A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

a methodological framework for a methodological framework
SMART_READER_LITE
LIVE PREVIEW

A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR - - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCHING THE USABILITY OF THE RESEARCHING THE USABILITY OF THE SPACE - TIME CUBE SPACE - TIME CUBE IRMA KVELADZE, MENNO-JAN KRAAK & CORN VAN ELZAKKER 26 th INTERNATIONAL


slide-1
SLIDE 1

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

26th INTERNATIONAL CARTOGRAPHIC CONFERENCE 26th INTERNATIONAL CARTOGRAPHIC CONFERENCE

IRMA KVELADZE, MENNO-JAN KRAAK & CORNÉ VAN ELZAKKER

A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCHING THE USABILITY OF THE SPACE - TIME CUBE A METHODOLOGICAL FRAMEWORK FOR RESEARCHING THE USABILITY OF THE SPACE - TIME CUBE

slide-2
SLIDE 2

Basics of time geography

Background Framework Phases

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

X X Y Y T T

slide-3
SLIDE 3

Turdukulov (2007)

So far

Background Framework Phases

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

Demšar & Virrantaus (2010) Kraak (2003)

Orellana, et.al (2012)

Authir (2011) Tominski, et.al (2012) Frank O. Ostermann (2010) Kraak (2008) Hadlak, et.al (2010) Kwan (1999, 2004) Tominski (2005) Thakur and Hanson (2010)

slide-4
SLIDE 4

What do we know?

Background Framework Phases

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

Compare 2D map to the 3D STC

Kristensson, et al. (2009)

Compare performance

  • n 2D map, 3D STC

and animation

Kjellin, et al. (2010) 2D 3D Animation

Compare the performance

  • f a dot animation, 3D

STC, and vessel density

Willems, et al.(2011)

Evaluated discrete spatio-temporal data on stereoscopic displays

Kjellin, et al. (2010)

slide-5
SLIDE 5

Conceptual framework

Background Framework Phases

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

Problem Solution Evaluation

slide-6
SLIDE 6

Use cases

Background Framework Phases

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

Simple dataset

‘Napoleons Russian Campaign’

Complex annotations

Travel log data: Estonia

Large dataset

Passive mobile phone positioning data of commuters, Tallinn

Complex dataset

Pedestrian movements in Delft city center

Problem identification

slide-7
SLIDE 7

Visual solution

Background Framework Phases

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

Consultation with cartographers

Multiple linked views

Functionality Functionality Functionality

Location

Object Attribute

Overview └ user def selection └ symbolization Zoom/Filter └ user def selection └ re-symbolization Details └ re-symbolization Analyze first

  • Context
  • knowledge

Analyze further

  • Explore

Geo Data Geo Data

Design guideline Design guideline Visualization strategy Visualization strategy

Time

slide-8
SLIDE 8

Phase 1 Establishing workflows

Scenarios for visualization strategies

Background Framework Phases

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

Data Data

Interview Interview

Researcher Researcher Domain expert Domain expert

Design Workflows Design Workflows Establish Workflows Establish Scenarios

slide-9
SLIDE 9

Phase 2 Compile design

Background Framework Phases

Multiple design options for the STC content

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

slide-10
SLIDE 10

Phase 3 Verification of workflow

Background Framework Phases

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

Validation of visualization strategies with domain experts

Domain expert Domain expert

SCENARIO 3. SCENARIO 3. SCENARIO 2. SCENARIO 2.

Overview Overview Zoom/Filter Zoom/Filter Details Details

SCENARIO 1. SCENARIO 1.

WORKFLOW FOR SCENARIOS WORKFLOW FOR SCENARIOS

Researcher Researcher Workflow Workflow Interaction Interaction Assistance Assistance

slide-11
SLIDE 11

Workflow Scenario

Design Design Details Details Zoom/Filter Zoom/Filter Overview Overview

Results Results

Workflow - Shneiderman’s Mantra Scenario - Different Design

Design 1 Design 1 Design 2 Design 2 Design 3 Design 3 Details Details Zoom/Filter Zoom/Filter Overview Overview

Evaluation Evaluation

Phase 4 Expert versus users

Multiple design options - focus group

Background Framework Phases

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

Experts Experts

slide-12
SLIDE 12

Methods

  • Task execution
  • Thinking aloud
  • Questionnaire
  • Eye tracking
  • Video / audio recording
  • Screen recording
  • Interview

Phase 5 Non expert versus users

Multiple design options - individual user test

Background Framework Phases

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany

Workflow Scenario

Design Design Details Details Zoom/Filter Zoom/Filter Overview Overview

Results Results

Workflow - Shneiderman’s Mantra Scenario - Different Design

Design 1 Design 1 Design 2 Design 2 Design 3 Design 3 Details Details Zoom/Filter Zoom/Filter Overview Overview

Evaluation Evaluation

Participant Participant

slide-13
SLIDE 13

Phase 6 STC in GVA environment

Experts Non experts Group 1

a d

Group 2

b c

Group 1

a d

Group 2

b c

Evaluation Evaluation

Quantitative Methods

  • Task execution
  • Questionnaire
  • Eye tracking

Quantitative Methods

  • Task execution
  • Questionnaire
  • Eye tracking

Qualitative Methods

  • Thinking aloud
  • Observation
  • Screen logging
  • Interview

Qualitative Methods

  • Thinking aloud
  • Observation
  • Screen logging
  • Interview

STC in a GeoVisual analytics environment STC in a GeoVisual analytics environment

Results Results Results Results Results Results Results Results Compare Compare Compare Compare

Background Framework Phases

August 25 – 30, 2013 | Dresden Germany Conclusions on:

  • Effectiveness
  • Efficiency
  • Satisfaction

Conclusions on:

  • Effectiveness
  • Efficiency
  • Satisfaction
slide-14
SLIDE 14

Thank you!