AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES
- Prof. Gibbert, Consumer Behaviour - SS 2018
AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES Prof. Gibbert, Consumer Behaviour - SS 2018 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
AUTONOMOUS VEHICLES Prof. Gibbert, Consumer Behaviour - SS 2018 BeautifulMinds: Alan Bicego, Francesca Panico, Federica Pedalino, Giada Rizzo Characters description ALEXA JOHN 30 years old 56 years old American American
technologies (innovator/first user)
well
need → the idea
using an autonomous vehicle changes an usual action like driving in something futuristic. Moreover, I perceive this car as a luxury product and since I am a woman in career, this car is appealing to me. These technological and luxurious fantasies make me want to have this kind of car. ○ Partially utilitarian → this car is useful in driving me home after a night out or to go to work when I don’t want to use public transportation.
usually drive during rush hour, with autonomous vehicles, I could read the documents of the client while reaching them. ○ Partially hedonic → I love the futuristic idea that the autonomous vehicle gives me, since I love technology and it makes me live my kid fantasies.
like to drive this kind of car, but on the other hand, I also consider the potential negative consequences of it: ○ I fear the fact that I don’t have much control on it ○ A widespread adoption of autonomous vehicles can lead to the loss of driving- related jobs ○ Too much technology might create some problems
would appreciate also a not fully autonomous vehicle (brakes, speed, parking assistance), but the idea of a completely autonomous car is really appealing too for the positive consequences: ○ Less stress ○ Use time more efficiently ○ Even if I’m tired or sick I don’t have to worry about driving ○ I don’t have to pay anymore for the damage of my wife when she parks!
○ Feel → Do → Think ○ Affective ○ Alexa has created a lot of emotional values and responses toward this
motivation and determine her attitude
She has conflicting motives toward the object ○ Could the actual use of the product change the emotional impact that drives the attitude? → Cognitive dissonance after purchase
○ Think → Feel → Do ○ Cognitive ○ John would seek a lot of information about the new autonomous vehicle
characteristics and functions, understands the benefits and forms
car or recommend it to others
use and driving leads to a perceived positive attitude towards autonomous vehicles
Affective bucket
autonomous car because it is technological and futuristic
to this product: she googles it and discusses about it with co-workers/friends/family members to get different points
view/opinions
might also consider not completely autonomous cars
according to the dissonance she experiences (approach-avoidance conflict)
Cognitive bucket
is on the market and that could improve his everyday driving experience, so he wants to change his old car
related to this product
carefully analyses the wanted characteristics and proceeds to compare different models
autonomous vehicle because it better fits his needs and desires
○ Autonomous vehicle manufacturers → provide more information to lower the fears of Alexa→ more advertisement on the media and social networks ○ Driving organizations → keep the job ○ Useful to limit the conflict to an approach-approach kind → Alexa should only question about driving a completely autonomous car or a partial one → regular cars not an option
life → less stress when driving, more time to do your work on the go
transportation), and include it slowly into regular vehicles (speed control, etc.)