antibiotics in relation to infection prevention and
play

ANTIBIOTICS IN RELATION TO INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL Dr. T. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

ANTIBIOTICS IN RELATION TO INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL Dr. T. B. Menge B. Pharm; M.Sc (Pharmacology & Toxicology) . DEPUTY CHIEF PHARMACIST, KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL . WHY DO WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT ANTIBIOTIC US E?


  1. ANTIBIOTICS IN RELATION TO INFECTION PREVENTION AND CONTROL Dr. T. B. Menge B. Pharm; M.Sc (Pharmacology & Toxicology) . DEPUTY CHIEF PHARMACIST, KENYATTA NATIONAL HOSPITAL .

  2. WHY DO WE NEED TO BE CONCERNED ABOUT ANTIBIOTIC US E?

  3. .

  4. Current Status  Antimicrobials are among the most commonly used medicines  More than 30% of all hospitalized patients are treated with one or more courses of antibiotics  KNH Study:  NBU: 48% medicines used; 75% patients on 1- 4 antibiotics  ICU: 70% patients on antibiotics  22% medicines prescribed  Antimicrobials among most MISUSED medicines  50% all viral infection treated with antibiotics

  5. WHAT INFLUENCES A DOCTOR TO PRESCRIBE ANTIBIOTICS?

  6. WHAT INFLUENCES A DOCTOR TO PRESCRIBE ANTIBIOTICS? The reasons driving unnecessary prescribing are complex, but include  pressures from patients and parents,  constraints on physician time,  a lack of appreciation of the possible impact on resistance 1. Felmingham et al. J Antimicrob Chemother 2000; 45 :191–203 2. Macfarlane et al. BMJ 1997; 315 :1211–1214 3. Ball et al. J Antimicrob Chemother 2002; 49 :31–40

  7. Pe e r g roups / pre sc ribing a nd pha rma c y a dvisors Pha rma c e utic a l Pa tie nts’ or re pre se nta tive s Pa re nt’s de ma nds Doc tor’s Re g ula tory a spira tions c ontrol me c ha nisms Hospita l e xpe rts, F ormula rie s a nd g uide line s

  8. Acute respiratory infection  Case: 40-year-old male with non-productive cough x 4 days; non-smoker; no comorbidity  Exam: Afebrile; P-72; R-20; lungs – no localized findings Survey of PCPs: No Yes  Should antibiotics be used? 90% 10%  Would antibiotics be used? 12% 88% Tom File: Personal Communication

  9. Relationship between pneumococcal resistance and beta-lactam usage 25 SPA 20 POR DDD/1000/day ITA 15 BEL LUX IRE 10 SWE FIN UK 5 GER NET 0 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 % Resistance Adapted from Bronzwaer et al . Emerg Infect Dis 2002; 8:278–282

  10. Risk factors for the development of antibacterial resistance  Low antibacterial dosages and long treatment duration are risks for carriage of penicillin- resistant S. pneumoniae Guillemot et al . JAMA 1998; 2 7 9 : 365–370  The risk of carrying penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae increases by 4% for each additional day of antibacterial use in the previous 6 months Nasrin et al. BMJ 2001; 3 2 3 : 1–4  Short-course, high-dose amoxicillin therapy reduces pneumococcal carriage and minimizes the impact of therapy on drug-resistant pneumococci Schrag et al . JAMA 2001; 2 8 6 : 49–59

  11. I m prove antibiotic use  Monitor and provide feedback on occurrence of AMR  Optim ize choice and duration of em piric antim icrobial therapy  Optim ize antim icrobial prophylaxis  I m plem ent form ulary restrictions for im portant types of antim icrobial use

