Assessment Task 2: Group Presentation Topic is : Should immunisations - - PDF document

Assessment Task 2: Group Presentation Topic is : Should immunisations be mandated for all healthcare consumers? The purpose of this assessment task is to explore and critically examine a contemporary topic that impacts the practice of nurses and

• ther health care providers. The interactive group process encourages

the development of communication, leadership and team building

• skills. This group presentation also provides a forum for discussion of

controversial nursing issues and improves student oral presentation

• skills. Description Group work and public speaking are significant

components of many careers. Working as a valued member of a team, with the ability to convey information to peers, patients and families are skills paramount for registred nurses. Students are expected to present their selected topic in an engaging 10 minute presentation, to be delivered to their peers in their tutorial. Each member of the group is required to participate and present. fdlGrades UD_NURBN1005_2019/20_2019-07-22 08:46:43 CRICOS Provider Number: 00103D 12 /16 Course Description (Higher Education) NURBN1005 INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH & EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE Group Presentation - Each group will consist of 4-5 students The total time for each group presentation will be 10 minutes plus 5 minutes for Q&A1. The group will select a topic from the list provided in the course descriptor 2. Presentations will consist of (5) parts;3. Part 1(Introduction) - One member of the group will be responsible for the introduction of the topic. You must give an

• verview of the issue; discuss its signiﬕ cance along with the

context that impacting on nursing practice Part 2 (Pros) - One member of the group will lay out the arguments (pro or con) from

• ne point of view. You must defend arguments, and possible

arguments should be raised and defended. Part 3 (Cons) - One member will mirror Part 2 but will take the opposite side and provide arguments. Part 4 (Conclusion) - One group member will attempt to address the nursing issue using literature to critically analyse a topic that impacting on contemporary nursing practice, and you must defend your conclusions. Part 5 (critique of the database/sources) - One group member will discuss the merit and quality of journal/research articles that are related to the issues. (Minimum 10 references) Guidelines for group presentations Clearly identify issue/topic

• utline of presentation and list of presenters, use research

literature being used to1. position the arguments Know material: Research positions taken by expert writers/authors in journal articles on the topic support the2. position you are taking on the topic Be logical and orderly by supporting the links between the part 1 to part 5 points3. Start on time and end on time - presentation 10 minutes and 5 minutes for questions and

• answers4. Marking Guide: Refer to the marking rubric for

specific details required for successful completion of task. Weighting: 50% Time Length: 15 min (10 min presentation plus 5 min questions and answers) References: Minimum of ten (10) reputable, current sources Submission: Attendance and participation in group presentation will be completed in Week 11 for standard students. For flexible students, the group presentation will be during Residential Week specific to your campus (timetable will be sent via Moodle when confirmed). Marking will occur during the group presentations. Students will be required to provide a copy of any presentation materials and a copy of marking criteria, along with the names of all group members at the beginning of the presentation. Do not submit via

• Moodle. Feedback/Mark: Feedback will be available to students

via Moodle and can be expected 4 weeks after the presentation,

unless otherwise indicated by the course coordinator Marking criteria- Group presentation N (0 marks) F (1 mark) P (2 marks) C (3 marks) D (4 marks) HD (5 marks) Part 1 (Introduction) no presentation Poor or no introduction of the topic; overview of the issue unclear; discussion of significance along with the context impacting on nursing practice unclear or absent Introduction of the topic lacks clarity. overview of the issue unclear; discussion of significance along with the context impacting on nursing practice unclear Introduction of the topic is clear. Overview of the issue clear; complete discussion of significance along with the context impacting on nursing practice. Introduction of the topic is clear. Overview of the issue broad; Excellent discussion of significance along with the context impacting on nursing practice. Excellent introduction of the topic. Broad but succinct overview

• f the issue; Excellent discussion of significance along with the

context that impacting on nursing practice Part 2 (Pros) no presentation Poor argument made. Links to research unclear and argument lacks depth or conviction Poor argument made. Links to research unclear and argument lacks depth or conviction

Solid argument made from one point of view. Links to research made but weak. Argument sound Solid argument made from one point of view. Links to research clear. Argument sound and convincing Excellent argument made from one point of view. Links to research clear and argument sound and convincing fdlGrades UD_NURBN1005_2019/20_2019-07-22 08:46:43 CRICOS Provider Number: 00103D 13 /16 Course Description (Higher Education) NURBN1005 INTRODUCTION TO RESEARCH & EVIDENCE-BASED PRACTICE Part 3 (Cons) no presentation Poor argument made. Links to research unclear and argument lacks depth or conviction Poor argument made. Links to research unclear and argument lacks depth or conviction Solid argument made from opposite point of view. Links to research made but weak. Argument sound Solid argument made from opposite point of view. Links to research

• clear. Argument sound and convincing

Excellent argument made from opposite point of view. Links to research clear and argument sound and convincing Part 4 (Conclusion) no presentation

Unclear discussion of topic impacting on the nursing issue using literature to critically analyse a contemporary nursing practice. Conclusion is unclear and does not link to the literature. The recommendations are irrelevant or inappropriate to the argument. Poor discussion of topic impacting on the nursing issue using literature to critically analyse a contemporary nursing practice. Conclusion did not bring closure due to some inaccuracies and flaws. The recommendations are not be relevant or appropriate to the argument The discussion of the topic impacting on nursing issue using literature to critically analyse a contemporary nursing practice is sound. Conclusion may not bring closure due to some inaccuracies and flaws. The recommendations may not be relevant or appropriate to the argument The discussion of the topic impacting on nursing issue using literature to critically analyse a contemporary nursing practice is sound. Recommendations are sound and generally relevant and appropriate but may not be linked effectively to the issues Excellent discussion of the topic impacting on nursing issue using literature to critically analyse a contemporary nursing practice, The conclusion skilfully summarises the key content and impact of the

• presentation. Excellent recommendations on implication for

practitioners Part 5 (Critique of the sources) no presentation

Discussion lacks direction and critique of articles related to the dilemma is superficial A discussion and critique of articles related to the dilemma. Major issues with article discussion or critique identified Sound discussion and critique of articles related to the dilemma. Some issues apparent. Proficient discussion and critique of articles related to the dilemma Excellent discussion and critique of articles related to the dilemma Evidence of teamwork (cooperation, cohesion, preparation & rehearsal) no presentation Little or no evidence of teamwork Conveys a limited sense of teamwork. There is a weak underlying sense ofco-operation, which can be considerably improved. Conveys a general sense of group effectiveness and cohesion, with some evidence of rehearsal and cooperation. There are many examples of effective teamwork, with some room for

• improvement. There is evidence of group rehearsal and preparation.

Evidence of effective preparation and practice, drawing on group

• strengths. Excellent equity in contribution

Delivery (posture, gesture, eye contact, and vocal expressiveness) no Presentation The speaker appears uninterested Holds no eye contact with audience, as entire report is read from notes Speaks in low volume and/or monotonous tone,which causes audience todisengage

Displays minimal eye contact with audience, while reading mostly from the notes Speaks in uneven volume with little or no inflection Consistent use of direct eye contact with audience, but still returns to notes Speaks with satisfactory variation of volume and inflection Holds attention of entire audience with the use of direct eye contact, seldom looking at notes Speaks with fluctuation in volume and inflection to maintain audience interest and emphasize key points Referencing no references provided. Material Contains irrelevant or inappropriate information. Inappropriate or less than five references material contains very little information. Inappropriate or less than five references material contains mostly relevant information. 5 – 9 appropriate and relevant references used in debate. All sources of high quality. Minimum of ten appropriate and relevant references used in debate. All sources of excellent quality. More than ten appropriate and relevant references used in debate. Time Frame Presentation will only be assessed within the designated timeframe (10 mins for presentation, 5 mins for