AIB Annual Me e ting, Minne apolis, June 27, 2018 do As a - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

AIB Annual Me e ting, Minne apolis, June 27, 2018

do

 As a professional organization with the pursuit of knowledge and education

as its primary aims, AIB must ensure trust and confidence in its membership through self-regulation that is consistent with scientific integrity and universally recognized ethical norms.

 AIB must also ensure that its members are treated ethically in the context of

AIB matters, activities, and structures.

 The AIB Code is grounded on the following assumptions:  Scholarly integrity is the cornerstone of impactful research, and a

necessary condition for the advancement of knowledge.

 Respect for persons is the cornerstone of internationally recognized

ethical norms such as the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the International Labor Organization standards.

 Self-regulation can only take place with clearly articulated standards,

procedures, and consequences for misconduct.

3

 June 2016, L

• rra ine E

de n (T e xa s A&M) ta ske d b y the AI B E xe c utive Bo a rd to de ve lo p a Co de o f E thic s fo r AI B me mb e rs

 June -De c 2016, ma te ria ls a nd a dvic e c o lle c te d  Ja nua ry 2017, first dra ft sub mitte d to the Bo a rd  Ja n-De c 2017, fe e db a c k inc o rpo ra te d, multiple re visio ns  Ja n 2018, se c o nd dra ft sub mitte d to Bo a rd  F

e b 2018, re vise d dra ft c irc ula te d to AI B F e llo ws, Cha pte r Cha irs, a nd o the r se le c te d individua ls fo r c o mme nt; fe e db a c k sub se q ue ntly inc o rpo ra te d

 Ma rc h 2018, re vise d dra ft c irc ula te d to AI

B g e ne ra l me mb e rship fo r c o mme nt; fe e db a c k sub se q ue ntly inc o rpo ra te d

 April 2018, re vise d dra ft sub mitte d to la w firm F

• ste r, Swift, Co llins

a nd Smith PC fo r le g a l a dvic e

 June 2018, dra ft re vise d b a se d o n le g a l fe e db a c k a nd c irc ula te d

fo r c o mme nt to re le va nt g ro ups

 June 24, 2018, fina l do c ume nt a ppro ve d b y AI

B E xe c utive Bo a rd 4

do

 T

he AI B Co de o f E thic s (the “Co de ”) o utline s

e thic al standar ds of pr

• fe ssional c onduc t and

pr

• c e dur

e s for handling violations of those standar ds.

 T

he Co de a pplie s to AIB me mbe r

s and e mploye e s, a nd to matte r s, ac tivitie s, and str uc tur e s of the AIB (e .g ., AI

B Se c re ta ria t, E xe c utive Bo a rd, Cha pte rs, Co mmitte e s, Co nfe re nc e s, a nd Pub lic a tio ns).

 T

he Co de sho uld b e re a d to g e the r with AI B’ s

Mission, Vision and Value s State me nt (adopte d by AIB Boar d, June 24, 2018).

6

MISSION AIB’S F UNDAME NT AL PURPOSE – WHAT WE DO

 We c re a te , nurture , a nd e mpo we r a g lo b a l c o mmunity o f

sc ho la rs fo c use d o n c re a ting , a dva nc ing , a nd disse mina ting kno wle dg e in inte rna tio na l b usine ss re se a rc h, e duc a tio n, po lic y, a nd pra c tic e .



VISION AIB’S L ONG-T E RM GOAL – WHE RE WE WANT T O GO

 T

• c o ntrib ute to a mo re pro spe ro us, just, a nd susta ina b le

wo rld b y fo ste ring a g lo b a l, c o lla b o ra tive c o mmunity o f inte rna tio na l b usine ss sc ho la rs, e duc a to rs, a nd de c isio n- ma ke rs.



7

Inte r na tiona liza tion: We b e lie ve in pro mo ting o pe nne ss in b o rd e rs, id e a s, a nd c ulture s.

K no wle d g e a nd a wa re ne ss o f g lo b a l, re g io na l, c ro ss-b o rd e r, a nd c ro ss-c ultura l issue s c a n b e b e st a c hie ve d thro ug h a c tive ly fo ste ring inte rna tio na l c o lla b o ra tio ns, o pe n- mind e d ne ss, a nd g lo b a l und e rsta nd ing .

E xc e lle nc e: We pursue the hig he st po ssib le pro fe ssio na l a nd sc ie ntific sta nd a rd s in o ur

re se a rc h, e d uc a tio n, a nd pro fe ssio na l live s, inc lud ing a n unwa ve ring c o mmitme nt to tra nspa re nc y, ve rifia b ility, rig o r, a nd re le va nc e in o ur re se a rc h. We a re d e d ic a te d to nurturing the c re a tio n, a d va nc e me nt, a nd d isse mina tio n o f sta te -o f-the -a rt kno wle d g e .

Inte lle c tua l fr e e dom: We a re c o mmitte d to fre e d o m o f inq uiry a nd e xpre ssio n in o ur

re se a rc h, e d uc a tio n, a nd pro fe ssio na l live s. We b e lie ve in fre e e xpre ssio n a nd e xc ha ng e

• f id e a s a nd e vid e nc e -b a se d re c o mme nd a tio ns, inc lud ing the rig ht to se e k, re c e ive ,

a nd sha re kno wle d g e re g a rd le ss o f b o und a rie s.

Inte g r ity: We b e lie ve in pra c tic ing the hig he st e thic a l princ iple s in o ur re se a rc h,

e d uc a tio n, a nd pro fe ssio na l live s. We a c t with ho ne sty, inte g rity, a nd pro fe ssio na lism. We ho ld o urse lve s a c c o unta b le fo r o ur a c tio ns a nd ina c tio ns.

Inc lusive ne ss: We a c tive ly pro mo te e q ua l o ppo rtunity, tre a tme nt, a nd a c c e ss fo r a ll. We

c e le b ra te a nd va lue d ive rsity a nd strive to e nsure tha t a ll vo ic e s a re he a rd .

Impa c t: We se e k to ma ke the wo rld a b e tte r pla c e b y b e ing re spo nsib le , re le va nt, a nd

fo rwa rd lo o king in o ur re se a rc h, e d uc a tio n, a nd pro fe ssio na l a c tivitie s. We b e lie ve b o th sc ie nc e a nd e d uc a tio n sho uld b e in the se rvic e o f so c ie ty. We le a d b y tra nsc e nd ing the b o und a rie s o f a c a d e mic d isc ipline s a nd ma na g e ria l func tio ns.

8

 AIB me mbe rs must formally ac knowle dge and agre e to

adhe re to the AIB Code of E thic s whe n the y first join the AIB and whe n the y re ne w the ir me mbe rship.

 Ac knowle dge me nt me ans that AIB me mbe rs must:

a .

K no w a nd a dhe re to the Co de in the ir o wn b e ha vio r with re spe c t to AI B ma tte rs, a c tivitie s, a nd struc ture s.

b .

Wo rk a c tive ly to pro mo te the Co de thro ug ho ut the AI B.

c .

Ask q ue stio ns if the y a re in do ub t a b o ut ho w to a pply the Co de .

d.

If the y pe rso na lly o b se rve a vio la tio n o f the Co de , re po rt the vio la tio n using the re so urc e s liste d in the Co de .

e .

Co o pe ra te with a ll inve stig a tio ns a nd a udits with re spe c t to the Co de .

f.

Unde rsta nd tha t se rio us disc iplina ry sa nc tio ns (up to a nd inc luding pub lic re prima nd o r c e nsure ) c a n re sult fro m a fa ilure to c o mply with the Co de .

9

a . Co mpe te nc e a nd E

xpe rtise : Adhe re nc e to the hig he st pro fe ssio na l sta nda rds in re se a rc h, e duc a tio n a nd se rvic e .

b . Pro fe ssio na l Ac tivitie s: Re spe c t fo r c ivil a nd huma n rig hts a s

• utline d in UN Huma n Rig hts Co nve ntio ns.

c .

Co nflic ts o f I nte re st: Avo ida nc e a nd de c la ra tio n o f a c tua l

• r po te ntia l c o nflic ts o f inte re st.
• d. Pub lic Co mmunic a tio n: Adhe re nc e to the hig he st

sta nda rds in pub lic c o mmunic a tio ns a b o ut o ne ’ s re se a rc h, te a c hing a nd pro fe ssio na l a c tivitie s

e . Re se a rc h a nd Pub lic a tio n: Adhe re nc e to the hig he st

pro fe ssio na l sta nda rds in re se a rc h a nd pub lic a tio n.

f.

T e a c hing a nd E duc a tio n: Adhe re nc e to the hig he st pro fe ssio na l sta nda rds in te a c hing , me nto ring a nd e va lua tio n.

10

E xe c utive Boar d: Ultima te ly re spo nsib le fo r

inte rpre ta tio n, a pplic a tio n, a nd e nfo rc e me nt

• f a ll AI

B c o de s o f e thic s.

Standing Committe e s:

 E

thic s Polic y Committe e (E

PC): Re spo nsib le fo r imple me nta tio n, inte rpre ta tio n, a dvic e , c o mmunic a tio n, re vie w a nd upda ting o f the e thic s c o de s.

 E

thic s Re vie w Committe e (E

RC): Re spo nsib le fo r dispute re so lutio n a nd e nfo rc e me nt o f the c o de s.

11

E thic s Polic y Committe e (E PC): re spo nsib le fo r

imple me nta tio n, inte rpre ta tio n, a dvic e , c o mmunic a tio n, re vie w a nd upda ting o f the e thic s c o de s.

12

Me mbe r s

• De nis Arno ld (UNC Cha rlo tte ) (Cha ir)
• JT

L i (Ho ng K

• ng UST

)

• Anne T

sui (No tre Da me )

• Ro sa lie T

ung (Simo n F ra se r)

• Ala in Ve rb e ke (Ca lg a ry)
• E

x Offic io

• AI

B Ma na g ing Dire c to r

• AI

B Pre side nt o r De le g a te

 T

he thre e AI B e thic s c o de s a re de sig ne d to b e c o mple me nta ry, e a c h fo c use d o n a diffe re nt issue a re a (me mb e rs, le a de rs, jo urna ls).

 T

he Code of E thic s for the AIB L e a de rship a pplie s to individua ls in le a de rship role s within the AIB.

 T

he AIB Journa ls Code of E thic s a pplie s to AIB journa ls.

 T

he AIB Code of E thic s a pplie s to AIB me mbe rs a nd e mploye e s, a nd to AIB ma tte rs, a c tivitie s a nd struc ture s.

 T

he E thic s Po lic y Co mmitte e (E PC) is ta ske d with c o o rdina ting a nd re c o nc iling diffe re nc e s a mo ng the thre e e thic s c o de s.

13

E thic s Re vie w Committe e (E RC):

re spo nsib le fo r dispute re so lutio n a nd e nfo rc e me nt o f the AI B Co de o f E thic s.

Me mbe r s

• Pa ul Va a le r (Minne so ta ) (Cha ir)
• T

a tia na K

• sto va (So uth Ca ro lina )
• Bo do Sc hle g e lmilc h (Vie nna Unive rsity o f

E c o no mic s a nd Busine ss)

• E

x Offic io Me mb e r: AI B Ma na g ing Dire c to r

14

do

E XAMPL E S OF POSSIBL E E T HICS VIOL AT IONS T HAT COUL D T RIGGE R COMPL AINT S (1)

 Re dundanc y (o r “se lf‐pla g ia rism”), e .g ., a utho rs

c re a te multiple pa pe rs tha t a re slig ht va ria tio ns

• n e a c h o the r, whic h a re sub mitte d fo r

pub lic a tio n with diffe re nt jo urna ls, b ut witho ut a c kno wle dg e me nt o f the o the r pa pe rs.

