ASTEROID MINING S H E N G E G E N E H A S ATA K H Y E R I M K - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

asteroid mining
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

ASTEROID MINING S H E N G E G E N E H A S ATA K H Y E R I M K - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ECONOMICS OF ASTEROID MINING S H E N G E G E N E H A S ATA K H Y E R I M K I M K A I D U E R F E L D K I R A N K U M A R T I K A R E OUTLINE Orbits Economic Asteroid Mining & Demand Geology Tech Propulsion Net Revenue


slide-1
SLIDE 1

ECONOMICS OF ASTEROID MINING

S H E N G E G E N E H A S ATA K H Y E R I M K I M K A I D U E R F E L D K I R A N K U M A R T I K A R E

slide-2
SLIDE 2

OUTLINE

Orbits & Propulsion Asteroid Geology Mining Tech Economic Demand Revenue and Cost Net Present Value Example Case

slide-3
SLIDE 3

GROWING INTEREST IN SPACE MINING

slide-4
SLIDE 4

ASTEROID RESOURCES

Chart from Charles Gerlach

slide-5
SLIDE 5

NEAR-EARTH ASTEROIDS

  • Ne

Near ar-Ear Earth th Aster eroids

  • ids (N

(NEAs) EAs) ar are of interest erest due e to th the e rel elat ativ ive e ea ease e of rea eaching ching th them. em.

  • All

ll NE NEAs s have e perihe ihelion lion le less s th than an 1.3 1.3 AUs. s.

Image Credit: William K Hartmann

slide-6
SLIDE 6

ESTIMATED NUMBER OF NEAS

Diameter(m) >1000 1000-140 140-40 40-1

Distance (km) for which F>100 (=0.5 m)

>20 million < 20 million, > 400,000 <400,000

(Lunar orbit)

>32,000

(GEO orbit)

<32,000 >20 H(absolute magnitude) 17.75 17.75-22.0 22.0-24.75 >24.75 N estimated 966 `14,000 ~285,000 ?? N observed 899 4,557 2,259 1,685 O/E 93% ~33% ~1% ??

Image Credit: http://www.iau.org/public/nea/

slide-7
SLIDE 7

KNOWN NEAS

Image Credit: NASA JPL

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FROM EARTH TO ASTEROID & BACK

  • 1. Ground
  • und Base

se Sta tati tion

  • n (Ea

Earth th) to LEO LEO

  • 2. Spac

ace e Base se Station ion (at t LE LEO) )

  • Transpor

nsportati tation

  • n Hub
  • Communicat

munications ions

  • Fuel Storag

rage

  • Manuf

ufact acturing uring

  • 3. Target

rget Base se Sta tati tion

  • n

(Ast ster eroid)

  • id)
slide-9
SLIDE 9

IMPORTANT QUESTIONS

Astrodynamics and Propulsion Asteroid Composition Mining Technologies Economic Demand

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Processor Producer End customer (Space tourist) House tourists Rent space for science Reload site / emporium Rent storage capacity Space jewelry collection Processing plant Storage Production plant Fuel station $$$ costs $$$ own usage $$$ revenue

ECONOMIC DEMAND

Our Products and services

slide-11
SLIDE 11

TYPES OF NEAS

S-type Stony (silicates, sulfides, metals) C-type Carbonaceous (water, volatiles) M-type Metallic (metals)

slide-12
SLIDE 12
slide-13
SLIDE 13

MATERIALS FROM NEAS

Materi rial al Product uct Raw silicate Ballast or shielding in space Water and other volatiles Propellant in space Nickel-Iron (Ni-Fe) metal Space structures Construction on earth Platinum Group Metals (PGMs) Catalyst for fuel cells and auto catalyzers on earth Jewelry on earth Semiconductor metals Space solar arrays Electronics on earth

slide-14
SLIDE 14

NEA ORBIT TYPES

Image Credit: http://neo.jpl.nasa.gov/neo/groups.html

slide-15
SLIDE 15

ACCESSIBILITY

We wan ant t to find nd th the as asteroi

  • ids

ds wi with th lo low w delta lta-vs vs to reduce uce propellant pellant need eded. ed.

Distribution of specific linear momentum of a Hohmann transfer from low Earth orbit (LEO) to NEAs according to Benner.

Image Credit: Elvis, McDowell, Hoffman, and Binzel. “Ultra-low Delta-v Objects and the Human Exploration of Asteroids.”

slide-16
SLIDE 16

ACCESSIBILITY: ROCKET EQ

whe here Δv = velo locity city change nge Ve = exhaus ust velocity

  • city

Mo = total ma mass ss Mp = propellant ellant mass ss Two Options:

  • ns:

1.

