An Update on the 86th Legislature 1 Key Dates in the 86th - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

an update on the 86th legislature
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

An Update on the 86th Legislature 1 Key Dates in the 86th - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An Update on the 86th Legislature 1 Key Dates in the 86th Legislative Session May 6th January 8th (119th Day) (1st Day) Last Day for Beginning of House to report Session house bills May 27th (140th Day) March 8th Sine Die (60th Day)


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An Update on the 86th Legislature

1

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Key Dates in the 86th Legislative Session

January 8th (1st Day) Beginning of Session May 27th (140th Day) Sine Die March 8th (60th Day) Bill Filing Deadline May 6th (119th Day) Last Day for House to report house bills 2

slide-3
SLIDE 3

School Finance Reform

3

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

CSSB 4, CSHB 3 and HB 3: Current Status

  • April 25th Senate Education hearing, CSSB 4 introduced. CSSB 4 made

substantial changes from the filed version.

  • Committee also introduced a substitute for HB 3, which was identical to

CSSB 4.

  • Senate Ed. is expected to vote on a revised CSHB 3 this morning.
  • The changes in the forthcoming slides describe the difference between HB 3

as passed by the House and the revised CSHB 3.

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Basic Allotment $5,880 $6,030 Cost-of-Education Index Both bills repeal the CEI. Small and Mid-Sized Adjustment Both bills move it into a separate allotment. CSHB 3 has slightly higher weights than HB 3, Engrossed.

slide-6
SLIDE 6

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Teacher Pay Classroom Teacher and Librarian Allotment of $5,000 for each full-time teacher and librarian. The allotment will decrease if a district’s ADA falls below 2018-19 levels. An additional adjustment related to benefits is included. 25 percent of district gain related to basic allotment increases dedicated to non-administrative pay raises. Teacher Incentive Pay Creates new Teacher Incentive Allotment similar to one in the introduced version of HB 3 (and identical to CSSB 4) Creates a new Educator Effectiveness Allotment with a weight of 0.012 for campuses in high-needs census tracts

  • r in rural areas.
slide-7
SLIDE 7

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Performance-Based Bonuses

  • 3rd Grade Reading Outcomes Bonus

based on performance on STAAR.

  • CCMR Outcomes Bonus.

No performance-based allotments related to student outcomes.

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Modelling Methodology for Performance-Based Allotments

  • Rank order all districts based on the rate of students

that meet grade level on 3rd grade reading STAAR test or percent of grads demonstrating CCMR.

  • For each allotment, create three separate

rankings for the three student subgroup listed in the bill.

  • Identify the district at the 25th percentile, and

use that rate as the threshold for generating an allotment.

  • Districts get a per-student allotment for each of

their students that exceed that threshold.

CCMR - Edu. Dis. Rate 100% 0% 30.4% 25th percentile

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Compensatory Education Allotment Both bills create a new comp. ed. allotment based on student’s resident census block, with weights ranging from 0.225 to 0.275. CSHB 3 is based on block groups, while HB 3 is based on blocks.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

A Quick Lesson in Census Blocks vs. Census Tracts

10

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Census Blocks Census Tracts

11

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Census Blocks

  • The smallest level of geography Census

Bureau estimates demographic data for.

  • Drawn based on visible features like

roads, streams, as well as nonvisible features like property lines or governmental boundaries.

  • Demographic estimates are only

provided in decennial Census.

  • Delineated by the Census Bureau every

10 years.

Census Tracts

  • Comprised of Census blocks.
  • Designated based on population. Average

around 4,000 inhabitants per tract. Cannot be more than 8,000 or less than 1,200.

  • Demographic estimates are provided

annually on the American Community

  • Survey. These are estimates covering 5

years of data collection.

  • Subdivide as population in an area

increases.

(Ex. Census Tract 1130 may be split into 1130.01 and 1130.02 if 1130 pop. increases above 8,000)

12

slide-13
SLIDE 13

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Other Student-Based Allotments

  • Mainstream special education weight

is increased to 1.15

  • Creates new dyslexia allotment with

weight is 0.12

  • Additional dual language weights of

0.15 for ELLs and 0.05 for non-ELLs

  • Does not expand eligibility for CTE

funding to additional grade levels

  • Mainstream special education weight

is increased to 1.15

  • Creates new dyslexia allotment with

weight is 0.10

  • Additional dual language weights of

0.15 for ELLs and 0.05 for non-ELLs

  • Extends eligibility for CTE funding to

grade 6

slide-14
SLIDE 14

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Indirect Cost Allotments/Spending Requirements

Repeals existing indirect cost allotments and does not replace them with new spending requirements.

  • At least 52 percent of compensatory

education allotment must be spent on eligible programs

  • At least 52 percent of bilingual

education allotment must be spent on eligible programs

  • At least 58 percent of career and tech

allotment must be spent on eligible programs

Other New Allotments

  • Creates a new allotment related to the

Accelerated Campus Excellance plans.

  • Creates a new allotment for fast growth

school districts. Based on ADA, not value growth.

  • Creates Dropout Recovery School

Allotment No similar provisions in HB 3.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Pre-K Both bills create a new early reading allotment with a weight of 0.1 that is commonly cited as providing the remaining funding needed for full-day pre-k. Both bills also provide waivers for districts to meet these requirements. CSHB 3 extends eligibility for free pre-k to the children of public school educators.

slide-16
SLIDE 16

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

NIFA Makes no change to appropriation limit, keeping it at $25 million. Increases appropriation limit to $100 million. Transportation Allotment Uniform rate per mile as set by appropriation Uniform rate per mile as set by appropriation Set-asides Sets aside $6 million of regular program for blended learning grants, and $8 million of CTE allotment for grants to P-TECH schools. No new set-asides

slide-17
SLIDE 17

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Number of Golden Pennies 6 8 Golden/Copper Penny Yields Golden penny yield = $94.08 Copper penny yield = $47.04 Golden penny yield = Greater of:

  • Per WADA per cent wealth of district

at the 96th percentile of wealth, or

  • $96.48

Copper penny yield = $48.24

slide-18
SLIDE 18

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Recapture Both bills redefine recapture to be excess local share compared to entitlement. Formula Transition Grant Establishes two targets based on the lesser of:

  • 100% of prior law revenue per

ADA, or

  • 128% of the statewide average of

revenue per ADA. In even numbered years, the bill requires use of the 2019-20 prior law revenue as the target, and in odd numbered years, the use of the 2020-21 prior law revenue. Establishes targets based on the lesser of:

  • 103% of prior law revenue per

ADA in the same year, or

  • 128% of the state average of

prior law revenue per ADA in the same year

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Property Tax Relief

19

slide-20
SLIDE 20

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

State Compression Percentage (applied to tier 1 M&O rate)

  • 92 percent in FY 2020
  • 85 percent in FY 2021. Contingent
  • n sales tax swap.
  • In FY 2022, individualized district

compression based on property value growth and inflation. Contingent on sales tax swap.

  • Would increase to 100 percent in FY

2021 if the sales tax swap is not approved by voters. 96 percent

slide-21
SLIDE 21

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Copper Penny Compression Both bills tie the compression of copper pennies to increases in the basic allotment. Rollback Rate Calculation Both bills include similar formula for calculating for the rollback tax rate (i.e. not based on effective tax rate, but on the state compression percentage * $1.00 plus compressed enrichment pennies). Of course, with a lower initial state compression percentage, CSHB 3 will result in lower rollback rates.

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Duelling Rollback Rate Calculation Methodologies

  • Senate Finance/House Ways and Means Committees’ proposals calculate rollback

rate based on the effective tax rate. The calculation for effective tax rate is unchanged for school districts under those bills from current law. ○ SB 2, As Engrossed multiplies the effective tax rate by 1.025. ○ CSSB 2 multiplies the effective tax rate by 1.02. Passed the House last night 107-40.

  • Senate Education/House Public Education Committees’ proposals calculate rollback

rate based on compressed tier 1 M&O rate plus compressed enrichment pennies.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

An Illustration of the Rollback Rate Calculation Under HB 3, As Engrossed

Additional details can be found here.

slide-24
SLIDE 24

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Residence Homestead Exemption Increases residence homestead exemption to $40,000 Does not include increase to residence homestead exemption. Tax Rate Swaps Requires language that would indicate a district may not increase its M&O rate to create a surplus to pay debt service. Creates a basis for injunction against collection of taxes if district found in violation No similar provision Bonds Requires ballot propositions for bonds to include language “THIS IS A PROPERTY TAX INCREASE” No similar provision

slide-25
SLIDE 25

CSHB 3 HB 3, Engrossed

Current/Prior Year Values Moves to current year values to calculate local share the FSP. Maintains use of prior year values to calculate local share of the FSP

slide-26
SLIDE 26

Current Year/Prior Year Comparison

  • The Texas Commission on Public School Finance estimated the switch to current year

values would result in a $1.8 Billion in reduction state FSP costs.

  • Additional analysis from MCA has determined that the formula transition grant

included in CSSB 4 would cost the state approximately $540 million in 2019-20.

  • This is largely due to the switch to current year values. Per TSA request, MCA created

two CSSB 4 models, one with current year and one with prior year. Switching back to prior year in CSSB 4 greatly reduced the state aid distributed through the formula transition grant.

  • As a result, the net amount of state FSP savings due to the switch to current year

values is approximately, $1.2 billion.

slide-27
SLIDE 27

CSSB 4 HB 3, Engrossed Difference

Impact on M&O Tax Collections

  • $3.0 B
  • $1.4 B
  • $1.6 B

Impact on FSP Revenue

$3.1 B $3.4 B

  • $0.3 B

Impact on FSP Revenue Less Teacher Pay Allotment

$1.2 B

Review: 2019-2020 Comparison to Current Law

slide-28
SLIDE 28

Assessment, Accountability, Instruction, and/or Programs

28

slide-29
SLIDE 29
slide-30
SLIDE 30
slide-31
SLIDE 31
slide-32
SLIDE 32
slide-33
SLIDE 33
slide-34
SLIDE 34

Ballot & Bond Bills

34

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

C.S.H.B. 440 (Murphy)

Limits a district's use of the unspent proceeds of issued general obligation bonds to the specific purposes for which the bonds were authorized, to retire the bonds, or to another purpose if the original purposes are accomplished or

  • abandoned. If the original purposes are accomplished or abandoned, the

unspent proceeds may be used for another purpose if the district's board of trustees approves in separate votes the use of the proceeds for a purpose other than to retire the bonds and for the purpose specified at the time the vote is taken.

slide-36
SLIDE 36

36

C.S.H.B. 440 (Murphy)

Prohibits a political subdivision from issuing general obligation bonds to purchase, improve, or construct an improvement to real property or to purchase personal non-real property if the weighted average maturity of the issue of bonds to finance the improvements or personal property exceeds 120 percent of the reasonably expected weighted average economic life of the improvements or personal property financed with the issue of bonds. Reported from Senate Property Tax.

slide-37
SLIDE 37

37

C.S.H.B. 477 (Murphy)

Requires the ballot for a bond measure by a political subdivision to specifically state a general description of the purposes for which the bonds are to be authorized, the total principal amount of the bonds to be authorized, and that taxes sufficient to pay the principal of and interest on the bonds will be imposed. The bill also requires specific information to be included in the voter information document, on the district’s website, and published in a newspaper. The bill is pending in Senate Property Tax.

slide-38
SLIDE 38

38

H.B. 4408 (Middleton)

The bill states that a political subdivision may not issue a bond for a certain purpose for five years after a vote for that same purpose was defeated by the voters. This bill will be heard in House Pensions on 5/2/19.

slide-39
SLIDE 39

39

S.B. 30 (Birdwell)

As engrossed, the bill states that the question of whether to approve the issuance of bonds for the construction, acquisition, and equipment of school buildings in the district and the purchase of necessary sites for school buildings may be submitted to the voters in a single ballot proposition, except that bonds for each of the following purposes must be stated in a separate proposition:

  • (1) the construction, improvement, or renovation of a stadium;
  • (2) the construction, improvement, or renovation of a natatorium;
  • (3) the construction, improvement, or renovation of another recreational facility other

than a gymnasium;

slide-40
SLIDE 40

40

S.B. 30 (Birdwell)

  • (4) the construction, improvement, or renovation of a performing arts facility;
  • (5) the construction, improvement, or renovation of housing for teachers as

determined by the district to be necessary to have a sufficient number of teachers for the district; and

  • (6) an acquisition or update of technology equipment, other than equipment

used for school security purposes.

slide-41
SLIDE 41

41

S.B. 30 (Birdwell)

The question of whether to approve the issuance of bonds for a building described above must be printed on the ballot as a separate ballot proposition regardless of whether that building is proposed as part of the same complex or building that contains traditional classroom facilities. Each separate ballot proposition required by this subsection must state the principal amount of the bonds to be issued that constitutes the cost for construction of that portion of the building or complex attributable to the building described above or to the traditional classroom facilities, as applicable. This bill has been referred to House Pensions.

slide-42
SLIDE 42

42

C.S.S.B. 323 (Huffman)

This bill applies only to a political subdivision located in a county with a population of more than 120,000. The bill requires a political subdivision seeking to hold an election on a measure to submit to the regional presiding judge of the administrative judicial region that the political subdivision is located in:

  • (1) the ballot proposition language; and
  • (2) a brief statement on the purpose of the proposition.
slide-43
SLIDE 43

43

C.S.S.B. 323 (Huffman)

A judge receiving a submission must appoint three judges from the administrative judicial region to serve on a panel to review the ballot proposition language before the election may be held. The panel will then either approve or disapprove of the language. If the panel disapproves of the language, it must rewrite the language. The political subdivision may submit revised language to the panel or use the rewritten language. This bill has been referred to House Elections.

slide-44
SLIDE 44

44

S.B. 462 (Campbell)

As engrossed, the bill states that the proposition submitted for an election to authorize a political subdivision to issue bonds must distinctly state:

  • (1) the purpose for which the debt obligations are to be authorized;
  • (2) the principal amount of the debt obligations to be authorized;
  • (3) that taxes sufficient to pay the annual principal of and interest on the debt
  • bligations may be imposed;
slide-45
SLIDE 45

45

S.B. 462 (Campbell)

  • (4) the aggregate amount of the outstanding principal of the political subdivision's

debt obligations as of the beginning of the political subdivision's fiscal year in which the election is ordered; and

  • (5) the ad valorem debt service tax rate for the political subdivision at the time

the election is ordered, expressed as:

  • (A) an amount per $100 valuation of taxable property; and
  • (B) a percentage of the political subdivision's adopted tax rate as of the

beginning of the political subdivision's fiscal year in which the election is

  • rdered.

The bill has been referred to House Pensions.

slide-46
SLIDE 46

Other Policy Areas of Focus

46

slide-47
SLIDE 47

47

Other Policy Areas of Focus

School Finance Reform Property Tax Relief

SB 3 by Nelson HB 1160 by Johnson HB 1632 by Bell SB 451 by Powell HJR 3/HB 4621 by Huberty SJR 76/SB 2441 by Taylor SJR71/SB 5 by Bettencourt

slide-48
SLIDE 48

48

Major Policy Areas of Focus

School Safety & Mental Health TRS Other Significant Issues

HB 17 by Bonnen SB 11 by Taylor HB 18 by Price HB 19 by Price SB 12 by Huffman HB 9 by Bonnen HB 4242 by Bernal HB 3904 by Huberty HB 281 by Middleton HB 433 by Shaheen SB 29 by Bettencourt HB 1131 by Cole HB 592/SB 398 by Hernandez/Zaffirini HB 1556 by VanDeaver

slide-49
SLIDE 49

49

Current Status - School Finance Reform

  • SB 3 by Nelson

○ The bill originally provided a state-funded $5,000 annual salary allotment for every full-time classroom teacher at a traditional public school. The committee substitute (CS) now includes teachers at public charter schools. On the Senate floor, the bill was amended to add full-time librarians at a cost of $53 million. The bill now has a permanent salary floor based on a district's salary schedule in effect during the 2019-2020 school year. ○ Passed in Senate, referred to House Public Education Committee

  • HB 1632 by Bell

○ The bill adds to the list of students that are considered "at risk" students with 1) dyslexia, 2) is educationally disadvantaged, 3) has been enrolled in at least two public schools in the current or preceding school year, or 4) has ten or more absences in a school year. ○ Passed in House, referred to Senate Education Committee

  • SB 451 by Powell

○ This bill would allow comp-ed funding to pay for school guidance and counseling program or counseling or social work services provided by a licensed social worker. ○ First placement on Senate Intent Calendar

slide-50
SLIDE 50

50

Current Status - Property Tax Relief

  • HB 2 by Burrows/SB 2 by Bettencourt (identical)

○ CSSB 2 passed in Senate 18-12 ○ HB 2 passed the House, cap lowered to 2% and discussion links passage of this bill to passage of HB 3

  • HJR 3/HB 4621 by Huberty

○ Left pending in House Ways and Means

  • SJR71/SB 5 by Bettencourt

○ Left pending in Senate Property Tax

slide-51
SLIDE 51

51

Current Status - School Safety and Mental Health

  • SB 11 by Taylor

○ This bill is an omnibus safety and security bill. It includes facilities standards, mental health resources for district personnel, charter school provisions, school safety allotments, and a requirement for school safety plans. ○ Passed by Senate, received in House

  • HB 18 by Price

○ This bill makes new requirements for schools pertaining to the training of principals, teachers and counselors on student mental health and substance abuse issues. ○ Passed by the House, referred to Senate Education Committee

  • HB 19 by Price

○ As filed, this bill would require local mental health authorities to employ a non-physician mental health professional to serve as a resource for school districts in the region. ○ Passed by the House, referred to the Senate Health and Human Services Committee

slide-52
SLIDE 52

52

Current Status - TRS

  • SB 12 by Huffman, SP: Bonnen

○ As engrossed, the bill sets contribution rates for members, districts, and the state. ○ Committee substitute adopted in Senate, passed 31-0 ○ Committee substitute adopted in House, passed 145-1, set on Senate Items Eligible Calendar

slide-53
SLIDE 53

53

Current Status - Other Significant Issues

  • SB 29 by Bettencourt

○ The bill states that a private entity that receives state funds may not use the state funds to pay certain lobby expenses ○ Passed in Senate, referred to House State Affairs Committee

  • HB 1131 by Cole

○ This bill would create a state financing program administered by the Texas Public Finance Authority to assist school districts with granting authority to issue bonds or other

  • bligations.

○ Set on House Calendar for 5/1

  • HB 1556 by VanDeaver

○ The bill would require school districts to go out for a bid on non-construction purchases (current law includes only contracts for purchases) valued at $50,000 or more. ○ Passed in House, referred to Senate Education Committee

slide-54
SLIDE 54

54

Bills Heard in Committee this Week

  • HB 2719 (Pacheco)

As filed, the bill would make appraisal district board directors elected positions, instead of being appointed by participating taxing units. The bill would take effect beginning with the Nov. 2020 elections. Oppose with card

  • HB 2750 (Hefner)

As filed, this bill would make one of the directors on the appraisal district board an elected position, with the remaining four positions still appointed by participating taxing units. The bill establishes a filing fee candidates must pay in order to run for the position. The bill would take effect in 2020, with the elected director taking office January 1, 2021. Oppose with card

slide-55
SLIDE 55

Lynn M. Moak Daniel T. Casey

Partners

Susan Moak Kari Ruehman

Administrative Staff

Kathy Mathias Larry Groppel, Ed. D. Thomas V. Alvis, Ph. D. Alicia Thomas, Ph. D.

Consultants

Buck Gilcrease, Ed. D. Dee Carney Joe Wisnoski Terry Faucheux Gretchen Hoffman Catherine Knepp John Grey Monica Zdrojewski Josh Haney

901 S. MoPac Expressway, Bldg. III, Ste 310, Austin, TX 78746

  • Ph. (512) 485-7878 Fax (512) 485-7888

www.moakcasey.com

55