 Autho rs nominate individuals as r

e vie we r s who

ha ve a lre a dy re a d a nd pro vide d c o mme nts o n the ma nusc ript.

 A se nior

sc holar pr e ssur e s junior c olle ague s o r

a dvise e s to b e a dde d to a pa pe r a s a c o - a utho r o r to b e liste d a s the le a d a utho r.

E XAMPL E S (2)

An a dvisor ste a ls the ide a s in a stude nt’ s

pa pe r a nd pub lishe s a pa pe r using tho se ide a s unde r the a dviso r’ s na me . T he stude nt finds the pub lic a tio n a nd re a lize s it’ s he r wo rk a nd no t he r a dviso r’ s.

AI

B me mb e rs ma inta in a n online dig ita l

pre se nc e tha t is hig hly ina c c ura te – a nd

typic a lly infla te s – the ir sc ho la rly a c tivitie s (e .g ., pub lic a tio ns o n Go o g le Sc ho la r).

 An AI

B me mb e r ste als a pa pe r sub mitte d to the ye a rly AI B c o nfe re nc e b y a no the r AI B me mb e r, a nd pub lishe s this pie c e in a jo urna l unde r his/ he r o wn na me .

 An a utho r who ha s ha d his/ he r pa pe r

re je c te d b y JI BS c o me s up with alte r

native fac ts a s to the re vie wing pro c e ss, a nd

a tte mpts to disc re dit me mb e rs o f the JI BS e dito ria l te a m.

 An a utho r sub mits a pa pe r to JI

BS with

statistic al table s and r e sults tha t a re a n inc or r e c t r e fle c tion of r e ality (Ulric h

L ic hte ntha le r syndro me ; 16 re tra c tio ns).

E XAMPL E S (3)

do

 F

air and just pr

• c e dur

e s: T

he pro c e ss will fo llo w b e st pra c tic e s inc luding c o nfide ntia lity, due pro c e ss, fa ir tre a tme nt, pre sumptio n o f inno c e nc e , a nd whistle b lo we r pro te c tio n.

 Re por

ting E thic al Violations: AI

B me mb e rs a re e xpe c te d to re po rt e thic a l vio la tio ns o f the AI B Co de o f E thic s to the E RC.

 Jur

isdic tion: T

he E RC ha s a fiduc ia ry duty o f c a re a nd lo ya lty to AI

• B. E

RC c a n re fuse to ha ndle a n e thic a l c o mpla int if it is (1) ta ng e ntia l o r no t ma te ria l to AI B, (2) no t within the jurisdic tio n o f AI B o r (3) wo uld b e mo re a ppro pria te ly ha ndle d e lse whe re .

20

Char ac te r istic s of E thic al Violations

 L

e ve l of har m to othe r s

 Mino r – ha rm to o the rs o r the pro fe ssio n no t like ly  Ma jo r – like ly to c a use o r ha s c a use d ha rm to o the rs

• r the pro fe ssio n

 E

g re g io us – like ly to c a use o r ha s c a use d sub sta ntia l ha rm to o the rs o r the pro fe ssio n  Visibility to othe r

s: priva te , pub lic

 F

r e que nc y of violation: o ne time , re pe a te d

 Mate r

iality to AIB: no ne , lo w, hig h

 Ignor

anc e of Code: no t a c c e pta b le e xc use

21

Pe naltie s de pe nd on se ve rity of violation and may be c ompounde d. Pe naltie s c an inc lude :

 priva te re prima nd  de nia l o f AI

B privile g e s

 Suspe nsio n o r re vo c a tio n o f AI

B me mb e rship

 pub lic re prima nd o r c e nsure

Proc e ss

• E

RC re c e ive s c o mpla int, de c ide s whe the r to ta ke o n the c a se .

• E

RC inve stig a te s c a se , re c o mme nds de c isio n a nd po ssib le pe na ltie s to the AI B Pre side nt who , a fte r c o nsulta tio n, ma ke s a nd c a rrie s o ut the de c isio n.

• T

he Pre side nt’ s de c isio n c a n b e a ppe a le d to the Bo a rd, b ut

• nly fo r ma te ria l pro c e dura l irre g ula ritie s.
• F
• rma l pro c e dure s to b e de te rmine d a nd po ste d la te r this

ye a r.

22

do

do

25

26

27 Note to Pr e se nte r s

• 1. T

he se slide s c a n b e mixe d a nd ma tc he d b a se d o n the a udie nc e , le ng th o f the pre se nta tio n, e tc . 2. Additio na l slide s with e xa mple s

• f

the c o re c o mpo ne nts in the Co d e o f E thic s fo llo w, whic h c a n b e use d to mo tiva te disc ussio n o r illustra te the c o mpo ne nts.

• 3. I

f yo u do ma ke a ne w slide d e c k, ple a se sa ve it with a ne w na me – b a se d o n whe re yo u pre se nte d , whe n a nd who did the pre se nta tio n (e .g . E de n-AI BSE

• Oc t-2018).

 In e ac h e xample be low, the AIB E

thic s Re vie w Committe e would fir st de te r mine whe the r the c omplaint is handle d by the Committe e and if ye s, pr

• c e e d with an inve stigation, findings

and r e c omme ndation to the AIB Pr e side nt.

1.

An a dviso r ste a ls the ide a s in a stude nt’ s pa pe r a nd pub lishe s a pa pe r using tho se ide a s unde r the a dviso r’ s na me . T he stude nt is a n AI B me mb e r; the a dviso r is no t. T he stude nt finds the pub lic a tio n a nd re a lize s it’ s he r wo rk a nd no t he r a dviso r’ s.

2.

A se le c tio n c o mmitte e c ho o se s o ne pe rso n a s winne r o f a n AI B a wa rd. Whe n the winne r is a nno unc e d, a no the r individua l a lso no mina te d re a lize s tha t the disse rta tio n c ha ir

• f the winne r wa s o n the se le c tio n c o mmitte e .

3.

At a c o nfe re nc e run b y o ne o f the AI B Cha pte rs, a c o nfe re nc e pa rtic ipa nt is physic a lly a ssa ulte d b y a no the r c o nfe re nc e pa rtic ipa nt a fte r the Ga la dinne r e ve nt.

28

1.

Co mpe te nc e a nd E xpe rtise : Adhe re nc e to the hig he st pro fe ssio na l sta nda rds in re se a rc h, e duc a tio n a nd se rvic e .

2.

Pro fe ssio na l Ac tivitie s: Re spe c t fo r c ivil a nd huma n rig hts a s o utline d in UN Huma n Rig hts Co nve ntio ns.

3.

Co nflic ts o f I nte re st: Avo ida nc e a nd de c la ra tio n o f a c tua l

• r po te ntia l c o nflic ts o f inte re st.

4.

Pub lic Co mmunic a tio n: Adhe re nc e to the hig he st sta nda rds in pub lic c o mmunic a tio ns a b o ut o ne ’ s re se a rc h, te a c hing a nd pro fe ssio na l a c tivitie s

5.

Re se a rc h a nd Pub lic a tio n: Adhe re nc e to the hig he st pro fe ssio na l sta nda rds in re se a rc h a nd pub lic a tio n.

6.

T e a c hing a nd E duc a tio n: Adhe re nc e to the hig he st pro fe ssio na l sta nda rds in te a c hing , me nto ring a nd e va lua tio n.

29

30

Co mpe te nc e a nd E xpe rtise : Adhe re nc e to the hig he st pro fe ssio na l sta nda rds in re se a rc h, e duc a tio n a nd se rvic e . E xa mple s o f E thic a l I ssue s

• 1. Suppre ssing
• r hinde ring

the fre e e xpre ssio n a nd e xc ha ng e o f ide a s in pa ne l se ssio ns a t AI B me e ting s a nd c o nfe re nc e s.

• 2. Cla iming e xpe rtise in a sub je c t a re a o utside o f the

b o unda rie s o f the individua l’ s c o mpe te nc e .

• 3. Disc o ve ring

tha t a po litic a l g ro up ha s misuse d

• r

misinte rpre te d the re sults o f a n AI B me mb e r’ s re se a rc h a nd is using tha t misuse o r misre pre se nta tio n to justify a pub lic po lic y.

 Pro fe ssio na l Ac tivitie s: Re spe c t fo r c ivil a nd huma n rig hts a s

• utline d in UN Huma n Rig hts Co nve ntio ns.

 E

xa mple s o f E thic a l I ssue s

1.

Misre pre se nting o ne ’ s a g e , inc o me , jo b sta tus o r lo c a tio n to q ua lify fo r a lo we r le ve l o f AI B due s o r re g istra tio n fe e s, o r fo r a c o nfe re nc e stipe nd.

2.

I na ppro pria te b e ha vio r (e .g ., sta lking , thre a ts, ina ppro pria te to uc hing , o r se xua l c o mme nts, re q ue sting se xua l fa vo rs in e xc ha ng e fo r pro fe ssio na l a dva nc e me nt).

3.

Se nding e ma ils a sking individua ls to vo te fo r a pe rso n fo r a n AI B le a de rship po sitio n is pro hib ite d unde r AI B Po lic ie s a nd wo uld the re fo re b e a vio la tio n o f the AI B Co de o f E thic s.

4.

Se le c ting the ve nue fo r a n AI B o r AI B Cha pte r c o nfe re nc e b a se d o n pe rso na l g ifts pro vide d to the c o nfe re nc e

• rg a nize r b y the c o nfe re nc e ho te l o r lo c a tio n.

31

 Co nflic ts o f I

nte re st: Avo ida nc e a nd de c la ra tio n o f a c tua l o r po te ntia l c o nflic ts o f inte re st.

 E

xa mple s o f E thic a l I ssue s

1.

Whe n sub mitting a pa pe r to a jo urna l, the AI B me mb e r sho uld no t no mina te “frie ndly” re vie we rs o r e dito rs who ha ve a pe rso na l o r pro fe ssio na l re la tio nship with the pa pe r’ s a utho r o r a utho rs.

2.

Whe n pro viding a le tte r o f re c o mme nda tio n fo r a fo rme r stude nt, the AI B me mb e r sho uld sta te in the le tte r tha t the individua l is a fo rme r stude nt.

3.

AI B me mb e rs who a re o n a se le c tio n c o mmitte e fo r a prize o r g ra nt whe re a c o lle a g ue , fo rme r stude nt, fa mily me mb e r o r c lo se frie nd is o ne

• f the c a ndida te s sho uld de c la re the c o nflic t o r po te ntia l c o nflic t o f

inte re st to the c o mmitte e , a nd no t pro vide a ny info rma tio n o r e va lua tio n until the c o mmitte e ha s de c ide d ho w to ha ndle the c o nflic t o f inte re st.

4.

