an examination of the impact of mixed variable fixed non
play

An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1


  1. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University

  2. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Non-Content-Based Content-Based Invalid Responding Invalid Responding F, Fp, Fs, Unscorable Overreporting CNS FBS, RBS Responding Variable L, K VRIN Underreporting Responding Fixed True Fixed False TRIN Responding Responding Ben-Porath (2013)

  3. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Non-Content-Based Content-Based Invalid Responding Invalid Responding F, Fp, Fs, Unscorable Overreporting CNS FBS, RBS Responding Variable L, K VRIN Underreporting Responding Mixed Inconsistent Responding CRIN Fixed True Fixed False TRIN Responding Responding Ben-Porath (2013) Ben-Porath & Tellegen (2020)

  4. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Burchett et al. (2016); Dragon, Ben-Porath, & Handel (2012); Handel, Ben-Porath, Tellegen, & Archer (2010); Lemaster, Whitney, Burchett, & Lee (2019); Whitney et al. (2018a, 2018b)

  5. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Research Questions: 1. How does mixed inconsistent responding affect MMPI-3 Validity Scales? 2. Do VRIN, TRIN, and CRIN reduce the likelihood of misinterpreting overreporting and underreporting Validity Scale elevations caused by mixed inconsistent responding (“false feigning”)?

  6. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University n = 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 166 ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0% CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

  7. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University n = 0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% 60% 70% 80% 90% 100% 166 ACR10: ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR ACR A (Acquiescent): 10% of Items #1-112 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 replaced with TRUE responses ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC ARC 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 C (Counter-Acquiescent): 10% of Items # 113-224 replaced with FALSE responses CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR CAR 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 0% R (Random): 10% of Items # 225-335 CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA CRA replaced with either TRUE or FALSE responses 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC RAC 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA RCA 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100

  8. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Mean Scores with 0 to 100% Mixed Inconsistent Responding CRIN VRIN TRIN 120T 40T 0% 100%

  9. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Fp ≥ 100 F ≥ 100 Fs ≥ 100 RBS ≥ 90

  10. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Fp ≥ 100 F ≥ 100 Fs ≥ 100 RBS ≥ 90

  11. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Fp ≥ 100

  12. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Fp ≥ 100

  13. An Examination of the Impact of Mixed Variable & Fixed Non-Content-Based Invalid Responding on the MMPI-3 Validity Scales Maddie Cardellio 1 , Amanda N. Hansen 1 , Akshata Melanahalli 1 , Danielle Burchett 1 , & Yossef S. Ben-Porath 2 1 California State University, Monterey Bay • 2 Kent State University Fp ≥ 100

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend