asset allocation longevity risk annuitisation and bequests
play

Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests Dr. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests Dr. David Schiess, B. Sc. Group for Mathematics & Statistics Bodanstrasse 6, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland david.schiess@unisg.ch www.mathstat.unisg.ch David Schiess, 27th of


  1. Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests Dr. David Schiess, B. Sc. Group for Mathematics & Statistics Bodanstrasse 6, 9000 St. Gallen, Switzerland david.schiess@unisg.ch www.mathstat.unisg.ch David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 1/24

  2. Outline ■ Motivation Outline ● Outline ■ Model Assumptions Motivation ■ Optimisation Problem Assumptions ■ Results Optimisation Problem Results ■ Conclusions Conclusions Thanks Back-up David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 2/24

  3. Relevance ■ Importance of the End of the Life-Cycle: Outline ◆ Rising Conditional Life Expectancies Motivation ● Relevance ◆ Growing Number of DC Plans ● Technical Problem ● Literature ◆ Continuing Wealth Concentration Among Pensioners ● Extensions ◆ Input for Labour Models Assumptions Optimisation Problem Results Conclusions Thanks Back-up David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 3/24

  4. Technical Problem ■ Technical View of the Pensioner’s Problem: Outline ◆ Consumption/Portfolio Optimisation ( c, π ) Motivation ● Relevance → Financial Market Risk ● Technical Problem ● Literature ◆ Optimal Annuitisation Decision ( τ ) ● Extensions → Longevity Risk Assumptions ■ ⇒ Combined Optimal Stopping and Optimal Control Optimisation Problem Problem (COSOCP) Results Conclusions Thanks Back-up David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 4/24

  5. Literature ■ Literature Overview: Outline ◆ Merton (1969) → Stochastic Control Motivation ● Relevance ◆ Vast Literature Imposing a Fixed or Infinite Planning ● Technical Problem ● Literature Horizon ● Extensions ◆ Yaari (1965) → Uncertain Lifetime Assumptions ◆ Richard (1975) → Reversible Annuities Optimisation Problem ■ Few Normative Models with Irreversible Annuities and Results Uncertain Lifetime, i.e. Conclusions ◆ Milevsky and Young (2007): Thanks Commitment to Predetermined Annuitisation Time Back-up ◆ Stabile (2006): Annuitisation Rule as a Controlled Stopping Time David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 5/24

  6. Extensions ■ Our Extensions to the Model of Stabile (2006): Outline ◆ Inclusion of a Bequest Motive Motivation ● Relevance ◆ Prior Life Insurance and Subsistence Level of Bequest ● Technical Problem ● Literature ◆ Economically Relevant Risk Aversion ( γ > 1 ) ● Extensions ◆ New Solution Method with Duality Arguments Assumptions Optimisation Problem Results Conclusions Thanks Back-up David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 6/24

  7. Model Assumptions ■ Utility Maximisation (Consumption, Annuity, Bequest; Outline Identical Relative Risk Aversion) Motivation ■ No Stochastic Income Assumptions ● Model Assumptions → No Labour Income Optimisation Problem ■ Prior Decision on Annuitisation and Life Insurance Taken as Results Given Conclusions ■ Annuitisation of Entire Wealth and Consumption of Entire Thanks Annuity Back-up ■ One Riskless Asset, One Risky Asset (Geometric Brownian Motion) ■ Exponential Mortality Law David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 7/24

  8. Indirect Utility Total Expected Discounted Utility J c,π,τ ( w ) : Outline Motivation  T x Assumptions � � W ( τ ) � � � e − δ S t E U 1 ( c ( t )) 1 { t ≤ τ } + U 2 1 { t>τ } dt Optimisation Problem  a x + τ ¯ ● Indirect Utility ● COSOCP 0 ● Verification Theorem �� + ηe − δ S T x � ● Variational Inequality U 3 ( W ( T x ) + Z s ) 1 { T x ≤ τ } + U 3 ( Z s ) 1 { T x >τ } Results Conclusions Thanks Back-up David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 8/24

  9. COSOCP General COSOCP with Exponential Mortality: Outline Motivation V ( w ) = sup J c,π,τ ( w ) for all w > 0 Assumptions ( c,π,τ ) ∈G ( w ) Optimisation Problem ● Indirect Utility  τ  ● COSOCP � ● Verification Theorem e − β S t f ( c ( t ) , W ( t )) dt + e − β S τ g ( W ( τ )) J c,π,τ ( w ) = E w ● Variational Inequality   Results 0 Conclusions Thanks dW ( t ) = W ( t ) [ r + π ( t ) ( µ − r )] dt − c ( t ) dt + σπ ( t ) W ( t ) dB ( t ) Back-up David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 9/24

