AIRS DATA ASSIMILATION WORKSHOP JOEL SUSSKIND NASA/GSFC 06 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

airs data assimilation workshop joel susskind nasa gsfc
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

AIRS DATA ASSIMILATION WORKSHOP JOEL SUSSKIND NASA/GSFC 06 - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AIRS DATA ASSIMILATION WORKSHOP JOEL SUSSKIND NASA/GSFC 06 November 2001 CLEAR COLUMN RADIANCE ERRORS CLEAR COLUMN RADIANCES R i ARE THE RADIANCES WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN OBSERVED IF NO CLOUDS WERE PRESENT R i ARE RECONSTRUCTED FROM


slide-1
SLIDE 1

AIRS DATA ASSIMILATION WORKSHOP JOEL SUSSKIND NASA/GSFC 06 November 2001

slide-2
SLIDE 2

CLEAR COLUMN RADIANCE ERRORS

CLEAR COLUMN RADIANCES ˆ R

i ARE THE RADIANCES WHICH WOULD HAVE BEEN

OBSERVED IF NO CLOUDS WERE PRESENT ˆ R

i ARE RECONSTRUCTED FROM OBSERVED RADIANCES IN ADJACENT FIELDS OF

VIEW AIRS TEAM GEOPHYSICAL PARAMETER RETRIEVALS USE ˆ R

i

RADIANCE ASSIMILATION CAN USE ˆ R

i AS WELL

ˆ R

i IS AN AIRS TEAM PRODUCT, ALONG WITH ITS UNCERTAINTY dˆ

R

i

WILL SHOW ERRORS FOR “CLEAR” CASES “NEAR CLEAR” CASES EASY CLOUD CONDITIONS ALL CLOUD CONDITIONS ALL RESULTS SHOWN ARE FOR JANUARY 2001 VERSION OF THE DECEMBER 15, 2000 DATA SET AND RUN AT GSFC

slide-3
SLIDE 3

CLOUD CLEARING

RI,J = 1- aJK

K

Â Ê Ë Á ˆ ¯ ˜ RI,CLR + aJKRI,CLDK

K

 CHANNEL I, FIELD OF VIEW J, CLOUD FRACTION aJK WE USE OBSERVATIONS IN 9 FIELDS OF VIEW TO OBTAIN ˆ R

I

ˆ R

I = R I +

hJ

J=1 9

 R

I - RI,J

( ) = R

i +

hJDRI,J

J=1 9

 R

I = AVERAGE RADIANCE IN 9 SPOTS

UNCONSTRAINED SOLUTION h= D ¢ R N-1DR

( )

  • 1

D ¢ R N-1 DRCLR N = CHANNEL NOISE COVARIANCE MATRIX DRCLR = RCLR,I - R

I

RCLR,I IS THE ESTIMATED CLEAR COLUMN RADIANCE COMPUTED FROM A STATE THAT AGREES WITH AMSU RADIANCES

slide-4
SLIDE 4

DETERMINATION OF NUMBER OF CLOUD FORMATIONS

DIAGONALIZE D ¢ R N-1DR BY THE TRANSFORMATION U EQUIVALENT TO SELECTION OF NEW FIELDS OF VIEW DRT = UDR DETERMINE ONE CLOUD FORMATION FOR EACH SIGNIFICANT EIGENVALUE lK FOR kmax SIGNIFICANT EIGENVALUES ˆ R

I = R I +

zK

K=1 k max

 DRI,K

T

WHERE zK = lK-1 DR ¢

T N-1 DRCLR

( )K,1

IF NO SIGNIFICANT EIGENVALUES EXIST ˆ R

I = R I

dˆ R

I =1/ 3NEDNI FOR ALL CHANNELS

ABOVE IS ALSO TRUE FOR CHANNELS THAT DO NOT SEE CLOUDS (CASE DEPENDENT) dˆ R

I TELLS WHEN NO CLOUD CORRECTION HAS BEEN MADE

EFFECTS OF CLOUDS ON CHANNEL NOISE

slide-5
SLIDE 5

ˆ R

I = R i +

hJ R

I - RI,J

( )

J=1 9

 WHERE h= Uz IF ALL hJ ARE PERFECT NEDNI(h) = NEDNI 1 9 1+ h ¢

J ¢ J =1 9

Â Ê Ë Á ˆ ¯ ˜ - hJ Ê Ë Á Á ˆ ¯ ˜ ˜

2 J=1 9

Â È Î Í Í ˘ ˚ ˙ ˙

1/2

= NEDNI A(hJ) A(hJ) IS CALLED THE NOISE AMPLIFICATION FACTOR A(hJ) = 1/3 IF ALL hJ=0 A(hJ) CAN GET LARGE. WE CURRENTLY REJECT RETRIEVALS IF A(hJ) > 3 THE RADIANCE ERRORS ARE UNCORRELATED FROM CHANNEL TO CHANNEL CHANNEL CORRELATED ERRORS ERRORS IN hJ CONTRIBUTE TO CORRELATED ERRORS IN ˆ R

I

CORRELATED ERRORS ARE MODELLED AND INCLUDED IN dˆ R

I

slide-6
SLIDE 6

“CLEAR” AND “NEAR CLEAR” CASES

“CLEAR” 1) WE LOOK AT EIGENVALUES OF D ¢ R N-1DR CALL CASE CLOUDY IF lMAX >lTHRESHOLD lTHRESHOLD = 80 FOR OCEAN, AND 200 FOR LAND ALLOWS FOR MORE SCENE VARIABILITY OVER LAND BECAUSE OF MORE SURFACE VARIABILITY 2) WE ALSO LOOK AT CORRECTION TO CLOUD CLEARED WINDOW RADIANCES DBT = AVERAGE VALUE OF ˆ Q

I - Q I FOR CHANNELS BETWEEN 800 cm-1

AND 900 cm-1 WHERE Q IS BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE CALL CASE CLOUDY IF DBT > 0.1K IF NEITHER, CALL CASE “CLEAR” “NEAR CLEAR” CALL CASE “NEAR CLEAR” IF DBT <1K REGARDLESS OF EIGENVALUES

slide-7
SLIDE 7

EASY CLOUD CASES

CLOUD CASES ARE EASIER TO HANDLE IF ONLY ONE CLOUD FORMATION EXISTS ˆ R

I = R I +

zKDRI,K

T K=1 k max

 HIGHER ORDER CLOUD FORMATIONS CONTRIBUTE zKDRI,K

T K=2 kmax

 TO ˆ R

I

WE SAY THE CLOUD CASE IS EASY IF HIGHER ORDER CLOUD FORMATIONS CONTRIBUTE LESS THAN 0.2K TO DBT AND DBT < 20

slide-8
SLIDE 8

CLEAR COLUMN BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE STATISTICS

THE FOLLOWING PLOTS SHOW MEAN AND RMS VALUES OF THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE ACTUAL CLEAR COLUMN BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE AND THE AVERAGE OBSERVED BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE IN THE SCENE (THE CLOUD CORRECTION NEEDED) THE CLOUD CORRECTION MADE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN THE CLOUD CORRECTION NEEDED AND THE CLOUD CORRECTION MADE ALSO SHOWN ON RMS IS THE SINGLE SPOT CHANNEL NOISE All results are based on Version 2.2.5.aa global simulation of AIRS radiances for 15 December 2000.

slide-9
SLIDE 9

CLEAR COLUMN BRIGHTNESS TEMPERATURE ERRORS

CLEAR CASES BIASES WORST BIASES OF CLEAR COLUMN RADIANCES IN WINDOWS ª 0.2K 0.2K CORRECTION NEEDED, NO CORRECTION MADE ON AVERAGE RMS ERRORS MOST SOUNDING CHANNELS HAVE LOWER ERRORS THAN SINGLE SPOT NOISE NEARLY CLEAR CASES BIASES WORST BIASES ARE ABOUT 0.3K IN WINDOWS 0.4K CORRECTION NEEDED ON AVERAGE RMS ERRORS MOST SOUNDING CHANNELS HAVE LOWER ERRORS THAN SINGLE SPOT NOISE

slide-10
SLIDE 10

EASY CLOUD CASES BIASES WORST BIASES ARE ABOUT 0.3K IN WINDOWS 5K CORRECTION NEEDED ON AVERAGE RMS ERRORS MOST TEMPERATURE SOUNDING CHANNELS HAVE LOWER OR SIMILAR ERRORS COMPARED TO SINGLE SPOT NOISE ALL CASES BIASES WORST BIASES ARE ABOUT 0.4K 11K CORRECTION NEEDED ON AVERAGE RMS ERRORS MOST TEMPERATURE SOUNDING CHANNELS HAVE ERRORS COMPARABLE OR SLIGHTLY WORSE THAN SINGLE SPOT NOISE

slide-11
SLIDE 11

CLEAR CASES

slide-12
SLIDE 12

CLEAR CASES

slide-13
SLIDE 13

NEARLY CLEAR CASES

slide-14
SLIDE 14

NEARLY CLEAR CASES

slide-15
SLIDE 15

EASY CLOUD CASES

slide-16
SLIDE 16

EASY CLOUD CASES

slide-17
SLIDE 17

ALL ACCEPTED CASES

slide-18
SLIDE 18

ALL ACCEPTED CASES

slide-19
SLIDE 19

ALL ACCEPTED CASES

slide-20
SLIDE 20

ALL ACCEPTED CASES

slide-21
SLIDE 21
slide-22
SLIDE 22
slide-23
SLIDE 23
slide-24
SLIDE 24
slide-25
SLIDE 25
slide-26
SLIDE 26
slide-27
SLIDE 27

SUMMARY

RECONSTRUCTED CLEAR COLUMN RADIANCES SHOULD BE USEFUL FOR DATA ASSIMILATION RADIANCE ERRORS ARE COMPARABLE TO SINGLE SPOT NOISE FOR SOME TEMPERATURE SOUNDING CHANNELS UNDER ALL CLOUD CONDITIONS FOR MOST TEMPERATURE SOUNDING CHANNELS UNDER MOST CLOUD CONDITIONS TEMPERATURE SOUNDINGS ARE ACCURATE UNDER ALL CONDITIONS DEGRADE SLIGHTLY IN TROPOSPHERE WITH INCREASING CLOUD COVER, CLOUD COMPLEXITY WATER VAPOR SOUNDINGS DO NOT DEGRADE WITH INCREASING CLOUD COVER