asylum lake assessment following
play

Asylum Lake Assessment Following BTR2 Sediment Loss Event Mark S. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Preliminary ry Findings: Asylum Lake Assessment Following BTR2 Sediment Loss Event Mark S. Kieser, Senior Scientist Doug McLaughlin, PhD, Env. Engineering Manager Kieser & Associates, LLC 536 E. Michigan Ave., Suite 300 Kalamazoo, MI


  1. Preliminary ry Findings: Asylum Lake Assessment Following BTR2 Sediment Loss Event Mark S. Kieser, Senior Scientist Doug McLaughlin, PhD, Env. Engineering Manager Kieser & Associates, LLC 536 E. Michigan Ave., Suite 300 Kalamazoo, MI 49007 July 11, 2019 Presentation to the Asylum Lake Policy and Management Council on behalf of Western Michigan University

  2. K&A Scope • Initial characterization of the 6/19-20 BTR2 erosion event with respect to suspended solids and phosphorus concentrations, water clarity, and arsenic transport to Asylum Lake • Identification of potential short-term/long-term impacts to Asylum Lake associated with the erosion event • Assessment of additional sampling needs to characterize extent of potential arsenic transport to Asylum Lake

  3. Runoff Event Information • Rainfall of 3-4 inches over June 19-20 th • Asylum Lake Preserve aerial drone video and photos from June 20 th after erosion event started • WMU asked K&A on June 20 th to undertake a 3 rd party evaluation of the erosion event • K&A site inspections and sampling began morning of June 21 st • K&A observations noted site erosion corrections being addressed by contractor on June 21 th

  4. Precipitation – June 1-25, 2019

  5. K&A Activities Timeline Overview • June 21 – first water and sediment sampling event • June 24 – site inspection/assessment to evaluate likely sediment flow path • June 25 – first drone video acquired on behalf of WMU • June 25 – second site inspection • July 2 – second water and sediment sampling event • July 3 – third site inspection • July 3 – second drone video acquired on behalf of WMU • July 9 – third water sampling event • July 11 – ALPMC presentation

  6. K&A Storm Event Runoff Flow Path Assessment Likely water/ sediment transport pathways

  7. Asylum Lake Characteristics for Background • 46.5 acres surface area, maximum 50-feet deep • 588 acres of drainage • Hydraulic residence time about 7 months • Historic stormwater runoff from: o Orchards o Former power plant o Farmland o Commercial businesses o Apartments o Trailer park (with septic systems) o Roadways

  8. Contributing and Non-contributing Watershed Areas for Asylum/Little Asylum Lake (from K&A, 2008)

  9. Aerial Drone Video Assessment • No other known drone video prior to the event for comparison • Asylum Lake Preserve drone videos 6/20/19 – initial impact • Transport of highly turbid water to wetland and lake over Drake Road and through ditch/wetland west of Drake Road • WMU drone video #1, 6/25/19 • Indicates improved water clarity compared to 6/20/19 • WMU drone video #2, 7/3/19 • Indicates somewhat improved water clarity, but also shows considerable new growth of filamentous algae near west end of lake also observed during 7/2/19 sampling event

  10. K&A Sampling Locations

  11. K&A Photos June 21 – wetland just east of Drake looking east June 21 – wetland just east of Drake looking west

  12. K&A Photos ( con’t .) June 21 – accumulated sediment on the east side of Drake Road composite sampled for heavy metals; looking south

  13. K&A Photos ( con’t .) June 21 – culvert discharge just east of Drake Road looking east

  14. K&A Photos ( con’t .) June 21 – ‘rivulets’ sampled in wetland just east of Drake looking northwest

  15. K&A Photos ( con’t .) June 21 – Asylum Lake S5 station looking north June 21 – Asylum Lake S4 June 21 – Asylum Lake S3 station looking northwest station looking west

  16. K&A Photos (concluded) June 24 – ditch just west of Drake road June 24 – ditch west of Drake road culvert culvert looking south looking west

  17. Asylum Lake Monitoring Data Soluble Total Total Reactive Suspended Phosphorus - Phosphorus - Solids - TSS Secchi Depth Turbidity Date TP (ppb) SRP (ppb) (ppm) (ft) (NTU) 7/26/76 a “Non - detect” -- -- 11.5 - 16.5 -- 8/9/06 b 13 - 22 2 - 3 <4 12.5 Historic Recent 6/21/19 c 30 - 110 -- 7 - 20 2.8 – 3.8 23 - 35 7/2/19 c 30 - 80 5 - 24 -- 7/9/19 c pending pending pending 10.5 - 11 23 - 24.5 a Engemann , E. (circa) 1977. “Observations on Asylum Lake, Kalamazoo, Michigan.” unpublished. (NOTE: Bottom water TP in Sept. 1976 was 1,500 ppb.) b Kieser & Associates, LLC. (K&A) 2008. “Water Quality Evaluation of Asylum Lake and Little Asylum Lake with Management Recommendations.” Prepared for WMU Asylum Lake Policy and Management Council, May 5, 2008, 194pp. (NOTE: Bottom water TP in Aug. 2006 was 565 ppb; SRP was 334 ppb.) c K&A preliminary monitoring results following the BTR2 erosion discharge to Asylum Lake.

