Albert-Lszl Barabsi With Emma K. Towlson, Sebastian Ruf, Michael - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

albert l szl barab si
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

Albert-Lszl Barabsi With Emma K. Towlson, Sebastian Ruf, Michael - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

Network Science Class 6: Evolving Networks Albert-Lszl Barabsi With Emma K. Towlson, Sebastian Ruf, Michael Danziger, and Louis Shekhtman www.BarabasiLab.com Section 6.4 Bose-Einstein condensation MAPPING TO A QUANTUM GAS h k


slide-1
SLIDE 1

Network Science Class 6: Evolving Networks

Albert-László Barabási

With

Emma K. Towlson, Sebastian Ruf, Michael Danziger, and Louis Shekhtman

www.BarabasiLab.com

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Bose-Einstein condensation

Section 6.4

slide-3
SLIDE 3
  • G. Bianconi and A.-L. Barabási, Physical Review Letters 2001; cond-mat/0011029

Network Bose gas

Fitness η  Energy level ε New node with fitness η  New energy level ε Link pointing to node η  Particle at level ε Network  quantum gas

Network Science: Evolving Network Models

MAPPING TO A QUANTUM GAS

j j j i i i

k k h h   

h ) (h

in

k

) (h r

b

  • e

) ( n

) ( g

slide-4
SLIDE 4

f()=e-b(-m) .

The dynamic exponent f(e) depends on m, determined by the self-consistent equation:

Network Science: Evolving Network Models

BOSE-EINSTEIN CONDENSATION

) (

) , , (

i

f i i i

t t m t t k

         

. 1 1 1 ) ( ) , (

) (

  •  ò
  • m

 b

  m b e p d I

1 1 ) (

) (

  • m

 b

 e n

¶k i(t, ti,i) ¶t  m e-b i k i(t,ti,i) e-b j k j(t,t j, j)

j

å

.

ò

1 ) ( ) (    n g d

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Section 4 Bose-Einstein Condensation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Section 4 Bose-Einstein Condensation

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Bianconi & Barabási, Physical Review Letters 2001; Europhys. Lett. 2001.

Network Science: Evolving Network Models

Bose-Einstein Condensation

slide-8
SLIDE 8

FITNESS MODEL: Bose-Einstein Condensation

Bianconi & Barabási, Physical Review Letters 2001; Europhys. Lett. 2001.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Evolving Networks

Section 6.5

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Section 6.5 Limitations

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Section 5 INITIAL ATTRACTIVENESS

Increases the degree exponent. Generates a small-degree cutoff.

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Section 5 INTERNAL LINKS

Double preferential attachment (A=0). Random attachment (B=0).

Π(k ,k ')∼(A+Bk)(A+Bk ')

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Section 5 NODE DELETION

  • Start with the Barabási-Albert model.
  • In each time step:
  • add a new node with m links
  • remove r nodes (in average).

r < 1: Scale-free phase r = 1: Exponential phase r > 1: Declining network

slide-14
SLIDE 14

Section 5 NODE DELETION

  • Start with the Initial Attractiveness model:
  • In each time step:
  • add a new node with m links
  • remove r nodes (in average).
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Section 5 The Impossibility of Node deletion

Jan Hendrik Schỏn

slide-16
SLIDE 16

Section 5 Declining Fashion: New York

slide-17
SLIDE 17

Section 5 Declining Fashion

slide-18
SLIDE 18

Section 5 Accelerated growth

we assumed that L = k N, where k is ⟨ ⟩ ⟨ ⟩ independent of time or N.

  • the average degree of the Internet

increased from 3.42 (Nov. 1997) to 3.96 (Dec. 1998);

  • the WWW increased its average degree

from 7.22 to 7.86 during five months;

  • in metabolic networks the average degree
  • f the metabolites grows approximately

linearly with the number of metabolites [33].

slide-19
SLIDE 19

Section 5 Aging ν<0: new nodes attach to older nodes  enhances the role of preferential attachment. ν→ −∞ each new node will only connect to the oldest node  hub-and-spoke topology (Fig 6.10a). ν>0: new nodes attach to younger nodes ν→ +∞: each node will connect to its immediate predecessor (Fig. 6.10a).

slide-20
SLIDE 20

Section 5

slide-21
SLIDE 21

Summary

Section 5

slide-22
SLIDE 22

Section 6 summary : Topological Diversity

SECTION 4.11

slide-23
SLIDE 23

Section 6 summary : Topological Diversity

slide-24
SLIDE 24

Section 6 summary : Topological Diversity

slide-25
SLIDE 25

Section 6 summary

slide-26
SLIDE 26

1. There is no universal exponent characterizing all networks. 2. Growth and preferential attachment are responsible for the emergence

  • f the scale-free property.

3. The origins of the preferential attachment are system-dependent. 4. Modeling real networks:

  • identify the low-level processes in the system
  • measure their frequency from real data
  • develop dynamical models to capture these processes.
  • 5. If the model is correct, it should correctly predict not only the degree

exponent, but both small and large k-cutoffs.

Network Science: Evolving Network Models

LESSONS LEARNED: evolving network models

slide-27
SLIDE 27

The end

Network Science: Evolving Network Models