Appli plications cations of f CFD and d Desi sign gn Exp - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Appli plications cations of f CFD and d Desi sign gn Exp - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Appli plications cations of f CFD and d Desi sign gn Exp xplorat loration ion in the Energy rgy & Power r industr dustry Jim m Rya yan Des esig ign Expl plorati ration on wit ith CFD FD in in E Ener ergy gy & P
- Design Exploration: key concepts and examples
- A “Maturity Model” for Engineering Simulation
- Gas Turbines
- Turbine blade cooling
with Conjugate Heat Transfer (CHT)
- Combustor liner cooling
with Conjugate Heat Transfer (CHT)*
- Combustor flows, temperatures, and emissions*
- Centrifugal Pumps & Hydro Turbines
Des esig ign Expl plorati ration
- n wit
ith CFD FD – in in E Ener ergy gy & P & Power er in indu dustry
2
*This topic is beyond the scope of this presentation
3
Gas Turbines Steam Turbines Compressors Combustion Heat Exchangers Balance of Plant
(Ducting, SCRs, etc.)
Pumps & Hydro Turbines
Energy & Power Simulation Solutions
Fans Nuclear Renewables
(Wind, Solar)
Solve & Visualize Import Geometry Mesh Set Up Physics
Change Design
(geometry and physics)
# of Designs Time
Design #N+1 Design #N
Des esig ign Expl plorati ration
- n wit
ith STAR-CCM+ CCM+
4
A Maturit ity y Mode del for r Engi ginee eerin ing g Sim imula lati tion
- n
Validate Troubleshoot Predict Explore Optimize
Explore digitally, Confirm physically
Ultimate Goal: Discover Better Designs Faster
Critical inversion point (from reactive to proactive engineering)
= Feasible = Infeasible
Objective 1 Objective 2
5
Des esig ign Expl plorati ration
- n Concepts
epts: : Hea eat Excha hange ger r exampl mple
6
Temperature Change (degrees) Pressure Drop (Pascals)
Pareto Front of Best Designs
= a Best Design = a Design iteration
= Design improvement (i.e., Better designs) Baseline Design
Des esig ign Expl plorati ration
- n Concepts
epts: : Hea eat Excha hange ger r exampl mple
Heat Exchanger Objectives:
7
1) Maximize Heat Transfer (Temperature Change) 2) Minimize Pressure Drop
SHERPA Benchmark Example Des esig ign Expl plorati ration
- n Concepts
epts: : Hea eat Excha hange ger r exampl mple
8
SHERPA
Change design variables Responses
STAR-CCM+
NOTE: Single Objective History Plots shown here for visualization purposes
/ Optimate+
- Com
- mpone
ponents nts
- Multi-disciplinary process automation
- Scalable high performance computing
- Efficient exploration (optimization, DOE)
- Sensitivity & robustness assessment
- Step
eps:
- Drag and drop process definition
- Assignment of compute resources (HPC)
- Define design variables, ranges, constraints
- Define responses of interest
- Explore, optimize, process results
- Assess sensitivity & robustness
Des esig ign Expl plorati ration
- n wit
ith HEEDS
Modeler Explorer
9
MDX = Multi-disciplinary Design eXploration
2 Sim imil ilar r but Dif iffer eren ent t Envir ironm
- nmen
ents ts for Des esig ign Expl plorati ration
- n
10
HEEDS Solver HEEDS Solver
Optim imat ate+
for Design Exploration within STAR-CCM+ IDENTICAL IDENTICAL DIFFERENT
HEE EEDS DS
for General CAE and MDX
Duct ct Fl Flow w Des esig ign Expl plorat
- ration
ion
11
- Challenge: With flow through a
duct, rapidly assess changes in pressure due to different turning-vane configurations
- Solution: Automated design
exploration using STAR-CCM+ with parameterized 3D-CAD and Optimate
- Impact:
- Find better designs
- Speed-up time-to-results by as
much as 10X
- Accelerate time-to-market
Turning Vanes:
- Uniform, finite thickness
- 0.10m < Radius < 0.50m
- Vane count: 1 to 10
1.5 m 1.0 m 2.0 m 1.0 m 0.5 m 0.5 m 0.5 m N = 4 R = 0.15 N = 4 R = 0.30 N = 4 R = 0.45 N = 7 R = 0.15 N = 7 R = 0.30 N = 7 R = 0.45 N = 10 R = 0.15 N = 10 R = 0.30 N = 10 R = 0.45
STAR-CCM+ CFturbo SHERPA High Power Required Optimal Design
Pareto Front
Baseline Design
Violates Constraint
Baseline Design
Flow rate = 400 m3/h Pressure head = 30 m
Power required = 38.4 kW
Optimized Design
Flow rate = 400 m3/h Pressure head = 30 m
Power required = 36.0 kW
STAR-CCM+ CFturbo SHERPA
“I can now obtain better pump designs faster by spending more time on engineering decision-making, and less time on model setup & data transfer.”
– Ed Bennett, VP of Fluids Engineering, Mechanical Solutions Inc. (MSI)
- Impact:
- Power reduced by 6%
- Found 33 improved designs;
not just 1 that is “good enough”
- Scalable platform for optimization
and multi-disciplinary simulations
- Solution:
- Parametric blade design (3rd-party)
- Flow simulation (STAR-CCM+)
- Process automation (HEEDS)
- Optimization (HEEDS)
- Challenge:
1) Modify impeller to increase pump
efficiency; minimize power required
2) Obtain set of lowest-power pump designs
for set of outlet pressures
SHERPA
Requirements Performance Optimization
STAR-CCM+ CFturbo
Cen entrif ifuga ugal l Pump mp Des esig ign Expl plorat
- ration
ion
12
6% improvement!
Fluid/Solid mesh considerations for increased solution fidelity: Geometry capturing Conformal interfaces Prism layers
GT Blade de Cooli ling g through
- ugh CHT
13
Fluid Solid
Fluid/Solid mesh considerations Polyhedral cells allow for accurate representation of complex geometry
GT Blade de Cooli ling g through
- ugh CHT
14
Fluid Solid
Fluid/Solid mesh considerations Conformal meshes along the entire Fluid/Solid interface yields increased accuracy
GT Blade de Cooli ling g through
- ugh CHT
15
Fluid Solid
3 Prism Layers
Engi ginee eerin ing g Sim imula lati tion
- n Maturi
rity ty Mode del Validate Troubleshoot Predict Explore Optimize
Ultimate Goal: Discover Better Designs Faster
= Feasible = Infeasible
Objective 1 Objective 2
16
NASA Mark II test vane Turbulence Models Transition Model Settings
B&B &B-AGEM GEMA: A: Gas Turbin bine e Blade de Cooli ling
- Challenge: Reduce cost & effort to develop
and upgrade gas turbine engines while ensuring proper temperature levels
- Solution: Validated Conjugate Heat Transfer (CHT)
simulations with STAR-CCM+
- Impact:
- Rapid, reliable A-to-B comparisons
- Significantly improved cooling efficiency
(needed for increased firing temperatures)
- Reduced costs; fewer experimental tests
“STAR-CCM+, with its high level of automation, meshing capabilities and high solution accuracy, is the best commercial CAE tool to perform fast and accurate simulations of conjugate heat transfer.” – René Braun, B&B-AGEMA Before Upgrade After Upgrade
17
Engi ginee eerin ing g Sim imula lati tion
- n Maturi
rity ty Mode del Validate Troubleshoot Predict Explore Optimize
Ultimate Goal: Discover Better Designs Faster
= Feasible = Infeasible
Objective 1 Objective 2
18
Presented at the 2014 STAR-Global conference in Vienna The role of CHT analysis in the design process for cooled gas turbine components
– Design process of the Kawasaki L30A – Upgrade of an E-class gas turbine – Novel film cooling technologies
Conjug jugate e Hea eat Transfer er (CHT) Case S e Study dy
19
Kawasaki L30A is the highest efficiency industrial 30 MW GT Full conjugate heat transfer analysis of the first stage vane
Des esig ign of the L3 e L30A 0A
20
Boundary Conditions:
- For primary gas path: stagnation
inlet & pressure outlet specified
- For sealing inlets: mass flow inlet
specified
- For cooling inlets (hub and shroud):
stagnation inlet specified
For cooling holes: mass flow is calculated (i.e., not specified)
Des esig ign of the L3 e L30A 0A
21
All internal geometric detail retained Modeled metal inserts to capture impingement cooling effect
Des esig ign of the L3 e L30A 0A
22
23
Des esig ign of the L3 e L30A 0A
Polyhedral mesh with prism layers 13.8M cells Conformal fluid-solid interface valuable for CHT
Des esig ign of the L3 e L30A 0A
24
Des esig ign of the L3 e L30A 0A
25
Des esig ign of the L3 e L30A 0A
26
Full conjugate heat transfer (CHT) analysis of the first-row turbine vane Analysis included all geometric detail including vane internals and inserts Very good agreement of results (simulation VS. experiment) Provided a detailed understanding of thermal profile and potential issues
Des esig ign of the L3 e L30A 0A
28
Engi ginee eerin ing g Sim imula lati tion
- n Maturi
rity ty Mode del Validate Troubleshoot Predict Explore Optimize
Ultimate Goal: Discover Better Designs Faster
= Feasible = Infeasible
Objective 1 Objective 2
29
(1) (2) (3)
b=29° „ear angle“
Anti-Kidney Vortex
2 1
ad f ,
2 1
Double Jet Film Cooling
cylindrical hole
ad f ,
film cooling effectiveness
hole exit Kidney Vortex Pair
- Impact:
- 300% improvement in cooling
effectiveness vs. shaped holes
- Turbine can run at increased
temperatures enabling increased GT efficiency
- Solution: Innovative “Nekomimi”
film cooling holes concept verified and improved by using:
- Flow simulation (STAR-CCM+)
- Parametric hole designs (NX)
- Process automation (HEEDS)
- Automated exploration (HEEDS)
- Challenge: Increase GT efficiency while
avoiding scorched turbine blades, downtime
KH KHI: Innovati tive e Turbin ine e Blade de Cooli ling
0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 5 10 15 20 25 30
Film Cooling Effectiveness [-] x/D [-]
shaped 1st Nekomimi manufactured Nekomimi 3rd variation Nth variation + 300 %
30
Pred edic icti ting g pu pump mp flow pe performan rmance ce vir irtual ually ly
Inlet Atmospheric pressure @ outlet Blades rotating at 2900 RPM Goal: Produce pump Performance Curves via simulation (Flow vs. Delta Pressure)
Pred edic icti ting g pu pump mp flow pe performan rmance ce vir irtual ually ly
Robust, ust, streaml eamlin ined ed mode delin ing g & me & meshin ing
700,000 polyhedral cells including 2 prism layers for better flow accuracy
Robust, ust, streaml eamlin ined ed mode delin ing g & me & meshin ing 2 prism layers
Pred edic icti ting g pu pump mp flow pe performan rmance ce vir irtual ually ly
Low Flow Rate High Flow Rate
Cavit itati tion
- n in
insid ide a do double le-sucti suction
- n pu
pump mp
Suction Inlet Volute Impeller Inlet Total Pressure – 175 kPa Inlet Total Pressure – 80 kPa Inlet Total Pressure – 40 kPa Inlet Total Pressure – 27 kPa Inlet Plane of symmetry
- Impact:
- Clear understanding of pump performance
across wide operating range
- Confidence in pump design through
simulation
- Unsteady solution with cavitation
- Poly meshed (~5M cells)
- CAD geometry; half-model
with splitter; 1 blade passage cyclically patterned
- Solution:
- Challenge: Accurately predict
pump performance at BEP (+/-) as well cavitation occurrence
Sim imula lati tion
- n of Compl
plex, x, Uns Unstea eady dy Fl Flows
Energy & Power
“STAR-CCM+ has all of the features required to solve extremely complex problems in hydraulic turbomachinery”
– Edward Bennett, Ph.D., VP of Fluids Engineering
A centrifugal pump consisting of multiple stages, designed to provide large amounts of total developed head (TDH)
Multist istage ge Pump mp (showi wing g Fl Flow Domain in)
Prim imary Station ionary/R y/Rota tati ting g Inter erface aces s and B d Bounda darie ies
39
Sec econd
- ndary Station
ionary/R y/Rota tati ting g Inter erfaces ces and d Bounda dari ries es
40
STAR-CCM+ CM+ Mes esh Handl dles es Comple mplex x Fl Flow Pat Paths
Include critical leakage flow paths!
41
Multist istage ge Cen entrif ifuga ugal l Pump mp
- Flow Physic
ysics
- Complex, transient flow through 360 degrees
- Stationary and rotating domains
- Unsteady forced response
- Complex secondary flows
- Relevant
nt STAR-CCM CM+ + feature ures s to facilitat litate a solutio tion
- Unsteady flow solver
- Unsteady cavitation model
- Unsteady stationary/rotating interfaces
- Advanced unstructured CFD meshing from CAD geometry
- Parallel capability for large size and economical time to solution
42
Pred edic icti ting g pu pump mp flow pe performan rmance ce vir irtual ually ly
359 GPM 1100 GPM
Q-H Curve
43
STAR-CCM+ CM+ Fl Flow Vis isuali liza zati tions
- ns
1100 GPM 359 GPM
44
Customer
- mer Succ
ccess ess
“STAR-CCM+ has been successfully used by Mechanical Solutions to solve extremely complex problems in hydraulic turbomachinery.” “STAR-CCM+ has all of the features required for an advanced, accurate CFD code, specifically:
- Advanced geometry modeling and CAD capture
- Relevant physical models to capture advanced flow physics
- Post-processing tools that facilitate flow diagnosis and
- ptimization”
- - Ed Bennett, VP Fluids Engineering, MSI
45
Engi ginee eerin ing g Sim imula lati tion
- n Maturi
rity ty Mode del Validate Troubleshoot Predict Explore Optimize
Explore digitally, Confirm physically
Ultimate Goal: Discover Better Designs Faster
Critical inversion point (from reactive to proactive engineering)
= Feasible = Infeasible
Objective 1 Objective 2
46