I n c lo se d c o mmitte e disc ussio ns with re spe c t to a n AI B e ntity (e .g ., a n AI B jo urna l) a c o mmitte e me mb e r with a le a de rship ro le in a c o mpe ting e ntity (e .g ., a jo urna l o r a sso c ia tio n) sho uld de c la re a ny c o nflic ts o r po te ntia l COI s, a nd no t pro vide a ny info rma tio n o r e va lua tio n until the c o mmitte e ha s de c ide d ho w to ha ndle the c o nflic t o f inte re st. 32

 Pub lic Co mmunic a tio n: Adhe re nc e to the hig he st sta nda rds

in pub lic c o mmunic a tio ns a b o ut o ne ’ s re se a rc h, te a c hing a nd pro fe ssio na l a c tivitie s.

 E

xa mple s o f E thic a l I ssue s

1.

I n c o mmunic a tio ns whe re e mplo yme nt is me ntio ne d, AI B me mb e rs sho uld ma ke the na ture o f e mplo yme nt c le a r, fo r e xa mple , whe n the y ha ve no n-fa c ulty po sitio ns, multiple a ffilia tio ns, o r visiting po sitio ns.

2.

I n pre ss inte rvie ws, se mina rs, a nd e xpe rt witne ss te stimo ny, AI B me mb e rs sho uld sta te tha t the ir o pinio ns a re the ir o wn a nd no t re pre se nt the ir pe rso na l vie ws a s b e ing the c o nse nsus o f AI B me mb e rs.

3.

AI B me mb e rs sho uld ta ke ste ps to e nsure tha t the ir o nline dig ita l pre se nc e a c c ura te ly re pre se nts a nd do e s no t infla te the ir sc ho la rly a c tivitie s (e .g ., pub lic a tio ns o n Go o g le Sc ho la r); the y sho uld a lso inc lude re la tive dime nsio ns a nd me tric s a s a ppro pria te .

33

 Re se a rc h a nd Pub lic a tio n: Adhe re nc e to the hig he st

pro fe ssio na l sta nda rds in re se a rc h a nd pub lic a tio n.

 E

xa mple s o f E thic a l I ssue s

1.

Co nduc ting re se a rc h tha t do e s no t c o mply with g e ne ra lly a c c e pte d e thic a l princ iple s fo r wo rking with huma n sub je c ts.

2.

Pre ssuring junio r c o lle a g ue s o r a dvise e s to b e a dde d to a pa pe r a s a c o -a utho r o r to b e liste d a s the le a d a utho r.

3.

Adding o ne ’ s na me to a re se a rc h pro je c t, witho ut ma king a n a ppro pria te c o ntrib utio n, e ve n whe n invite d b y o the r a utho rs (who ma y, fo r e xa mple , think tha t a dding a se nio r sc ho la r’ s na me wo uld impro ve the pub lic a tio n pro spe c ts o f a pa pe r).

4.

F a ilure to no te the c o ntrib utio ns o f a ll c o -a utho rs whe n a sub se t o f the a utho rship te a m is pre se nting o r disse mina ting the wo rk.

5.

Pub lishing in pre da to ry jo urna ls o r g iving pa pe rs a t pre da to ry c o nfe re nc e s to a rtific ia lly infla te o ne ’ s c urric ulum vita e .

34

 T

e a c hing a nd E duc a tio n: Adhe re nc e to the hig he st pro fe ssio na l sta nda rds in te a c hing , me nto ring a nd e va lua tio n.

 E

xa mple s o f E thic a l I ssue s

• 1. Se le c ting te xtb o o ks b a se d o n the inc o me tha t c a n b e

g e ne ra te d fo r the pro fe sso r.

• 2. Ac c e pting g ifts fro m stude nts b e fo re fina l g ra de s a re due .
• 3. No t pro viding me nto ring a nd a n a ppro pria te duty o f c a re

to stude nts a nd te a c hing a ssista nts.

• 4. Offe ring hig he r g ra de s in e xc ha ng e fo r se xua l o r o the r

fa vo rs fro m stude nts.

• 5. Disc rimina ting a g a inst individua l stude nts (e .g ., b a se d o n

the ir ra c e o r g e nde r).

35