a general framework for systemic risk
play

A General Framework for Systemic Risk Ciamac Moallemi Graduate - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

A General Framework for Systemic Risk Ciamac Moallemi Graduate School of Business Columbia University email: ciamac@gsb.columbia.edu Joint work with Chen Chen and Garud Iyengar. Systemic Risk system collection of entities 2


  1. A General Framework for Systemic Risk Ciamac Moallemi Graduate School of Business Columbia University email: ciamac@gsb.columbia.edu Joint work with Chen Chen and Garud Iyengar.

  2. Systemic Risk ‘system’ ≡ collection of ‘entities’ 2

  3. Systemic Risk ‘system’ ≡ collection of ‘entities’ Examples: firms in an economy business units in a company suppliers, sub-contractors, etc. in a supply chain network generating stations, transmission facilities, etc. in a power network flood walls, pumping stations, etc. in a levee system 2

  4. Systemic Risk ‘system’ ≡ collection of ‘entities’ Examples: firms in an economy business units in a company suppliers, sub-contractors, etc. in a supply chain network generating stations, transmission facilities, etc. in a power network flood walls, pumping stations, etc. in a levee system Systemic risk refers to the risk of catastrophic collapse of the entire system. Involves: the simultaneous analysis of outcomes across all entities in a system the possibility of complex interactions between components 2

  5. Joint Distribution of Outcomes 3 firms in 3 future scenarios (equally likely) Loss matrix: Scenario Firm 1 Firm 2 Firm 3 1 / ω 1 +50 − 40 +20 3 1 / 3 ω 2 − 40 +50 − 40 1 / 3 ω 3 +20 +20 +50 ( + ‘loss’; − ‘profit’) 3

  6. Complex Interactions Complex interactions between entities can create contagion, or cascades of failures. 4

  7. Complex Interactions Complex interactions between entities can create contagion, or cascades of failures. In financial markets, structural mechanisms for contagion include: 4

  8. Complex Interactions Complex interactions between entities can create contagion, or cascades of failures. In financial markets, structural mechanisms for contagion include: Interbank loans 4

  9. Complex Interactions Complex interactions between entities can create contagion, or cascades of failures. In financial markets, structural mechanisms for contagion include: Interbank loans Interbank derivatives exposures (e.g., AIG) 4

  10. Complex Interactions Complex interactions between entities can create contagion, or cascades of failures. In financial markets, structural mechanisms for contagion include: Interbank loans Interbank derivatives exposures (e.g., AIG) Transmission of illiquidity, ‘bank runs’ (e.g., Lehman) 4

  11. Complex Interactions Complex interactions between entities can create contagion, or cascades of failures. In financial markets, structural mechanisms for contagion include: Interbank loans Interbank derivatives exposures (e.g., AIG) Transmission of illiquidity, ‘bank runs’ (e.g., Lehman) Fire sales, asset price contagion (e.g., CDOs) 4

  12. Contributions A general, axiomatic framework for coherent systemic risk analyzes joint distribution of outcomes allows for some endogenous mechanisms of contagion subsumes many recently proposed systemic risk measures A structural decomposition of systemic risk A dual representation for systemic risk measures ‘shadow price of risk’ A mechanism for systemic risk attribution & decentralization Methodology extends to a much broader class of risk functions 5

  13. Literature Review Axiomatic theory of single-firm risk measures: Artzner et al., (2000); see survey of Schied (2006) Systemic risk measures: portfolio approach Gauthier et al., (2010); Tarashev et al., (2010); Acharya et al., (2010); Brownlees & Engle (2010); Adrian & Brunnermeier (2009) Systemic risk measures: deposit insurance / credit approach Lehar (2005); Huang et al., (2009); Giesecke & Kim (2011) Structural models of contagion & systemic risk: Acharya et al., (2010); Staum (2011); Liu & Staum (2010); Cont et al., (2011); Bimpikis & Tahbaz-Salehi (2012) Portfolio attribution: Denault (2001); Buch & Dorfleitner (2008) 6

  14. Single-Firm Risk Measures Scenario Loss ω 1 x ω 1 x ω 2 ω 2 Ω = set of scenarios . . x ∈ R Ω . . . . x ω = loss in scenario ω ω | Ω | x ω | Ω | 0 T 7

  15. Coherent Risk Measures Definition. A coherent single-firm risk measure is a function ρ : R Ω → R that satisfies, for all x , y ∈ R Ω : (i) Monotonicity: if x ≥ y , then ρ ( x ) ≥ ρ ( y ) (ii) Positive homogeneity: for all α ≥ 0 , ρ ( α x ) = αρ ( x ) (iii) Convexity: for all 0 ≤ α ≤ 1 , � ≤ αρ ( x ) + (1 − α ) ρ ( y ) � α x + (1 − α y ) ρ (iv) Cash-invariance: for all α ∈ R , ρ ( x + α 1 Ω ) = ρ ( x ) + α [Artzner et al., 2000] 8

  16. Systemic Risk Measures Scenario Firm 1 Firm 2 Firm |F| ω 1 X 1 ,ω 1 X 2 ,ω 1 · · · X |F| ,ω 1 ω 2 X |F| ,ω 2 , X 1 ,ω 2 X 2 ,ω 2 · · · . . . . ... . . . . . . . . ω | Ω | X |F| ,ω | Ω | X 1 ,ω | Ω | X 2 ,ω | Ω | · · · 0 T F = set of firms (entities in the system) Ω = set of scenarios X i ,ω = loss for firm i in scenario ω X ∈ R Ω ×F 9

  17. Systemic Risk Measures: Definition Ω = set of scenarios, F = set of entities in the system, X ∈ R Ω ×F X i ,ω = loss for firm i in scenario ω , X ω = loss vector in scenario ω 10

  18. Systemic Risk Measures: Definition Ω = set of scenarios, F = set of entities in the system, X ∈ R Ω ×F X i ,ω = loss for firm i in scenario ω , X ω = loss vector in scenario ω Definition. A systemic risk measure is a function ρ : R Ω ×F → R that satisfies, for all economies X , Y , Z ∈ R Ω ×F : (i) Monotonicity: if X ≥ Y , then ρ ( X ) ≥ ρ ( Y ) (ii) Positive homogeneity: for all α ≥ 0 , ρ ( α X ) = αρ ( X ) (iii) Normalization: ρ � 1 E ) = |F| 10

  19. Systemic Risk Measures: Definition Definition. (con’t.) Given x , y ∈ R F , define the ordering x � ρ y by x � ρ y ⇐ ⇒ ρ ( x , . . . , x ) ≥ ρ ( y , . . . , y ) 11

  20. Systemic Risk Measures: Definition Definition. (con’t.) Given x , y ∈ R F , define the ordering x � ρ y by x � ρ y ⇐ ⇒ ρ ( x , . . . , x ) ≥ ρ ( y , . . . , y ) (iv) Preference consistency: if X ω � ρ Y ω for all scenarios ω , then � ≥ ρ ρ � X � Y � 11

  21. Systemic Risk Measures: Definition Definition. (con’t.) Given x , y ∈ R F , define the ordering x � ρ y by x � ρ y ⇐ ⇒ ρ ( x , . . . , x ) ≥ ρ ( y , . . . , y ) (iv) Preference consistency: if X ω � ρ Y ω for all scenarios ω , then � ≥ ρ ρ � X � Y � Scenario ω 1 . . . ω . . . ω | Ω | Firm 1 X 1 ,ω 1 X 1 ,ω X 1 ,ω | Ω | . . . . . . . . . . . . = X Firm |F| X |F| ,ω 1 X |F| ,ω X |F| , | Ω | X ω � ρ Y ω ∀ ω ⇒ ρ ( X ) ≥ ρ ( Y ) Firm 1 Y 1 ,ω 1 Y 1 ,ω Y 1 ,ω | Ω | . . . . . . . . . . . . = Y Firm |F| Y |F| ,ω 1 Y |F| ,ω Y |F| , | Ω | 11

  22. Systemic Risk Measures: Definition Definition. (con’t.) (v) Convexity: for all 0 ≤ α ≤ 1 , ¯ α = 1 − α (a) Outcome convexity: if Z = α X + ¯ α Y then, ρ � � Z ≤ αρ ( X ) + ¯ αρ ( Y ) 12

  23. Systemic Risk Measures: Definition Definition. (con’t.) (v) Convexity: for all 0 ≤ α ≤ 1 , ¯ α = 1 − α (a) Outcome convexity: if Z = α X + ¯ α Y then, ρ � � Z ≤ αρ ( X ) + ¯ αρ ( Y ) (b) Risk convexity: if for all scenarios ω ∈ Ω , ρ ( Z ω , . . . , Z ω ) = αρ ( X ω , . . . , X ω ) + ¯ αρ ( Y ω , . . . , Y ω ) then, ρ � � Z ≤ αρ ( X ) + ¯ αρ ( Y ) 12

  24. Systemic Risk Measures: Definition Definition. (con’t.) (v) Convexity: for all 0 ≤ α ≤ 1 , ¯ α = 1 − α (a) Outcome convexity: if Z = α X + ¯ α Y then, ρ � � Z ≤ αρ ( X ) + ¯ αρ ( Y ) (b) Risk convexity: if for all scenarios ω ∈ Ω , ρ ( Z ω , . . . , Z ω ) = αρ ( X ω , . . . , X ω ) + ¯ αρ ( Y ω , . . . , Y ω ) then, ρ � � Z ≤ αρ ( X ) + ¯ αρ ( Y ) Two different notions of diversity 12

  25. Systemic Risk Measures: Definition Definition. (con’t.) 1. Outcome convexity: Increasing diversification reduces risk X ω α � ≤ αρ ( X ) + ¯ ⊕ ⇒ � Z αρ ( Y ) Z ω ρ α ¯ Y ω 2. Risk convexity: Removing randomness reduces risk � X ω 1 ⊤ ◦ ρ � α Ω � ≤ αρ ( X ) + ¯ � ◦ � Z ω 1 ⊤ � Z ρ ⇒ ρ αρ ( Y ) Ω α ¯ � Y ω 1 ⊤ ◦ ρ � Ω 13

  26. Structural Decomposition Definition. An aggregation function is a function Λ: R F → R that is monotonic, positively homogeneous, convex, and normalized so that Λ( 1 F ) = |F| . Aggregation function: aggregates risk across firms in a given scenario 14

  27. Structural Decomposition Definition. An aggregation function is a function Λ: R F → R that is monotonic, positively homogeneous, convex, and normalized so that Λ( 1 F ) = |F| . Aggregation function: aggregates risk across firms in a given scenario Theorem. A function ρ : R Ω ×F → R is a systemic risk measure with ρ ( − 1 E ) < 0 iff there exists an aggregation function Λ coherent single-firm base risk measure ρ 0 such that � � ρ ( X ) = ( ρ 0 ◦ Λ)( X ) � ρ 0 Λ( X 1 ) , Λ( X 2 ) , . . . , Λ( X | Ω | ) 14

  28. Example: Economic Systemic Risk Measures F = firms in the economy X i ,ω = loss of a firm i in scenario ω 15

  29. Example: Economic Systemic Risk Measures F = firms in the economy X i ,ω = loss of a firm i in scenario ω Example. (Systemic Expected Shortfall) Λ total ( x ) � � ρ SES ( X ) � ( CVaR α ◦ Λ total )( X ) x i , i ∈F [Acharya et al., 2010; Brownlees, Engle 2010] 15

Download Presentation
Download Policy: The content available on the website is offered to you 'AS IS' for your personal information and use only. It cannot be commercialized, licensed, or distributed on other websites without prior consent from the author. To download a presentation, simply click this link. If you encounter any difficulties during the download process, it's possible that the publisher has removed the file from their server.

Recommend


More recommend