Analyzing Quantitative Data Analysis is about QUESTIONS Does - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

analyzing quantitative data analysis is about questions
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Analyzing Quantitative Data Analysis is about QUESTIONS Does - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Analyzing Quantitative Data Analysis is about QUESTIONS Does physical vs soft keyboard, known vs unknown language affect typing speed or error rate? Hypotheses? Analysis Analysis (2) Analysis (3) Analysis (2) Results Univariate Tests


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Analyzing Quantitative Data

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Analysis is about QUESTIONS

  • Does physical vs soft keyboard, known vs

unknown language affect typing speed or error rate?

  • Hypotheses?
slide-3
SLIDE 3

Analysis

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Analysis (2)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Analysis (3)

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Analysis (2)

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Results

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Univariate Tests

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Summary Tables

slide-10
SLIDE 10

So … Multivariate or Univariate

  • You can look at your design from a

multivariate point of view if you regard your data not as representing realisations of one DV in different conditions, but of (ultimately) different DVs which are to be analysed simultaneously.

– http://stats.stackexchange.com/questions/4530/when-to-interpret-multivariate-tests-when-performing-repeated-measures-ancova

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Also gives estimates of performance for each iv

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Also gives estimates of performance for each iv

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Another Interesting Effect: Tripling Data

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Another Interesting Effect: Tripling Data

slide-15
SLIDE 15

Analysis is about QUESTIONS

  • Does physical vs soft keyboard, known vs

unknown language affect typing speed or error rate?

  • Hypotheses?
  • OTHER QUESTIONS?
slide-16
SLIDE 16

Examples of other questions

  • Correlation Questions

– Does physical keyboard speed correlate with soft keyboard typing speeds? – Does error rate correlate on physical vs soft keyboards?

  • Likert/Preference/Rating Questions

– Preferences for physical vs soft keyboards? – Perceived efficacy of soft keyboards? – Perceived performance of soft keyboard for known vs unknown language

  • Cognitive workload questions

– NASA TLS evaluation of soft vs physical keyboards?

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Data Types

  • Categorical

– Technical discipline, Y/N – Gender, M/F

  • Ordinal

– Orderable but not equidistant values – Likert data is a good example

  • Strongly agree, agree, neutral, disagree, strongly disagree

– Education Level (high school, some university, undergrad, grad).

  • Interval

– Equidistant values, but values are not based upon a 0. – Can’t really say “twice as X”. – Evaluate the software: Hated it = -3; Loved it = 3.

  • Ratio

– Speed: Twice as fast – Years of education: 2X the years of education. – Errors: Double the errors

Categorical Continuous

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Correct Test for Correct Data/Questions

  • Does physical vs soft keyboard, known vs

unknown language affect typing speed or error rate?

  • Does physical keyboard speed correlate with

soft keyboard typing speeds?

slide-19
SLIDE 19

A Note on Likert (and Other) Ordinal Data

  • Likert Data

– Mann-Whitney U-TestThis test is used when we

  • btain ordinal data in the independent

groups situation. – Wilcoxon Signed-Ranks TestThis test is used when we obtain ordinal data in the paired samples situation.

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Question

  • Does physical vs soft correlate?
slide-21
SLIDE 21

Question

  • Does physical vs soft correlate?
slide-22
SLIDE 22

Question

  • Does physical vs soft correlate?
slide-23
SLIDE 23

Correlations

3 1

) ( ) ( 1 ) ( s r s w b s v ⋅ ′ =

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Models and Correlation

Touch Mouse

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Analysis?

Paths r p Intercept Slope Unidir All .55 <.0001 8.35 1.18 Last .56 <.0001 7.73 1.18 Circular All .37 <.0001 28.23 .39 Last .33 <.0001 27.11 .40 Paths r p Intercept Slope Unidir All .63 <.0001 4.17 .98 Last .64 <.0001 4.53 .95 Circular All .39 <.0001 10.6 .56 Last .41 <.0001 10.3 .57

What about nice Fitts’s Law correlation?

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Averaging

  • Averaging serves a highly valuable purpose; when

curves are averaged, factors including naturally

  • ccurring neurophysiological noise, errors

(overshoot, undershoot and target misses), and cognitive variations such as response bias [14] that are present in any one sample are

  • eliminated. What remains is the expected

performance value for a task, i.e. the average cost given a large number of iterations. The higher the correlation coefficient for average input time, the more encompassing the model.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

Analysis

Filter Touch Mouse r2 p r2 p Unidir All .94 <.0001 .98 <.0001 Last .93 <.0001 .97 <.0001 Circular All .87 <.001 .90 <.0001 Last .89 <.001 .92 <.0001