  12. I m prove antibiotic use  Monitor and provide feedback on occurrence of AMR

  13. Patient X, transferred from Kisum u | ( 1) x1 | ( 2) x1 | ( 3) x1 | ( 4) x1 | | ( 1) x1 | ( 2) x1 | ( 3) x1 | ( 4) x1 | ANTI BI O ANTI BI O G G RAM RAM M M ES | Aci net obact er | E. col i | S aur eus | ES | Aci net obact er | E. col i | S aur eus | | | | | | | | | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Peni ci l l i ne G Peni ci l l i ne G | | | | RESI ST | | | | | RESI ST | Fl ucl oxaci l l i ne | | | | RESI ST | Fl ucl oxaci l l i ne | | | | RESI ST | Am Am oxi ci l l i ne | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | | oxi ci l l i ne | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | | Co- am Co- am oxi cl av | I NTERM oxi cl av | I NTERM | RESI ST | RESI ST | | | RESI ST | RESI ST | | I s this patient in your I CU? Pi per aci l l i ne | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | | Pi per aci l l i ne | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | | Pi per ac. +t azob | RESI ST | RESI ST | I NTERM Pi per ac. +t azob | RESI ST | RESI ST | I NTERM | | | | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Can you treat his infection? Cef ur oxi m Cef ur oxi m e | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | e | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | Cef t azi di m Cef t azi di m e | I NTERM e | I NTERM | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | Cef t r i axone | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | Cef t r i axone | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | Can you prevent cross-infection? Cef epi m Cef epi m e | I NTERM e | I NTERM | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | | RESI ST | RESI ST | RESI ST | I m I m i penem i penem | S | I NTERM | S | I NTERM | S | RESI ST | | S | RESI ST | Azt r eonam Azt r eonam | | | | RESI ST | | | | | RESI ST | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + Am Am i kaci ne | RESI ST | S | RESI ST | I NTERM i kaci ne | RESI ST | S | RESI ST | I NTERM | | G G ent am ent am i ci ne | RESI ST | RESI ST | S | S | i ci ne | RESI ST | RESI ST | S | S | Tobr am Tobr am yci ne | | RESI ST | | S | yci ne | | RESI ST | | S | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + Nor f l oxaci ne | RESI ST | RESI ST | S | RESI ST | Nor f l oxaci ne | RESI ST | RESI ST | S | RESI ST | Ci pr of l oxaci ne | | RESI ST | S | S | Ci pr of l oxaci ne | | RESI ST | S | S | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + Cl i ndam Cl i ndam yci ne | | | | S | yci ne | | | | S | Er yt hr om Er yt hr om yci ne | | | | RESI ST | yci ne | | | | RESI ST | - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - + - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - +

  14. Antibiotic tre a tme nt without mic robiolog ic c ulture s in China (Hospita l) a nd Ne pa l (ICU) 1 0 0 9 0 8 0 7 0 % 6 0 5 0 No culture 4 0 3 0 Culture 2 0 1 0 0 China Ne pa l n=466 n=149 Suping Hu e t a l. J I nfe c t 2003; 46:161-63 Sha nkar e t a l. Am J I nfe c t Co ntro l 2003; 31: 410-14

  15. I m prove antibiotic use  Monitor and provide feedback on occurrence of AMR  Optim ize choice and duration of em piric antim icrobial therapy

  16. Surviva l Among 401 Pa tie nts with Nosoc omia l Pne umonia Assig ne d to Short (8 d) or L ong (15 d) Antimic robia l T re a tme nt 1.0 Proba bility of Surviva l 8- da y 0.8 15- da y 0.6 0.4 0.2 0.0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Da ys a fte r Bronc hosc opy Courtesy: J. Chastre, Paris JAMA 2003; 290: 2588-98

  17. E me rg e nc e of multire sista nt pa thog e ns for pa tie nts who ha d pulmona ry infe c tion re c urre nc e 80% P = 0.04 60 62.3% 40 42.1% 20 0 “8-da y” “15-da y” (n=197) (n=204) Courtesy: J. Chastre, Paris JAMA 2003; 290: 2588-98

  18. I m prove antibiotic use  Monitor and provide feedback on occurrence of AMR  Optim ize choice and duration of em piric antim icrobial therapy  Optim ize antim icrobial prophylaxis

  19. Common Misc onc e ptions in Surg ic a l Prophyla xis  Bro a d-spe c trum is b e tte r  L o ng e r a ntib io tic pro phyla xis is b e tte r  Pro phyla xis sho uld b e c o ntinue d until a ll “tub e s” a re o ut

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend