A Model Initiative: Addressing Social & Environmental Concerns - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a model initiative
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A Model Initiative: Addressing Social & Environmental Concerns - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Model Initiative: Addressing Social & Environmental Concerns in the Context of Hydro Development in the Mekong Basin The Lifeblood of Cambodia 30% of Cambodias Population lives below poverty line, 72% of these rely on the natural


slide-1
SLIDE 1

A Model Initiative:

Addressing Social & Environmental Concerns in the Context of Hydro Development in the Mekong Basin

slide-2
SLIDE 2

The Lifeblood of Cambodia

30% of Cambodia’s Population lives below poverty line, 72% of these rely on the natural resources for their survival The Tonle Sap Lake and the Mekong River and its tributaries is the lifeblood of Cambodia The Tonle Sap Lake produces 100,000 tons of fish a year, providing 80 percent of the protein consumed within the country

Fish migrate from the Tonle Sap Lake into the Mekong River help restock fisheries as far upstream as Yunnan province in China

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Experiences with Mekong Basin Hydro Development

  • Transboundary Impacts of

Vietnam’s Dams

  • 1995 Mekong Agreement

Not fully being Enforced

  • Inadequate/or No EIAs
  • Limited/or No Public

Participation

  • Unresolved Environmental

and Social Impacts

slide-4
SLIDE 4

Transboundary Dams

Sesan River 3 dams operational and 3 under construction Srepok River 1 dam operational and 4 under construction Sekong River 1 dam operational and 1 under construction

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Impacts to Ecological Systems

  • Erratic and Irregular Water Flows (Floods,

Dry Ups, and irregular)

  • Deteriorating Water Quality
  • Riverbank Erosion
  • Loss of Fishery Habitat, Aquatic Life, and

Riparian Species

  • Reduction in Fish Catches and Fish

Species

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Impacts to Society

  • Loss of Livelihood and Decrease in Household

Income from $109 to $46 a month

  • 76% Fish Decline = Loss of Food Security
  • Increase in Water-borne Illness and Deaths
  • 722 Households Have Abandoned Homes
  • Disruption to Cultural Activities
  • Fear of River
slide-7
SLIDE 7

CHINA BURMA VIETNAM

LAOS

THAILAND CAMBODIA

VIENTIANE

PB LP SA PL PC BK DS SB

Gonguoqiao Xiaowan Manwan Dachaoshan Nuozhadu Jinghong Ganlanba Nam Ngum Nam Mang 3 N a m L e u k Nam Theun Hinboun Xe Set 1 Houay Ho Yali Fall Sesan 3 Sesan 3A Dray Linh Old Nam Ngum 2 Nam Theun 2 Xe Set 2 Xekaman 3 Sesan 4 Srepok 3 Dray Linh New Buon Koup Ban Tou Srah Nam Ngum 5 Nam Theun 1 Nam Ngum 3 Nam Ngiep 1 Xekaman 1 Xe Pian-Xe Nam Noy Xekong 4 Xekong 5 Nam Kong 1 Nam Ou 1-7 Nam Tha 1 Theun Hinboun (extension) Xe Bang Fai Xe Bang Hieng L

  • w

e r S e s a n 2 Lower Srepok 2 Lower Srepok 3 Lower Srepok 4 Srepok 4

PB LP SA PL PM BK DS SB Pak Beng Luang Prabang Sayaburi Pak Lay PaK Chom Ban Kum Don Sahong Sambor Proposed dams on Lower Mekong mainstream

HANOI BANGKOK PHNOM PENH

Mengsong

TERRA

Threats of Mekong Development

slide-8
SLIDE 8

MRC Involvement on Sesan

Year Activity 2000 MRC Secretariat Delegate Visits Sesan MRC Facilitates Dialogue between Vietnam and Cambodia Joint Committee on the Sesan River Established between Vietnam and Cambodia 2001 First Bilateral Meeting Held 2002 Vietnam’s Ministry of Industry Acknowledges Harm from 2000 Water Releases 2003 Five Solutions Established Establishing Notification System 2004-2005 MRC Facilitates Water Quality Study on Sesan [No health parameters were tested] 2007 EIA for Sesan Dams Completed [MRC Not Directly Involved, but CNMC and VNMC] 2008 Fourth Bilateral Meeting Held [No Solutions Made]

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Community and Civil Society’s Experience with 3S Dams

Limited or No Public Participation in Planning

and Decision Making Processes

Project Planning and Studies are Not Transparent Community and Civil Society Must Document Impacts Complaints Ignored No Compensation or Mitigation No Dispute Mechanism in Place

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Conclusions from the 3S Experience

1) There Are No Model Initiatives to Address Social and Environmental Concerns In Place 2) The Concept of Sustainable Hydropower Development on the Mekong Must be Questioned

slide-11
SLIDE 11

A Role for the MRC’s Hydropower Programme

1) Facilitate Research and Dialogue 2) Promote Regional Water Governance 3) Capacity Building

slide-12
SLIDE 12

1. Facilitate Research and Dialogue

  • Generate Scientific Transboundary Data About the

State of the River and its Major Tributaries (Including Environmental and Social Impacts of Dam)

  • Facilitate Studies with Research Institutions,

Scientists, Government Agencies and Civil Society

  • Disclose Research to Public
  • Hold Transboundary Dialogue and Debate
slide-13
SLIDE 13
  • 2. Promote Regional Water Governance
  • Enforce the 1995 Mekong Agreement

and Make Necessary Amendments

  • Enable Member States to Promote and

Respect Community Rights

  • The MRC Must Define and Declare the

International Standards that the MRC Agrees to Uphold related to hydropower

  • Help Resolve Transboundary Disputes
slide-14
SLIDE 14
  • 3. Capacity Building

Capacity Building of Member States to Adhere To Best Practice Standards & To Adequately Prevent and Mitigate Impacts, including:

  • Training on Transboundary EIAs
  • Public Participation Tools
  • Developing Public Disclose Standards
  • Dam Operation and Environmental Flows
  • Conflict Resolution
slide-15
SLIDE 15

Thank you for your attention

For more information, please contact: The Rivers Coalition in Cambodia ngoforum@ngoforum.org.kh