a mayer problem for a controlled sweeping
play

A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Giovanni Colombo Process - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Process Chems Eddine Arroud and A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Giovanni Colombo Process Preliminaries The dynamics Monotonicity of The Chems Eddine Arroud and Giovanni Colombo


  1. A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Process Chems Eddine Arroud and A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Giovanni Colombo Process Preliminaries The dynamics Monotonicity of The Chems Eddine Arroud and Giovanni Colombo Distance Example University Of Jijel Algeria, Università di Padova 20 septembre 2017

  2. A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Process Chems Eddine Preliminaries 1 Arroud and Giovanni Colombo Preliminaries The dynamics 2 The dynamics Monotonicity of The Distance Monotonicity of The Distance Example Example 3

  3. Preliminaries A Mayer Problem for A The first differential inclusions problems have been studied in Controlled Sweeping the early 70s by H. Brezis Process Chems Eddine − ˙ x ( t ) ∈ ∂ϕ ( x ( t )) t ∈ [0 , T ] Arroud and Giovanni Colombo thanks to the theory of maximal monotone operators. Preliminaries The dynamics Monotonicity of The Distance Example

  4. Preliminaries A Mayer Problem for A The first differential inclusions problems have been studied in Controlled Sweeping the early 70s by H. Brezis Process Chems Eddine − ˙ x ( t ) ∈ ∂ϕ ( x ( t )) t ∈ [0 , T ] Arroud and Giovanni Colombo thanks to the theory of maximal monotone operators. Preliminaries "J.J. Moreau ", Evolution problems associated with a moving The dynamics convex set in a Hilbert space Monotonicity of The Distance Example − ˙ x ( t ) ∈ ∂ I C ( t ) ( x ( t )) , x (0) ∈ C (0)

  5. Preliminaries A Mayer Problem for A The first differential inclusions problems have been studied in Controlled Sweeping the early 70s by H. Brezis Process Chems Eddine − ˙ x ( t ) ∈ ∂ϕ ( x ( t )) t ∈ [0 , T ] Arroud and Giovanni Colombo thanks to the theory of maximal monotone operators. Preliminaries "J.J. Moreau ", Evolution problems associated with a moving The dynamics convex set in a Hilbert space Monotonicity of The Distance Example − ˙ x ( t ) ∈ ∂ I C ( t ) ( x ( t )) , x (0) ∈ C (0) where ∂ I C ( t ) is the subdifferential of the indicator function of a closed convex C (normal cone) : − ˙ x ( t ) ∈ N C ( t ) ( x ( t )) , x (0) ∈ C (0)

  6. A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Process Formally, the sweeping process is the differential inclusion with Chems Eddine initial condition Arroud and Giovanni Colombo − ˙ x ( t ) ∈ N C ( t ) ( x ( t )) , x (0) = x 0 ∈ C (0) Preliminaries Here N C ( x ) denotes the normal cone to C at x in C . In The dynamics Monotonicity of The particular, Distance Example

  7. A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Process Formally, the sweeping process is the differential inclusion with Chems Eddine initial condition Arroud and Giovanni Colombo − ˙ x ( t ) ∈ N C ( t ) ( x ( t )) , x (0) = x 0 ∈ C (0) Preliminaries Here N C ( x ) denotes the normal cone to C at x in C . In The dynamics Monotonicity of The particular, Distance Example N C ( x ) = { 0 } if x ∈ C N C ( x ) = ∅ if x / ∈ C

  8. A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Process Chems Eddine The perturbed sweeping process : Arroud and Giovanni Colombo − ˙ x ( t ) ∈ N C ( t ) ( x ( t )) + f ( x ( t )) , x (0) = x 0 ∈ C (0) Preliminaries The dynamics Monotonicity of The Distance Example

  9. A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Process Chems Eddine The perturbed sweeping process : Arroud and Giovanni Colombo − ˙ x ( t ) ∈ N C ( t ) ( x ( t )) + f ( x ( t )) , x (0) = x 0 ∈ C (0) Preliminaries Given a dynamics, it is impossible resisting to the temptation of The dynamics Monotonicity of The putting some control Distance Example − ˙ x ( t ) ∈ N C ( t ) ( x ( t )) + f ( x ( t ) , u ) , u ∈ U

  10. Prox-regular set We say that C is ρ -prox-regular provided the inequality A Mayer Problem for A Controlled � ζ, y − x � ≤ � y − x � 2 Sweeping 2 ρ Process holds for all x , y ∈ C , for every ζ the unit external normal to C Chems Eddine Arroud and Giovanni Colombo Preliminaries The dynamics Monotonicity of The Distance Example

  11. Prox-regular set We say that C is ρ -prox-regular provided the inequality A Mayer Problem for A Controlled � ζ, y − x � ≤ � y − x � 2 Sweeping 2 ρ Process holds for all x , y ∈ C , for every ζ the unit external normal to C Chems Eddine Arroud and Giovanni Colombo Preliminaries The dynamics Monotonicity of The Distance Example

  12. The dynamics A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Process Let the problem P Chems Eddine Arroud and Giovanni Colombo Minimize h ( x ( T )) Preliminaries The dynamics Monotonicity of The Distance Example

  13. The dynamics A Mayer Problem for A Controlled Sweeping Process Let the problem P Chems Eddine Arroud and Giovanni Colombo Minimize h ( x ( T )) Preliminaries Subject to The dynamics Monotonicity of The Distance � x ( t ) ∈ − N C ( t ) ( x ( t )) + f ( x ( t ) , u ( t ))) , ˙ (1) Example x (0) = x 0 ∈ C (0) , with respect to u : [0 , T ] � U , u is measurable.

  14. A Mayer Assumptions Problem for A Controlled H 1 : C : [0 , ∞ ) � R n is a set-valued map with the following Sweeping Process properties : Chems Eddine Arroud and Giovanni Colombo Preliminaries The dynamics Monotonicity of The Distance Example

  15. A Mayer Assumptions Problem for A Controlled H 1 : C : [0 , ∞ ) � R n is a set-valued map with the following Sweeping Process properties : Chems Eddine Arroud and H 1 . 1 : for all t ∈ [0 , T ], C ( t ) is nonempty and compact and there Giovanni exists r > 0 such that C ( t ) is uniformly r -prox regular. Colombo H 1 . 2 : C is γ − Lipschitz and has C 3 boundary. Preliminaries The dynamics Monotonicity of The Distance Example

  16. A Mayer Assumptions Problem for A Controlled H 1 : C : [0 , ∞ ) � R n is a set-valued map with the following Sweeping Process properties : Chems Eddine Arroud and H 1 . 1 : for all t ∈ [0 , T ], C ( t ) is nonempty and compact and there Giovanni exists r > 0 such that C ( t ) is uniformly r -prox regular. Colombo H 1 . 2 : C is γ − Lipschitz and has C 3 boundary. Preliminaries H 1 . 3 : C ( t ) = { x : g ( t , x ) ≤ 0 } with g ( ., x ) lipschitz and of class The dynamics C 2 , 1 . Monotonicity of The Distance Example

  17. A Mayer Assumptions Problem for A Controlled H 1 : C : [0 , ∞ ) � R n is a set-valued map with the following Sweeping Process properties : Chems Eddine Arroud and H 1 . 1 : for all t ∈ [0 , T ], C ( t ) is nonempty and compact and there Giovanni exists r > 0 such that C ( t ) is uniformly r -prox regular. Colombo H 1 . 2 : C is γ − Lipschitz and has C 3 boundary. Preliminaries H 1 . 3 : C ( t ) = { x : g ( t , x ) ≤ 0 } with g ( ., x ) lipschitz and of class The dynamics C 2 , 1 . Monotonicity of The Distance H 2 : U ∈ R n is compact and convex. Example

  18. A Mayer Assumptions Problem for A Controlled H 1 : C : [0 , ∞ ) � R n is a set-valued map with the following Sweeping Process properties : Chems Eddine Arroud and H 1 . 1 : for all t ∈ [0 , T ], C ( t ) is nonempty and compact and there Giovanni exists r > 0 such that C ( t ) is uniformly r -prox regular. Colombo H 1 . 2 : C is γ − Lipschitz and has C 3 boundary. Preliminaries H 1 . 3 : C ( t ) = { x : g ( t , x ) ≤ 0 } with g ( ., x ) lipschitz and of class The dynamics C 2 , 1 . Monotonicity of The Distance H 2 : U ∈ R n is compact and convex. Example H 3 : f : R n × U � R n such that there exist β ≥ 0 with H 3 . 1 : | f ( x , u ) | ≤ β for all ( x , u ) ; H 3 . 2 : f ( x , u ) is of class C 1 for all x and u and f ( ., . ) is Lipschitz with lipschitz constant k ; H 3 . 3 : f ( x , U ) is convex for all x ∈ R n ;

  19. A Mayer Assumptions Problem for A Controlled H 1 : C : [0 , ∞ ) � R n is a set-valued map with the following Sweeping Process properties : Chems Eddine Arroud and H 1 . 1 : for all t ∈ [0 , T ], C ( t ) is nonempty and compact and there Giovanni exists r > 0 such that C ( t ) is uniformly r -prox regular. Colombo H 1 . 2 : C is γ − Lipschitz and has C 3 boundary. Preliminaries H 1 . 3 : C ( t ) = { x : g ( t , x ) ≤ 0 } with g ( ., x ) lipschitz and of class The dynamics C 2 , 1 . Monotonicity of The Distance H 2 : U ∈ R n is compact and convex. Example H 3 : f : R n × U � R n such that there exist β ≥ 0 with H 3 . 1 : | f ( x , u ) | ≤ β for all ( x , u ) ; H 3 . 2 : f ( x , u ) is of class C 1 for all x and u and f ( ., . ) is Lipschitz with lipschitz constant k ; H 3 . 3 : f ( x , U ) is convex for all x ∈ R n ; H 4 : h : R � R is of class C 1

  20. Main result A Mayer Theorem Problem for A Controlled Let ( x ∗ , u ∗ ) be a global minimizer satisfying the outward (or Sweeping Process inward) pointing condition. Then there exist a BV adjoint Chems Eddine vector p : [0 , T ] → R n ,a finite signed Radon measure µ on Arroud and Giovanni [0 , T ], and measurable vectors ξ, η : [0 , T ] → R n , with ξ ( t ) ≥ 0 Colombo for µ -a.e. t and 0 ≤ η ( t ) ≤ β + γ for a.e. t , satisfying : Preliminaries The dynamics Monotonicity of The Distance Example

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend