A self-consistent constrained path auxiliary field Quantum Monte - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a self consistent constrained path auxiliary field
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A self-consistent constrained path auxiliary field Quantum Monte - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A self-consistent constrained path auxiliary field Quantum Monte Carlo method Mingpu Qin ( ) Shanghai Jiao Tong university July 22, 2019, CAQMP 2019 ISSP, Kashiwa, Japan In collaboration with Shiwei Zhang (William & Mary, CCQ of


slide-1
SLIDE 1

1

A self-consistent constrained path auxiliary field Quantum Monte Carlo method

Mingpu Qin ( 秦明普 ) Shanghai Jiao Tong university July 22, 2019, CAQMP 2019 ISSP, Kashiwa, Japan

In collaboration with Shiwei Zhang (William & Mary, CCQ of Flatiron Institute) and Hao Shi (CCQ of Flatiron Institute)

slide-2
SLIDE 2

2

Outline

  • Auxiliary field Quantum Monte Carlo.
  • Minus sign problem.
  • Constrained path approximation and the self-

consistent loop.

  • Results on 2D Hubbard model.
slide-3
SLIDE 3

3

Auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo

Hubbard model

slide-4
SLIDE 4

4

Auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo

Hubbard model

slide-5
SLIDE 5

5

Auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo

Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation Hubbard model

slide-6
SLIDE 6

6

Auxiliary field quantum Monte Carlo

Hubbard-Stratonovich transformation For a general Hamiltonian where

slide-7
SLIDE 7

7

Open-ended projection

Deal directly with ground state wave-function

slide-8
SLIDE 8

8

Open-ended projection

Deal directly with ground state wave-function

|φ0

0>

|ψ0>

|φ0

1>

|φ0

N>

|φ1

0>

|φ1

1>

|φ1

N>

... ...

|φ2

0>

|φ2

1>

|φ2

N>

... |ψ1> |ψ2>

Sample {x} Sample {x}

...

slide-9
SLIDE 9

9

Physical observable

Instead of using the real estimator, mixed estimator is usually used which is computational less intensive.

slide-10
SLIDE 10

10

Physical observable

Instead of using the real estimator, mixed estimator is usually used which is computational less intensive. For energy it is OK because:

slide-11
SLIDE 11

11

Physical observable

Instead of using the real estimator, mixed estimator is usually used which is computational less intensive. For energy it is OK because: For other observables, we need back-propagation:

slide-12
SLIDE 12

12

Minus sign problem

Sign problem results from the cancellation of positive and negative trajectories.

slide-13
SLIDE 13

13

Minus sign problem

Projection time

Sign problem results from the cancellation of positive and negative trajectories.

slide-14
SLIDE 14

14

Minus sign problem

Projection time

Sign problem results from the cancellation of positive and negative trajectories.

slide-15
SLIDE 15

15

Minus sign problem

Projection time

Sign problem results from the cancellation of positive and negative trajectories. constrained path AFQMC:

Keep only the positive trajectories, approximate the node structure

with a trial wave-function.

Shiwei Zhang, J. Carlson, J.E. Gubernatis, Phys. Rev. Lett. 74, 3652 (1995)

slide-16
SLIDE 16

16

Introduce a trial wave-function

Only allow those walkers whose overlap with trial wave-function is positive to propagate.

|φ0

0>

|ψ0>

|φ0

1>

|φ0

N>

|φ1

0>

|φ1

1>

|φ1

N>

|φ3

0>

|φ3

1>

|φ3

N>

... ... ...

|φ2

0>

|φ2

1>

|φ2

N>

...

X

apply the constraint

Population control

... ... ... ... |ψ1> |ψ2> |ψ3> |ψi>

One step CP-AFQMC: sample the field, apply the projection operator

slide-17
SLIDE 17

17

Results with constraint

4 x 4 system ground state energy

Chia-Chen Chang and Shiwei Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 78, 165101 (2008)

slide-18
SLIDE 18

18

The cost of introducing a trial wave-function: systematic bias Common choices of trial wave-functions:

  • 1. Free electron wf.
  • 2. Hartree-Fock wf.

Bias-variance trade-off:

slide-19
SLIDE 19

19

Add the self-consistent loop

Limitation of CP-AFQMC method: how does the result depend on trial wave-function?

slide-20
SLIDE 20

20

Add the self-consistent loop

CP-AFQMC

Limitation of CP-AFQMC method: how does the result depend on trial wave-function?

Trial wave-function

slide-21
SLIDE 21

21

Add the self-consistent loop

CP-AFQMC

Key question: How to construct a new trial wave-function from physical quantities? Limitation of CP-AFQMC method: how does the result depend on trial wave-function?

Trial wave-function

slide-22
SLIDE 22

22

Add the self-consistent loop

CP-AFQMC

Key question: How to construct a new trial wave-function from physical quantities? Limitation of CP-AFQMC method: how does the result depend on trial wave-function?

Trial wave-function

Residual error still exists, but at least the method is internally consistent.

slide-23
SLIDE 23

23

Couple CP-AFQMC with mean field

  • 1. Construct a trial wave-function from the mean-field Hamiltonian,

using the local density from CP-AFQMC calculation. Hubbard model

slide-24
SLIDE 24

24

Couple CP-AFQMC with mean field

  • 1. Construct a trial wave-function from the mean-field Hamiltonian,

using the local density from CP-AFQMC calculation. Hubbard model Mean field

slide-25
SLIDE 25

25

Couple CP-AFQMC with mean field

  • 1. Construct a trial wave-function from the mean-field Hamiltonian,

using the local density from CP-AFQMC calculation. Scan Ueff to minimize Hubbard model Mean field

slide-26
SLIDE 26

26

Self-consistent CP-AFQMC

Choose an initial trail wf: Free electron / HF One step CP-AFQMC Optimization to match the physical quantities Physical quantities: density Construct a single Slater determinant Trial wave-function Stop Converged? no yes

slide-27
SLIDE 27

27

Give the exact spin density

Mingpu Qin, Hao Shi, Shiwei Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235119 (2016)

4 x 16, U = 8, 1/8 doped From free trial wave-function

slide-28
SLIDE 28

28

Give the exact spin density

Mingpu Qin, Hao Shi, Shiwei Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235119 (2016)

4 x 16, U = 8, 1/8 doped

From UHF trial wave-function

slide-29
SLIDE 29

29

Energy

Mingpu Qin, Hao Shi, Shiwei Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 94, 235119 (2016)

4 x 16, U = 8, 1/8 doped

slide-30
SLIDE 30

30

Results on Hubbard model

6 x 32, U=8, 1/8 doped, red: DMRG, Blue: QMC

Ref: Bo-Xiao Zheng, Chia-Min Chung, Philippe Corboz, Georg Ehlers, Ming-Pu Qin, Reinhard M. Noack, Hao Shi, Steven R. White, Shiwei Zhang, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Science 358, 1155 (2017)

slide-31
SLIDE 31

31

Ground state energy in TDL

Ref: Bo-Xiao Zheng, Chia-Min Chung, Philippe Corboz, Georg Ehlers, Ming-Pu Qin, Reinhard M. Noack, Hao Shi, Steven R. White, Shiwei Zhang, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Science 358, 1155 (2017)

U=8 1/8 doped

slide-32
SLIDE 32

32

Ground state energy with different methods

Ref: Bo-Xiao Zheng, Chia-Min Chung, Philippe Corboz, Georg Ehlers, Ming-Pu Qin, Reinhard M. Noack, Hao Shi, Steven R. White, Shiwei Zhang, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Science 358, 1155 (2017)

U=8 1/8 doped

slide-33
SLIDE 33

33

Ground state at 1/8 doping: stripe phase

  • Arrow direction: spin direction
  • Arrow size: spin density
  • Symbol size: hole density
  • Agreement among different

methods, with discrepancy in details.

Ref: Bo-Xiao Zheng, Chia-Min Chung, Philippe Corboz, Georg Ehlers, Ming-Pu Qin, Reinhard M. Noack, Hao Shi, Steven R. White, Shiwei Zhang, Garnet Kin-Lic Chan, Science 358, 1155 (2017)

slide-34
SLIDE 34

34

Conclusion and perspective

  • 1. We have developed a self-consistent CP-AFQMC

method, which can reduce the bias from trial wave function (finite temperature: see Yuan-Yao He, Mingpu Qin,

Hao Shi, Zhong-Yi Lu, Shiwei Zhang, Phys. Rev. B 99, 045108 (2019) ).

  • 2. We established the stripe state as the ground state
  • f the 1/8 doped 2D Hubbard model.
  • 3. Other ways to optimize the trial wave-function self-

consistently?

slide-35
SLIDE 35

35

Thanks