  18. Historic Asylum Lake Stormwater Conditions Date TP (ppb) SRP (ppb) TSS (ppm) Asylum Lake b 99 - 498 6 - 255 3 - 46 (Sept. 2006) Asylum Lake b 299 - 326 121 - 247 4 - 76 (July 2007) b Kieser & Associates, LLC. (K&A) 2008. “Water Quality Evaluation of Asylum Lake and Little Asylum Lake with Management Recommendations.” Prepared for WMU Asylum Lake Policy and Management Council, May 5, 2008, 194pp.

  19. Arsenic Water Sampling in Asylum Lake Arsenic Water Quality Criteria for Comparison: Water Sampling Concentration Criterion Date Location (ppb) Value Cate- 6/21/2019 S1 3 (ppb) gory Definition 6/21/2019 S2 3 10 Human non-cancer value, includes HNV- drinking water exposure Drink 6/21/2019 S3 2 HNV 280 Human non-cancer value, does not 6/21/2019 S4 <2 (non-detect) Non- include drinking water exposure 7/2/2019 S1 <2 (non-detect) drink 7/2/2019 S2 <2 (non-detect) 10 Human cancer value, includes HCV- drinking water exposure Drink 7/2/2019 S3 <2 (non-detect) HCV- 10 Human cancer value, does not 7/2/2019 S4 <2 (non-detect) Non- include drinking water exposure 7/9/2019 S1 pending drink 150 Final Chronic Value (aquatic life) 7/9/2019 S2 pending FCV 340 Aquatic Maximum Value (aquatic life) 7/9/2019 S3 pending AMV 680 Final Acute Value (aquatic life) 7/9/2019 S4 pending FAV

  20. Asylum Lake Sediment Sampling Results Surficial EGLE WRD- (top 0.5-in) 048 Table 2 Composite Residential Aquatic Life Statewide Sediment Curb/ Creek Bed Creek Bed Wetland Soil Direct Surface (ppb) Non-residential and Wildlife Default Sample >> Gutter (ppb) (ppb) (ppb) Contact Direct Contact Screening Background Criteria 2 (ppb) Criteria 1 Guidelines Level (ppb) 1 (ppb) (ppb) Date >> 6/21/2019 6/21/2019 7/2/2019 7/2/2019 5,800 Arsenic 420 1,180 1,980 12,700 37,000 33,000 (<300-22,800) 7,600 Barium 2,960 16,900 pending pending 130,000,000 none 75,000 37,000,000 Cadmium <200 <200 pending pending 2,100,000 4,980 1,200 550,000 Chromium 640 6,730 pending pending 9,200,000 111,000 18,000 2,500,000 Copper 1,620 9,030 pending pending 73,000,000 149,000 32,000 20,000,000 Lead 830 28,100 pending pending 900,000 128,000 21,000 400,000 Mercury <50 <50 pending pending 580,000 1,060 130 160,000 Selenium <400 570 pending pending 9,600,000 1,900 410 2,600,000 Silver <200 <200 pending pending 9,000,000 none 1,000 2,500,000 Zinc 4,120 55,800 pending pending 630,000,000 459,000 47,000 170,000,000 1 Table 2. Soil: Residential Part 201 generic cleanup criteria and screening levels/Part 213 risk-based screening levels. 2 Table 3. Soil: Non-residential Part 201 generic cleanup criteria and screening levels/Part 213 risk-based screening levels.

  21. Preliminary Findings • Low to non-detect Arsenic measured in water from wetland and lake has shown no exceedances of relevant water quality criteria • Loss of Arsenic-contaminated soils via erosion event appears to have been limited • Comparatively low levels of Arsenic in representative curb/gutter soil sample • No exposed contaminated soils observed/reported at BTR2 erosion locations during rain event • Some sediment was recovered from roadway and ditch west of Drake post-event • Observations of mostly fine sediment discharges to Asylum Lake and wetland • Evidence of legacy stormwater loading impacts on wetland sediment contaminants (consistent with previous historic reporting) • Short-term phosphorus, turbidity, algal bloom impacts are evident • Limited historic sediment data/limited access to water quality data; both needed to clearly establish baseline conditions from post-event conditions

  22. Next Steps • Finish data analysis with pending lab data • Assess need for additional monitoring • Short-term in-lake phosphorus conditions • Wetland/lake sediments for heavy metals • Updated presentation for summary findings on short-term/long-term impacts and recommendations

  23. Questions?

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend