An ontology-based model for representing evolution of both data and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

an ontology based model for representing evolution of
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

An ontology-based model for representing evolution of both data and - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An ontology-based model for representing evolution of both data and semantic in GIS Chamseddine Zaki Myriam Servieres Guillaume Moreau 2008 GI-DAYS Plan Introduction Related Work: Snapshot Model Three domain Model MADS Ontologies Our


slide-1
SLIDE 1

An ontology-based model for representing evolution of both data and semantic in GIS

Chamseddine Zaki Myriam Servieres Guillaume Moreau

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Plan Introduction Related Work: Snapshot Model Three domain Model MADS Ontologies Our Approach Objective MADS + ONTOLOGIES History tracking Conclusion

2

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Introduction - GIS

Geographic Information Systems The goal of GIS is to provide information about a given space. Layers Geographical objects organized in themes frequently represented as layers. Data in GIS Objects are either spatial or spatio-temporal.

3

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Introduction : Exigencies

Historicity Enrich spatial analysis by an evolutionary study of the considered objects. Dynamicity Models should be able to represent the concept evolution through time. Multi-Presentation, Multi-Resolution Geographical applications have strong requirements in terms of multiple presentations.

4

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Related Work – Snapshot Model Snapshot Model (1988)

Time Stamping Layers This model uses time-stamping layers that show the states of a geographic distribution, at a certain time. Problems (complex queries, redundancy …)

5

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Related Work – Three Domain Model Three Domain Model (1994)

Three Dimensions (Semantics, Space and Time) The semantic domain holds uniquely identifiable

  • bjects.

Improvements

  • 1. Handling Both movements and changes
  • 2. Handling simple and complex, temporal and

spatio-temporal queries.

6

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Related Work – MADS Modeling of Application Data with Spatio- Temporal features (1998)

Spatial Data Types

7

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Related Work – MADS Temporal Data Types

8

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Related Work – MADS

  • Dimensions (Spatial, Temporal, Structural).
  • Multiple Perception using perception stamps.
  • Multiple Presentation Techniques.
  • Problems?

Closed World Assumption. Impossible update of the Underlying model.

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Related Work – Ontologies Definition Interesting features Advantages over the MADS model:

Open World Assumption. Ability to update the conceptual model.

10

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Our Approach

11

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Our Approach : Objective A new model that insures:

Multi-presentation of geographic objects. Ability of Adding, removing, and changing concepts. Keeping track of the historical data of instances and concepts.

12

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Our Approach: MADS + Ontologies Combining MADS and Ontologies.

  • MADS
  • Mapping MADS to an Ontology
  • History tracking

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Example: MADS model GI-DAYS 2008

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Example: MADS model

A "Dense Core" is composed of "Structure Types". Structure Types are "Building", "Road" and "Land". Buildings can be public or private. Many lands may be joined together to form one land,

  • r a land can be split in many smaller lands.

Roads have borders with lands.

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Example: Mapping MADS to Ontology

16

Translating the MADS model into a web ontology language (OWL) using transformation rules. GI-DAYS 2008

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Example: History Tracking

17

GI-DAYS 2008

Object creation : “Begin”. A new entity derived from a previous existing object: “Begin-Replaced”. Each change will have a specific value (Change in geometry, in topology, in attribute, in geometry, in topology and attribute …). Object Destruction: End

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Example: History Tracking

18

GI-DAYS 2008

Relationship 1: Value = “Begin”, Start Node = “T1”, Finish Node= “T1”, Instance ID = “Land A”. Relationship 2: Value = “No Change”,… Relationship 3: Value = “Change in Geometry and Topology”, Start Node = “T3”, Finish Node= “T4”, Instance ID = “Land A”…

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Conclusion

19

A solution that allows the evolution of spatio- temporal data models in terms of concepts. Multiple models that contributed in this domain. MADS in detail, and his shortcomings. Combining MADS and Ontologies. Mapping the MADS model to a new ontology. Explicit temporal relationship in the ontology model. Future Works: Application of this model on the geographic data of Nantes.

GI-DAYS 2008

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Thank You For Your Attention

Chamseddine Zaki Myriam Servieres Guillaume Moreau

GI-DAYS 2008