an introduction to exotic spheres and singularities
play

AN INTRODUCTION TO EXOTIC SPHERES AND SINGULARITIES Andrew Ranicki - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

1 AN INTRODUCTION TO EXOTIC SPHERES AND SINGULARITIES Andrew Ranicki (Edinburgh) http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/ aar Edinburgh, 4 May, 2012 2 The original papers J. Milnor, On manifolds homeomorphic to the 7-sphere , Annals of Maths. 64,


  1. 1 AN INTRODUCTION TO EXOTIC SPHERES AND SINGULARITIES Andrew Ranicki (Edinburgh) http://www.maths.ed.ac.uk/ � aar Edinburgh, 4 May, 2012

  2. 2 The original papers ◮ J. Milnor, On manifolds homeomorphic to the 7-sphere , Annals of Maths. 64, 399-405 (1956) ◮ M. Kervaire and J. Milnor, Groups of homotopy spheres I. , Annals of Maths. 77, 504–537 (1963) ◮ F. Pham, Formules de Picard-Lefschetz g´ en´ eralis´ ees et egrales , Bull. Soc. Math. France 93, ramification des int´ 333-367 (1965) ◮ E. Brieskorn, Beispiele zur Differentialtopologie von Singularit¨ aten , Inventiones math. 2, 1–14 (1966) ◮ F. Hirzebruch, Singularities and exotic spheres , Seminaire Bourbaki 314, 1966/67 ◮ J. Milnor, Singular points of complex hypersurfaces , Annals of Maths. Study 61 (1968)

  3. 3 Homotopy spheres ◮ A homotopy m -sphere Σ m is a differentiable oriented m -dimensional manifold which is homotopy equivalent to S m . ◮ For m � 5 Σ m is homeomorphic to S m . ◮ Σ m is standard if it is diffeomorphic to S m . ◮ Σ m is exotic if it is not diffeomorphic to S m . ◮ In this lecture will describe the construction and main properties of the Brieskorn spheres , which arise as the links of the isolated singularities of complex hypersurfaces.

  4. 4 The original exotic spheres ◮ The original exotic 7-spheres Σ 7 of Milnor (1956) were constructed as boundaries Σ 7 = ∂ F of the ( D 4 , S 3 )-bundles over S 4 ( D 4 , S 3 ) → ( F , ∂ F ) → S 4 of the 4-plane vector bundles over S 4 classified by particular elements in π 4 ( BSO (4)) = Z ⊕ Z . ◮ The exotic nature of Σ 7 detected by the defect signature( F ) − ⟨L ( F ) , [ F ] ⟩ ∈ Q of the Hirzebruch signature theorem for an 8-dimensional manifold F with ∂ F = Σ 7 . ◮ Kervaire and Milnor (1963) showed that there are 28 differentiable structures on S 7 .

  5. 5 Bounding exotic spheres ◮ A homotopy m -sphere Σ m bounds if Σ m = ∂ F for a framed ( m + 1)-dimensional manifold F . ◮ Pairs ( F , ∂ F ), ( F ′ , ∂ F ′ ) are cobordant if there exists an = ∂ F ′ such that orientation-preserving diffeomorphism ∂ F ∼ F ∪ ∂ − F ′ is a framed boundary. The cobordism classes constitute a group bP m +1 under connected sum. ◮ Kervaire-Milnor (1963) computed bP m +1 to be a quotient of the simply-connected surgery obstruction group P m +1 = L m +1 ( Z ) . ◮ No obstruction to simply-connected odd-dimensional surgery, P 2 n − 1 = L 2 n − 1 ( Z ) = 0, so that bP 2 n − 1 = 0: every bounding homotopy (2 n − 2)-sphere Σ 2 n − 2 is standard.

  6. 6 The bounding odd-dimensional homotopy spheres I. ◮ Every bounding homotopy (2 n − 3)-sphere is the boundary Σ 2 n − 3 = ∂ F of an ( n − 2)-connected framed (2 n − 2)-dimensional manifold F 2 n − 2 constructed by plumbing together µ copies of τ S n − 1 using a nonsingular ( − 1) n − 1 -quadratic form ( H n − 1 ( F ) = Z µ , b , q ) over Z . ◮ The rel ∂ surgery obstruction of ( F , ∂ F ) → ( D 2 n − 2 , S 2 n − 3 ) is { signature( F ) / 8 σ ( F ) = Kervaire( F ) { Z if n is odd ∈ P 2 n − 2 = L 2 n − 2 ( Z ) = if n is even . Z 2 ◮ Kervaire( F ) = Arf( H n − 1 ( F ; Z 2 ) , q ) is the Arf invariant of the quadratic form q determined by the framing. ◮ The surjection b : P 2 n − 2 → bP 2 n − 2 ; σ ( F ) �→ ∂ F is a precursor of the Wall realization of surgery obstructions. ◮ The groups bP 2 n − 2 are cyclic finite.

  7. 7 The bounding odd-dimensional homotopy spheres II. ◮ bP 4 m is cyclic of order σ m / 8 with σ m = ϵ m 2 2 m − 2 (2 2 m − 1 − 1)numerator( B m / 4 m ) where B m is the m th Bernoulli number, and ϵ m = 2 or 1, according as to whether m is odd or even. ◮ bP 8 = Z 28 , generated by one of the Milnor 1956 examples. ◮   0 if there exists a framed  = bP 4 m +2 (4 m + 2)-dimensional manifold   otherwise Z 2 { 0 for m = 0 , 1 , 3 , 7 , 15 = for m ̸ = 0 , 1 , 3 , 7 , 15 , 31 . Z 2 ◮ bP 126 = Z 2 or 0.

  8. 8 The Brieskorn-Hirzebruch-Pham-Milnor construction ◮ For any a = ( a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n ) with a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a n � 2 the map P a : C n → C ; ( z 1 , z 2 , . . . , z n ) �→ z a 1 1 + z a 2 2 + · · · + z a n n has an isolated singularity at a (0) = complex hypersurface ⊂ C n . (0 , 0 , . . . , 0) ∈ P − 1 ◮ The ‘(star,link)’-pair of the singularity is a framed (2 n − 2)-dimensional manifold with boundary ( F , ∂ F ) ⊂ C n constructed near the singular point. The complexity of the singularity is measured by the differential topology of ( F , ∂ F ). ◮ A Brieskorn sphere is a link ∂ F = Σ 2 n − 3 which happens to be a homotopy (2 n − 3)-sphere, necessarily bounding. ◮ Σ 2 n − 3 can be exotic.

  9. 9 The hypersurface Ξ a ( t ) ◮ Terminology of Brieskorn (1966) ◮ For t ∈ C define the hypersurface = P − 1 Ξ a ( t ) a ( t ) = { ( z 1 , z 2 , . . . , z n ) ∈ C n | z a 1 1 + z a 1 1 + · · · + z a n n = t } ⊂ C n ◮ Ξ a ( t ) is non-compact if n � 2. ◮ For t ̸ = 0 Ξ a ( t ) is nonsingular, an open (2 n − 2)-dimensional manifold, with a diffeomorphism Ξ a ( t ) ∼ = Ξ a (1) . ◮ Write Ξ a (1) = Ξ a .

  10. 10 The star F a and link Σ a of the singular point (0 , 0 , . . . , 0) ∈ Ξ a (0) ◮ Ξ a (0) has an isolated singularity at (0 , 0 , . . . , 0), with Ξ a (0) \{ (0 , 0 , . . . , 0) } an open (2 n − 2)-dimensional manifold ◮ For t ̸ = 0 the star of the singularity is the compact framed (2 n − 2)-dimensional manifold F a ( t ) = Ξ a ( t ) ∩ D 2 n ⊂ D 2 n . ( F a ( t ) denoted M a ( t ) by Brieskorn). ◮ The link of the singularity is Σ a ( t ) = ∂ F a ( t ) = Ξ a ( t ) ∩ S 2 n − 1 ⊂ S 2 n − 1 ◮ For t ̸ = 0 with | t | sufficiently small the (star, link) pair is independent of t , and written ( F a ( t ) , Σ a ( t )) = ( F a , Σ a ) , with a diffeomorphism F a \ ∂ F a ∼ = Ξ a .