  • 1. Reduce

e delta-v v requi uired red for traject ectories

  • ries to enable

ble low- thrus ust propulsion ulsion meth ethods s su such as el s electri tric, c, so solar thermal, al, or so solar r sa sail propuls ulsion. ion. 2.

  • 2. Use

se che hemi mical cal propuls ulsion ion for hi high h thr hrust st traject ectories

  • ries if

f needed. ed.

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ACCESSIBILITY EXAMPLE

“Apollo-Type” Mission

Image Credit: Sonter’s Thesis

slide-18
SLIDE 18

LOW DELTA-VS FOR MANY NEAS

Compa pare re!

Image Credit: Elvis, McDowell, Hoffman, and Binzel. “Ultra-low Delta-v Objects and the Human Exploration of Asteroids.” Image Credit: http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commo ns/c/c9/Deltavs.svg

slide-19
SLIDE 19

ROCKET PROPULSION TECHNOLOGIES CLASSIFICATION

CHEMICAL PROPULSION

  • Liqui

iquid d Stora rable ble

  • Liqui

iquid d Cryogen

  • genic

ic

  • Solid

id

  • Hybri

rid

  • Cold

d Gas/Warm rm Gas

NON NON – CHEMICAL PROPULSION

  • Elect

ectric ic propuls ulsion ion

  • Resistojet
  • Ion thruster
  • Arcjet
  • Hall thruster
  • Solar

ar sail l propulsion ulsion

  • Therm

rmal l propulsion pulsion

  • Pulsed

lsed plasm sma propu puls lsion ion

  • Magnetoplas
  • plasmadyn

dynamic amic

slide-20
SLIDE 20

MINING SYSTEM MODEL

Explorer Rock Breaker Excavator Processor

slide-21
SLIDE 21

MINING STEP 1: EXPLORER

  • Explorer

lorer is a li light t fast st robot t equipp equipped ed with h a Rock ck Bre reak aker er an and ch chem emic ical al an anal alyz yzers ers that at ca can n sco cout ut viable le mi mini ning ng are reas. s.

  • Lo

Low mo mobility lity en envir ironmen

  • nment

t pre revents ents us use e of wheeled eeled rover er.

Locomo moti tion

  • n Mode

Exampl ple Feasib sibil ility ty Locati tion

  • n

Hopping Jumping Tortoise, Ciliary Micro- hopper High Surface Grasping Rock Climber High Surface, Underground Legged Multi-limbed Rover, Big Dog Medium Surface

slide-22
SLIDE 22

MINING STEP 1: EXPLORER EXAMPLES

Image Credit: Yoshida, Maruki, and Yano. “A Novel Strategy for Asteroid Exploration with a Surface Robot.” Image Credit: Nakamura, Shimoda, and

  • Shoji. “Mobility of a Microgravity Rover

using Internal Electromagnetic Levitation.” Image Credit: Chacin and Yoshida. “Multi- limbed Rover for Asteroid Surface Exploration using Static Locomotion.” Image Credit: Nagaoka, et al. “Ciliary Micro-Hopping Locomotion of an Asteroid Exploration Robot.” Image Credit: Yoshida. “Jumping Tortoise: A Robot Design for Locomotion on Micro Gravity Surface.”

slide-23
SLIDE 23

MINING STEP 2: ROCK BREAKER EXAMPLES

Controlled Foam Injection (CFI) Electric Rockbreaking Microwave Drilling Diamond Wire Sawing

Image Credits: Harper, G.S. “Nederburg Miner.”

slide-24
SLIDE 24

MINING STEP 3A: ROCK EXCAVATOR

  • The e

e excavator

  • r di

digs gs up up large ge quantit itie ies s of rock ck in in the e ar area ea the e Expl plorer rer + Rock ck Brea eaker er has as id iden entif ifie ied d as v via iable.

  • e. It is

is t the e main in min iner er.

  • Currentl

ently y extremel emely y common mmon on Earth h and d ther ere e are r e robotic tic ones es unde der de devel elopmen pment t such ch as Qin inet etiQ iQ Spa partacus acus:

Pa Parameter Quanti ntity ty Capacity 4540 kg Speed 2.33 m/s Range 800 m Power Diesel Volume 5.97 m3 Mass 5675 kg

slide-25
SLIDE 25

MINING STEP 3A: ROCK EXCAVATOR EXAMPLE

QinetiQ Spartacus Image Credits: QinetiQ

slide-26
SLIDE 26

MINING STEP 3B: WATER EXTRACTOR

Image Credits: Zacny et al. “Mobile In-situ Water Extractor (MISWE) for Mars, Moon, and Asteroids In Situ Resource Utilization.”

Water ice extraction from soils currently being developed by Honeybee called the Mars In-situ Water Extractor (MISWE).

slide-27
SLIDE 27

MINING STEP 4: PROCESSOR

  • Dep

epending ending on n the e type e of mi mine neral ral or r met metal al, , process

  • cessing

ng it on-sit site e ma may be e mo more re fea easible sible than n bri ring nging ng it back ck to Earth.

Chem emist stry Type Techn hnique Metal Loose grains Macroscopic lumps Interconnected dendrites Electrostatic or magnetic separation Crush and then sieve Carbonyl separation Volatiles With minor silicates Minor component Chemically combined Melt slabs Drill into, vaporize, distill Severe heating (> 800 K) Hydrocarbons With major silicates Heat and distill

slide-28
SLIDE 28

MINING STEP 4: PROCESSOR EXAMPLE

Conceptual process flow sheet for volatiles extraction from carbonaceous chondrite-type asteroid. Image Credit: Sonter, Mark. “Technical and Economic Feasibility of Mining the Near-Earth Asteroids.”

slide-29
SLIDE 29

MINING SYSTEM DESIGN

Robot Qty Subtot Rock Breaker* Qty Subtot Excavator Qty Subtot Processor Qty Subtot Total Names Microbot 100 N/A N/A N/A iRobot 710 Warrior 3 Electric Rock- breaking 3 Generic 1 None Mass (kg) 0.1 100 10 226.8 3 680.4 0.5 3 1.5 453.5925 1 453.59 1145.493 kg Carryi ng Mass (kg) 0 100 136.1 3 408.3 907.185 1 907.19 907.185 kg Power (W) 0.1 100 10 500 3 1500 40000 3 120000 500 1 500 122000 W Volum e (m3) 4188.790 205 100 418879 612553.0 45 3 2E+06 0.5 3 1.5 500 1 500 2257040 m3

slide-30
SLIDE 30

PHASES OF MINING

Phase se IV: Manufacturing and Consumption

Duration: 3 years

Goals: Continue mining process; Sell the product

Phase se III: : Mining Initialization (Reconnaissance)

Duration: 3 years

Goals: Initialize mining process

Phase se II: Infrastructure Setup in Space

Duration: 5 years Goals: Establish an operation base in space; Send mining module to target asteroid; Send cargo module to target asteroid

Phase se I: Technology Development on Earth

Duration: 5 years

Goals: Development and manufacturing of necessary equipment

slide-31
SLIDE 31

COST STRUCTURE

Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV R & D Target Analysis x Technology Analysis x Space Craft Design x Manufacture Space Craft Model x Qualification Tests x Optimizing Space Crafts / Mining Technology x x x x Manufacturing and Testing Manufacture Docking Station x Manufacture Mining Module x Manufacture Cargo Module x Launch Launch Docking Station x Launch Mining Module x Launch Cargo Module x Operations Costs for Control Center (own or rent) x x x Personnel Cost x x x Administration and Project Management Project Management x x x x Administration x x x x

slide-32
SLIDE 32

RESOURCES UTILIZATION BY PHASES

Sell in Commodities and Services Processed commodity Phase I Phase II Phase III Phase IV Problem Water unprocessed O O O P Should be possible in near future Water for life support O O O P Should be possible in near future Food O O O O We need our own space farm Fuel (H2, O2, CH4) O O O P Should be possible in near future Construction metals (Fe / Ni / Ti) unprocessed (Ore) O O O P Implys space industry processed in bares O O O P We need space our own kind of space factory construction elements O O O O Implys space industry Pt group metals unprocessed (Ore) O O O P Implys space industry pure in bars O O O P Implys space industry PtG containing products O O O O Implys space industry Rare Earth elements unprocessed O O O P Implys space industry pure for industry use O O O P Implys space industry Silicates unprocessed (Ore) O O O P Implys space industry processed as mono- crystal O O O O Implys space industry Si containing products O O O O Implys space industry Carbon and its chemical compounds unprocessed O O O P Implys space industry Space tourism (hotel) O P P P We have to offer just accomodation in order to avoid futher costs caused by launches. Science capacities O P P P We have to calculate appropriate rooms / laboratories in our space station. Space jewelry collection O O P P Should be possible in near future. We should sell limited editions exclusively in space (for the rich tourists) -> we can ask for extremly high price.

slide-33
SLIDE 33

NET PRESENT VALUE

  • The

he ec economic

  • nomic justif

tification ication for an an as aster eroid

  • id

mi mining ng operation eration is only ly th the e ca case e if th the net et prese sent nt val alue e (N (NPV PV) ) is ab above e zero.

  • .
  • It

t is NO NOT just t th the e co cost st of th the e project ject an and reven enue ue gener nerat ated. ed.

slide-34
SLIDE 34

SONTER’S NPV EQUATION

Corbit

it is the per kilogr

gram am Earth-to to-or

  • rbit

it launch nch cost t [$/kg] g] Mmpe is mass s of mining ng and process ssin ing g equipmen quipment t [kg] g] f is the specif cific ic mass s throughp ghput ut ratio for the miner er [kg g mined ed / kg equipmen quipment t / day] t is the mining ng period d [days] ys] r is the percen enta tage ge recover ery of the valua uable e materi erial al from the ore ∆v is the velocit

  • city incremen

ment t needed ed for the ret eturn n traject ector

  • ry [km/s]

/s] ve is the propulsi sion

  • n system

em exhau aust st veloci

  • city

ty [km/s] m/s] i is the market t interest est rate a is semi-ma majo jor axis s of transf sfer er orbit it [AU] U] Mps

ps is mass

s of power er suppl ply [kg] Mic

ic is mass

ss of instrume ument ntat atio ion n and contr trol [kg] g] Cmanuf

nuf is the specif

cific ic cost st of manuf ufact acture ure of the miner et

  • etc. [$/kg]

g] B is the annual ual budge get t for the project ect [$/yea ear]

slide-35
SLIDE 35

GE AND SATAK NPV

𝑂𝑄𝑊 = 𝑄 − 𝐷𝑁 − 𝐷𝑀 − 𝐷𝑆 − 𝐷𝐹, where ere P P = ret eturned rned profit t ($) CM = Manufacturing cturing cost st ($) CL = Laun unch ch cost st ($) is equa ual to ms/c

/c (mass

ss of spacec cecraf raft) t) * uLV

LV (un

unit t mass s cost st) CR = Recurring ring cost t ($) is equa ual to B (annu nual al opera rati tional

  • nal expen

ense) se) * T (tota

  • tal time)

e) CE = Reen entr try y cost t ($) is equa ual to Mretur

eturne ned (mass

ss ret eturned rned) ) * fe (fracti ction

  • n of materi

erial al sold d on Ea Earth th) ) * uRV

RV (un

unit t mass s cost st)

𝐷𝑁 = 𝐷𝑛𝑗𝑜𝑓𝑠 + 𝐷𝑡𝑞𝑏𝑑𝑓𝑑𝑠𝑏𝑔𝑢 𝐷𝑛𝑗𝑜𝑓𝑠 = 𝑁𝑛𝑞𝑓𝑣 𝑄 = 𝑊

𝑡 1 − 𝑔 𝑓 + 𝑊 𝑓𝑔 𝑓 𝑁𝑠𝑓𝑢𝑣𝑠𝑜𝑓𝑒

(1 + 𝑗)𝑈 where, Vs = Value in space ($) Ve = Value on Earth ($) fe = Fraction of material sold on Earth

𝐷𝑡/𝑑 = 106(225 + 𝑁𝑛𝑞𝑓𝑞𝑔 8 ) 𝑞𝑔 = 𝑓−∆𝑤𝑢/𝑤𝑓 − 𝑡𝑔 1 − 𝑡𝑔

where, u = unit cost of miner ($/kg) pf = payload fraction sf = structural fraction ∆𝑤𝑢 = delta-v to asteroid ve = exhaust velocity

slide-36
SLIDE 36

EXAMPLE CASE: 1996 FG3

Preliminary baseline of ESA’s MarcoPolo-R Mission

Element Value Uncertainty (1-sigma) Units e .34983406668 87911 1.5696e-08 a 1.0541679265 97945 7.8388e-10 AU q .68538407386 32947 1.6408e-08 AU i 1.9917406207 71903 1.4433e-06 deg node 299.73096661 80939 4.8879e-05 deg peri 23.981176173 36174 4.8216e-05 deg M 167.67133206 88418 1.4068e-06 deg tp 2456216.3721 68471335 (2012-Oct- 15.87216847) 1.4204e-06 JED period 395.33305146 70441 1.08 4.4095e-07 1.207e-09 d yr n .91062459529 7746 1.0157e-09 deg/d Q 1.4229517793 32595 1.0581e-09 AU

Source: NASA JPL

slide-37
SLIDE 37

TRAJECTORY TO 1996 FG3

slide-38
SLIDE 38

NPV COMPARISONS

  • Both mining time and total time for

is optimized for maximum returns.

  • Greatest mining time ≠ best NPV
  • Least total time ≠ best NPV
  • Selling water at $200.00

per liter (kg) yields a NPV of $763,370,000.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

NPV DEPENDENCY ON ECONOMICS

  • A good estimate of discount

rate is crucial for estimating a good NPV.

  • Selling water at a minimum of 187

USD/kg is necessary to break even.

  • Even bringing back water to sell at

$7000/k 00/kg makes a profit since launching >1500 kg of water is very expensive.

slide-40
SLIDE 40

WHAT’S NEXT?

slide-41
SLIDE 41

QUESTIONS?

Image Credit: http://en.es-static.us/upl/2012/04/asteroid_mining.jpeg