  10. Verification Theorem ■ Optimal Strategies: Outline ◆ Annuitisation rule Motivation Assumptions τ ∗ = inf { t ≥ 0 | W ∗ ( t ) / ∈ D } Optimisation Problem ● Indirect Utility ● COSOCP with ● Verification Theorem ● Variational Inequality D = { W ( t ) ∈ G | v ( W ( t )) > g ( W ( t )) } Results ◆ Consumption rule Conclusions c ∗ = I ( v W ( W ∗ ( t ))) 1 { t ≤ τ ∗ } Thanks Back-up ◆ Investment rule v W ( W ∗ ( t )) π ∗ = − µ − r W ∗ ( t ) v W W ( W ∗ ( t ))1 { t ≤ τ ∗ } σ 2 David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 10/24

  11. Variational Inequality ■ The Verification Theorem Reduces the COSOCP to the Outline Variational Inequality: Motivation Assumptions max { L com v ( W ( t )) , g ( W ( t )) − v ( W ( t )) } = 0 for W ( t ) > 0 Optimisation Problem ● Indirect Utility ● COSOCP with ● Verification Theorem ● Variational Inequality L com v ( W ( t )) = f ( c ( t ) , W ( t )) − β S v ( W ( t )) + Lv ( W ( t )) � � sup Results ( c,π ) ∈G τ ( W ( t )) Conclusions Thanks ■ subject to Back-up v ( W ( t )) = g ( W ( t )) for all W ( t ) ∈ ∂D ■ and v W ( W ( t )) = g W ( W ( t )) for all W ( t ) ∈ ∂D. David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 11/24

  12. No-Bequest Case ■ Now-or-Never Annuitisation: M nb Outline Motivation ■ Natural Parameter Effects Assumptions ◆ Risk Aversion (A + ) Optimisation Problem ◆ Subjective Life Expectancy (A + ) Results ◆ Objective Life Expectancy (A − ) ● No-Bequest Case ● Bequest Case γ < 1 ◆ Identical Life Expectancy (A − ) ● Bequest Case γ > 1 ◆ Sharpe Ratio (A − ) Conclusions ■ Annuitisation in Most Parameter Settings Thanks → Important Inclusion of a Bequest Motive Back-up David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 12/24

  13. Bequest Case γ < 1 ■ Bequest Case γ < 1 and Z s = 0 : Outline ◆ Now-or-Never Annuitisation: M b = M nb + λ S η Motivation ◆ Slight Tendency for the Financial Market Assumptions → Important Inclusion of Bequest Motive Optimisation Problem ◆ Natural Parameter Effects Results ● No-Bequest Case ◆ Natural Comparison to No-Bequest Case ● Bequest Case γ < 1 ● Bequest Case γ > 1 c b c nb W b < ■ W nb Conclusions ■ W b > W nb Thanks ■ π b = π nb Back-up c b W b decreases in η ■ David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 13/24

  14. Bequest Case γ > 1 ■ Bequest Case γ > 1 and Z s > 0 : Outline ◆ Never Annuitisation or Wealth-Dependent Annuitisation Motivation with D = ( W, ∞ ) Assumptions ◆ Natural Comparison to No-Bequest Case Optimisation Problem ◆ Real COSOCP with D = ( W, ∞ ) : Results ● No-Bequest Case ■ Simplification via Duality Arguments ● Bequest Case γ < 1 ● Bequest Case γ > 1 ■ Free Boundary Value Problem Conclusions ■ Numerical Solution Algorithm Thanks → Boundaries Back-up → Value Function ■ Natural Parameter Effects: → Life Insurance ( A + ) → Bequest Motive ( A − ) ■ Heavy Consumption Smoothing ■ More Aggressive Investment Rule Compared to Merton → Additional Option of Annuitisation David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 14/24

  15. Conclusions ■ Conclusions: Outline ◆ COSOCP: New Solution Method Motivation ◆ Economically Important Risk Aversion γ > 1 Assumptions ◆ Longevity Risk Is Absolutely Relevant Optimisation Problem → Modelling of Lifetime Results → Role of Pension Funds Conclusions ● Conclusions ◆ Essential Inclusion of a Bequest Motive Thanks → Consumption-Wealth Trade-off Back-up → Absurd Strong Tendency for the Annuity Market Vanishes David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 15/24

  16. Thanks Thank you very much for your attention! Outline Motivation Assumptions Optimisation Problem Results Conclusions Thanks ● Thanks Back-up David Schiess, 27th of March 2008, MAF 2008 Asset Allocation, Longevity Risk, Annuitisation and Bequests - p. 16/24

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend