Anomaly-mediated supersymmetry breaking “demystified”
based on JHEP03(2009)123 (arXiv:0902.0464) Jae Yong Lee (KIAS)
in collaboration with Dong-Won Jung (NCU)
PHENO 2009 SYMPOSIUM
1
Anomaly-mediated supersymmetry breaking demystified based on - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation
Anomaly-mediated supersymmetry breaking demystified based on JHEP03(2009)123 (arXiv:0902.0464) Jae Yong Lee (KIAS) in collaboration with Dong-Won Jung (NCU) PHENO 2009 SYMPOSIUM 1 OUTLINE
in collaboration with Dong-Won Jung (NCU)
1
2
Randall, Sundrum (’98); Giudice, Luty, Murayama, Rattazzi (’98)
3
renormalization scale transforms as
conformal (or scale) transformations
4
5
6
Seff =
m ,
T m
m
= βQCD(g) 2g F a
nlF anl
Example: massless QCD theory Trace (or conformal) anomaly Fugikawa’s path-integral method Feynman diagrams with background field method Coupling See Peskin’s QFT book
7
Seff =
m ,
T m
m
= βQCD(g) 2g F a
nlF anl
Example: massless QCD theory Trace (or conformal) anomaly Fugikawa’s path-integral method Feynman diagrams with background field method Coupling See Peskin’s QFT book
A
8
Seff =
m ,
T m
m
= βQCD(g) 2g F a
nlF anl
Example: massless QCD theory Trace (or conformal) anomaly Fugikawa’s path-integral method Feynman diagrams with background field method Coupling See Peskin’s QFT book
A
9
Supersymmetry Conformal symmetry
10
Hm(x, θ, ¯ θ) = θσa¯ θem
a (x) + i
2 ¯ θ¯ θθψm(x) − i 2θθ¯ θ ¯ ψm(x) + 1 4θθ¯ θ¯ θˆ νm(x) ˆ νm ψm
α
em
a
U(1)_R gauge gravitino vierbein 3=4-1 8=16-4-4 5=16-6-4-1
jR
m
Sm
α
T m
n
∂mjR
m = 0
γmSm
α = 0
T m
m = 0
R-current SUSY current Energy-momentum tensor
Conformal supergravity (Matter) Supercurrent
11
Hm(x, θ, ¯ θ) = θσa¯ θem
a (x) + i
2 ¯ θ¯ θθψm(x) − i 2θθ¯ θ ¯ ψm(x) + 1 4θθ¯ θ¯ θˆ νm(x) ˆ νm ψm
α
em
a
U(1)_R gauge gravitino vierbein 3=4-1 8=16-4-4 5=16-6-4-1
jR
m
Sm
α
T m
n
∂mjR
m = 0
γmSm
α = 0
T m
m = 0
R-current SUSY current Energy-momentum tensor
Conformal supergravity (Matter) Supercurrent
12
Gravity and Matter Anomaly
13
˚ r ≡ ∂mjR
m
ξα ≡ γmSm
α
˚ t ≡ T m
m
1 4 1
2 Suppose that all the three symmetries are “anomalous”.
X(x, θ) ≡ A(x) + √ 2θξ(x) + θθF(x), ¯ DX = 0 A = a + ib F = ˚ t + i˚ r
Chiral anomaly supermultiplet and chiral compensator
14
˚ r ≡ ∂mjR
m
ξα ≡ γmSm
α
˚ t ≡ T m
m
1 4 1
2 Suppose that all the three symmetries are “anomalous”.
ˆ νm ψm
α
em
a
U(1)_R gauge gravitino vierbein 3=4-1 8=16-4-4 5=16-6-4-1
X(x, θ) ≡ A(x) + √ 2θξ(x) + θθF(x), ¯ DX = 0 A = a + ib F = ˚ t + i˚ r χ3(x, θ) ≡ e2̺(x)+2iδ(x)[1 + √ 2θ ¯ Ψ(x) + θθM ∗(x)] M ∗
2
¯ Ψα ∼ σα ˙
α m ¯
ψm
˙ α (Nambu-Goldstino = dilatino)
Chiral anomaly supermultiplet and chiral compensator
15
˚ r ≡ ∂mjR
m
ξα ≡ γmSm
α
˚ t ≡ T m
m
1 4 1
2 Suppose that all the three symmetries are “anomalous”.
ˆ νm ψm
α
em
a
U(1)_R gauge gravitino vierbein 3=4-1 8=16-4-4 5=16-6-4-1
X(x, θ) ≡ A(x) + √ 2θξ(x) + θθF(x), ¯ DX = 0 A = a + ib F = ˚ t + i˚ r χ3(x, θ) ≡ e2̺(x)+2iδ(x)[1 + √ 2θ ¯ Ψ(x) + θθM ∗(x)] M ∗
2
¯ Ψα ∼ σα ˙
α m ¯
ψm
˙ α (Nambu-Goldstino = dilatino)
Chiral anomaly supermultiplet and chiral compensator
16
Coupling of the CASM to the chiral compensator SX =
SX =
Ψξ + F) + h.c.]
in components, conformal anomaly gaugino mass term
M ∗ = m3/2, A = the lowest comp. of CASM M ∗A ⇒ m3/2λaλa
soft susy breaking terms
X = W a
αW aα ⇒ A| = λaλa
for example,
17
S =
θ φi
+e2gV φi
+ d4x d2θ 1 4 W aαW a
α + 1
3! yijk φiφjφk
1 4W aαW a
α
β(g) 2g W aαW a
α
Mλ = β(g) g m3/2 1 3! yijk φiφjφk − 1 3! (γi + γj + γk) yijkφiφjφk Aijk = −(γi + γj + γk)yijkm3/2
interaction soft term CASM (Simplified MSSM action)
18
X 1 4W aαW a
α
β(g) 2g W aαW a
α
Mλ = β(g) g m3/2 1 3! yijk φiφjφk − 1 3! (γi + γj + γk) yijkφiφjφk Aijk = −(γi + γj + γk)yijkm3/2
interaction soft term
S =
θ φi
+e2gV φi
+ d4x d2θ 1 4 W aαW a
α + 1
3! yijk φiφjφk
(Simplified MSSM action)
β-function γ-function
i = −
iklyjkl − 4g2δj i CA(φi)]
19
Supergraphs : (a) vector, (b) ghost, (c) chiral one-loop contribution to the vector superpropagator.
ln µ2 → ln µ2 − 2̺
20
Supergraphs : (a) vector, (b) ghost, (c) chiral one-loop contribution to the vector superpropagator.
ln µ2 → ln µ2 − 2̺
β(g) = − g3 16π2 [3CA(adj.) −
TA(φi)]
Mλ = β(g) g m3/2
V
21
Supergraphs : one-loop contribution to the Yukawa term.
ln µ2 → ln µ2 − 2̺
22
Supergraphs : one-loop contribution to the Yukawa term.
ln µ2 → ln µ2 − 2̺
γj
i = −
1 32π2 [y∗
iklyjkl − 4g2δj i CA(φi)]
Aijk = −(γi + γj + γk)yijkm3/2
23
Supergraphs : these one-loops do NOT contribute to the Yukawa term.
24
We have reviewed SUSY breaking of anomaly mediation from a field- theoretical perspective, using superspace perturbation theory and supergraphs. This approach is physically more understandable in comparison with the conventional spurion technique. We can even adopt this scheme to study the connection between the hidden sector and Einstein supergravity. We can/may systematically study various SUSY breaking mediation scenarios at once using this scheme. (i.e. GMSB+AMSB)
Conclusion
25
26