  • The yoke between the 'ordinary course of business' component and

the 'ordinary business terms' component has been removed by the ordinary business terms component has been removed by BAPCPA

  • Industry standards are now applied to the factual circumstances of

y pp the transfer to determine “ordinary business terms”

In re National Gas Distributors, 346 B.R. 394 (E.D.N.C. 2006) 105

slide-106
SLIDE 106

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

“Ordinary business terms” refers to the range of terms that encompasses the range of terms that encompasses the practices in which firms similar in some general way to the creditor in question g y q engage, and only dealings so unusual as to fall outside that broad range should be deemed extraordinary and therefore outside the scope of b ti 547( )(2)(B) subsection 547(c)(2)(B).

106

slide-107
SLIDE 107

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Q: What is the relevant industry from which to draw the industry standard for to draw the industry standard for challenged credit arrangements? A: Courts look at credit practices between suppliers to whom a debtor might bl t f it i t d reasonably turn for its inventory and companies with whom the debtor competes (i.e., credit practices between co petes ( e , c ed t p act ces bet ee your competitors and the debtor's competitors).

107

slide-108
SLIDE 108

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Note: The more cemented (as measured by its duration) the pre- insolvency relationship between the debtor and the creditor, the more the creditor will be allowed to vary its credit terms from the industry norm, yet remain within the safe harbor section of section 547(c)(2).

108

slide-109
SLIDE 109

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Subsequent New Value Exception

Protects transfers to or for the benefit of a Protects transfers to or for the benefit of a creditor, such that after the transfer creditor gave new value to or for the benefit of debtor, g and

  • a. New value not secured by otherwise unavoidable

security interest; and security interest; and

  • b. On account of the new value, debtor did not

make an otherwise unavoidable transfer to or for the benefit of s ch creditor the benefit of such creditor.

109

slide-110
SLIDE 110

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

New Value Exception After alleged preferential transfer, creditor: P id d l i l di a. Provides unsecured new value, including

  • Goods shipped
  • Services provided
  • Services provided
  • Liens released
  • New credit

b. On account of which the creditor does not receive an otherwise unavoidable transfer (i.e. avoidable lien) avoidable lien)

  • Rationale: prevents bankruptcy, rewards

creditors dealing with financially troubled

110

creditors dealing with financially troubled company

slide-111
SLIDE 111

Policy Considerations Supporting

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Policy Considerations Supporting New Value Exception

1. Without the exception, a creditor who extends credit to the debtor perhaps in extends credit to the debtor, perhaps in implicit reliance on prior payments, would merely be increasing his bankruptcy loss. 2. Limited protection provided by the subsequent advance rule encourages creditors to continue their revolving credit creditors to continue their revolving credit arrangements with financially troubled debtors, and potentially helps the debtor

111

avoid bankruptcy altogether.

slide-112
SLIDE 112

N V l W k h t

Defenses in a Preference Lawsuit

Invoice Number Invoice Date Invoice Amount Check No. Check Date Check Amount Check Receipt Date

New Value Worksheet

NOTE TO PREPARER: This worksheet is intended to show the chronology of payments received and shipments made during the Preference Period. Each individual payment (by check,

112

wire or otherwise) received during the Preference Period, and each shipment made during the Preference Period, should be listed chronologically. The information should be forwarded to us by e-mail in Microsoft Excel format, if possible.

slide-113
SLIDE 113

New Value Analysis

(90 days prior to preference period only)

Check Invoice Number Invoice Date Invoice Amount Check No. Check Date Check Amount Check Receipt Date Net Preference 04/16/09 $18,056.21 04/20/09 $18,056.21 1015 04/21/09 $20 590 11 1234 $0 00 1015 04/21/09 $20,590.11 1234 $0.00 04/19/09 $18,420.07 04/23/09 $18,420.07 1016 04/25/09 $23,056.79 2345 $0.00 05/02/09 $18,922.37 05/06/09 $18,922.37 05/09/09 $23,479.03 05/13/09 $42,401.40 1017 05/17/09 $17,436.51 3456 $24,964.89 05/28/09 $17,127.20 06/01/09 $42,092.09 1018 06/10/09 $113,566.47 4567 $0.00

113

slide-114
SLIDE 114

PAID v. UNPAID NEW VALUE

Q: Does the new value still count if the Q: Does the new value still count if the underlying invoice is paid?

114

slide-115
SLIDE 115

A: Depends on the jurisdiction. Some U.S. Courts of Appeals (Third, Seventh, Ei hth d El th) l Eighth and Eleventh) say new value must remain unpaid – otherwise the debtor's estate is not truly “replenished” debtor s estate is not truly replenished by the new value. Other Courts of Appeals (Fourth, Fifth and Ninth) say new value counts even if paid Ninth) say new value counts even if paid.

THIS IS BECOMING THE MAJORITY VIEW.

115

THIS IS BECOMING THE MAJORITY VIEW.

slide-116
SLIDE 116

116

slide-117
SLIDE 117

Creditor Prevention Creditor Prevention

  • f
  • f

Preference Lawsuits Preference Lawsuits

117

slide-118
SLIDE 118

Creditor Prevention of P f L i Preference Lawsuits

As with other things in life, preferential transfers will happen. Nevertheless, a credit professional can take steps to avoid the characterization of a transfer as “preferential.” The following are recommendations in your relationships with debtors that might help you avoid being a victim of a preference lawsuit:

118

slide-119
SLIDE 119

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Third Party Payment. A payment is not preferential if (i) it is made from the A payment is not preferential if (i) it is made from the assets of a third party and (ii) it does not diminish the assets remaining in the debtor's estate. Ideally, the g y debtor should have no part in such a transaction. If the debtor simply borrows the money from a third t t k th t th i d th t th party to make the payment, there is a danger that the court will still construe the payment as having been made by the debtor to the creditor rendering it an made by the debtor to the creditor, rendering it an avoidable preference. On the other hand, if a third party makes the payment directly to the creditor, the

119

p y p y y , preferential transfer issue can be avoided.

slide-120
SLIDE 120

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Third Party Guaranty. Although collection from a non-debtor guarantor may sometimes be postponed by the debtor's bankruptcy filing, bankruptcy discharges only

  • bligations of the debtor, not those of a non-

debtor guarantor. Thus, by obtaining the guaranty of a solvent third party, a creditor can

  • ften shift the risk of the debtor's later

bankruptcy to that guarantor.

120

slide-121
SLIDE 121

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Preference Indemnities. A solvent third party who will not willingly guarantee the payment of a debt may guarantee the payment of a debt may, nevertheless, be willing to guaranty or indemnify against preferential transfer indemnify against preferential transfer avoidance in the event the account debtor enters bankruptcy enters bankruptcy.

121

slide-122
SLIDE 122

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits Obtain a purchase money security interest. If you are supplying inventory for the debtor, demand a purchase money security interest in the goods sold to the debtor This requires a UCC filing and should be

  • debtor. This requires a UCC filing, and should be

accomplished prior to the 90-day preference period, or the security interest risks avoidance as a preference. If the h it i t t i t d d i th purchase money security interest is granted during the preference period and enables the debtor to acquire product that is the subject of the security interest, make sure that the funds received were used to acquire the product, and that the UCC is filed on or before 30 days after the debtor acquires possession of the product

122

acquires possession of the product.

slide-123
SLIDE 123

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

The Trust or Bailment Exception. p To be preferential, a transfer must be made from “an interest in the property of the debtor ” In some interest in the property of the debtor. In some circumstances, it may be possible to structure a settlement as a return of property of the creditor that was being held by the debtor in express or constructive trust. If the property used to make the t b t d t th dit th i i l payment can be traced to the creditor as the original source, the payment may survive attack as a preference

123

preference.

slide-124
SLIDE 124

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits Payment in Property. The return or other transfer of property in payment of a debt i ht tit t id bl f Th i i l might constitute an avoidable preference. The principal danger here is that the transfer expressly or implicitly

  • vervalues the property returned, thereby creating

p p y , y g preference liability in excess of the value the creditor actually

  • received. So, for example, when a vendor accepts returned

goods from a customer in the shadow of the customer's goods from a customer in the shadow of the customer s bankruptcy, a settlement document or credit memo should expressly state the value of the goods returned to the vendor. Th d i ht th i b h ld li bl i f The vendor might otherwise be held liable in a preference action for the original purchase price of the goods.

124

slide-125
SLIDE 125

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Change to a “cash in advance” or COD basis. If you find that an account debtor is getting If you find that an account debtor is getting behind on its payments, then decisively change payment requirements to a “cash in advance” or payment requirements to a cash in advance or COD basis. Insist on cash, cashier's check, certified check or wire transfer, and demand payment based upon the immediate same day exchange of new inventory that the debtor i k th t f COD d t receives, or make the transfer COD and accept no company checks – only cash, cashier's check

  • r money orders

125

  • r money orders.
slide-126
SLIDE 126

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Promptly cash all checks received. If a check is honored prior to the f i d it i t f ti l preference period, it is not a preferential

  • transfer. Also, the earlier one knows of

the debtor's financial problems, the better.

126

slide-127
SLIDE 127

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Save all payment envelopes so as to preserve the post-mark date. The post-mark will provide evidence of when the debtor mailed the check. Receipt stamps or lockbox p p schedules provide when you received the check. By doing so you might later be able to argue that the d t f ili h ld b d t d t i th ti date of mailing should be used to determine the time the debtor transferred the funds. One court has ruled that the date of mailing would apply Also ruled that the date of mailing would apply. Also helps in “slicing and dicing” the data.

127

slide-128
SLIDE 128

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Establish uniform collection procedures. Establish a uniform set of procedures for the collection of debts and apply it evenly to all your customers. Customizing collection practices to an individual account debtor may satisfy the needs of the moment, but runs the risk of any payments received being found to be outside the ordinary course of business, and therefore

128

preferential.

slide-129
SLIDE 129

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Compare industry practices. Compare your credit and ll ti ti ith th f collection practices with those of

  • thers in the same industry and

y make sure that your company's practices are competitive with practices are competitive with industry standards.

129

slide-130
SLIDE 130

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Demand receipt of regular, timely financial statements. When you are dealing with a slow-paying debtor, ask that the debtor provide regular, timely financial p g y statements showing the debtor's assets and

  • liabilities. If a balance sheet shows that the debtor

i l t ti th th dit is a solvent corporation, then the creditor can assert the debtor's solvency in the event of any subsequent preference avoidance action You subsequent preference avoidance action. You should ask for financial statements from a slow- paying company every month or so, and no less

130

p y g p y y , frequently than quarterly.

slide-131
SLIDE 131

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Make the debtor prove its prima facie case. p p Do not return the alleged preferential payment to the debtor even if you feel that the debtor is correct in his debtor, even if you feel that the debtor is correct in his

  • demand. Bankrupt debtors and bankruptcy trustees

will often settle for a smaller percentage of the preferential payment. You could save yourself some money just by making the debtor go through the h f idi ith id f i f i hoops of providing you with evidence of a prima facie case.

131

slide-132
SLIDE 132

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Workout of troubled debt with Preference Prevention in mind Prevention in mind

  • Solvency representation
  • Solvency representation.
  • Payment from third party
  • No release until 91 days after receipt of payment
  • No release until 91 days after receipt of payment
  • Preference indemnity
  • Does workout destroy ordinary course of business

Does workout destroy ordinary course of business defense?

132

slide-133
SLIDE 133

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

  • 503(b)(9) vs. Avoid preference
  • Cash in advance vs application of payment to

Cash in advance vs. application of payment to earliest unpaid invoice a) likelihood of bankruptcy ) p y b) What does application to oldest invoice do to ordinary course of business c) Unusually large payment

133

slide-134
SLIDE 134

Creditor Prevention of Preference Lawsuits

Eliminating Small Nuisances ( /k/ “ h k d ”) (a/k/a “shake downs”)

  • Preferential transfer must now exceed $5,000 for avoidance

action to be filed (11 U.S.C. § 547(c)(9)).

  • Preferential transfer to non-insider business defendants of

l h $10 000 b fil d i h di i i hi h h less than $10,000 must be filed in the district in which the defendant resides (28 U.S.C. § 1409(b)). Practical impact: Preferences less than $10 000 may be

  • Practical impact: Preferences less than $10,000 may be

demanded, but unlikely to be pursued.

134

slide-135
SLIDE 135

OVERVIEW:

Weapons for the Proactive Credit Professional

Section 503(b)(9) – 20 day Administrative Claims Bankruptcy Rights of Reclamation The Creditors' Committee – Fighting g g Within the System Defending Preference Litigation g g MFSG Bonus Offer – Filling out a Proof of Claim Form

135

slide-136
SLIDE 136

Preparation of Proof of Claim

FORM AND CONTENT

1.

  • Definition. A Proof of Claim is a written statement setting forth a creditor's claim against a debtor.

A Proof of Claim is required to conform substantially to Official form No. 10. 2. Who May Execute. A Proof of Claim is required to be executed by the Creditor or the Creditor's authorized representative. 3. Claim Based on Writing. When a claim is based on a writing, the original or a duplicate shall be filed with the Proof of Claim. If the writing has been lost or destroyed, a statement of the circumstances of loss or destruction must be filed with the claim. If the documents are voluminous, the official form authorizes the creditor to provide a summary. 4 Necessity for Filing In order for an unsecured creditor's claims to be allowed it must file a Proof of 4. Necessity for Filing. In order for an unsecured creditor s claims to be allowed it must file a Proof of Claim in accordance with the Bankruptcy Rules unless certain exceptions apply. With respect to reorganization cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code, the debtor's Schedule of Liabilities filed pursuant to bankruptcy Code Section 521(1) constitutes prima face evidence of the validity of amount the claim of creditors, unless they are scheduled as disputed, contingent or unliquidated. If a claim is scheduled as disputed, contingent or unliquidated or if a creditor disputes the amount

  • f claim listed on the debtor's schedules, such a creditor must file a Proof of Claim. However, the

best rule is to always file a Proof of Claim. 5. Evidentiary Effect. A Proof of Claim executed and filed in accordance with the bankruptcy 136 5. Evidentiary Effect. A Proof of Claim executed and filed in accordance with the bankruptcy rules, constitutes prima face evidence of the validity in the amount of claim.

slide-137
SLIDE 137

PROOF OF CLAIM

6. Time to File. (1) Chapter 7 Case. A Proof of Claim must be filed within ninety (90) days after the first day set for the meeting of creditors pursuant to Section 341(a) of the Bankruptcy Code, l N ti f I ffi i t A t t P Di id d i t dit d th unless a Notice of Insufficient Assets to Pay a Dividend was given to creditor and the trustee thereafter notifies the court that payment of a dividend appears possible. In such a case, creditors should receive notice of that fact and they must file Proof of Claims within 90 days of such notice. (2) Chapter 11 Cases. The court fixes a time for filing Proofs of Claim, or in a Chapter 11 case notice of such "Bar Date" may often be found on the Notice of Commencement

  • f Case. While some dispute exists in the bankruptcy courts as to whether such a date

is binding, it is the recommendation of this author that a Proof of Claim be filed well in the advance of any bar date set by any Notice of Commencement of Case received in the advance of any bar date set by any Notice of Commencement of Case received by a creditor. 137

slide-138
SLIDE 138

PROOF OF CLAIM

7. Objections to Claims. (1) Who May File A debtor or any interested party may file an objection to any claim (1) Who May File. A debtor or any interested party may file an objection to any claim against the debtor in a bankruptcy case. Generally, the debtor in a Chapter 11 case

  • r the Chapter 7 Trustee in a Chapter 7 case will file an Objection to Claims. At a

hearing on such an objection, the debtor or the Trustee will bear the burden of proof to support the grounds to his objection. (2) Time for Objecting to Claims. Generally, Objection to Claims are filed after all assets of the estate have been liquidated in a Chapter 7 case or after confirmation of

  • f a plan in a Chapter 11 case. Accordingly, some time may pass between a creditor's filing
  • f a Proof of Claim and any objection thereto

In Chapter 11 reorganization cases the

  • f a Proof of Claim and any objection thereto. In Chapter 11 reorganization cases, the

plan and/or the disclosure statement should provide information regarding the deadline for filing Objection to Proofs of Claim. 8. A Reason not to File a Proof of Claim. In the event a particular creditor has significant preferential t f f d l t th t dit t t id t fili f transfer or fraudulent conveyance exposure, that creditor may want to consider not filing a proof

  • f claim because one consequence of filing a proof of claim is to consent to the bankruptcy court's

jurisdiction and thereby waive its right to a jury trial. 138

slide-139
SLIDE 139

139

slide-140
SLIDE 140

PROOF OF CLAIM

140

slide-141
SLIDE 141

PROOF OF CLAIM

141

slide-142
SLIDE 142

PROOF OF CLAIM (cont'd)

Secured

142

  • Perfected UCC-1 lien
  • Statutory lien
  • Perfected Judicial lien
  • Right to setoff
slide-143
SLIDE 143

P i it (li t d P f f Cl i ) Priority (listed on Proof of Claim)

  • Administrative Claims
  • "Gap" Claims
  • Employees (up to $10,950)
  • Governmental Units

Governmental Units

143

slide-144
SLIDE 144

PROOF OF CLAIM (cont'd)

144

slide-145
SLIDE 145

PROOF OF CLAIM (cont'd)

Penalty for presenting fraudulent claim: Fine of up to $500,000 or imprisonment for up to 5 years, or both. 18 U.S.C. §§ 152 and 3571.

145

slide-146
SLIDE 146

146