  11. 11 The Milnor fibration ◮ The codimension 2 submanifold ( F a , Σ a ) ⊂ ( D 2 n , S 2 n − 1 ) is framed, i.e. extends to an embedding ( F a , Σ a ) × D 2 ⊂ ( D 2 n , S 2 n − 1 ) . ◮ Define the (2 n − 1)-dimensional manifold with boundary ( E a , ∂ E a ) = (cl.( S 2 n − 1 \ Σ a × D 2 ) , Σ a × S 1 ) . ◮ The Milnor fibration map z a 1 1 + z a 2 2 + · · · + z a n p : E a → S 1 ; ( z 1 , z 2 , . . . , z n ) �→ n ∥ z a 1 1 + z a 2 2 + · · · + z a n n ∥ is the projection of a fibre bundle with fibre p − 1 (1) = F a . ◮ The monodromy automorphism h : F a → F a is such that E a = F a × I / { ( x , 0) ∼ ( h ( x ) , 1) | x ∈ F a } with p : E a → S 1 ; [ x , θ ] �→ e 2 π i θ and h | = id. : ∂ F a = Σ a → Σ a , p | = proj. : ∂ E a = Σ a × S 1 → S 1 .

  12. 12 The join ◮ The join of topological spaces A , B is the space A ∗ B = ( A × I × B ) / { ( a 1 , 0 , b ) ∼ ( a 2 , 0 , b ) , ( a , 0 , b 1 ) ∼ ( a , 0 , b 2 ) } for all a , a 1 , a 2 ∈ A , b , b 1 , b 2 ∈ B . ◮ If the reduced homology groups ˜ H ∗ ( A ), ˜ H ∗ ( B ) are without torsion then ∑ ˜ H i ( A ) ⊗ ˜ ˜ H r +1 ( A ∗ B ) = H j ( B ) . i + j = r ◮ If A is non-empty, and B is path-connected, then A ∗ B is simply-connected. ◮ The join is associative, with a homeomorphism ( A ∗ B ) ∗ C ∼ = A ∗ ( B ∗ C ) .

  13. 13 The algebraic and differential topology of ( F a , Σ a ) I. ◮ Pham, Brieskorn, Hirzebruch and Milnor determined the algebraic and differential topology of ( F a , Σ a ), in particular the conditions under which Σ a is a homotopy sphere, and determined the differentiable structure. ◮ The subspace of Ξ a = { ( z 1 , . . . , z n ) ∈ Ξ a | z a j Ξ real is real for j = 1 , 2 , . . . , n } a j has the following properties. ◮ Ξ real is a compact deformation retract of Ξ a = F a \ Σ a . a ◮ Ξ real = G 1 ∗ G 2 ∗ · · · ∗ G n is the join of the cyclic groups a G j = Z a j of order a j , regarded as discrete spaces with a j elements. ◮ Ξ real is ( n − 2)-connected, with homotopy equivalences a ≃ Ξ a ≃ F a ≃ S n − 1 ∨ S n − 1 ∨ ... ∨ S n − 1 Ξ real a involving µ = ( a 1 − 1)( a 2 − 1) . . . ( a n − 1) copies of S n − 1 . µ is called the Milnor number , with H n − 1 ( F a ) = Z µ .

  14. 14 The algebraic and differential topology of ( F a , Σ a ) II. ◮ The characteristic polynomial of the monodromy automorphism h ∗ : H n − 1 ( F a ) → H n − 1 ( F a ) is ∆ a ( z ) = det( z − h ∗ : H n − 1 ( F a )[ z ] → H n − 1 ( F a )[ z ]) ∏ n ∏ ( z − ω i 1 1 ω i 2 2 . . . ω i n = n ) ∈ Z [ z ] k =1 0 < i k < a k with ω j = e 2 π i / a j ∈ S 1 . ◮ For n � 4 Σ a is ( n − 3)-connected, with exact sequence 0 → H n − 1 (Σ a ) → H n − 1 ( F a ) 1 − h ∗ � H n − 1 ( F a ) → H n − 2 (Σ a ) → 0 . Thus Σ a is a homotopy (2 n − 3)-sphere if and only if ∆ a (1) = 1 ∈ Z .

  15. 15 The Kervaire invariants of Brieskorn (4 m + 1) -spheres ◮ J. Levine, Polynomial invariants of codimension two , Annals of Maths. 84, 537–554 (1966) ◮ For m � 1 let a = ( a 1 , a 2 , . . . , a 2 m +2 ) be such that Σ a is a homotopy (4 m + 1)-sphere. The Kervaire invariant of F a in L 4 m +2 ( Z ) = { 0 , 1 } is σ ( F a ) = Arf( H 2 m +1 ( F a ; Z 2 ) , q ) { 0 if ∆ a ( − 1) ≡ ± 1 mod 8 = 1 if ∆ a ( − 1) ≡ ± 3 mod 8

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend